Can't we talk about something more interesting, like red meat?
Read meet may not be a topic of interest for most WO OGs because it is not healthy for them. What do I even know
White meet and fish seems better option.
You have been brain washed... so yeah, what do you know to be repeating untruths as if they were true.
JayJuanGee tell me my dear, have people been bullish or bearish today?
I don't want to say anything myself to not upset you.
Focusing on the sentiment of members within this thread or even member sentiment towards BTC is problematic.
You coming to this thread in a judgmental tone has been problematic, and likely will continue to be problematic, yet hey you can do what you like in regards to your desires to get backlash - not just from me.
Your use of the double negative is interesting.. perhaps purposeful.
You do not need to worry about upsetting me or suggesting my level of supposed upsettedness matters very much in the whole scheme of things.
I recognize that some folks trade BTC based on sentiment or perhaps inverse sentiment. I doubt that trading bitcoin in that sort of way would be very successful (not that trading in general is likely to be successful as compared to just buying and HODLing), so hopefully, for their own good, they would just use ONLY small portions of their BTC stack for such trading based on such sentiment indicators.
I tend to recommend using less than 10% of the size of the bitcoin holdings for trading, even though I understand that once a guy goes down the trading route, he might have difficulties limiting his position size, and so the more experienced he gets the more he might gravitate towards using higher and higher portions of his bitcoin holdings, and then he ends up in a position like LFC and/or OgNasty in which they are talking their book because they sold too much too soon... even though for sure LFC has not yet devolved into OgNasty's personality of always needing to be right... and maybe I am generalizing too much?
Many of us here claim to not trade, which is my own position about myself, even though i have been selling on the way up and buying on the way down since about late 2015.. and the sales amounts have been relatively small, which I have been criticized for not selling enough - which I suppose I criticize myself for the same thing.. even though I don't claim to be suffering..
how can a guy suffer if his holdings have doubled almost 9 times, but then now we are between 8 and 9 times.... even though in recent times I have been starting to think that in some cases it can be o.k. to describe my holdings as having average costs of around $10k per coin. That is still a good average... even though some guys are claiming 20x profits, 50x profits and/or 100x, but still more than 10x profits is not a bad place to be.
Maybe before late 2015, I was just buying BTC all the time and not really selling any, yet if I did sell before late 2015, I would spend and replace .. so that way the HOLDINGs are always growing, but then it seems that I was doing spend and replace for several years after 2015 too... so sometimes reflecting back on the history, my rendition of what I did does not even exactly match what I thought that I was doing or what I said that I was doing in those earlier times...
So many times there is a subconscious drive to keep building the stack size, which is part of the motivation of spend and replace... but then after a while a guy might conclude that he has enough and/or more than enough, so spending and a shrinking of the stack size becomes personally acceptable.
I think that Michael Saylor might be broken, since he seems to think that a guy (or a company in his case) can never get enough bitcoin. On a personal (at least a normal person) level, there seems to be something wrong with the concept that there is never enough. I know that some guys here won't agree with me on some of these points.
look if im supposed to be paying attention to something, im out
At some point it will work itself out.
Perhaps in a couple of weeks (best case scenario)
Perhaps in a couple of months?
Perhaps in more than 6 months (does not seem like a likely scenario, but yeah, it could happen).
I hardly imagine spending more than 18 months to get back on track and get back to ATH prices, but there is a chance (maybe 25%-ish) that it could happen
some have not given up yet... good
WO full of cyclist bears nowadays...
There will always be bagholders. I don’t want to hurt people’s feelings though.
There are some bullish events in the pipeline in the near future as well that could keep
us above $100K. The government shutdown ending and Michael Saylor buying more BTC with funds from his new STRE offering.
I like holding BTC bags! It made me rich
That is a good way to put it.
Many of us bag holders have suffered through the UPs and the downs, yet we likely have done a lot better than those who had been trying to catch the waves.
Sure there may be some exceptions in which the wave catchers have done better, but I doubt it, especially the longer that we have been in and holding our bags and just letting the price play itself out.
...you good traders can spot the highs and the lows pit pat piffy wing wong wang just like that and make a millino bucks sure no problem...
...but not me. So I just keep my stash and sell only when necessary...
We can shave off profits here and there along the way, and the rest of our holdings just continues to compound upon itself. As long as we have accumulated enough and we do not sell too much, then our holdings can transform into a kind of passive income.
Poll
