Bitcoin Forum
December 18, 2017, 11:16:10 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
  Print  
Author Topic: BITSTAMP eXchange wall Observer. second biggest and best exchange  (Read 88661 times)
dserrano5
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1848



View Profile
October 13, 2013, 07:36:33 PM
 #481

And then you will buy or sell?

I'll laugh. Laugh out loud.

1513595770
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513595770

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513595770
Reply with quote  #2

1513595770
Report to moderator
1513595770
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513595770

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513595770
Reply with quote  #2

1513595770
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
joesmoe2012
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756


Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2013, 11:33:31 PM
 #482

Is there something like Goxtool for bitstamp?


Wary
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798


Who's there?


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 01:23:51 AM
 #483

Most chinese exchanges have zero fee.

That boosts their volume artificially.

How exactly do they make money, then? When they said 0 fee, I sorta assumed they artificially induced spread or something.

Maybe they use the additional information they have compared to the other market participants to their advantage.

Maybe they are doing arbitrage with Western exchanges.

Fairplay medal of dnaleor's trading simulator. Smiley
derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 02:20:58 AM
 #484

Bitstamp entering full fledged rally mode... prepare for takeoff?

FNG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 02:28:39 AM
 #485

 Grin

SecondMarket buying more?  Buyers are relentless
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 02:38:28 AM
 #486

It's this US govt shutdown/anxiety.. I'm telling ya.  Prob continue til something comes of it, then it'll be interesting what happens.
bobdude17
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 455



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 02:50:13 AM
 #487

Stampede!

Nice. That should be thing.
pand70
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 04:34:03 AM
 #488

Someone is trying to get rid of around 500 BTC above 135. He is very carefull and half way through...

SheHadMANHands
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 04:44:46 AM
 #489

lulz, some spaz tard just market sold ~300 btc into nothing, selling as low as $132 in the process (already back at $136).
pand70
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 04:52:12 AM
 #490

Well i think we should expect some pressure all the way down to 130.

derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 04:58:03 AM
 #491

Well i think we should expect some pressure all the way down to 130.

In English plrease?
SheHadMANHands
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 05:01:28 AM
 #492

Well i think we should expect some pressure all the way down to 130.

If Gox stays stable where it is, very doubtful.  Also, btcchina would indicate otherwise, though that may change...
Erdogan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 10:22:14 AM
 #493

It's this US govt shutdown/anxiety.. I'm telling ya.  Prob continue til something comes of it, then it'll be interesting what happens.

Nope, it's china. Shutdown, debt limit and sequester part 2, that is for december. Yummy.

derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 02:36:43 PM
 #494

Coins flooding in to Bitstamp? Asks back up and pushing toward 18k, from a low of 13k.

Now going to 19k.. Bid/Ask back under $100.
TERA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 05:55:38 PM
 #495

In order for the price move to be substantiated, there needs to be volume and this requires asks filling in.  19k (now 17k) is actually still low for stamp. It was 24k for a while.
oda.krell
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 06:05:15 PM
 #496

Here's the problem with volume analysis: there's now definitive way of knowing if some trade contributing to the volume is between two parties that both previously held btc (i.e. "trading back-and-forth"), or whether at least one party will buy btc for the first time (or in substantially higher quantities than before). The latter case is what we really want (and need), it's the "fresh money" that is necessary in the argument that says: price can only be sustained/go up if X amount of USD enter the market each month. Since from the outside there is no way of telling which of the cases applies, I'm extremely sceptical about arguments based on volume and price sustainability based on volume.

Not sure which Bitcoin wallet to use? I suggest to take a look at Electrum.
Electrum is an open-source lightweight client: user friendly, fast, and one of the safest ways to store, send or receive bitcoins.
For executables (Windows, OSX, Linux, Android), source code and documentation, see the Electrum homepage.
notme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 06:09:53 PM
 #497

Here's the problem with volume analysis: there's now definitive way of knowing if some trade contributing to the volume is between two parties that both previously held btc (i.e. "trading back-and-forth"), or whether at least one party will buy btc for the first time (or in substantially higher quantities than before). The latter case is what we really want (and need), it's the "fresh money" that is necessary in the argument that says: price can only be sustained/go up if X amount of USD enter the market each month. Since from the outside there is no way of telling which of the cases applies, I'm extremely sceptical about arguments based on volume and price sustainability based on volume.

It doesn't matter as much as you might think.  It's all about outstanding positions, not whether it is your 1st position in btc, or your 1000th.

https://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
While no idea is perfect, some ideas are useful.
12jh3odyAAaR2XedPKZNCR4X4sebuotQzN
oda.krell
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 06:36:39 PM
 #498

I guess we disagree on this question, then. For the overall size of the market, and as a result, for overall buying pressure, it matters a lot whether new participants enter, or whether the same ones trade back and forth.

Not sure which Bitcoin wallet to use? I suggest to take a look at Electrum.
Electrum is an open-source lightweight client: user friendly, fast, and one of the safest ways to store, send or receive bitcoins.
For executables (Windows, OSX, Linux, Android), source code and documentation, see the Electrum homepage.
thoughtfan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602

thoughtfanwritesstuff.wordpress.com


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 07:21:30 PM
 #499

I guess we disagree on this question, then. For the overall size of the market, and as a result, for overall buying pressure, it matters a lot whether new participants enter, or whether the same ones trade back and forth.

What's the difference between an old-time bitcoiner adding a fresh $1,000 worth of bitcoin to his porfolio/trading account than a new person coming along with $1,000?

Please disregard Litecoin and Zcash badges to the left. I have just gathered they are an April fool's joke!
Chalkbot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 891



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 07:25:17 PM
 #500

I guess we disagree on this question, then. For the overall size of the market, and as a result, for overall buying pressure, it matters a lot whether new participants enter, or whether the same ones trade back and forth.

What's the difference between an old-time bitcoiner adding a fresh $1,000 worth of bitcoin to his porfolio/trading account than a new person coming along with $1,000?

That wasn't the specific distinction he was trying to make. He was trying to illustrate that two parties with a vested interest in pumping the volume on the exchange, could trade back and forth for minimal fees, to create the appearance of a robust market.

Feel free to correct me oda.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!