Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[savetherainforest]

Buddy!!!!! .... Throw us some 'pamp' numbers in the next hours or days cuz we getting bored from trying to look at comets that might or not hit Earth and a WW7 that might not come until 7 years, 7 months, 7 days, 7 hours, 7 minutes and 7 seconds. Give us 70K+ already to glare on u'r relentless spamming, in the next 7 days, or at least untill the 25th of December 2021.    

7 is a good number! ... The next 7 hours are critical.      

[1715421819]

1715421819

[1715421819]

1715421819

[1715421819]

1715421819

[1715421819]

1715421819

[1715421819]

1715421819

[1715421819]

1715421819

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Arriemoller]

I post a nice cat card and the price goes up, you post a gay card and the price goes down. It's last year all over again, you guys never learn, do you.

Posting one more just to get the price up again.

[Arriemoller]

And we are going up again.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[shahzadafzal]

“Inflation is higher than what we've been told.

#Bitcoin is our life raft.”


https://twitter.com/thebitcoinconf/status/1469669345169186827?s=21

[JayJuanGee]

Here are the Top 10 Contributors of the WO Thread. (Congratulations!!!)

1. ChartBuddy [665]
2. JayJuanGee [124]
3. cAPSLOCK [107]
4. philipma1957 [99]
5. El duderino_ [98]
6. BitcoinBunny [93]
7. Arriemoller [87]
8. naim027 [77]
9. OutOfMemory [76]
10. d_eddie [72]

Two bots in the top, I don't think they should be counted.

For sure this is a reference to post count (presumably in November, even though there was a reference to both October and November), and sure there is some humor in what you say - even the sad part regarding your actually being serious in your humanoid perspective.

29k is ultimate support =D gogogoggg

10k incoming.
Lol at 69k the cycle top. Not even 4 x of last cycle high.

Quoted for future nostalgia 

I was close to commenting upon this idea earlier.. and surely it seems to be that there is a kind of tendency for disingenuine posters (or maybe sometimes just distracted posters) to get caught up upon previous tops and to use the previous tops as their measuring points regarding where we have been, where we are at and where we might be going.  Maybe a disproportionate focus on the tops allow for the presentation of more extreme views and just to lead the topic into nonsensical directions (even if there might be some factual truths within the framework).

So, yes.. there is a truth that bitcoin prices for this particular top of $69k had so far ONLY reached about 3.5x of the December 2017 top (which was $19,666).

On another note, I am thinking that a fair representation of the start of this particular bull cycle would be around $4,200, and surely some claims of randomness can be thrown in my direction too.. but I will maintain a believe that $4,200 is a kind of ballpark starting off figure for this particular bull cycle and that the cycle had largely started right around April 1, 2019 (even though we could not really feel too confident about the start of the cycle until around mid-May 2019).   So, our high so far for this cycle seems to be around 16.4x from its base.. which surely is way smaller than the 2013 cycle and the 2017 cycle, which ended up around more than 100x and around 78x respectively.   

If this cycle ends with only 16.4x, the that would be a decent amount of disappointment for a lot of BTC accumulators/HODLers who seem to have been expecting a bit more for this cycle (including yours truly), but even a 16.4x price appreciation is still not any kind of major disappointment - absent figuring out where we would be going from here (presuming that this cycle is actually over, which does NOT seem likely but we surely cannot rule it out because having this cycle over would likely have greater than 40% odds of actually playing out that way.. from my quasi-layman's overview).

By the way, another ball park framing from my perspective would be that current odds of going below $10k probably would have less than 1% odds, below $20k less than 5% odds and below $30k less than 20% odds... and another dynamic is actually to go below those various price thresholds as a kind of spike down, and another dynamic would be to actually be able to stay below certain price thresholds.. and in any event Billy nocoiners desires to discuss sub $10k as if it were really any kind of meaningful possibility seems to be quite a fantasy whether we are either referring to sustainability or even short term spikes (and sure we did see one exchange (BinanceUS) have a fluke short term spike to around $8k just about 2 months ago, and surely that is a kind of fluke of relatively illiquid exchanges, rather than any kind of a meaningful reflection on the overall BTC price support thresholds).

[Paashaas]

I post a nice cat card and the price goes up, you post a gay card and the price goes down. It's last year all over again, you guys never learn, do you.

Posting one more just to get the price up again.

I've sended an e-mail to Coca-Cola company for a suggestion to remaster/digitalise their christmas commercial from 1995.

This must the only commercial add i really want to see it getting aired on t.v again.

Pure nostalgia, great memories.

[Arriemoller]

I post a nice cat card and the price goes up, you post a gay card and the price goes down. It's last year all over again, you guys never learn, do you.

Posting one more just to get the price up again.

