Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed

[CucakRowo]

Plagiarism (Thanks to @jawhead999) :

User : skiphendri6661

Bisnis Bitcoin adalah salah satu bisnis cryptocurrency yang cukup populer di kalangan investor saat ini. Kata bitcoin itu sendiri harus sangat familiar untuk didengar dan kebanyakan orang sudah mengerti bahwa bitcoin adalah uang elektronik yang memiliki nilai tukar dan penjualan yang cukup menjanjikan.
Jumlah penggemar baru di dunia bisnis bitcoin kemudian membuka peluang bagi pemula untuk belajar perdagangan cryptocurrency yang juga membuka peluang untuk meningkatkan nilai aset bitcoin.

Original Source :
Bisnis Bitcoin merupakan salah satu bisnis cryptocurrency yang cukup populer di kalangan investor kekinian. Kata bitcoin sendiri pasti sangat familiar didengar dan sebagian besar kalangan sudah cukup paham bitcoin merupakan uang elektronik yang memiliki nilai tukar dan jual yang cukup menjanjikan.....

[1714570610]

1714570610

[1714570610]

1714570610

[1714570610]

1714570610

[1714570610]

1714570610

[nutildah]

Didn't CH post the same (DRK scam proof links list) many times, warning of the instamine scam, but only forgot the link to the list in a couple of them?

I think he linked to the same proof a bunch of times, but only missed the link in a couple of them? No?

Either way... It's not as egregious as word spinning (lauda).. CH just posted a list of links with "plagerized" descriptions/headlines of the links..

If CH deserves a ban for posting proof links, the word spinners deserve 2X+ the same ban, easy..

Posting a kindof well know list doesn't seem to involve deception, especially along with unique text on topic of the list..

Word spinning, on the other hand, shows deception.. Shows that they knew it was plagiarism, and were trying to get away with it, to hide it..


For any that don't know or remember, these plagerism accusations came against CH a long time ago as an attack in retaliation for speaking out as the status quo.. And failed... So keep that in mind also..

First of all, I'm not talking about the numbered list. I specifically said that instance wasn't plagiarism. I'm talking about the second example which is word-for-word copying another person's post and passing it off as their own work.

Second of all, regardless of the motives behind why somebody reported plagiarism, plagiarism is still plagiarism. Doesn't matter what you think is more "egregious" as this isn't a contest -- if somebody copies the work of another verbatim and doesn't attribute the source to it, that is plagiarism.

[muslol67]

Lauda was someone who had a mark in the forum, even if it was an unnecessary person.

The forum will be a better place when the managers do what it takes. A member with thousands of posts will no longer be here, but at the same time, the forum will be free from a racist, hateful, disrespectful person. We know very well why those who defend Lauda. In fact, what is written here gives us an idea of what everyone is.

I think we should all be quiet and respectfully waiting for managers to do their jobs.

By the way, I would like to quote this post, which is a valuable comment for me;

Lauda needs to be permanently banned just to improve the community. Never seen a more horrible person on a forum before.

[peloso]

We know very well why those who defend Lauda.

Here they are. Lauda's fan club and inner circle.

it seems lauda's trust list)

i recognised even marlboroza and vod)))

[Balthazar]

it seems lauda's trust list)

Oh that's a deep mutual understanding for sure. No doubt they're filling a trust list every day.

[Rikafip]

User cjsummers82 wakes up few days ago after 1 year break, and starts c/p posts. Might be hacked or sold account

Post made by @noorman0

You shouldn't stop here to do your own research. Anyone and even a member with a good reputation can be fooled one day. You also need to learn how future project prospects are, even if you believe the project is safe from potential scams.
So far, Hhampuz hasn't stated that this is his project. I don't think Hhampuz will be fully responsible for your losses

https://archive.fo/EIbc6

Post made by @cjsummers82 few hours later

You shouldn't stop here to do your own research. Anyone and even a member with a good reputation can be fooled one day. You also need to learn how future project prospects are, even if you believe the project is safe from potential scams.
So far, Hhampuz hasn't stated that this is his project. I don't think Hhampuz will be fully responsible for your losses.

