Lexxon
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
February 02, 2018, 04:26:11 AM |
|
Not much going on at this tread anymore. Is the dev active any more, or has he abbandoned ship. Any info anyone please.
The coordinator and moderator of the project, Alekso, who tried to reanimate, disappeared. He did not enter his accounts for more than six months. And Kalgecin (coin developer) - is active, but no longer supports the project.
|
|
|
|
Beyerd17
|
|
February 02, 2018, 07:38:57 AM |
|
Not much going on at this tread anymore. Is the dev active any more, or has he abbandoned ship. Any info anyone please.
The coordinator and moderator of the project, Alekso, who tried to reanimate, disappeared. He did not enter his accounts for more than six months. And Kalgecin (coin developer) - is active, but no longer supports the project. Well, that would pretty much make it a very dead coin. Is anybody interested in taking over and start developing the coin?
|
|
|
|
Lexxon
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
February 02, 2018, 07:56:54 AM Last edit: February 02, 2018, 08:10:35 AM by Lexxon |
|
Well, that would pretty much make it a very dead coin. Is anybody interested in taking over and start developing the coin?
As far as I know, at the moment, nobody showed any interest in resuscitation and coin development. But some people mining the coin and coin traded on stock exchanges. Cachecoin it is not completely dead.
|
|
|
|
Lexxon
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
February 05, 2018, 07:49:55 AM |
|
Update! In the Russian-speaking topic of Cachecoin, user Deff leads some work on the coin wallet. If he succeeds, then you can hope for a coin take-off.
|
|
|
|
singula
|
|
February 05, 2018, 09:04:54 AM |
|
I might also join the development. While I have relatively little extra time to spare, so I can't promise anything big (do not expect stuff like smart contract ala Ethereum - that would require more or less huge rewrite of the protocol and in the first place fixing all the problems Ethereum has - there are many ways how a smart contract user can "shoot itself in the foot" and lose coins and there are many challenges also from the programming perspective and it is very hard to do the contract so you get some compromise between how powerful the contracts will be and how long will it take to verify them, etc ...) Good thing about CACHe is the durability of the coin - due to its variable PoW + PoS it survived very well both times when there was a lot of interest in the coin and also times with minimal interest in the coin. When comparing with other coins, what is missing in CACHe is the 100% fungibility - while bitcoin is relatively anonymous, current governments tend to regulate the currencies and if they will start having "blacklisted" (i.e. those that were involved in some hack, or criminal activity or whatever, so coins that were touched by some criminal in the past may be "tainted" forever) and "whitelisted" coins, then this could be a major blow to usability, as coins from many BTC hacks are already dispersed in the blockchain, often they are partially in wallets of people not connected to any of the hack. Having fully anonymous transaction will ensure 100% fungibility -- all coins are equal, there would be no "tainted" coins In order to not reinvent the wheel, the code could be "borrowed" from other coins - there are several candidates, like ZCash (although it does have relatively complex setup), DASH (no complex setup, but you have to add the masternodes infrastructure, which is quite complex) and few other coins I have currently on my watchlist. I may also create a mining pool if there would be interest
|
Big brother is not watching you anymore. Big brother is telling you how to live.
