This person has created at least a dozen different accounts which they use to talk back and forth to themselves in threads for CRW and BSV, several of which are already banned.
Please help me report these accounts for plagiarism.
#1:
CookyCook72Copy:But how are nonfungible tokens created?There are concerns that the use of nonfungible tokens could end up becoming fragmented, with different standards and varying degrees of certification.
At the moment, as we mentioned a little earlier, it can be an expensive and complicated thing to achieve. It can sometimes take months to develop a DApp, and in the fast-moving blockchain world, that could cost an entrepreneur their competitive advantage.
Instead of every outlet interested in nonfungible tokens creating their own framework (which would result in a breeding ground for inconsistency,) some platforms are trying to create a technological layer which unifies and standardizes these tokens.
One of them is Crown CRW, which offers a “plug and play” framework which means that a nonfungible token can be developed and verified quicker – and the platform claims it is achievable in days. The company says it eliminates the need for in-depth blockchain knowledge, while stopping precious data from being siloed and preventing developers from having a lengthy, expensive and insecure process.
[/quote]
<---- weirdly enough I have to put this here or it runs on with the below quoteOriginal:But how are nonfungible tokens created?
There are concerns that the use of nonfungible tokens could end up becoming fragmented, with different standards and varying degrees of certification.
At the moment, as we mentioned a little earlier, it can be an expensive and complicated thing to achieve. It can sometimes take months to develop a DApp, and in the fast-moving blockchain world, that could cost an entrepreneur their competitive advantage.
Instead of every outlet interested in nonfungible tokens creating their own framework (which would result in a breeding ground for inconsistency,) some platforms are trying to create a technological layer which unifies and standardizes these tokens.
One of them is 0xcert, which offers a “plug and play” framework which means that a nonfungible token can be developed and verified quicker – and the platform claims it is achievable in days. The company says it eliminates the need for in-depth blockchain knowledge, while stopping precious data from being siloed and preventing developers from having a lengthy, expensive and insecure process.
You can see the only significant change they made was changing the coin name from "0xcert" to "Crown CRW". The entire rest of the post is plagiarized directly from the Cointelegraph article, I just included this last section for brevity.
#2:
Do_zzzeCopy:
For information:
Crown is a multi-channel scalable Blockchain solution provider leveraging environmentally friendly technology that has been evolving since October 08, 2014, the date of the Genesis Block of Crown.
Crown provides a complete ecosystem including the ability to create Blockchains, smart contract data, governance and scalable analysis for your single- or multi-chain custom projects hosted directly within the Crown Platform's revolutionary network; providing scale benefits with low ecological impact because Crown Platform is based on the MNPOS protocol, dramatically reducing operating costs and carbon footprint.
Crown Plateform offers specific research, development and production functionalities via NFTs, offering interoperability of concrete solutions and optimal security within its decentralized network. You can now create your DApps, remote programs, various games and move towards a new form of non-fungible interactive chain marketing, laying the foundation for tracking and analyzing data in the global chain. Crown Platform is the ideal multi-channel solution for real, daily, cheap and accessible use at any time thanks to its unique combined technology.
This is now a time of great opportunity to harness the power of Crown to make the exploitation and use of your assets, any value of public data that is not fungible on an unchangeable Blockchain database at any time, accessible.
Original:Crown describes itself as a multi-channel scalable Blockchain solution provider leveraging environmentally friendly technology that has been evolving since October 08, 2014, the date of the Genesis Block of Crown.
Crown aims to provide a complete ecosystem including the ability to create blockchains, smart contract data, governance and scalable analysis for single- or multi-chain custom projects hosted directly within the Crown Platform's network. Crown Platform aims to provide scale benefits with low ecological impact because it is based on the MNPOS protocol, reducing operating costs and carbon footprint.
Crown Plateform offers specific research, development and production functionalities via NFTs. It aims to offer interoperability of concrete solutions and optimal security within its decentralized network. Users can create DApps, remote programs, various games and move towards a new form of non-fungible interactive chain marketing, laying the foundation for tracking and analyzing data in the global chain. Crown Platform aims to become the ideal multi-channel solution for real, daily, cheap and accessible use at any time.
This is now a time of great opportunity to harness the power of Crown to make the exploitation and use of your assets, any value of public data that is not fungible on an unchangeable Blockchain database at any time, accessible.
He changed around a few basic words but it is still 90% plagiarized. I know that the Coinmarketcap description was written before the Bitcointalk post because
Google shows it as having been written on or before June 11, 2018.
Here's another other one for this user; this one is a bit more tricky so I've bolded the parts copy/pasted verbatim (or nearly verbatim):
Copy:At another stage, all audited data flows through their pipelines. Their data science transforms this data into a more thoughtful FCAS score that also provides higher fidelity data analysis. At the end of the analyzed pipeline program, you will receive a higher fidelity FCAS score and an analytical dashboard. It seems to me that FCAS scores are provided on a scale of 0 to 1,000 points with a corresponding letter grade. The breakpoints are based on the standard deviations in the distributions of the underlying components.
The numerical score is derived from a combination of classical statistics with Bayesian approaches to provide a simple score for each metric. The scores are only intended to be statements of opinion on the relative health of applicable cryptography projects based on the available data.
Original (images and most text removed for brevity):...
FCAS RATINGSFCAS ratings are based on a 0-1000 point scale with a corresponding letter grade. Breakpoints are based on standard deviations in the underlying component distributions....
The number rating is derived from a combination of classical statistics with Bayesian approaches to provide a simple score for each metric.
...
Check here for FAQs related to FCAS -
FCAS FAQsSource: Check here to know more about FCAS ratings -
https://www.flipsidecrypto.com/fcas-explainedUnfortunately, the original text is no longer available from the source website.
I think what he usually does is use Google translate to convert articles from Spanish to English, and then paste the English version in his posts, but its difficult to find the original Spanish sources as it's not easy to reverse-translate the words (I tried).
Copy / past !!!??
Not doing yourself any favors when it comes to proving you typed the previous paragraph, especially considering the complex syntax in the penultimate sentence prior to your question.
Do you have a problem with me writing here ?
Only you and your friends are allowed to write here? You make the law of underwear like at home ?
How come you add a space before your question marks here, yet you don't do the same in your question about BSV protecting itself?
After Google announced the domination of quantum computers overtaking the computing power of supercomputers, the crypto-currency market fell sharply.... This would be due to the logic that quantum computers can penetrate the blockchain's security. If the extremely fast operating speed of the quantum computer is used, it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant. However, there are many perspectives that the problem will have little impact on the market. This is an analysis that will take a long time to commercialize the quantum computer, which is the first step. In addition, there is an interpretation that the assumption that the encryption of the block chain is broken does not ignore all the financial cryptosystems on the planet. In addition, as quantum computers develop, block chain technology will continue to develop.
How can BSV protect itself?
Original paragraph for reference.
By the way... can you tell me what you meant by "book" in the following fragment?
"it is possible to manipulate the book through the blockchain consensus algorithm in an instant"
What book?
Hey Papi, I write in my mother tongue and translated on Internet, syntax is reported, not everyone writes English fluently in the world that's how it is. If I make a space more or less between my words then am I a Martian for you, okay.
If somebody wants to take a stab at locating the original Spanish version of the post about Google and quantum computers and can do it, please by all means give it a go.
Thanks.