I've sended an e-mail to Coca-Cola company for a suggestion to remaster/digitalise their christmas commercial from 1995.

This must the only commercial add i realy want to see it getting aired on t.v again.

Pure nostalgia, great memories.

Yeah, that is a good one, but since there are no blacks, hispanics, orientals, women, gays, transsexuals, dwarfs  and electric vehicles in it it can unfortunately no longer be aired.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[serveria.com]

I post a nice cat card and the price goes up, you post a gay card and the price goes down. It's last year all over again, you guys never learn, do you.

Posting one more just to get the price up again.

No Arrie you got it wrong. It's the original gay xmas cards that push the price up. See for yourself:

[Arriemoller]

Invalid image.

[JayJuanGee]

so fuck off diptwhat naim027 and your lame/whiney-ass superficial assessments regarding who you believe to be participating in this thread and what you believe to be going on in these here parts.

Aha. Look like Bots have feelings   . Why so serious? You look hyped and my every word hit your balls. Dang bro. Grow up. You are the legendary one. You should talk like Legendaries. Don't talk like fucking idiots. I appreciate your healthy criticism. So, Use your words wisely.

Now you are into the advices giving category with your seemingly keen abilities to assess whether a member (or a bot) is getting emotional?    Part of the humor remains your ongoing inability to even understand what you are reading.

So this leads most to infer that your only reason for being here is to try to accumulate enough Merits to become more profitable with a signature campaign... In other words, begging.
It puts you in the same category as a certain "I need 3 BTC desperately" loser that also keeps being an annoying little gadfly!!

So if you're legit here looking for comraderie, hang in there and learn, contribute and grow into the community... but if you're just here because WO gives the most Merits, yea Fuck Right Off!  diptwat

Wait, wait, I am not talking to you. I was talking with the JJG, Poker Player, and other legendaries. Every legendary were newbies. so don't judge from someone's staring activity.
If you think this is matter, I will quote here a lot of post from Legendaries only.

Last time I checked, you posted a topic publicly... accordingly, any member has the ability to chime in with his/her perspective, whether the subject was directed at him or not.... I suppose another possibility could be for you to create a self-moderated thread naim027.. and then find out how many members are going to respond to you... might be a little test of both your popularity and the extent to which any members are inclined to interact with you in your own lil thread if you were to actually desire finding out.

Hmm, look like the F word is more interesting to use for you guys. Right? I also use that when I meet some Fucking guy like you. But, I like to use my words wisely.

It's a discretionary word, and sure you would be correct to point out that some words might lose some of their effectiveness if they are overused.

Two bots in the top, I don't think they should be counted.

Haha. I know ChartBuddy Post Automatically. Also, The JJG is the only Human-based Bot. (I thought I am the only person who calls him a bot)

yes.. you and arriemoller have quite an original perspective to discover my unable to hide botness..   It's like you invented the idea... 

Amazing




amazing




amazing




What other unique perspectives would you like to share,  naim027? 





   

Yes, and we all saw it, so why are you posting it again?
No, don't answer that, it's a rhetorical question.

Oo thanks at last someone entertained me.
Okay I don't answer your questions

I don't want to be rude, but it's not uncommon in this thread to not have someone react to your posts. We just don't care and post anyway.

I suspect that a non-reaction does not even mean that no one cares.  More importantly, it seems quite lame that members are going to start to expect that they have to get a reaction to every post that they make.. Gosh, if I had to delete all of my posts that did not get reactions, I would be left with only a few posts (relatively speaking)...

I reckon a $100,000 or even $200,000 BTC is more likely within the next year rather than a $40,000 Eth token.

What is a "Eth token?" 

Rhetorical question.. I really don't want to know.

 

In other words, anyone is free to contribute in this thread whether newbie or more ranking member on the forum, and we frequently have new members chiming into this thread (and some of them come from other parts of the forum and some of them lurk for a decent amount of time before chiming in).. and surely any new member whether low ranking or not (whether having a hat or not) is free to contribute and participate..

Yes, that's how I have experienced it. I think the first few times I posted something in the thread I was a newbie but I just don't think I ever expected a certain reaction. Sometimes I posted something and no one responded, and it didn't matter to me.

You have to be aware of what this thread is, as Arriemoller says:

...it's not uncommon in this thread to not have someone react to your posts. We just don't care and post anyway.

I didn't know naim027 at all and we were accused of being alts (which I could prove to be false). The only thing I hope is that he understands well the people here and how the thread works.

I had not known about that linked thread that you pointed out, and I did a quickie glance through that thread and I merited a few of the responses therein, even if I did not feel that I understood very deeply into the background of some of the aspects of the story.  On a personal level, I do tend to stay away from several of the Meta threads, yet I can see how sometimes any of us could get drug into some of those threads (or some of those seemingly interpersonal topics or even if there might be some members who appear abusive of their forum status).. which getting drug into such topics/threads has also been the case for me from time to time.