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
March 15, 2018, 04:52:48 AM Last edit: March 15, 2018, 05:38:02 AM by Deff |
|
CACHeCoin_v_6.1.0.0 1. POS and POW are separated (retarget POW - 15min, POS - 10min) 2. A new algorithm for calculating the difficulty (VALM-Cach (logical analysis, mathematically variable)) 3. Spam-Hash control function added 4. Subsidy algorithm modified (Inverted (min 45, max 90)) 5. Errors in calculating the balance of addresses eliminated 6. There are other minor changes 7. I do not dwell on the changes made Algorithm VALM-Cach passed tests.. . getdifficulty
13:49:15
{ "proof-of- work" : 0.02867835, "search-interval-powblock" : 505, "search-twointerval-powblock" : 2296, "search-full-result-powblock" : 1439, "pow-target-spacing-variable" : 1030, "UpperLower-pow" : 182, "XUpper-pow" : 1, "XLower-pow" : 104, "proof-of-stake" : 2.95717419, "search-interval-posblock" : 385, "search-twointerval-posblock" : 335, "search-full-result-posblock" : 385, "pos-target-spacing-variable" : 670, "UpperLower-pos" : 275, "XUpper-pos" : 122, "XLower-pos" : 1, "search-interval-without pow block" : 487, "search-interval-without pos block" : 593 } static const int64 nTargetSpacingWorkMaxPow = 12 * nPowTargetSpacing; // 14400 static const int64 nTargetSpacingWorkMaxPos = 12 * nPosTargetSpacing; // 7200 static const int64 nTargetTimespanPow = nTargetSpacingWorkMaxPow * 6 * 12; // 1036800 matrix static const int64 nTargetTimespanPos = nTargetSpacingWorkMaxPos * 6 * 12; // 518400 matrix unsigned int GetNextTargetRequiredPow(const CBlockIndex* powpindexLast, bool fProofOfWork) { CBigNum bnTargetLimitPow = bnProofOfWorkLimit;
if (powpindexLast == NULL) return bnTargetLimitPow.GetCompact(); // last block const CBlockIndex* powpindexPrev = GetLastBlockIndexPow(powpindexLast, fProofOfWork); if (powpindexPrev->pprev == NULL) return bnInitialHashTarget.GetCompact(); // first block const CBlockIndex* powpindexPrevPrev = GetLastBlockIndexPow(powpindexPrev->pprev, fProofOfWork); if (powpindexPrevPrev->pprev == NULL) return bnInitialHashTarget.GetCompact(); // second block 1 const CBlockIndex* powpindexPrevPrevPrev = GetLastBlockIndexPow(powpindexPrevPrev->pprev, fProofOfWork); if (powpindexPrevPrevPrev->pprev == NULL) return bnInitialHashTarget.GetCompact(); // second block 2 const CBlockIndex* powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrev = GetLastBlockIndexPow(powpindexPrevPrevPrev->pprev, fProofOfWork); if (powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrev->pprev == NULL) return bnInitialHashTarget.GetCompact(); // second block 3 const CBlockIndex* powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrevPrev = GetLastBlockIndexPow(powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrev->pprev, fProofOfWork); if (powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrevPrev->pprev == NULL) return bnInitialHashTarget.GetCompact(); // second block 4 const CBlockIndex* powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrevPrevPrev = GetLastBlockIndexPow(powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrevPrev->pprev, fProofOfWork); if (powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrevPrevPrev->pprev == NULL) return bnInitialHashTarget.GetCompact(); // second block 5
double nPowTargetSpacingTest = 0; if(powpindexPrev->GetBlockTime() > nPowForceTimestamp && powpindexPrev->GetBlockTime() < nPowForceTimestamp + NTest) nPowTargetSpacingTest = nPowTargetSpacing / nPowTargetSpacing * 900; else nPowTargetSpacingTest = nPowTargetSpacing; int64 nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst = powpindexPrev->GetBlockTime() - powpindexPrevPrev->GetBlockTime(); int64 nActualTimeIntervalLongPowFirst = powpindexPrevPrev->GetBlockTime() - powpindexPrevPrevPrev->GetBlockTime(); int64 nActualTimeIntervalLongPowSecond = powpindexPrevPrevPrev->GetBlockTime() - powpindexPrevPrevPrevPrev->GetBlockTime(); double nActualSpacingTotalsPow = ( nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst + nActualTimeIntervalLongPowFirst ) / 2; double nActualTimeIntervalNvar = nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst; // ( nActualSpacingTotalsPow + nActualTimeIntervalLongPowSecond ) / 2;
