|
elbandi
|
 |
September 15, 2020, 01:45:44 AM |
|
so the blocks it said I found were wrong or right? and do i need to change something?
edit - the miner is running more smoothly now but i am still curious about all those blocks it said i found - I stopped counting after 35 or so. though the miner says i am running at about 25 mh/s and the pool says 1.6 mh/s
for example i am getting this scrolling repeatedly
now its acting all goofy again - not sure if its the pool or the miner. but going to give it a break for a few days and see if any new updates come out.
we already found a block. the pool hashrate display was buggy. i tested with my pc, and displays same as the miner. i dont know, why shows many foundblocks for you.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
MoparMiningLLC
aka Stryfe
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 2058
Merit: 2201
EIN: 82-3893490
|
|
September 15, 2020, 02:36:19 AM |
|
so the blocks it said I found were wrong or right? and do i need to change something?
edit - the miner is running more smoothly now but i am still curious about all those blocks it said i found - I stopped counting after 35 or so. though the miner says i am running at about 25 mh/s and the pool says 1.6 mh/s
for example i am getting this scrolling repeatedly
now its acting all goofy again - not sure if its the pool or the miner. but going to give it a break for a few days and see if any new updates come out.
we already found a block. the pool hashrate display was buggy. i tested with my pc, and displays same as the miner. i dont know, why shows many foundblocks for you. not sure but it started tossing up errors about diff too low and rejecting all the shares. what miner are you using? I was using wildrig |
|
|
|
andrucrypt
Member
 Offline
Activity: 719
Merit: 49
|
|
September 15, 2020, 09:15:00 AM |
|
so the blocks it said I found were wrong or right? and do i need to change something?
Probably this is some error in miner, or too high mem overclock on gpu. Also this can be with nvidia gpu's, since this kind of algorithms are not well done in miner yet and need some additional work. |
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
September 15, 2020, 06:06:00 PM |
|
For me mining with WildRig Multi 0.26.0 works well. But it is not enough profitable at current level of network hashrate and BTX price.
ETH mining gives about 1.5 times more than BTX mining.
My config is 8 x GTX1070 and I get about 15-16 Mh/s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
andrucrypt
Member
Offline
Activity: 719
Merit: 49
|
|
September 15, 2020, 06:11:30 PM |
|
For me mining with WildRig Multi 0.26.0 works well. But it is not enough profitable at current level of network hashrate and BTX price.
ETH mining gives about 1.5 times more than BTX mining.
My config is 8 x GTX1070 and I get about 15-16 Mh/s.
yeah, unfortunately miner not yet fully optimized for NVIDIA gpu's. Hashrate should be at least twice higher, so it will be comparable to values on AMD gpu's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MoparMiningLLC
aka Stryfe
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2058
Merit: 2201
EIN: 82-3893490
|
|
September 16, 2020, 02:51:59 AM
Last edit: September 16, 2020, 03:03:38 AM by MoparMiningLLC |
|
well have been using this miner - so far pool has found 4 blocks during that time (5 total but 1 I assume is the one from yesterday) - though not sure how to see what I have earned though as it still says my balance is zero - guessing maybe have to wait till its confirmed? the site could use some better stats or a way to look up a miners stats if they are not currently mining. edit - I do see in the pending blocks that it shows my miner as the finder of the first, third and fourth blocks as well (I used 2 different addresses) |
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
September 16, 2020, 03:05:11 AM |
|
Daily income calculator should be corrected. Indeed total Block reward is 1.5625 but only a half goes to PoW miners (0.78125 BTX). So divide forecasted income by two. Also there is often connection error Stratum connection interrupted |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
MoparMiningLLC
aka Stryfe
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2058
Merit: 2201
EIN: 82-3893490
|
|
September 16, 2020, 03:14:07 AM |
|
Daily income calculator should be corrected. Indeed total Block reward is 1.5625 but only a half goes to PoW miners (0.78125 BTX). So divide forecasted income by two. Also there is often connection error Stratum connection interrupted yes I agree on both of those points. I was like wait a minute, the block reward increased? lol and I am seeing those errors too. but I dont know of any other pools that are using the new algo for bitcore. |
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
September 16, 2020, 03:24:24 AM |
|
yes I agree on both of those points. I was like wait a minute, the block reward increased? lol and I am seeing those errors too. but I dont know of any other pools that are using the new algo for bitcore.
