jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:32:57 AM |
|
So has anyone here actually treated themselves to anything after passing an arbitrary milestone?
Not yet. OTOH, my daughter asked me to walk her through my 'laddered day trading' strategy for monetizing the volatility. She's been sitting on her BTC for just shy of four years now. I guess she's ready. Well, you going to share some kind of outline of that overall strategy with us (in it's current iteration and how it might vary for your daughter, who likely has a smaller BTC/fiat stash), or is your overall strategy a secret to pass only on to family members? Oh hell, JJG. It's not secret. In fact, I've divulged it here before*. And indeed, to the extent that you have revealed yours, I think it is largely the same strategy. *I've couched it in terms of 'taking value in fiat', in a means that plays off the volatility, that sometimes nets you even more BTC than before starting to pull out fiat value. Either way, maximizes your possible net. Maybe a month or two ago. Let me know if you need me to drag it out again. Though I distinctly remember you commenting upon at at the time. The important point is daughter is now interested enough to try to absorb it. I find this an excellent development, as dinner table discussion between the Mrs. and me has transitioned from 'what do you want to do now that we have all this money'? to 'what is the most responsible way to handle dynastic wealth'? Really the only variable for a smaller owner is using smaller amounts. Everything scales to holdings. I'll simplify to BTC only, and only on GDAX (where makers pay 0%). At least at first. The strategy -- such as it is -- is applicable to other scenarios, perhaps with additional complications. We're divided by a 45 minute drive and infrequent emails & phone. She really needs a full intro. I figure it'll be a written manual, plus live demo when we can get together. First installment written and sent, but that is really an overview of available data that a trader might need. I'll post it if you want, but it is likely remedial for Bitcoin wall watchers, and only covers background info. Next installment will be an exchange overview, then third likely the method itself.
|
|
|
|
Ted E. Bare
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:34:21 AM |
|
-CME cancels the future due to SEC -Japan pulls a China -Segwit/Lightning/etc are teh fail -Bitfinex is goxxed -Satoshi becomes a bear and dumps all in one market order on Bitstamp filling my order for a million coins at $0.11
Stop being a bear. Just buy bitcoin. Hodl and chill. Best decision you will ever make.
|
|
|
|
TERA2
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 222
Deb Rah Von Doom
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:35:59 AM |
|
-CME cancels the future due to SEC -Japan pulls a China -Segwit/Lightning/etc are teh fail -Bitfinex is goxxed -Satoshi becomes a bear and dumps all in one market order on Bitstamp filling my order for a million coins at $0.11
Stop being a bear. Just buy bitcoin. Hodl and chill. Best decision you will ever make. This is false. You need to replace 'bitcoin' with 'dogecoin'.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 10791
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:38:59 AM |
|
This could well have been written about me. I'm not saying that it is always absolutely wrong to have 90% of your assets in BTC or whatever, but it should be because you are intentionally choosing to do so, not because the price got away from you and you never really considered that you now have 90% of your wealth riding on one thing. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7gi55s/dont_invest_recklessly/I'm spooked again. So, theymos is now advising those of us who went 50% in on Bitcoin, and are now nearly 90% in due to a rising Bitcoin, to sell 45% of our BTC stash, in order to return to the initial BTC/total investment of 50%. I respect him, but can't help but wonder if that is a good piece of advice... I feel I should have invested more in BTC when I could. But I guess that's the greedy side of me talking. Will see how things play out... I also don't really know what he is saying, except perhaps that we need to be making conscious assessments about what are doing and how we are allocating our assets and whether we may be in a decent position to be considering reallocation. Surely, I doubt that you need to have anything near an allocation of 50% initially in order to be approaching 90% currently and based on the exorbitant extent of our recent price appreciation(s). I can look at my own initial goal of allocating around 10% that ended up being closer to 15%, and even though I lost a decent amount of coin through a hacker(s), I still am running numbers very close to 90%, depending on how I frame my investment. On a personal level, I feel fairly cognizant about the personal appropriateness of the approach that I am taking, and surely I appreciate the concept of diversification and reallocation too. i also appreciate the concept of selling on the way up and buying on the way down, which I continue to believe to be a really decent vehicle that could sufficiently address allocation and diversification concerns and allow what might appear to be more risky/lopsided BTC allocation levels. I know that each of us develop some strategies here, too, and I am thinking about Bob, too... .. I mean sometimes guys give us ideas about the quantity of their holdings, and sure, he is saying that he is diversifying by cashing out some of his Bcash, and stuff like that, and is that level of cashing out enough? Should not each of us be cashing out a little bit along the way.. just in case (without making any BIG ASS cashing outs?) Another thing that Bob said, is where is he going to put his money that is better than BTC.. and in that regard, just having it in cash is not better, but it does help to prepare for BTC dips, even knowing that long term cash is not going to hold its value, but for a year or less, it is not a major price to pay to hold some cash, just in case for buying BTC dips, no?