https://archive.fo/EIbc6


Another example of his plagiarism:

Original post made by @Time Teller

If Hhampuz posted a project here, it means he accepted the job of posting the project on behalf of the team because he believes that this is a legit project.
Reputable BMs usually don't accept the job of representing a project unless he is truly convinced with the intentions of the project.
So let's see if this will really be indeed a good project to watch out for or not...

https://archive.fo/EIbc6

Ad his c/p in totally unrelated thread

If Hhampuz posted a project here, it means he accepted the job of posting the project on behalf of the team because he believes that this is a legit project.
Reputable BMs usually don't accept the job of representing a project unless he is truly convinced with the intentions of the project.
So let's see if this will really be indeed a good project to watch out for or not...

https://archive.vn/q7OAZ


Another suspicious activity is that he sent 1 merit for this redundant post made in Hebrew part of the forum. Might be merit sale, or sending to his alt, as that acount has been tagged for making fake ANN thread infected with malware.

Hi, Guys

https://archive.fo/8j8Vp

[Mbitr]

Sorry first time I’ve reported plagiarism - probably not the correct format 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251631.new#new

[Lafu]

Sorry first time I’ve reported plagiarism - probably not the correct format 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251631.new#new

You should post in here like you have done it in the other thread !

Thread : For what purpose do banks create their own cryptocurrencies?

User (that has done the copy and paste) : pmedia

Plagiarized

Already at least several commercial banks have created their own cryptocurrencies. Some investment funds invest part of their assets in selected cryptocurrencies. Recently, the investment bank JP Morgan has created its own cryptocurrency JPM Coin. Cryptocurrency JPM Coin will be used to settle initially a small part of the transaction, which JP Morgan performs on a daily basis for a total of about USD 6 billion.
Thanks to JPM Coin, settlements between business partners should take place immediately, ie much faster than the current standards of transfers. However, apart from accelerating the time of the transaction, what are the other goals for banks to introduce their own cryptocurrencies?
Could investment banks create a new type of collateral for transactions in the event of a possible strong loss of the USD dollar in the event of another global financial crisis connected with the currency crisis? Such a risk exists if the problem of growing public debt in the US is not resolved and banks in China cease to buy US Treasury bonds.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
For what purpose do banks create their own cryptocurrencies?

Perhaps the question should read - To what purpose do people plagiarise others work?

https://www.researchgate.net/post/For_what_purpose_do_banks_create_their_own_cryptocurrencies

Original

For what purpose do banks create their own cryptocurrencies?
Already at least several commercial banks have created their own cryptocurrencies. Some investment funds invest part of their assets in selected cryptocurrencies. Recently, the investment bank JP Morgan has created its own cryptocurrency JPM Coin. Cryptocurrency JPM Coin will be used to settle initially a small part of the transaction, which JP Morgan performs on a daily basis for a total of about USD 6 billion.
Thanks to JPM Coin, settlements between business partners should take place immediately, ie much faster than the current standards of transfers. However, apart from accelerating the time of the transaction, what are the other goals for banks to introduce their own cryptocurrencies?
Could investment banks create a new type of collateral for transactions in the event of a possible strong loss of the USD dollar in the event of another global financial crisis connected with the currency crisis? Such a risk exists if the problem of growing public debt in the US is not resolved and banks in China cease to buy US Treasury bonds.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
For what purpose do banks create their own cryptocurrencies?

Source : https://www.researchgate.net/post/For_what_purpose_do_banks_create_their_own_cryptocurrencies

And you should report the post and thread with a reference to your post in here .

Hope it helps you for the next time 

[Mbitr]

Sorry first time I’ve reported plagiarism - probably not the correct format  

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251631.new#new

You should post in here like you have done it in the other thread !

Thread : For what purpose do banks create their own cryptocurrencies?

