Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[cbeast]

I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...

Feminism comes with a lot of baggage due to the bad seeds in the group ruining it for the ones who just want simple equality and respect. Misandrists in feminist clothing, women who think it's fine when men are sexualized (or just outright don't think men can be sexualized) but hate it when women are, and those who act like women who enjoy wearing revealing outfits are cheapening themselves immediately come to mind.

There's no money in being respectful. Markets need problems they can solve with products. Fashion, makeup, and entertainment create and feed into the feedback loop. Without money, there would be no markets for such tactics.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[ErisDiscordia]

I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...

Feminism comes with a lot of baggage due to the bad seeds in the group ruining it for the ones who just want simple equality and respect. Misandrists in feminist clothing, women who think it's fine when men are sexualized (or just outright don't think men can be sexualized) but hate it when women are, and those who act like women who enjoy wearing revealing outfits are cheapening themselves immediately come to mind.

The first two are hypocrites, the third is simply ironic that they want to stifle a womans right to express herself as she chooses.

yep, those sort of girls are doing themselves and their fellow women a disservice by discrediting a relevant philosophy in the eyes of the public.

I'll gladly admit that many of our current societal problems stem from a certain imbalance between men and women. And I don't only mean stuff like "there's not enough female CEOs and heads of state" but our very culture (collective operating system) is heavily biased towards values traditionally considered to be male. This goes back hundreds of years and I'd pin down patriarchal, monotheistic religions as the main culprit. Just look how afraid those people are of everything female. From catholic priests refusing anyone without a dick being their peer to muslims which cover their "possessions" in burkas so their neighbor won't covet them.

That being said, reversing the polarity and going to the other extreme won't solve shit. Do white people need to become slaves in order to atone for what they've done to black people?

There's no money in being respectful. Markets need problems they can solve with products. Fashion, makeup, and entertainment create and feed into the feedback loop. Without money, there would be no markets for such tactics.

One of the many reasons why our current cultural and economic model SUCKS. In this case there are no incentives to create permanent solutions. Creating problems and maintaining them is so much more profitable.

[superresistant]

I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...

Feminism comes with a lot of baggage due to the bad seeds in the group ruining it for the ones who just want simple equality and respect. Misandrists in feminist clothing, women who think it's fine when men are sexualized (or just outright don't think men can be sexualized) but hate it when women are, and those who act like women who enjoy wearing revealing outfits are cheapening themselves immediately come to mind.
The first two are hypocrites, the third is simply ironic that they want to stifle a womans right to express herself as she chooses.

I have no idea why you talk about feminism but I'd like to say that it doesn't exist like amazons or matriarch society never existed.
It is just a fantasy. It's a way for men to materialize their fear of women.

You are afraid of women don't you ?
Especially their desire and sexual needs.

[btcney]

Not sure which version of Shroomskit I'm talking to but I think you know that's untrue; I hate the lazy, casual sexism that pervades this thread and the fact that as soon as there is any resistance to it, it prompts comments that you are either sensitive or 'hate men'.  

I'm not going to get into this (mainly because I'm hopelessly outnumbered and have done it, fruitlessly, before nearly a year ago) but I do wonder if Piggles et al actually behave like this with their wives, partners and daughters in the 'real' world.  I imagine not.

Back on topic: I'm not going to change my view supporting the theory that we'll back in the high 200's in the next 9 days.

I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...

fuck off fag

[razorramon]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz7ZzQbSiGA

Aziz Ansari about feminism

[MrPiggles]

Not sure which version of Shroomskit I'm talking to but I think you know that's untrue; I hate the lazy, casual sexism that pervades this thread and the fact that as soon as there is any resistance to it, it prompts comments that you are either sensitive or 'hate men'. 

I'm not going to get into this (mainly because I'm hopelessly outnumbered and have done it, fruitlessly, before nearly a year ago) but I do wonder if Piggles et al actually behave like this with their wives, partners and daughters in the 'real' world.  I imagine not.

Back on topic: I'm not going to change my view supporting the theory that we'll back in the high 200's in the next 9 days.

oh yes, because me saying that my wifes 5 minutes can be anywhere from 2 mins to an hour is oh so sexist.

quick, call the waaaaaaaaaaahmbulance, someones feelings have been hurt.