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2478
Merit: 4559
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:40:03 AM |
|
This could well have been written about me. I'm not saying that it is always absolutely wrong to have 90% of your assets in BTC or whatever, but it should be because you are intentionally choosing to do so, not because the price got away from you and you never really considered that you now have 90% of your wealth riding on one thing. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7gi55s/dont_invest_recklessly/I'm spooked again. So, theymos is now advising those of us who went 50% in on Bitcoin, and are now nearly 90% in due to a rising Bitcoin, to sell 45% of our BTC stash, in order to return to the initial BTC/total investment of 50%. I respect him, but can't help but wonder if that is a good piece of advice, or a borderline FUD call... Just a typical diversification advice. Don't invest more than you can loose etc.etc..etc... Sure, the "don't invest what you can't afford to lose" advice is good and should be followed by all but the most adventurous. But if you've already applied it when you invested initially (at 50%), then it still holds true now that you're at 90%, so you can still be adventurous without the risk (well, you're only risking your current gains). If you have enough to lead a happy, comfortable life if Bitcoin goes to zero tomorrow, then there’s nothing wrong with the vast majority of your wealth being tied up in Bitcoin.
Of course, it would be sad to live poorly and in misery just to keep a big BTC stash! But if your life was already OK before investing your 50% on BTC, I don't see a good reason for returning from 90% to 50% just to secure the profits. It's a risk that many of us are willing to take. If BTC goes to the moon, all the better for us. If it drops to zero, the initial investment was small anyway, so life goes on as normal. That's the way I approach it. I've rephrased my original post, removing the FUD part, as I feel I was too harsh on him. It is very possible that a huge bear period will come, and we may well lose more than 50-80% of our BTC's current value. But even at that point, there's still profit to be made for many of us, especially the very early adopters. In short, personally, I'm planning to liquidate half of my BTC stash at the time when the fiat value I will get is enough to allow me to quit my job and pursue an independent career in my field. The other half I will keep, in the hope that BTC will eventually become something much bigger than it already is.
|
|
|
|
TERA2
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 222
Deb Rah Von Doom
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:41:39 AM |
|
Having an order at a low price doesn't mean I'm a bear - it has to do with individual exchanges screwing up and liquidating the entire book - I've seen it before.
|
|
|
|
ayesha201009
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 145
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:48:03 AM |
|
so far there is a clear trend between btctalk users ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) , it seems pretty clear by now price is up trending and a new record is also probable. in the last hour price is again around 11k dollars, Are these good moment to buy before another rise? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) wait for december 18th!
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 10791
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 08:59:44 AM |
|
So has anyone here actually treated themselves to anything after passing an arbitrary milestone?
