|
Dilla
|
 |
December 31, 2014, 07:05:01 PM |
|
Let's hope for some New Years fireworks. I haven't bought any real fireworks this year so Bitcoin taking off will replace that just fine.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:10:44 PM |
|
Disregard short squeeze. People are not incorrectly reading bad news as though it were good news like they normally do. Bring on the end of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
franckuestein
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1130
Truth will out!
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:12:21 PM |
|
Let's hope for some New Years fireworks. I haven't bought any real fireworks this year so Bitcoin taking off will replace that just fine. ~316$ now in some of the exchanges 
@Dilla, do you want a graphic like this one? hehe  Let's see where it goes price on the New Year's Eve |
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:14:38 PM |
|
This is going to get really ugly. Everybody, last chance to sell your bags and take the loss on your taxes. Let the government subsidize away your 1/3 of your gambling addiction.
|
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:19:54 PM |
|
It´s a pity that bitcoin economics aren´t applied to oil.
I´d love to see them expand operations until a barrel
fetches five bucks.
$20 has potential... $5 seems a little low. $52 now  |
|
|
|
|
|
Dilla
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:37:14 PM |
|
Lmao perfect |
|
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:40:01 PM |
|
It´s a pity that bitcoin economics aren´t applied to oil.
I´d love to see them expand operations until a barrel
fetches five bucks.
$20 has potential... $5 seems a little low. $52 now 5-year low is a promising start. But of course they´re offing themselves to hurt Russia and most of the rest of the current Axis of Evil.  |
|
|
|
|
|
indiemax
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:42:48 PM |
|
I'm sure Bitcoin will rise from the ashes but not enough people have been burnt yet |
|
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:49:30 PM |
|
not enough desperation we will drop
|
|
|
|
|
|
phoenix1
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:53:51 PM |
|
Disregard short squeeze. People are not incorrectly reading bad news as though it were good news like they normally do. Bring on the end of the world.
haha I was waiting for someone to try and spin this further delay and uncertainty surrounding the ETF as good news, but it seems not to be happening. I think they've spotted the snipers in the bushes |
|
|
|
|
Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
|
December 31, 2014, 07:57:39 PM |
|
Disregard short squeeze. People are not incorrectly reading bad news as though it were good news like they normally do. Bring on the end of the world.
haha I was waiting for someone to try and spin this further delay and uncertainty surrounding the ETF as good news, but it seems not to be happening. I think they've spotted the snipers in the bushes You sir are trying to do the spinning  |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2210
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
December 31, 2014, 08:00:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
phoenix1
|
|
December 31, 2014, 08:07:53 PM |
|
Disregard short squeeze. People are not incorrectly reading bad news as though it were good news like they normally do. Bring on the end of the world.
haha I was waiting for someone to try and spin this further delay and uncertainty surrounding the ETF as good news, but it seems not to be happening. I think they've spotted the snipers in the bushes You sir are trying to do the spinning No sir , just calling it how it is If I am spinning, please explain to me how further delay of something that people are eagerly anticipating for a boost in prices is positive. Clearly their last submission was not approved or they would not need to submit another one. Clearly this pushes back the timeline. At best it's neutral if you were not expecting an imminent launch. The whole news article was complete misrepresentation and omitted most of the facts. That is spinning ... or just piss poor journalism, probably the latter |
|
|
|
|
|
griffinriz
|
|
December 31, 2014, 08:09:03 PM |
|
we are going to 2xx  |
|
|
|
|
|
jertsy
|
|
December 31, 2014, 08:14:55 PM |
|
Disregard short squeeze. People are not incorrectly reading bad news as though it were good news like they normally do. Bring on the end of the world.
haha I was waiting for someone to try and spin this further delay and uncertainty surrounding the ETF as good news, but it seems not to be happening. I think they've spotted the snipers in the bushes You sir are trying to do the spinning No sir , just calling it how it is If I am spinning, please explain to me how further delay of something that people are eagerly anticipating for a boost in prices is positive. Clearly their last submission was not approved or they would not need to submit another one. Clearly this pushes back the timeline. At best it's neutral if you were not expecting an imminent launch. The whole news article was complete misrepresentation and omitted most of the facts. That is spinning ... or just piss poor journalism +1 I almost took the author's word for it. Thankfully others took the time to do some proper research. |
|
|
|
|
Chalkbot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 31, 2014, 08:21:25 PM |
|
we are going to 2xx There will also be party shrapnel. That's not nothing. |
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
December 31, 2014, 08:32:34 PM |
|
Disregard short squeeze. People are not incorrectly reading bad news as though it were good news like they normally do. Bring on the end of the world.
haha I was waiting for someone to try and spin this further delay and uncertainty surrounding the ETF as good news, but it seems not to be happening. I think they've spotted the snipers in the bushes You sir are trying to do the spinning No sir , just calling it how it is If I am spinning, please explain to me how further delay of something that people are eagerly anticipating for a boost in prices is positive. Clearly their last submission was not approved or they would not need to submit another one. Clearly this pushes back the timeline. At best it's neutral if you were not expecting an imminent launch. The whole news article was complete misrepresentation and omitted most of the facts. That is spinning ... or just piss poor journalism +1 I almost took the author's word for it. Thankfully others took the time to do some proper research. Bingo! There was a quick spike before people figured out what the news really was. Fortunately, nobody appears to have gotten caught too far out on that limb. |
|
|
|
|
cryyptc
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
#BITCOIN4LIFE
|
|
December 31, 2014, 08:33:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
akujin
|
|
December 31, 2014, 08:34:10 PM |
|
Bitcoin bull to the moon in 2015  Aww.. The poor bull thought he's finally going to the moon... He didn't know he wouldn't be able to put his helmet on  |
|
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
December 31, 2014, 08:34:42 PM |
|
please explain to me how further delay of something that people are eagerly anticipating for a boost in prices is positive. Clearly their last submission was not approved or they would not need to submit another one. Clearly this pushes back the timeline. At best it's neutral if you were not expecting an imminent launch. The whole news article was complete misrepresentation and omitted most of the facts. That is spinning ... or just piss poor journalism, probably the latter Here is a diff of this latest amended proposal (version 5) and the previous one (version 4): http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2qxgah/diff_of_the_newest_winklevoss_filing_here/They update some data about the state of bitcoin (e.g. adoption) and change the State where the fund is incorporated, from New York to Delaware. Would this change improve the chances of approval? The plan is still to trade the fund on NASDAQ anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