User (that has done the copy and paste) : pmedia

Plagiarized

Already at least several commercial banks have created their own cryptocurrencies. Some investment funds invest part of their assets in selected cryptocurrencies. Recently, the investment bank JP Morgan has created its own cryptocurrency JPM Coin. Cryptocurrency JPM Coin will be used to settle initially a small part of the transaction, which JP Morgan performs on a daily basis for a total of about USD 6 billion.
Thanks to JPM Coin, settlements between business partners should take place immediately, ie much faster than the current standards of transfers. However, apart from accelerating the time of the transaction, what are the other goals for banks to introduce their own cryptocurrencies?
Could investment banks create a new type of collateral for transactions in the event of a possible strong loss of the USD dollar in the event of another global financial crisis connected with the currency crisis? Such a risk exists if the problem of growing public debt in the US is not resolved and banks in China cease to buy US Treasury bonds.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
For what purpose do banks create their own cryptocurrencies?

Perhaps the question should read - To what purpose do people plagiarise others work?

https://www.researchgate.net/post/For_what_purpose_do_banks_create_their_own_cryptocurrencies

Original

For what purpose do banks create their own cryptocurrencies?
Already at least several commercial banks have created their own cryptocurrencies. Some investment funds invest part of their assets in selected cryptocurrencies. Recently, the investment bank JP Morgan has created its own cryptocurrency JPM Coin. Cryptocurrency JPM Coin will be used to settle initially a small part of the transaction, which JP Morgan performs on a daily basis for a total of about USD 6 billion.
Thanks to JPM Coin, settlements between business partners should take place immediately, ie much faster than the current standards of transfers. However, apart from accelerating the time of the transaction, what are the other goals for banks to introduce their own cryptocurrencies?
Could investment banks create a new type of collateral for transactions in the event of a possible strong loss of the USD dollar in the event of another global financial crisis connected with the currency crisis? Such a risk exists if the problem of growing public debt in the US is not resolved and banks in China cease to buy US Treasury bonds.
Do you agree with my opinion on this matter?
In view of the above, I am asking you the following question:
For what purpose do banks create their own cryptocurrencies?

Source : https://www.researchgate.net/post/For_what_purpose_do_banks_create_their_own_cryptocurrencies

And you should report the post and thread with a reference to your post in here .

Hope it helps you for the next time  

Thanks for showing me the process and I’ll use this when necessary 

[TravelMug]

User: oledtivi2020
Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5251644.msg54516129#msg54516129

1. Increased geopolitical uncertainty could spur Bitcoin

2. Bitcoin is like a hedge against negative interest rates

3. Central banks print unlimited money

4. Bitcoin đang trở thành hệ thống thanh toán

5. The Bitcoin derivatives market is flashing a bottom indicator

6. On-chain activity is still bullish

Do you think Bitcoin price will reach $ 10K in June?

Archived: http://archive.is/P0WJC

Original: https://www.tapchibitcoin.vn/ly-do-bitcoin-bung-no-den-10k-va-kich-thich-nhu-cau.html

The original post is in Vietnamese. You need Google to translate it to English.
His mistakes is that he forgot to translate #4 in his original post. Too bad for him. 

Increased geopolitical uncertainty can spur Bitcoin

Bitcoin is like a hedge against negative interest rates

Central banks print unlimited money

Bitcoin is becoming the payment system

The Bitcoin derivatives market is flashing a bottom indicator

On-chain activity is still bullish

[FatFork]

More plagiarized content from user oledtivi2020 - nuked

Crypto-friendly web browser Brave has announced that private and unlimited video calls can now be made on its platform.

Brave wrote on Twitter that video conferencing is now available on Brave Nightly, a test and development version of the browser. Known as Brave Together, the platform allows for end-to-end encryption of video calls - but is still in beta with incomplete features.
Brave Together is based on open source, Jitsi-encrypted video chat software, favorite video application of NSA control officer Edward Snowden, according to an interview he provided Wired in 2017.

An account does not necessarily use the video conferencing platform but will need to use the Brave browser.