Not yet. OTOH, my daughter asked me to walk her through my 'laddered day trading' strategy for monetizing the volatility. She's been sitting on her BTC for just shy of four years now. I guess she's ready. Well, you going to share some kind of outline of that overall strategy with us (in it's current iteration and how it might vary for your daughter, who likely has a smaller BTC/fiat stash), or is your overall strategy a secret to pass only on to family members? Oh hell, JJG. It's not secret. In fact, I've divulged it here before*. And indeed, to the extent that you have revealed yours, I think it is largely the same strategy. You are the one who brought it up, and I am kind of getting another lovey dovey tinglie feeling to be anticipate that I could be having a bit of trade strategy bonding (sharing of commonality) with a picnic food eating bear. *I've couched it in terms of 'taking value in fiat', in a means that plays off the volatility, that sometimes nets you even more BTC than before starting to pull out fiat value. Either way, maximizes your possible net. Maybe a month or two ago. Let me know if you need me to drag it out again. Though I distinctly remember you commenting upon at at the time.
I have read a few posts of yours on the topic, and surely you have informed me in various ways.. but I thought that you could share the overall essence, rather than just saying that your daughter is interested... I mean give us a bit more than merely that. The important point is daughter is now interested enough to try to absorb it. I find this an excellent development, as dinner table discussion between the Mrs. and me has transitioned from 'what do you want to do now that we have all this money'? to 'what is the most responsible way to handle dynastic wealth'?
Actually that is a very important point. It takes a long time to put theory into practice and to hone strategies that are comfortable on a personal level and that are personally tailored.. and mistakes are likely to be made, too, in order to learn.. or at least mistakes will likely be made if someone is really engaging with the matter in a meaningful way to attempt to use BTC to reach personalized goals. Really the only variable for a smaller owner is using smaller amounts. Everything scales to holdings.
Actually, I agree with you, but the owner of a smaller level of assets frequently wants to catch up and gets anxious and then starts to make BIG ASS mistakes.. that has been my experience trying to teach people, many times, they have difficulties keeping down their amounts and exercising restraint because otherwise they either run out of BTC on major price rises or they run out of fiat on major crashes. I have seen that a lot with people I interact, and even with myself it has taken a lot of time, and I am thinking that I am not completely immuned from such overrunning. I'll simplify to BTC only, and only on GDAX (where makers pay 0%). At least at first. The strategy -- such as it is -- is applicable to other scenarios, perhaps with additional complications.
Actually, I think that it is good to be able to have the zero fee option, and surely if you try to trade in other place, you gotta cushion a bit more to account for those trading fees. We're divided by a 45 minute drive and infrequent emails & phone. She really needs a full intro. I figure it'll be a written manual, plus live demo when we can get together.
I am kind of in the opinion to give guidance and then let the person practice and the person should practice with smaller amounts and then can get into more of an interaction about what s/he did and learning from mistakes and smart moves, too... so maybe writing less and just going over scenarios and letting the person develop a strategy that fits within some semblance of acceptable parameters. First installment written and sent, but that is really an overview of available data that a trader might need. I'll post it if you want, but it is likely remedial for Bitcoin wall watchers, and only covers background info. Next installment will be an exchange overview, then third likely the method itself.