There are some forum members who I have trusted for their participation in some of those threads/topics, and surely it can be confusing regarding if some claims about other members or their supposed connections (between members or corruption) are being made based on accurate information and/or reasonable/fair inferences.. .so for example, sometimes I will merit posts in which I might not really trust the member or his/her judgement but I believe that such member (or post) has raised some valid point(s) or helped to clarify or to bring some insight (or even humor).

[OutOfMemory]

29k is ultimate support =D gogogoggg

10k incoming.
Lol at 69k the cycle top. Not even 4 x of last cycle high.

Quoted for future nostalgia  

I was close to commenting upon this idea earlier.. and surely it seems to be that there is a kind of tendency for disingenuine posters (or maybe sometimes just distracted posters) to get caught up upon previous tops and to use the previous tops as their measuring points regarding where we have been, where we are at and where we might be going.  Maybe a disproportionate focus on the tops allow for the presentation of more extreme views and just to lead the topic into nonsensical directions (even if there might be some factual truths within the framework).

So, yes.. there is a truth that bitcoin prices for this particular top of $69k had so far ONLY reached about 3.5x of the December 2017 top (which was $19,666).

On another note, I am thinking that a fair representation of the start of this particular bull cycle would be around $4,200, and surely some claims of randomness can be thrown in my direction too.. but I will maintain a believe that $4,200 is a kind of ballpark starting off figure for this particular bull cycle and that the cycle had largely started right around April 1, 2019 (even though we could not really feel too confident about the start of the cycle until around mid-May 2019).   So, our high so far for this cycle seems to be around 16.4x from its base.. which surely is way smaller than the 2013 cycle and the 2017 cycle, which ended up around more than 100x and around 78x respectively.  

If this cycle ends with only 16.4x, the that would be a decent amount of disappointment for a lot of BTC accumulators/HODLers who seem to have been expecting a bit more for this cycle (including yours truly), but even a 16.4x price appreciation is still not any kind of major disappointment - absent figuring out where we would be going from here (presuming that this cycle is actually over, which does NOT seem likely but we surely cannot rule it out because having this cycle over would likely have greater than 40% odds of actually playing out that way.. from my quasi-layman's overview).

By the way, another ball park framing from my perspective would be that current odds of going below $10k probably would have less than 1% odds, below $20k less than 5% odds and below $30k less than 20% odds... and another dynamic is actually to go below those various price thresholds as a kind of spike down, and another dynamic would be to actually be able to stay below certain price thresholds.. and in any event Billy nocoiners desires to discuss sub $10k as if it were really any kind of meaningful possibility seems to be quite a fantasy whether we are either referring to sustainability or even short term spikes (and sure we did see one exchange (BinanceUS) have a fluke short term spike to around $8k just about 2 months ago, and surely that is a kind of fluke of relatively illiquid exchanges, rather than any kind of a meaningful reflection on the overall BTC price support thresholds).

I can only second that, JJG. I'm anything but disappointed, but sure extending the climb up, finishing in another exponential blow-off top, even invalidating S2F (in the up direction) would have been the foundation for a great story to tell my kids as grown ups.
It it what it is. That's my sentiment.

Now for the explanation of my statement to BillyNocoiner,

for future nostalgia

was more or less only about the $10k, and especially about the "cycle top". Who could call out a "cycle top" if nocoiner nobody knows exactly IF we already had this cycle's top.
"For future nostalgia", as a log entry in WO, if BillyNocoiner ever deletes his post, when we might finally hit higher figures than the quoted $69k.
I mean nostalgia in the likes of "Do you WO guys remember annoying BillyNocoiner, constantly calling out $10k bottoms just before we were climbing to $234k back in 2022? LOL".
I am bullish on Bitcoin. Don't ask me how, maybe it's only assertive thinking, but i still refuse to be bitter about the way BTC is charting at the time.
Why not being bitter? You gave yourself the answer already. We're up since 2017 a fair amount of times. How could i be unhappy with that?

Invalid image.

For my part it's good enough that the original image stays in Imaginationland 

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Don’t give BillyNoCoiner the time of day.

It’s going up forever, Laura.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[Biodom]

Positive for the last 7 days atm, nice!

[sirazimuth]

It is time.

Is posting the same pic every year considered spam?

Naaah. You're good Jimbo. I email this one out every year.
Maybe recipients think it's spam. I think its hilarious.  F**k em if they don't have an Xmas sense of humor...
 I consider it tradition....  (I'm not sure if it fits the gay Xmas card tradition in here, but whatever...)

[Copetech]

It is time.

Is posting the same pic every year considered spam?

I think it more like Canned Ham than truly Spam...