The Covid-19 pandemic witnessed an explosion in the use of video conferencing platforms as countries around the world made rigorous strides and people conducted remote meetings or phoned family and friends.

Brave browser - praised by crypto inventors from Tyler Winklesvoss to CEO Binance Changpeng Zhao - provides an alternative to regular web browsers with privacy and crypto reward programs via native BAT tokens . The platform has criticized Google's purposeful monopoly and seriously as a more appropriate option.

With such developments, will the price of BAT token increase in the near future? Let me know your comments

Archived: http://archive.is/GDKcJ

Original source: https://decrypt.co/30319/privacy-browser-brave-now-enables-encrypted-video-calls

Crypto-friendly web browser Brave has announced that private and unlimited video calls can now be made on its platform.

Brave wrote on Twitter that video conferencing is now available on Brave Nightly, the testing and development version of the browser. Known as Brave Together, the platform allows end-to-end encryption for video calls—but is still in testing mode with incomplete features. (The service, for example, only enables encryption for one-on-one calls at the moment.)

Brave Together is based on the open-source, encrypted video chat software Jitsi, the preferred video app of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, according to an interview he provided Wired in 2017.

An account is not necessary to use the video conferencing platform but one will need to use the Brave browser.

The coronavirus pandemic has seen an explosion of the use of video conferencing platforms as countries around the world enforce strict lockdowns and people conduct meetings remotely or call family and friends.
<snip>
Brave Browser—which has been praised by crypto luminaries from Tyler Winklesvoss to Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao—provides an alternative to typical web browsers with increased privacy and a crypto rewards program through its native BAT token. The platform has criticized Google’s purported monopoly and aims to be taken seriously as a more ethical option.

[20kevin20]

User: kakamrul
Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5253441.msg54570916#msg54570916
Copied from: https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-best-new-altcoins-2019?share=1
Archived: https://web.archive.org/web/20200606150336/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5253441.40

Proof:

With over 5000+ cryptocurrencies available it’s hard to know which have a future and which are destined for the dustbin of history. In this article, I try to find a balance and outline 10 altcoins that have the greatest potential for growth and the lowest potential for loss in 2020.
1. Ethereum (ETH)
2. Ripple (XRP)
3. Litecoin (LTC)
4. Binance Coin (BNB)
5. Bitcoin Cash (BCH)
6. Neo (NEO)
7. Tezos (XTZ)
8. Zcash (ZEC)
9. EOS (EOS)
10. Bitcoin SV (BSV)

With over 2000 cryptocurrencies available it’s hard to know which have a future and which are destined for the dustbin of history. In this article, I try to find a balance and outline 10 altcoins that have the greatest potential for growth and the lowest potential for loss in 2019.

[Yaunfitda]

User: ramyakutty
Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5254161.msg54582622#msg54582622
Original: https://www.forbes.com/sites/billybambrough/2020/06/08/bitcoin-could-hit-300000-in-five-years-even-without-institutional-adoption/#4f3fbdc452c6
Archive: http://archive.is/cBK2Q

Proof:

Bitcoin bulls are currently out in force, talking up the cryptocurrency amid unprecedented central bank stimulus and quantitative easing.

The bitcoin price, which has failed to hold its ground over $10,000 per bitcoin in recent weeks, has climbed some 30% since the beginning of the year—but remains far from its all-time highs (for the time being).

Now, crypto pioneer Adam Back has predicted bitcoin will soar to $300,000 per bitcoin within the next five years, even without Wall Street's highly-anticipated institutional support.


Previous month Analysis of the bitcoin price

Last month, bitcoin got a big boost when legendary macro investor Paul Tudor Jones revealed he is buying bitcoin as a hedge against the inflation he sees coming as a result of never-before-seen levels of central bank money-printing.

"It is causing people to think about the value of money and looking for ways to preserve money," Back said, adding "it’s a difficult environment to get any yield."

Back, a cryptographer who invented a system of verification used by bitcoin called Hashcash was again forced to deny he's bitcoin's mysterious creator Satoshi Nakamoto after fresh claims last month.