Look at https://pool.rplant.xyz/but Nvidia miner is much slower for this pool (My config gives 15 Mh/s at rplant vs. 25 Mh/s at coinspool) |
|
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone. |
|
|
MoparMiningLLC
aka Stryfe
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2058
Merit: 2201
EIN: 82-3893490
|
|
September 16, 2020, 03:58:31 AM |
|
yes I agree on both of those points. I was like wait a minute, the block reward increased? lol and I am seeing those errors too. but I dont know of any other pools that are using the new algo for bitcore.
Look at https://pool.rplant.xyz/but Nvidia miner is much slower for this pool (My config gives 15 Mh/s at rplant vs. 25 Mh/s at coinspool) well that would not be worth it. really need to get the miners optimized that is for sure. as time goes by, that should hopefully be rectified. |
|
|
|
|
minerja
|
|
September 16, 2020, 07:13:06 AM |
|
Hi guys,
Am i missing something here?
I thought the algo change was to go back to cpu/gpu mining, but i cant see a standalone cpu miner anywhere?
Does anyone know of one?
Pretty pointless change otherwise, cos no way you can make anything mining in the wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
MoparMiningLLC
aka Stryfe
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2058
Merit: 2201
EIN: 82-3893490
|
|
September 16, 2020, 10:32:35 AM |
|
Hi guys,
Am i missing something here?
I thought the algo change was to go back to cpu/gpu mining, but i cant see a standalone cpu miner anywhere?
Does anyone know of one?
Pretty pointless change otherwise, cos no way you can make anything mining in the wallet.
yea mining from the wallet has netted me only 8 blocks so far in 12 days - i found 3 blocks for the pool in a few hours. |
|
|
|
|
pinpins
|
|
September 17, 2020, 06:00:18 AM |
|
 You can mine BitCore at autoexchange mining pool Zergpool.com at 0.5% fee. Please use following commands for different mining options Option 1 Auto coin switch mining by profitability within algorithm with autoexchange to specified coin wallet(BTC in example below) -o stratum+tcp://megabtx.mine.zergpool.com:3557 -u <YOURBTCWALLET> -p c=BTC Direct coin mining with payout to coin wallet -o stratum+tcp://megabtx.mine.zergpool.com:3557 -u <YOURBTXWALLET> -p c=BTX,mc=BTX Direct coin mining with autoexchange to specified coin wallet(BTC in example below) -o stratum+tcp://megabtx.mine.zergpool.com:3557 -u <YOURBTCWALLET> -p c=BTC,mc=BTX Please note mc stands for mining coin symbol, c stand for payout coin symbol SOLO and PARTY mining Set m=solo, or m=party.YourPartyPassword to your password field to use this feature. No extra fees. Autoexchange to BTC, LTC, DASH, BCH, DOGE or any other currency we mine Happy mining, cheers pinpin |
|
|
|
|
MoparMiningLLC
aka Stryfe
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2058
Merit: 2201
EIN: 82-3893490
|
|
September 17, 2020, 04:02:18 PM |
|
I guess the hard part is the wait - takes like 2 weeks to get the rewards lol and the value is very low - quite often I cannot even locate a value as there is no volume trading - unless I am looking at all the wrong exchanges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MoparMiningLLC
aka Stryfe
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2058
Merit: 2201
EIN: 82-3893490
|
|
September 18, 2020, 02:54:33 PM |
|
now if we can get some optimized miners that would be great
|
|
|
|
webhead
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 123
Merit: 0
|
|
September 20, 2020, 10:44:46 PM |
|
i got the qt wallet and theres no receive address what can i do i go into receive and its just empty had do i make one can someone help cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
MoparMiningLLC
aka Stryfe
Legendary
Online
Activity: 2058
Merit: 2201
EIN: 82-3893490
|
|
September 21, 2020, 12:14:10 AM |
|
man hit a lot of blocks on zerg but even after 3 days the rewards are not even half way confirmed.... 1818 of 4032
and on coinspool - I hit their first block 6 days ago and its at 3515/4032 - it should not take a week or longer to get block rewards.
|
|
|
|
|
elbandi
|
|
September 22, 2020, 02:18:24 PM |
|
man hit a lot of blocks on zerg but even after 3 days the rewards are not even half way confirmed.... 1818 of 4032
and on coinspool - I hit their first block 6 days ago and its at 3515/4032 - it should not take a week or longer to get block rewards.
Daily found blocks are ~550 blocks, so 4032/550=7days -> block maturity is almost 7 days. if you have problem with this, ask the devs to lower this. |
|
|
|
|
|