That is literally all I said, you must really like playing the victim if you believe me casually saying "my wifes 5 mins can mean 2 mins or an hour" is something so sexist that you actually wonder if i say things like that in the real world.

Are you fuckin retarded?

[ShroomsKit]

And another big dump.
You can forget about the trend reversal. The dumpers will stop it for sure. Back to bear market.

[Hunyadi]

And another big dump.
You can forget about the trend reversal. The dumpers will stop it for sure. Back to bear market.

[octaft]

I have no idea why you talk about feminism but I'd like to say that it doesn't exist like amazons or matriarch society never existed.
It is just a fantasy. It's a way for men to materialize their fear of women.

You are afraid of women don't you ?
Especially their desire and sexual needs.

I'm pretty sure feminism is a real thing, considering there are plenty of women who call themselves feminists.

The rest is incoherent rambling that I can't figure out how you came up with. Are you saying because I'm willing to call a woman out when she's being an asshole, that somehow implies I hate or fear all women?

[JayJuanGee]

Not sure which version of Shroomskit I'm talking to but I think you know that's untrue; I hate the lazy, casual sexism that pervades this thread and the fact that as soon as there is any resistance to it, it prompts comments that you are either sensitive or 'hate men'.  

I'm not going to get into this (mainly because I'm hopelessly outnumbered and have done it, fruitlessly, before nearly a year ago) but I do wonder if Piggles et al actually behave like this with their wives, partners and daughters in the 'real' world.  I imagine not.

Back on topic: I'm not going to change my view supporting the theory that we'll back in the high 200's in the next 9 days.

I'd just add that it's a shame that it's called "feminISM" - any "-ism" implies ideology and dogma. I'd rather call it "being respectful of everyone and their individuality" but that doesn't market very well, does it? Nowadays we end up in a situation where often men can't be considered victims of sexism, sort of like white people can't be victims of racism. It's bullshit, but bullshit makes the flowers grow...

fuck off fag

Most likely Eris Discordia is female...  .. so female fag? 

[razorramon]

And another big dump.
You can forget about the trend reversal. The dumpers will stop it for sure. Back to bear market.

of course there are "dumps"/corrections/whatever we went up quite a lot after 10months downtrend...a lot of traders are still afraid...in both directions...that is why the orderbook between 350 and 390 is so thin at the moment...

[adaseb]

And another big dump.
You can forget about the trend reversal. The dumpers will stop it for sure. Back to bear market.

of course there are "dumps"/corrections/whatever we went up quite a lot after 10months downtrend...a lot of traders are still afraid...in both directions...that is why the orderbook between 350 and 390 is so thin at the moment...

its thin but most of the orders are hidden.

You need to check the volume instead, not the order book

[ShroomsKit]

And another big dump.
You can forget about the trend reversal. The dumpers will stop it for sure. Back to bear market.

of course there are "dumps"/corrections/whatever we went up quite a lot after 10months downtrend...a lot of traders are still afraid...in both directions...that is why the orderbook between 350 and 390 is so thin at the moment...

These dumps have been going on for months. It's the reason why we went down. Nothing has changed except short term hype which is dying out already.

[YogoH]

350 temp bot until we retry 395

Looks like we won't make it to 395 just quite yet. Looking for higher lows, but BTC swaps have gone even higher.  Current thin orderbook also makes me cautious.  If 364 holds, I will be more optimistic. Currently just holding coin.  

Edit: Also I think many of you aren't giving china enough credit.

[FNG]

Bitfinex spikes to a new high.  14,384 btc short


 

Going to be epic

[noobtrader]

real men dont do dump, real men eat wall....   

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[tarmi]

Bitfinex spikes to a new high.  14,384 btc short


 

Going to be epic

did to anyone occur that he who is opening those short knows what is he doing?

[YogoH]

Bitfinex spikes to a new high.  14,384 btc short


 

Going to be epic

did to anyone occur that he who is opening those short knows what is he doing?

Or maybe its not one person but a huge influx of noobs trying to short the demise of bitcoin after reading the bitcoin is dead headlines.  Only to be burned when the honey badger goes the way of most pain.