Additional Points need to be noted

Meanwhile, long-expected institutional adoption of bitcoin is still looking precarious despite some early signs Wall Street is coming around to crypto.

JPMorgan, once described as "bitcoin's biggest enemy," has added its first crypto exchange customers and its chief executive Jamie Dimon reportedly hosted secret meetings with the boss of major bitcoin and crypto exchange, Coinbase.

Elsewhere, Goldman Sachs poured cold water on bitcoin and cryptocurrency community hopes the Wall Street giant was about to dive into crypto last month in a highly critical investor call.

The bitcoin price has slumped since last year with early signs of another bitcoin bull run halted by the coronavirus crash in March.


Summary:    
Many researchers used data and information available publicly from the people involved to create what they termed as the most comprehensive picture of open-source Bitcoin developer funding. There was a sharp drop that bottomed on March sixteen at $4,626 amid the spread of the Coronavirus around the globe, and both crypto and traditional markets feeling the impact of the pandemic. Many experts don't expect Bitcoin to fall below the $6,000 mark in two thousand and twenty even though we could witness some FUD before the halving event.

Bitcoin bulls are currently out in force, talking up the cryptocurrency amid unprecedented central bank stimulus and quantitative easing.

The bitcoin price, which has failed to hold its ground over $10,000 per bitcoin in recent weeks, has climbed some 30% since the beginning of the year—but remains far from its all-time highs (for the time being).

Now, crypto pioneer Adam Back has predicted bitcoin will soar to $300,000 per bitcoin within the next five years, even without Wall Street's highly-anticipated institutional support.

Last month, bitcoin got a big boost when legendary macro investor Paul Tudor Jones revealed he's is buying bitcoin as a hedge against the inflation he sees coming as a result of never-before-seen levels of central bank money-printing.

"It is causing people to think about the value of money and looking for ways to preserve money," Back said, adding "it’s a difficult environment to get any yield."

Back, a cryptographer who invented a system of verification used by bitcoin called Hashcash, was again forced to deny he's bitcoin's mysterious creator Satoshi Nakamoto after fresh claims last month.

Meanwhile, long-expected institutional adoption of bitcoin is still looking precarious despite some early signs Wall Street is coming around to crypto.

JPMorgan, once described as "bitcoin's biggest enemy," has added its first crypto exchange customers and its chief executive Jamie Dimon reportedly hosted secret meetings with the boss of major bitcoin and crypto exchange, Coinbase.

Elsewhere, Goldman Sachs poured cold water on bitcoin and cryptocurrency community hopes the Wall Street giant was about to dive into crypto last month in a highly critical investor call.

[The Cryptovator]

Plagiarism, direct copy paste.
User: hectorhanx
Archived thread; http://archive.is/Mvc1R

If you are a Bitcoin trader either in Australia or New Zealand, good news! Coke vending machines now accept Bitcoin as a form of payment.

What does this mean for Bitcoin?
Although a coke vending machine that accepts Bitcoin may at first seem silly or insignificant, it is actually yet another sign that adoption of the cryptocurrency is progressively increasing. The 1,200 or so machines available between the two countries means more exposure for the project. Even if many will never actually pay for a soda with Bitcoin, the simple awareness that such an option exists is already a positive.

For those who do wish to experience paying for an instantly redeemable physical product with Bitcoin, they will simply need to download the Sylo payment app. With it, they can scan a QR code in a manner reminiscent to China’s Alipay or Wechat Pay system. The crypto will then be automatically converted into the relevant local currency.

Other Benefits
With the current health crisis involving COVID-19, any initiative that lowers customers’ physical contact with machines is beneficial. Particularly so when these machines are frequently used by hundreds of people and tourists every day. QR codes limit a user’s need to interact with both potentially contaminated surfaces and cash.