// cachecoin retarget // VALM-Cach /logical analysis - mathematically variable/ int64 nActualSpacingPow = 0; double nVar = nPowTargetSpacingTest / 3; int64 nNonAccelerating = 0; // sec +0- PowPindexPrevTime = powpindexPrev->GetBlockTime(); nLastCoinPowSearchInterval = nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst; nLastCoinPowFiveInterval = nActualSpacingTotalsPow; nActualSpacingPow = ( nActualSpacingTotalsPow + nActualTimeIntervalLongPowSecond ) / 2; // nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst; if(nActualTimeIntervalNvar >= nNonAccelerating && nActualTimeIntervalNvar < nPowTargetSpacingTest - nNonAccelerating) nPowTargetSpacingVar = (( nPowTargetSpacingTest - 1 + nVar ) - ( nActualTimeIntervalNvar * nVar / nPowTargetSpacingTest )); else if (nActualTimeIntervalNvar > nPowTargetSpacingTest + nNonAccelerating && nActualTimeIntervalNvar <= nPowTargetSpacingTest * 2) nPowTargetSpacingVar = (( nPowTargetSpacingTest + 1 + nVar ) - ( nActualTimeIntervalNvar * nVar / nPowTargetSpacingTest )); else if (nActualTimeIntervalNvar > nPowTargetSpacingTest * 2) nPowTargetSpacingVar = nPowTargetSpacingTest - nVar + 1; else nPowTargetSpacingVar = nPowTargetSpacingTest; double nPTSp = nPowTargetSpacingTest; // 1200 sec int64 powUppermin = 0; double powUppermax = nPTSp - nNonAccelerating; // 1199 sec double powLowermin = nPTSp + nNonAccelerating; // 1201 sec int64 powLowermax = nTargetSpacingWorkMaxPow; // 14400 sec if(nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst > powLowermin && nActualSpacingTotalsPow < powUppermax) nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow = nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst; else if(nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst > powLowermin && nActualSpacingTotalsPow > powLowermin) nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow = min((double) nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst, (double) nActualSpacingTotalsPow); else if(nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst < powUppermax && nActualSpacingTotalsPow < powUppermax) nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow = max((double) nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst, (double) nActualSpacingTotalsPow); else if(nActualSpacingTotalsPow < powUppermax && nActualSpacingTotalsPow > nActualSpacingPow) nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow = nActualSpacingTotalsPow; else if(nActualSpacingTotalsPow > powLowermin && nActualSpacingTotalsPow < nActualSpacingPow) nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow = nActualSpacingTotalsPow; else nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow = nActualSpacingPow; double nNix = nPTSp / 100 * 70; // 714 double nReverseEffectPow = 0; if(nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow < nNix) nReverseEffectPow = nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow / nNix; else if(nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow > nPTSp && nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow <= nPTSp + ( nPTSp - nNix)) nReverseEffectPow = ( nPTSp / nPTSp ) / 2; else if(nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow > nPTSp + ( nPTSp - nNix) && nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow < powLowermax) nReverseEffectPow = (( nPTSp + ( nPTSp - nNix )) / nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow ) / 2; else nReverseEffectPow = 1; powUpperLower = ( nPTSp / 2 ) * nReverseEffectPow; // interval sampling 2:1 variable if(nActualSpacingTotalsPow < nNix / 1.30 && nActualTimeIntervalLongPowVeryFirst < powUppermax) powUpperLower = powUpperLower * (( nNix / 1.30 ) / nActualSpacingTotalsPow ); double XUXL = nPowTargetSpacingTest / 100 * 4; double U = 0; double L = 0; double XU = XUXL + ( powUppermax * powUpperLower / nPTSp ); // 100.9166 +% double XL = XUXL + ( nPTSp * powUpperLower / powLowermin ); // 100.9167 +% double nBalance = 1.0; double nN = XUXL - ( XUXL / nBalance ); int64 nTargetTimespanMin = nTargetTimespanPow / XL - 1; // min int64 nActualTimeIntervalXU = nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow; int64 nActualTimeIntervalXL = nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow; if(nActualTimeIntervalXU >= powUppermin && nActualTimeIntervalXU < powUppermax) U = nN + (( XU - ( nActualTimeIntervalXU * powUpperLower / nPTSp )) / nBalance ); else U = 1; if(nActualTimeIntervalXL > powLowermin && nActualTimeIntervalXL < powLowermax) L = XL - ( nPTSp * powUpperLower / nActualTimeIntervalXL ); else if(nActualTimeIntervalXL >= powLowermax) L = XL / 2; else L = 1; int64 nTargetTimespanControlu = nTargetTimespanPow / U; // min int64 nTargetTimespanControll = nTargetTimespanPow / L; // min if(nTargetTimespanControlu >= nTargetTimespanMin) XUpperPow = U; else if(nTargetTimespanControlu < nTargetTimespanMin) XUpperPow = XU; else XUpperPow = 1; if(nTargetTimespanControll >= nTargetTimespanMin) XLowerPow = L; else if(nTargetTimespanControll < nTargetTimespanMin) XLowerPow = XL; else XLowerPow = 1; CBigNum bnNewPow; bnNewPow.SetCompact(powpindexPrev->nBits); double nTargetTimespanBn = nTargetTimespanPow / max( XUpperPow, XLowerPow ); double nInterval = nTargetTimespanBn / nPowTargetSpacingTest; if(powpindexPrev->GetBlockTime() > nPowForceTimestamp) { if(powpindexPrev->GetBlockTime() > nPowForceTimestamp && powpindexPrev->IsProofOfWork())