hopefully you do not bore her to death with your bear talk? hahahahhahaha.. I am just kidding. Hopefully, she will continue to pay attention through all three treatises... Maybe that is why I have such a love hate relationship with such a picnic bear... reminds me of myself, somewhat. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2478
Merit: 4559
Addicted to HoDLing!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 09:04:49 AM Last edit: December 03, 2017, 09:53:37 AM by AlcoHoDL |
|
This could well have been written about me. I'm not saying that it is always absolutely wrong to have 90% of your assets in BTC or whatever, but it should be because you are intentionally choosing to do so, not because the price got away from you and you never really considered that you now have 90% of your wealth riding on one thing. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7gi55s/dont_invest_recklessly/I'm spooked again. So, theymos is now advising those of us who went 50% in on Bitcoin, and are now nearly 90% in due to a rising Bitcoin, to sell 45% of our BTC stash, in order to return to the initial BTC/total investment of 50%. I respect him, but can't help but wonder if that is a good piece of advice... I feel I should have invested more in BTC when I could. But I guess that's the greedy side of me talking. Will see how things play out... I also don't really know what he is saying, except perhaps that we need to be making conscious assessments about what are doing and how we are allocating our assets and whether we may be in a decent position to be considering reallocation. Surely, I doubt that you need to have anything near an allocation of 50% initially in order to be approaching 90% currently and based on the exorbitant extent of our recent price appreciation(s). I can look at my own initial goal of allocating around 10% that ended up being closer to 15%, and even though I lost a decent amount of coin through a hacker(s), I still am running numbers very close to 90%, depending on how I frame my investment. On a personal level, I feel fairly cognizant about the personal appropriateness of the approach that I am taking, and surely I appreciate the concept of diversification and reallocation too. i also appreciate the concept of selling on the way up and buying on the way down, which I continue to believe to be a really decent vehicle that could sufficiently address allocation and diversification concerns and allow what might appear to be more risky/lopsided BTC allocation levels. I know that each of us develop some strategies here, too, and I am thinking about Bob, too... .. I mean sometimes guys give us ideas about the quantity of their holdings, and sure, he is saying that he is diversifying by cashing out some of his Bcash, and stuff like that, and is that level of cashing out enough? Should not each of us be cashing out a little bit along the way.. just in case (without making any BIG ASS cashing outs?) Another thing that Bob said, is where is he going to put his money that is better than BTC.. and in that regard, just having it in cash is not better, but it does help to prepare for BTC dips, even knowing that long term cash is not going to hold its value, but for a year or less, it is not a major price to pay to hold some cash, just in case for buying BTC dips, no? Thanks for replying JJG. I read the entire reddit post by theymos, but just can't follow his advice. I'm not a trader like you, and have been studying the posts here, in order to slowly pick up on trading methods. I have nowhere near the amount of BTC that veterans here like you, Jimbo or BLB have, so for me it's an "all or nothing" game. If I sell almost half of my stash, I'm effectively reducing the chances of financial independence. I will ride the wave and let it take me where it may.
|
|
|
|
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 09:09:09 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
windjc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 09:10:54 AM |
|
I wouldn't be surprised if Theymos sold a bunch of his btc stash before the 2x threat. I know at least one other prominent early adopter who completely cashed out.
Theymos might be hoping the price comes back down so he gives advice as such to make himself feel better. I don't know why he otherwise would feel compelled to advise people. Why does he care? This is free market. Let people live and learn.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 09:20:47 AM |
|
Actually, I agree with you, but the owner of a smaller level of assets frequently wants to catch up and gets anxious and then starts to make BIG ASS mistakes..
Probably the most important point in your response. Perhaps the most important part of having a strategy, is that you have a mechanism for dealing with both market boredom (price in a tiny range for days on end) and market terror (to the point where your brain has a hard time catching up with the level of change). The strategy is methodical. It will never yield results as good as the uber-trader who somehow 'knows' what point the lows are, and 'knows' what point the highs are. But it will always be positive. ( I really fee that uber-trader is just lucky, and everyone's luck runs out some time). I'll dig through my post history, and find the clearest to day exposition of the process. Just for you. Well, you and everyone else reading. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 09:33:02 AM |
|
I'll dig through my post history, and find the clearest to day exposition of the process. Just for you. Well, you and everyone else reading. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) OK, I found the post. It is a skeleton which assumes some previous knowledge, but provides the basics for those interested. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg22405941#msg22405941Interestingly, I needed to link to a post directly before my post of interest. I still see the post, but am unable to link to it. More overzealous moderation? Someone erasing my previous history? I dunno. In case I am shadowbanned - JJG - here is your response that quotes the most salient portion: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg22411843#msg22411843
|
|
|
|
Karartma1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 09:58:07 AM |
|
Bitcoin price hovering around the most recent ATH: another (extra)ordinary day in the making. About theymos advice: I still don't get it. Why does he care? and what does he know about the fact that For example, there is no mathematical proof that the cryptographic algorithms used in Bitcoin are actually secure -- they are merely believed to be secure because nobody has been able to break them after many years of intense scrutiny. ( Food for thought I guess
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 10:01:12 AM |
|
Bitcoin price hovering around the most recent ATH: another (extra)ordinary day in the making. About theymos advice: I still don't get it. Why does he care? and what does he know about the fact that For example, there is no mathematical proof that the cryptographic algorithms used in Bitcoin are actually secure -- they are merely believed to be secure because nobody has been able to break them after many years of intense scrutiny. ( Food for thought I guess I don't know that gravity works; I believe it does, since I haven't floated away... Yet. Anything can happen. Reasonable doubt is reasonable. Risks are what make up life, decision by decision.