Fortunately, even bitcoin derivatives traders and spot traders that do not live in these countries can still benefit. As suggested above, the more Bitcoin is adopted as a form of payment, the more relevant and strong the cryptocurrency becomes. Other similar efforts to facilitate the use of Bitcoin for transactions include BitPay. This payment processor already works with large brands such as Shopify and Newegg to help their users pay with Bitcoin.

Stay tuned for more blog articles on different concepts and ideas that will improve your knowledge of Bitcoin Trading.

Copy paste from Phemex blog

If you are a Bitcoin trader either in Australia or New Zealand, good news! Coke vending machines now accept Bitcoin as a form of payment.

What does this mean for Bitcoin?
Although a coke vending machine that accepts Bitcoin may at first seem silly or insignificant, it is actually yet another sign that adoption of the cryptocurrency is progressively increasing. The 1,200 or so machines available between the two countries means more exposure for the project. Even if many will never actually pay for a soda with Bitcoin, the simple awareness that such an option exists is already a positive.

For those who do wish to experience paying for an instantly redeemable physical product with Bitcoin, they will simply need to download the Sylo payment app. With it, they can scan a QR code in a manner reminiscent to China’s Alipay or Wechat Pay system. The crypto will then be automatically converted into the relevant local currency.

Other Benefits
With the current health crisis involving COVID-19, any initiative that lowers customers’ physical contact with machines is beneficial. Particularly so when these machines are frequently used by hundreds of people and tourists every day. QR codes limit a user’s need to interact with both potentially contaminated surfaces and cash.

Fortunately, even bitcoin derivatives traders and spot traders that do not live in these countries can still benefit. As suggested above, the more Bitcoin is adopted as a form of payment, the more relevant and strong the cryptocurrency becomes. Other similar efforts to facilitate the use of Bitcoin for transactions include BitPay. This payment processor already works with large brands such as Shopify and Newegg to help their users pay with Bitcoin.

Stay tuned for more blog articles on different concepts and ideas that will improve your knowledge of Bitcoin Trading.

[NeuroticFish]

I can't tell for sure if it's plagiarism or not, but this post looks "from another world":
a lot of specific terms (I think) and quite different from this user's other posts.

However, I couldn't find a match in my web search, but maybe you guys are more skilled in this.


This is a call for doing a check, not a proper report. If it's not OK that I've posted this here, I don't mind if my post gets deleted.

[Rikafip]

I can't tell for sure if it's plagiarism or not, but this post looks "from another world":
a lot of specific terms (I think) and quite different from this user's other posts.

However, I couldn't find a match in my web search, but maybe you guys are more skilled in this.


This is a call for doing a check, not a proper report. If it's not OK that I've posted this here, I don't mind if my post gets deleted.

Try googling the second quoted sentence and you will get the results. Seems like it has been taken from some book. In general, try googling sentence by sentence and there will be some results.

Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.

Screenshot has been taken from google books. For some reason when I share link it gets broken.

[FatFork]

I can't tell for sure if it's plagiarism or not, but this post looks "from another world":
<cut>

Of course, as Rikafip already noted, this is pure plagiarism. He copied entire sentences with some minor modifications. I highlighted the parts that are blatant copy/paste and the rest is partially spun.

Logistics platforms based on blockchain technology are not only technically demanding, but also require the clarification of many legal issues.
In addition to data protection, for example, the implementation of the many legal sources that are particularly relevant to transport must be taken into account.
For example, the transport law framework conditions are relatively complex, because the legal cornerstones result from a complex interplay of modality-related conventions, the (controversial) rules of multimodal transport and the different national legal norms.

Furthermore, quasi-binding specifications of the lex mercatoria (e.g. ERA 600 or BIMCO bill of lading) must also be taken into account.
Moreover, such automated systems must be coordinated with the mandatory standards at national and international level (such as formal requirements or restrictions on liability for damages).
Furthermore, questions of ownership and the role of securities and book-entry securities will have to be clarified within the block chain.
Finally, the question of how to deal with the large number of discretionary decisions must also be answered, for example in assessing fault, quantifying damages or interpreting specific contractual obligations and duties.

