BitcoinWisdom.com - Live Bitcoin/LiteCoin Charts

[namzycad3]

using google chrome here, i only can randomly get it load up once in a few F5 in a min. sometime i leave it there for hours but still come back nothing, is there something i need to configure ?

[nahtnam]

Nice work... Do you support different exchanges?

[annette786]

Would be great to have 24-hour volume for each site.

[annette786]

Would be great to have 24-hour volume for each site.

Better yet-- display the volume for each time period as it's selected.

[Falkvinge]

BUG: Depth chart has a off-by-one error.

I positively love bitcoinwisdom and it has become the standard image on one of my screens. However, there's a bug in the order depth book I thought I'd highlight.

If you look at the bid order book in the bottom right, you'll find how many BTC are needed to transact to break a certain price, right? So if we see "141.0 605", that means 605 BTC must be sold for the price to break 141 USD. This is correct behavior.

However, in the ask order book, there's an off-by-one error. The first entry with a last transaction of 141.88 currently reads "141.5 348", and that's with a lowest ask of 141.87999. The 141.5 label, I guess, should have read 142.0 - the label above. For the ask order book, the BTC count consistently refers to the label to the left and one step above it.

There's an off-by-one error. Just thought I'd say.

Again, thank you for this great visualization tool!

Cheers,
Rick

[BitcoinWisdom]

BUG: Depth chart has a off-by-one error.

I positively love bitcoinwisdom and it has become the standard image on one of my screens. However, there's a bug in the order depth book I thought I'd highlight.

If you look at the bid order book in the bottom right, you'll find how many BTC are needed to transact to break a certain price, right? So if we see "141.0 605", that means 605 BTC must be sold for the price to break 141 USD. This is correct behavior.

However, in the ask order book, there's an off-by-one error. The first entry with a last transaction of 141.88 currently reads "141.5 348", and that's with a lowest ask of 141.87999. The 141.5 label, I guess, should have read 142.0 - the label above. For the ask order book, the BTC count consistently refers to the label to the left and one step above it.

There's an off-by-one error. Just thought I'd say.

Again, thank you for this great visualization tool!

Cheers,
Rick

for asks: 100.5 500, it means  there are 500 BTC in the range [100.5, 101), if user bought 500 BTC then it will reach 101.
So the 100.8 belongs to group 100.5.
for bids: 100.5 500, it still means there are 500 BTC in the range [100.5, 101), if user sell 500 BTC then it will break 100.5.

The order is read as the each number move up 50% line-height.
Eg:
Asks
103 8
100 5
Bids
100 5
97 8

It will be read as
Asks:
103.5 (imaged)
  | ----8
103
100.5 (imaged)
  | ----5
100
Bids:
100.5 (imaged)
  | -- 5
100
97.5 (imaged)
 | -- 5
97

If change it to the your solution. it would be
Asks:
103.5
  | --- 8
103 (imaged)
100.5
  | --- 5
100 (imaged)
Bids:
100.5 (imaged)
  | -- 5
100
97.5 (imaged)
 | -- 5
97

Both of the solutions have there own advantage, so it won't be changed.

[letcore]

Hi,

I'll pay 0.01 BTC for a login to remove the ad.

Thanks,
John

[Tamis]

Great work ! My #1 chart especially for bitstamp.

[cet]

I really love the difficulty analysis and difficulty history charts!

/cet

[knox2000]

Hi,

I'll pay 0.01 BTC for a login to remove the ad.

Thanks,
John

Me too.

[bitcoin44me]

Yes, that would be a nice feature to get a premium membership without ads
I have no idea how much money comes from ads, but it should be possible to implement it.

[Falkvinge]

Both of the solutions have there own advantage, so it won't be changed.

Thank you for taking the time to write such an elaborate explanation! While I would still prefer the "distance-to-price" readout style, I understand the thinking much better now.

Thank you again for the site, too!

Cheers,
Rick

[rbdrbd]

Please consider adding btc-e prices for PPC, as it is the 3rd largest coin and btc-e is the largest market for it.

[ewibit]

add PPC and Zetacoin 

[mhps]

Would be nice to have PPC added.

[Eternity]

Looks great

[knox2000]

Thanks for adding the possibility to remove the ads with a premium account. Very good implemented, very fast activation.

[BitcoinWisdom]

Thanks for adding the possibility to remove the ads with a premium account. Very good implemented, very fast activation.

Thank you!

[BitcoinWisdom]

Please consider adding btc-e prices for PPC, as it is the 3rd largest coin and btc-e is the largest market for it.

BTC-e PPC/BTC is added. http://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/btce/ppcbtc

[oda.krell]

Just came here to say thank you for your fantastic website. Great design and functionality, and it was one of the very few ones that held up well during the latest flash crash -- I hope that wasn't just because of a lack of visitors :P Anyway, going to make my first donation in a moment.

Two, rather minor, feature requests, maybe consider them if you have some time to spare:

1) I regularly have to use bitcoinwisdom on a pretty small screen, when I'm on my netbook because I have to be mobile. It seems that the maximum history (i.e. max number of candles on the screen) shown in the most zoomed out state depends on the resolution of my computer. On my really small screen, that max number of candles is really quite low (e.g. the 15 min view doesn't even cover the past 24 hours). Is there any chance you could *slightly* increase the max no. of candles value (if I am right about that it depends on screen resolution)? Maybe 50% higher? I know, candles would become pretty small, but nobody would be forced to zoom out that far -- it's just that I simply *can't* zoom out any further, and would like to see more history at once.

2) the price graph settings I usually use are candles, but I like to look at *median* price as well for some of my trading decisions. Right now the "line" setting seems to be closing price, which is a bit useless. Any chance you could have the line display median price? Or even better (but that's probably getting too much work), chose what is displayed when chosing line: closing price, median price, or VWAP. That'd be utopia :P