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1477
Self made HODLER ✓
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 10:11:03 AM |
|
I personally think John Macafee's dick is safe.
I'm not certain he will even make it to the deadline. He's 72 years old and all those drugs must have been taking a toll on his body. Perhaps he has an iron constitution. Better living through chemistry? Maybe, look at those Rolling Stones guys.
|
|
|
|
Globb0
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2053
Free spirit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 10:12:23 AM |
|
I always wondered if I went back in time and bought 1,000,000 coins, what would happen and how it would change. Maybe btc would just fail altogether.
Do not f*ck with the past, it's working out perfectly ... well for the majority of us at least. Just continue doing whatever it is that you do. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) What if someone is already living it over and over again perfecting the rise of bitcoin. Hmmm this time lets try a fork called BCH, oo and make RV turn evil. Good *rubs hands* I personally think John Macafee's dick is safe.
I'm not certain he will even make it to the deadline. He's 72 years old and all those drugs must have been taking a toll on his body. Perhaps he has an iron constitution. Better living through chemistry? Maybe, look at those Rolling Stones guys. Yeah but they are only 35 years old ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1464
Clueless!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 10:13:36 AM |
|
I always wondered if I went back in time and bought 1,000,000 coins, what would happen and how it would change. Maybe btc would just fail altogether.
Do not f*ck with the past, it's working out perfectly ... well for the majority of us at least. Just continue doing whatever it is that you do. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) What if someone is already living it over and over again perfecting the rise of bitcoin. Hmmm this time lets try a fork called BCH, oo and make RV turn evil. Good *rubs hands* I believe Jihan Wu of Bitmain has such a machine......it all fits the facts of bitmain's rise to power and BCH games. (shudder) ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Spaceman_Spiff_Original
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 10:21:53 AM |
|
This could well have been written about me. I'm not saying that it is always absolutely wrong to have 90% of your assets in BTC or whatever, but it should be because you are intentionally choosing to do so, not because the price got away from you and you never really considered that you now have 90% of your wealth riding on one thing. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/7gi55s/dont_invest_recklessly/I'm spooked again. So, theymos is now advising those of us who went 50% in on Bitcoin, and are now nearly 90% in due to a rising Bitcoin, to sell 45% of our BTC stash, in order to return to the initial BTC/total investment of 50%. I respect him, but can't help but wonder if that is a good piece of advice... I feel I should have invested more in BTC when I could. But I guess that's the greedy side of me talking. Will see how things play out... He isn't saying that at all. Read bold part.
|
|
|
|
bitserve
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1477
Self made HODLER ✓
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 03, 2017, 10:29:13 AM |
|
-CME cancels the future due to SEC -Japan pulls a China -Segwit/Lightning/etc are teh fail -Bitfinex is goxxed -Satoshi becomes a bear and dumps all in one market order on Bitstamp filling my order for a million coins at $0.11
You have over $100K spare sitting on Bitstamp just waiting for a potential BTC dump to $0.11?
|
|
|
|
|