Davyd05
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 05:59:16 AM |
|
I'm starting to believe in the reversal...I mean it is possible the whale is just trying to get as many people to believe that so he can knife right through the book causing panic but I dunno...that just seems like a useless strategy to employ at this stage.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2221
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 06:01:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1735
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 06:08:33 AM |
|
Looks like price is stalling in this area. Entering a small short just in case.
Huge bounce so far from the last low
|
|
|
|
octaft
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 06:15:27 AM |
|
And some people wonder why there is a lack of women in technology and trading.
because they take everything personally ? don't worry, there's usually a bunch of white knight neckbeards around to rush to their defense Fuck man, if you're going to troll, at least do it better than a 14 year old 4channer. ooh here's another 0/10. Would have gotten at least a 1 if you put any effort into it.
|
|
|
|
ShroomsKit
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 06:28:28 AM |
|
she's a fuckin lawyer, of course you can't get a straight answer out of her.
also, she's a woman. since when do women know how long anything takes. my wifes 5 mins can be several minutes to an hour
I bet she knows how long you take!  Absolutely, and I bet 5mins in the company of such a charming man like 'Piggles' would feel like an hour for most women. Oh look at that I made a sarcastic generalisation about women and someone got butthurt. Calm down dear Don't worry. She just hates men.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4130
Merit: 12433
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 06:29:42 AM |
|
I'm starting to believe in the reversal...I mean it is possible the whale is just trying to get as many people to believe that so he can knife right through the book causing panic but I dunno...that just seems like a useless strategy to employ at this stage.
I keep thinking about the recent volume of BTC trades, and it seems relatively high in the last four weeks but even greater in the last two weeks with the drop into the $300s and below... Accordingly, based on the increased trade volume, there should be some additional BTC price movement (up or down.. maybe up?). On the other hand, this upcoming weekend in the USA is a long bank holiday on Monday - so lack of fiat may be possible. Yet, on the other hand, there seems to have been quite a bit of fiat coming into the exchanges, and a lot of the large fiat holders should have been red-flagged last weekend to prepare fiat on the exchanges over the weekend, just in case there is another testing of either lower $300s or even a drop into the $200s (which seems less likely). In the totality of circumstances, it seems a bit less plausible that any kind of major BTC dump would be be successful over this coming weekend b/c fiat holders should have been sufficiently prepared (especially based on last weekend's price movement(s)). Nonetheless, from watching BTC's performance (recent and longer) I have come to believe that nearly anything is possible (or pausible) in Bitcoinlandia!!! 
|
|
|
|
FNG
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 06:45:48 AM |
|
According to bitcoinity there's approx 16,000 coins total on bitfinex. There's nearly 14,000 btc short!
Shorts are going to get their asses handed to them with a single large market buy.
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 06:47:53 AM |
|
since 2011 I hve drunk traed, 12k btc ltater I dtull druk trade. hammred me says up.
|
|
|
|
Raystonn
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 06:51:31 AM |
|
since 2011 I hve drunk traed, 12k btc ltater I dtull druk trade. hammred me says up.
Up it is. Another round?
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2221
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 07:01:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ErisDiscordia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1163
Imposition of ORder = Escalation of Chaos
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 07:01:09 AM |
|
since 2011 I hve drunk traed, 12k btc ltater I dtull druk trade. hammred me says up.
I approve of this post  Bearstamp Bullstamp BitSwamp Beerstamp
What else?
you forgot blowstamps
|
|
|
|
medialab101
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 07:24:27 AM |
|
since 2011 I hve drunk traed, 12k btc ltater I dtull druk trade. hammred me says up.
I approve of this post  Bearstamp Bullstamp BitSwamp Beerstamp
What else?
you forgot blowstamps 'blowstamps' is leetspeak for BTC
|
|
|
|
nanobrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Dumb broad
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 07:40:15 AM |
|
she's a fuckin lawyer, of course you can't get a straight answer out of her.
