Ethereum Mining NoDevFee 0% v15.0 🔥

[tesar]

anyone confirm 7.1 NoDevFee works with Claymore 9.7? does it detect NoDevFee 7.1? I am still on 9.5

[NikWing]

tesar, you're right, it's under 7.0 and I had to read twice until I saw it XD *so tired*

I currently try it using 9.7, no visible error messages yet

by the way, how do I notice stale shares with nanopool? If the number of shared mentioned there is the same as claymore reports, does it mean that there was no stale share?

it would be nice to add a workername (or if nodevfee it would use the same as the one set on claymore), but oh well

[pomak]

since you tested this nodevfee program it's safe to use, I guess?
I'm always a bit scared about included keylogger and such things, claymore's miner also is closed source (and I always thought stuff on github is open source haha XD)

the readme is a bit puzzling. in the video they suggest to add the port in the batch file (along with the wallet address)
the moment I started nodevfee with the port added to the command line it tried to add the bat file to the autostart folder ... this didn't happen when I 1st started it without the port

Don't worry, if the software has that kind of behaviors, it is detectable. Closed source program doesn't mean it can do whatever it wants. It communicates with your OS's environment and also with the internet. That means you can't know actually how it is implemented but you can detect what it does, how it interacts with the other elements.

[tesar]

tesar, you're right, it's under 7.0 and I had to read twice until I saw it XD *so tired*

I currently try it using 9.7, no visible error messages yet

by the way, how do I notice stale shares with nanopool? If the number of shared mentioned there is the same as claymore reports, does it mean that there was no stale share?

it would be nice to add a workername (or if nodevfee it would use the same as the one set on claymore), but oh well

I switched from nanopool to ethermine.. I dont remember seeing stale shares being reported on nanopool, not sure if they pay for stale shares like ethermine.

[doktor83]

tesar, you're right, it's under 7.0 and I had to read twice until I saw it XD *so tired*

I currently try it using 9.7, no visible error messages yet

by the way, how do I notice stale shares with nanopool? If the number of shared mentioned there is the same as claymore reports, does it mean that there was no stale share?

it would be nice to add a workername (or if nodevfee it would use the same as the one set on claymore), but oh well

I switched from nanopool to ethermine.. I dont remember seeing stale shares being reported on nanopool, not sure if they pay for stale shares like ethermine.

are you sure that ethermine still pays for stale shares?

[NikWing]

pomak, I guess you talk about wireshark and watching the program's traffic?

I'm kinda new to mining and still figuring out the best way, so I try to gain every bit of information I can get
google isn't always helpful
after reading some forum threads and mining websites, I decided to go to nanopool (and tested ethermine once only for a short time)

[chaxshet]

How to use this one? The read me is not that clear.

In the bat file, how can I add 2 wallets because Im using dual. And which to run first? Claymore's or this one?

[maxmad_x]

Since so many days I have been watching this dev creating this patch to redirect devfee to supposedly mining account. But the variability of hashrate and not being open source or even backed by any other dev makes it difficult for me to start

[Facinat]

How to use this one? The read me is not that clear.

In the bat file, how can I add 2 wallets because Im using dual. And which to run first? Claymore's or this one?

You only need the ETH wallet.

[chaxshet]

How to use this one? The read me is not that clear.

In the bat file, how can I add 2 wallets because Im using dual. And which to run first? Claymore's or this one?

You only need the ETH wallet.

Thanks

I experienced a bug. When I ran this patch, on the first two rounds it successfully redirected to my wallet. But on third devfee, it goes to dev wallet. Then after that, in my wallet again

[raumi29]

How did you check that?

[tesar]

tesar, you're right, it's under 7.0 and I had to read twice until I saw it XD *so tired*

I currently try it using 9.7, no visible error messages yet

by the way, how do I notice stale shares with nanopool? If the number of shared mentioned there is the same as claymore reports, does it mean that there was no stale share?

it would be nice to add a workername (or if nodevfee it would use the same as the one set on claymore), but oh well

I switched from nanopool to ethermine.. I dont remember seeing stale shares being reported on nanopool, not sure if they pay for stale shares like ethermine.

are you sure that ethermine still pays for stale shares?

Not really sure, read somewhere they did.

[tesar]

How to use this one? The read me is not that clear.

In the bat file, how can I add 2 wallets because Im using dual. And which to run first? Claymore's or this one?

You only need the ETH wallet.