bnNewPow *= (( (int64) nInterval - 1) * (int64) nPowTargetSpacingVar + (int64) nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow + (int64) nActualTimeIntervalXUXLpow); bnNewPow /= (( (int64) nInterval + 1) * (int64) nPowTargetSpacingVar);
if(bnNewPow > bnTargetLimitPow) bnNewPow = bnTargetLimitPow; if(bnNewPow < bnTargetLimitPow + bnTargetLimitPow && powpindexPrev->GetBlockTime() > nPowForceTimestamp && powpindexPrev->GetBlockTime() < nPowForceTimestamp + NTest) bnNewPow = bnTargetLimitPow; } return bnNewPow.GetCompact(); }
|
|
|
|
GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 16, 2018, 04:45:48 PM |
|
What is the future of CACHECOIN going to be like?
|
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
March 16, 2018, 05:02:40 PM |
|
Depends on many factors. The main now is the work of Wallet
|
|
|
|
GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 16, 2018, 05:10:44 PM |
|
Depends on many factors. The main now is the work of Wallet
Please, when you work on wallets, please contact the exchanges (CRYPTOPIA, COINEXCHANGE.IO), so that they can also have the correct wallet versions.
|
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
March 16, 2018, 05:22:27 PM |
|
Depends on many factors. The main now is the work of Wallet
Please, when you work on wallets, please contact the exchanges (CRYPTOPIA, COINEXCHANGE.IO), so that they can also have the correct wallet versions. Waiting for an answer
|
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
March 19, 2018, 01:45:07 PM |
|
If there is an unnecessary hash https://cach.digger.work
|
|
|
|
Lafu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3150
Merit: 3224
|
|
March 21, 2018, 01:12:33 PM |
|
Any new wallet version for this coin ? or some working nodes for the wallet ?
if so please pm me the nodes or info for !
Regards Lafu
|
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
March 21, 2018, 03:03:56 PM |
|
Any new wallet version for this coin ? or some working nodes for the wallet ?
if so please pm me the nodes or info for !
Regards Lafu
Sent to coinwallets@cryptopia.co.nz
|
|
|
|
morning4386
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
March 30, 2018, 01:30:58 PM |
|
cash.digger.work locked my Account Instead of replying to email my account have 6200 cach coins
|
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
March 31, 2018, 02:55:23 AM |
|
cash.digger.work locked my Account Instead of replying to email my account have 6200 cach coins
I'll check .. You participated in the attack on the network Cach-e-coin and ZCcoin - why? Are you a bad person ? Or do you consider yourself to be the smartest ?
|
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
March 31, 2018, 12:51:12 PM |
|
Attempt to attack .. Angry .. Next time I'll write from which city ..
vgrk
|
|
|
|
GREEDYJOHN
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 02, 2018, 11:05:31 AM |
|
CACHE will do well, if both COINEXCHANGE and CRYPTOPIA receive correct updates.
|
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
April 02, 2018, 02:24:07 PM |
|
Ron over Yacoin works - interesting ..
|
|
|
|
Deff
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 939
Merit: 261
Data HDD Repair - Recovery of lost information
|
|
April 02, 2018, 02:46:34 PM |
|
The fate of the coins is similar. Attacks. Many forks. Refusal to support exchanges later by pools.
|
|
|
|
rrusell22
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
April 03, 2018, 04:47:25 AM |
|
cash.digger.work locked my Account Instead of replying to email my account have 6200 cach coins
I'll check .. You participated in the attack on the network Cach-e-coin and ZCcoin - why? Are you a bad person ? Or do you consider yourself to be the smartest ? Is this coin still alive? Is he under attack? zcoin has been attacked recently? it is assumed that the lyra2z algorithm is removable by gpu, which would discourage the botnets
|
|
|
|
|