Archived: http://archive.is/MEOGw

Source: Innovation-Based Development of the Mineral Resources Sector: Challenges and Prospects by Vladimir Litvinenko

[NeuroticFish]

try googling sentence by sentence and there will be some results.

Even the first full sentence doesn't return anything meaningful for me.
Half of it, indeed, returned Litvienko's book.

Good job @Rikafip and @FatFork, thank you.

[dkbit98]

Plagiarism 100% copy paste
User: chmod755
!account owner changed!

Miners use tons of electricity to process transactions, and the general assumption is that miners directly sell their newly created bitcoins to cover their costs. Almost everyone knows that after the halving, not 1800 bitcoins, but only 900 bitcoins are supplied to the market daily.
This change is believed to have a positive effect on the price of bitcoin.
If the price of bitcoin does not increase after the block is rewarded by half, the miners revenue calculated in $ will decrease. This means that they will have trouble covering their costs, and that will cause miners with the highest electricity costs to leave the market first. The reduction in electricity consumption to maintain the network means that the difficulty of processing a block of transactions will decrease.
Theoretically, this means that it would be easier to attack the blockchain network and create 51% of attacks.

What do you think?

archive: http://archive.vn/otE2M

''Miners use tons of electricity to process transactions, and the general assumption is that miners directly sell their newly minted bitcoins in order to cover their costs. This would mean that after the halving not 1800 bitcoins, but only 900 bitcoins are freshly supplied to the market every day. This scarcity is believed to have a positive effect on the bitcoin price.

If the price of bitcoin does not increase after the block reward halving, the revenue of miners calculated in $USD will decrease. This means that they will have problems covering their cost, and this will drive miners with the highest electricity costs out of the market first. The reduction in electricity consumption to maintain the network means that the difficulty of processing a block of transactions will drop. Theoretically, this means that it would be easier to attack the blockchain network and create 51% attacks.

What do you think?''

Original source Blockchair: https://blockchair.com/tools/halving-countdown
archive: http://archive.vn/BLiAx

Also did multiple plagiarism from portuguese language as shown by Veleor  HERE

[SiNeReiNZzz]

-cut-

-Translated from my Statement in the german local section- see below!

First of all: I admit to having made a mistake, especially with regard to the reference to my sources.
But I have to make it clear that I did not get anything from these sources, which were discussed in the accusation against me.

About 1 year ago, I did a 'project work' in the context of a further education, in which I talked about the future of logistics and the possibilities to make it more efficient.
I also have to say that it was not expected from our lecturer that we would give sources. (Which should not be an excuse for this anyway!)

Of course I used different sources.  I was especially interested in the topic of block chain in the interaction of different possible scenarios and processes in logistics.
For this purpose I also briefly dealt with legal issues and read an article by Prof. Dr.Andreas Furrer, which deals with this topic in detail, and used it for my project work:

Prof. Dr.Andreas Furrer:
https://www.unilu.ch/fakultaeten/rf/professuren/furrer-andreas/

Article:
https://jusletter.weblaw.ch/fr/dam/publicationsystem/articles/jusletter/2017/917/der-einsatz-der-bloc_776b0ed3df/Jusletter_der-einsatz-der-bloc_776b0ed3df_fr.pdf

As already mentioned I may have taken over too much content without marking it.
That was my mistake and that will certainly not happen again...

It's just a pity that I'm not addressed personally (not even parallel to the public accusation) in order to be able to correct misunderstandings, possible mistakes or misfortunes.

I must honestly say that I'm a little perplexed!
A forum ban would be sad, but also no end of my life...
In my case I see a small difference to real copy and paste plagiarism. But maybe I just want to see that!
But okay if you are so determined to fight against such practices, I can understand that, because there is a lot going wrong in this direction.

I can only sincerely apologize for this and in the future I can better point out possible sources!

Everything else is not in my hands...



Best regards

SiNeReiNZzz

PS: Should this be my last mail and I get banned, I still wish you all a pleasant and successful time.