Thanks

I experienced a bug. When I ran this patch, on the first two rounds it successfully redirected to my wallet. But on third devfee, it goes to dev wallet. Then after that, in my wallet again

If you are seeing message in the window, you can ignore that.. Devfee address is yours after the patch, that's what you change to yours

[chaxshet]

thanks for confirming guys.

But was it the difficulty of eth increased thats why its kind'a slow when I used the patch? Just have 270 jobs for 24hrs mining  for one 1060

[cryptday]

Hello guys !

i've read the whole thread and i would like to ask... which version is the best to use ? 7.1 or 5.5 ??
I'm using claymore 9.5 with 5.5 at the moment (not patched yet as i just read the last pages..) which works great except the shares that go to falcon's wallet as indicated ...

Is it worth updating to 9.7 with 7.1 ? Or maybe another combination ??
Thank you all and mostly to the guys who reverse engineered this "addon" and to falcon even if he should have told the whole truth...

[doktor83]

Hello guys !

i've read the whole thread and i would like to ask... which version is the best to use ? 7.1 or 5.5 ??
I'm using claymore 9.5 with 5.5 at the moment (not patched yet as i just read the last pages..) which works great except the shares that go to falcon's wallet as indicated ...

Is it worth updating to 9.7 with 7.1 ? Or maybe another combination ??
Thank you all and mostly to the guys who reverse engineered this "addon" and to falcon even if he should have told the whole truth...

Best would be not to use this at all, and go with one of the proxies, there are a few.

[tesar]

Hello guys !

i've read the whole thread and i would like to ask... which version is the best to use ? 7.1 or 5.5 ??
I'm using claymore 9.5 with 5.5 at the moment (not patched yet as i just read the last pages..) which works great except the shares that go to falcon's wallet as indicated ...

Is it worth updating to 9.7 with 7.1 ? Or maybe another combination ??
Thank you all and mostly to the guys who reverse engineered this "addon" and to falcon even if he should have told the whole truth...

Am using 9.7 with 7.1 no issues.. 9.7 improved hashrates for nvidia, probably Claymore got free ride improvements from ethminer..

[tesar]

Hello guys !

i've read the whole thread and i would like to ask... which version is the best to use ? 7.1 or 5.5 ??
I'm using claymore 9.5 with 5.5 at the moment (not patched yet as i just read the last pages..) which works great except the shares that go to falcon's wallet as indicated ...

Is it worth updating to 9.7 with 7.1 ? Or maybe another combination ??
Thank you all and mostly to the guys who reverse engineered this "addon" and to falcon even if he should have told the whole truth...

Best would be not to use this at all, and go with one of the proxies, there are a few.

I used python proxy for few days, it worked but too many stale shares, that made my effective rate worse than DevFee

[cryptday]

All my cards are AMD at the moment.. i'm just asking for :

1) Claymore version 9.6 or 9.7 for possible detection of noDevFee ..
2) NoDevFee version 7.1 .. if it's better than 5.5, what's changed ? Is it better ? Does it worth updating ?

I still have to patch it though..
What about stale shares using a proxy ?? Anybody has more experience on that ?

Thank you all guys !

[xxcsu]

All of you who is playing with this bs , mostly novice users, members, probably lost more shares in the past few months than claymore taking away from you with his 1% fee !!!
You probably already lost a lot of shares
You probably already lost some hashpower
You probably generated a lot of stale shares
You probably get unstable pool side reported average hashrate
You probably get some trouble to use RDP ,Radmin, TeamViewer or any remote access software ...
Definitely you lost some $ if you are a long term user of this cheat , crack , hack ...whatever you calling it ...

WHY ARE U GUYS DEALING WITH SOMETHING LIKE THIS ? Do you think its worth it ?

In the beginning he probably was stealing more than what he takes away from u now , he might cut back his "earning" after a few ppl started to found out whats going on

Im a kind of person who like to try new things ... No , not because i dont want to pay that 1% fee for claymore for his job , bc members on this this forum need to know who is the possible scammer. so i give a try for this patch , hack , crack , bypass ... whatever you calling this, just like i did last time with another smart guy , who tried to do the same thing before , but at least he asked for a money ahead , and was not stealing mined income from miners
There is my own experience with this bs ... It might work for you ,but not for me ... you can decide for yourself. I run a little bit more than 48 hours this test with this cheat and there is my results ...

AND NO I DID NOT GET THIS GRAPH FROM ANOTHER TOPIC , THIS IS MY OWN GRAPH FROM ETHERMINE.ORG with a little bit over 48 hours run

the topic OP said a few times his software can really benefit larger miners with 50-100 GPU , so i decided to try this and used around 50 GPU for this test run