also, she's a woman. since when do women know how long anything takes. my wifes 5 mins can be several minutes to an hour
I bet she knows how long you take!  Absolutely, and I bet 5mins in the company of such a charming man like 'Piggles' would feel like an hour for most women. Oh look at that I made a sarcastic generalisation about women and someone got butthurt. Calm down dear Don't worry. She just hates men. Not sure which version of Shroomskit I'm talking to but I think you know that's untrue; I hate the lazy, casual sexism that pervades this thread and the fact that as soon as there is any resistance to it, it prompts comments that you are either sensitive or 'hate men'. I'm not going to get into this (mainly because I'm hopelessly outnumbered and have done it, fruitlessly, before nearly a year ago) but I do wonder if Piggles et al actually behave like this with their wives, partners and daughters in the 'real' world. I imagine not. Back on topic: I'm not going to change my view supporting the theory that we'll back in the high 200's in the next 9 days.
|
|
|
|
ErisDiscordia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1163
Imposition of ORder = Escalation of Chaos
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 07:45:08 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 07:45:51 AM |
|
I hate the lazy, casual sexism that pervades this thread

|
|
|
|
octaft
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 07:56:02 AM |
|
I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...
Feminism comes with a lot of baggage due to the bad seeds in the group ruining it for the ones who just want simple equality and respect. Misandrists in feminist clothing, women who think it's fine when men are sexualized (or just outright don't think men can be sexualized) but hate it when women are, and those who act like women who enjoy wearing revealing outfits are cheapening themselves immediately come to mind. The first two are hypocrites, the third is simply ironic that they want to stifle a womans right to express herself as she chooses.
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1030
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 07:59:25 AM |
|
I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...
Feminism comes with a lot of baggage due to the bad seeds in the group ruining it for the ones who just want simple equality and respect. Misandrists in feminist clothing, women who think it's fine when men are sexualized (or just outright don't think men can be sexualized) but hate it when women are, and those who act like women who enjoy wearing revealing outfits are cheapening themselves immediately come to mind. There's no money in being respectful. Markets need problems they can solve with products. Fashion, makeup, and entertainment create and feed into the feedback loop. Without money, there would be no markets for such tactics.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2221
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 08:01:02 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ErisDiscordia
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1133
Merit: 1163
Imposition of ORder = Escalation of Chaos
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 08:08:45 AM |
|
I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...
Feminism comes with a lot of baggage due to the bad seeds in the group ruining it for the ones who just want simple equality and respect. Misandrists in feminist clothing, women who think it's fine when men are sexualized (or just outright don't think men can be sexualized) but hate it when women are, and those who act like women who enjoy wearing revealing outfits are cheapening themselves immediately come to mind. The first two are hypocrites, the third is simply ironic that they want to stifle a womans right to express herself as she chooses. yep, those sort of girls are doing themselves and their fellow women a disservice by discrediting a relevant philosophy in the eyes of the public. I'll gladly admit that many of our current societal problems stem from a certain imbalance between men and women. And I don't only mean stuff like "there's not enough female CEOs and heads of state" but our very culture (collective operating system) is heavily biased towards values traditionally considered to be male. This goes back hundreds of years and I'd pin down patriarchal, monotheistic religions as the main culprit. Just look how afraid those people are of everything female. From catholic priests refusing anyone without a dick being their peer to muslims which cover their "possessions" in burkas so their neighbor won't covet them. That being said, reversing the polarity and going to the other extreme won't solve shit. Do white people need to become slaves in order to atone for what they've done to black people? There's no money in being respectful. Markets need problems they can solve with products. Fashion, makeup, and entertainment create and feed into the feedback loop. Without money, there would be no markets for such tactics.
One of the many reasons why our current cultural and economic model SUCKS. In this case there are no incentives to create permanent solutions. Creating problems and maintaining them is so much more profitable.
|
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1136
|
 |
October 10, 2014, 08:10:18 AM |
|
I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...
Feminism comes with a lot of baggage due to the bad seeds in the group ruining it for the ones who just want simple equality and respect. Misandrists in feminist clothing, women who think it's fine when men are sexualized (or just outright don't think men can be sexualized) but hate it when women are, and those who act like women who enjoy wearing revealing outfits are cheapening themselves immediately come to mind. The first two are hypocrites, the third is simply ironic that they want to stifle a womans right to express herself as she chooses. I have no idea why you talk about feminism but I'd like to say that it doesn't exist like amazons or matriarch society never existed. It is just a fantasy. It's a way for men to materialize their fear of women. You are afraid of women don't you ? Especially their desire and sexual needs.
|
|
|
|
|