|
brubic
|
 |
April 30, 2017, 10:12:01 AM |
|
There are already 4 coins on the balance of the pool, but not in the wallet.
I received the receipt address in my wallet, he was indicated in the miner.
Did I do it right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
metamorphin
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
No risk, no fun!
|
|
April 30, 2017, 10:25:03 AM |
|
There are already 4 coins on the balance of the pool, but not in the wallet.
I received the receipt address in my wallet, he was indicated in the miner.
Did I do it right?
Dont forget, its like bitcoin...u need 101 confirmations till maturating... Greetz Steve |
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
April 30, 2017, 11:19:53 AM |
|
Here's another Pool: https://btx.suprnova.ccHowever - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos. Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well. However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already. In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken. |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
ivan1975
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1168
|
|
April 30, 2017, 11:26:25 AM |
|
Here's another Pool: https://btx.suprnova.ccHowever - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos. Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well. However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already. In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken. Thanks. Start mining there. |
|
|
|
|
Cra5t
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 1
|
|
April 30, 2017, 12:06:16 PM |
|
Any news about amd gpu miner?
|
|
|
|
|
|
cptfisher
|
|
April 30, 2017, 12:17:13 PM |
|
sg miner is already out for ati ... but i cant connect to ocminer pool with it... to other pool yes
|
|
|
|
|
Limx Dev (OP)
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1348
|
|
April 30, 2017, 12:25:07 PM |
|
List of Pools for Timetravel10Singlepool Timetravel10 ▌suprnova.cc l last check ▌passed (Webmaster: ocminer)
▌Coinspool.cu.cc l last check ▌passed (Webmaster: elbandi)
https://btx.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=gettingstarted
STRATUM: stratum+tcp://btx.suprnova.cc
PORT:3629
Username: Weblogin.Worker
Password: Worker Password Username: your wallet address Password: anything Algo: timetravel10
Example: minerd -a timetravel10 -o stratum+tcp://coinspool.cu.cc:3055 -u 1DKAo1HYr7zXLSvvgDvz9VMbCEQmSGLzvp -p t
URL (VarDiff between 0.0002 and 32) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3052
URL (VarDiff between 0.002 and 32) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3053
URL (VarDiff between 0.02 and 128) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3054
URL (VarDiff between 0.1 and 128) stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3055
|
Bitcore BTX - a UTXO fork of Bitcoin - since 2017 |
|
|
Limx Dev (OP)
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1348
|
|
April 30, 2017, 12:26:36 PM |
|
Jon has just test the first payout. http://claim.bitcore.cc/payout.phpKind Regards Christian P.S. Thank you Jon for your hard work. |
Bitcore BTX - a UTXO fork of Bitcoin - since 2017 |
|
|
|
Vaccinus
|
|
April 30, 2017, 12:30:17 PM |
|
Here's another Pool: https://btx.suprnova.ccHowever - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos. Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well. However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already. In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken. ah that's why con coinpool was showing all the time like 60% or that was just a bad estimate of the pool? for now my 1070 is at 16MH each one, is this correct? |
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
April 30, 2017, 12:45:49 PM |
|
Here's another Pool: https://btx.suprnova.ccHowever - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos. Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well. However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already. In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken. ah that's why con coinpool was showing all the time like 60% or that was just a bad estimate of the pool? for now my 1070 is at 16MH each one, is this correct? no, actually gtx1070=8Mh |
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
marco89
Member
Offline
Activity: 157
Merit: 10
|
|
April 30, 2017, 12:58:33 PM |
|
Here's another Pool:
Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well.
Cuda error in func 'qubit_luffa512_cpu_init' at line 455 : invalid device symbol. still getting this error from 2 days. and you say the only problem in ccminer is displaying correct hashrate? |
BTC: 1NCJRUoVo1L1SV4kJDk5e9Ai67ZufEbFnw
|
|
|
|
spiz0r
|
|
April 30, 2017, 01:04:09 PM |
|
I am getting really bad hash rates for AMD rx 480 (around 100 khash/ss). My I7 CPU gives over 300 khash/s.
Is it really that slow?
|
|
|
|
kondiomir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1000
Twitter @Acimirov
|
|
April 30, 2017, 01:17:04 PM |
|
Any settings for AMD Sgminer ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr_Victor
|
|
April 30, 2017, 01:21:27 PM |
|
I am getting really bad hash rates for AMD rx 480 (around 100 khash/ss). My I7 CPU gives over 300 khash/s.
Is it really that slow?
My r9 280x has 4Mh |
yobit.net is banned from signatures
|
|
|
|
levelten
|
|
April 30, 2017, 01:25:46 PM |
|
I am getting really bad hash rates for AMD rx 480 (around 100 khash/ss). My I7 CPU gives over 300 khash/s.
Is it really that slow?
My r9 280x has 4Mh What is your setting? If you don't mind sharing. |
|
|
|
|
ParmaBTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1002
|
|
April 30, 2017, 01:58:29 PM |
|
How is the price going on cryptopia?
|
|
|
|
|
boo50
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 472
Merit: 250
lux8.net
|
|
April 30, 2017, 02:08:34 PM |
|
no, actually gtx1070=8Mh
suprnova show 50 for 4x1070 OC'd coinspool show around 30 miner show 66Mh but avrg btx/day almost the same on both. |
|
|
|
|
antaja
|
|
April 30, 2017, 02:10:00 PM |
|
Here's another Pool: https://btx.suprnova.ccHowever - the displayed hashrate in the current ccminer version is too high, it's correct on the poolside though. the modified ccminer misses a modification of the hashrate calculation since the old timetravel algo only hashes with 8 possible variations of hashes (and is therefore faster) and this algo hashes with 10 algos. Once I have some time I'll modify ccminer so it'll display the correct hashrate as well. However payouts, statistics/calculations etc. should all reflect the correct values already. In short: The pool shows the correct hashrate, ccminer is broken. my amd miner shows 12mh but only 4mh shown on pool |
|
|
|
|
|
brubic
|
|
April 30, 2017, 02:13:47 PM |
|
Show how the settings sgminer for the suprnova
|
|
|
|
|
haveaniceday
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
April 30, 2017, 02:22:23 PM |
|
What happens if not many people claim their Bitcoin? Do Devs take all the unclaimed?
I wonder if private keys for BTC can be reused for BTX. Is it not possible because hash algo was changed?
Anyways if we could reuse private key, we do not need to worry about ownership or thinking its significantly premined coin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
