DCORP Venture Capitalism

[codemanX]

When will next vote be?

Really? I wrote on the post before yours: "They said on telegram a few days ago, if the vote says "no", the next vote will be in the near future, maybe in a month."
There is no fixed date, at the moment it looks like the Tokens will be unlocked in this voting round, I'm sure they will give us a timeframe if the Tokens staying locked.

[analyzing]

When will next vote be?

Really? I wrote on the post before yours: "They said on telegram a few days ago, if the vote says "no", the next vote will be in the near future, maybe in a month."
There is no fixed date, at the moment it looks like the Tokens will be unlocked in this voting round, I'm sure they will give us a timeframe if the Tokens staying locked.

in this case they will make us wait for a long time , i know them they are really lazy developers  and planning only for other ICOs , they should not do any more vote for releasing tokens in future. they should
give us a fixed release date if voting go for "no" this time.in my case , i really want token to be release ASAP , keeping them locked will not solve any thing

[Fluffington]

No new vote date if no? How is that even possible?

[analyzing]

one day more to go , voting will end tomorrow

so far vote update


 dcorpAddress|address :  0x01d5d0108589f3c52fcce6e65503bb6515e66698
  deadline|uint256 :  1510226558
  approvedWeight|uint256 :  588455.01
  disapprovedWeight|uint256 :  346442.07

hurry up guys ,

[codemanX]

When will next vote be?

Really? I wrote on the post before yours: "They said on telegram a few days ago, if the vote says "no", the next vote will be in the near future, maybe in a month."
There is no fixed date, at the moment it looks like the Tokens will be unlocked in this voting round, I'm sure they will give us a timeframe if the Tokens staying locked.

in this case they will make us wait for a long time , i know them they are really lazy developers  and planning only for other ICOs , they should not do any more vote for releasing tokens in future. they should
give us a fixed release date if voting go for "no" this time.in my case , i really want token to be release ASAP , keeping them locked will not solve any thing

Lazy developers? How do you know this? They are always on Telegram to answer your questions and in my opinion they are working very hard to release a well working product, you can't say they are lazy.
Further they should not unlock the Tokens at a specific date automatically, it's pretty cool that the holders can vote for it, that's democracy. If the result of the vote doesn't match your position, bad luck.

[vodkabebimq2014]

promising project but I think it would better if there is some bounty

[Fluffington]

Why is that?

[the_hodler]

promising project but I think it would better if there is some bounty

Why do they need a bounty program?

[illiki23]

I think the time for releasing the Tokens is not good at the moment and will be much better after the fork when the whole Altcoin market will rise, because some people will dump no matter of the price just to get into Bitcoin.
I will also hold long term and see what happens.
They said on telegram a few days ago, if the vote says "no", the next vote will be in the near future, maybe in a month.

I don't mind waiting a month.  I am not a big fan of vague language such as 'near future' though.

I am also rather concerned about the amount of control the devs have given themselves in the corp by not only setting the fees to propose changes to corp laws really really high but establishing a large number of laws without any voting...   they really really REALLY need to waive those massive fees until we vote on a number of things (such as what the appropriate fees are).

If this doesn't happen this is all an illusion with respect to being semi autonomous and token holder controlled.

[Fluffington]

Is there a soft date on next vote if no?

[analyzing]

When will next vote be?

Really? I wrote on the post before yours: "They said on telegram a few days ago, if the vote says "no", the next vote will be in the near future, maybe in a month."
There is no fixed date, at the moment it looks like the Tokens will be unlocked in this voting round, I'm sure they will give us a timeframe if the Tokens staying locked.

in this case they will make us wait for a long time , i know them they are really lazy developers  and planning only for other ICOs , they should not do any more vote for releasing tokens in future. they should
give us a fixed release date if voting go for "no" this time.in my case , i really want token to be release ASAP , keeping them locked will not solve any thing

Lazy developers? How do you know this? They are always on Telegram to answer your questions and in my opinion they are working very hard to release a well working product, you can't say they are lazy.
Further they should not unlock the Tokens at a specific date automatically, it's pretty cool that the holders can vote for it, that's democracy. If the result of the vote doesn't match your position, bad luck.

dude looks like you are on their side but if vote is democracy then what happen to DRP token , they split in two tokens with out voting , where is that democracy?

[analyzing]

Is there a soft date on next vote if no?

they said on telegram it will be in short time probably within one month ,

[analyzing]

I think the time for releasing the Tokens is not good at the moment and will be much better after the fork when the whole Altcoin market will rise, because some people will dump no matter of the price just to get into Bitcoin.
I will also hold long term and see what happens.
They said on telegram a few days ago, if the vote says "no", the next vote will be in the near future, maybe in a month.

I don't mind waiting a month.  I am not a big fan of vague language such as 'near future' though.

I am also rather concerned about the amount of control the devs have given themselves in the corp by not only setting the fees to propose changes to corp laws really really high but establishing a large number of laws without any voting...   they really really REALLY need to waive those massive fees until we vote on a number of things (such as what the appropriate fees are).

If this doesn't happen this is all an illusion with respect to being semi autonomous and token holder controlled.

i also don't mind waiting for one more month but real issue is, they should stop poking their nose in other ICOs (Like ICO adviser) and start giving attention to their on project

[illiki23]

It costs 5 Eth just to propose a change in 'Governance rules' so a vote can be held.

Half of which is paid out to the small 'Board of Directors'.

They claim it is to encourage people to write better proposals.  What it really does is consolidate their power.

Ideally we should be able to propose a vote if enough voters sign some sort of petition not have to pay a 1500$ fee for something which may not even pass...

Ok.  I need to stop checking this thread for awhile.

[jc12345]

Unlocking the token means it would be movable and will probably quickly be added to Etherdelta. This will probably happen before the fork. This means people can then buy more at low dumping prices before money flows back into alts after the fork.

[analyzing]

It costs 5 Eth just to propose a change in 'Governance rules' so a vote can be held.

Half of which is paid out to the small 'Board of Directors'.

They claim it is to encourage people to write better proposals.  What it really does is consolidate their power.

Ideally we should be able to propose a vote if enough voters sign some sort of petition not have to pay a 1500$ fee for something which may not even pass...

Ok.  I need to stop checking this thread for awhile.

i think they said in white paper, they will create some sort of .net platform website where they will do all voting on project etc , not sure they will follow up that or they will go expensive voting process

[swpceo1]

Interesting concept. Good luck!

[analyzing]

Unlocking the token means it would be movable and will probably quickly be added to Etherdelta. This will probably happen before the fork. This means people can then buy more at low dumping prices before money flows back into alts after the fork.

i agree with you completely but not releasing tokens also creating panic in investors including in me , in one side i really want to see token in market and other side i am worry people will dump and other people will buy it in very low price and we all investors will go in extreme pain while watching them to grab DRP on very low price

[Fluffington]

It costs 5 Eth just to propose a change in 'Governance rules' so a vote can be held.

Half of which is paid out to the small 'Board of Directors'.

They claim it is to encourage people to write better proposals.  What it really does is consolidate their power.

Ideally we should be able to propose a vote if enough voters sign some sort of petition not have to pay a 1500$ fee for something which may not even pass...

Ok.  I need to stop checking this thread for awhile.

How does Dcorp democracy work? I see no platform ready for this.

If it costs so much to make proposals, why not collect a bunch of people in support of the proposal
to contribute with smaller amount until the proposal amount is fully filled and then make the proposal?
This plan splits the cost and also establishes support for the proposal idea.

[ThibautMT]

How does Dcorp democracy work? I see no platform ready for this.

We vote through the smart contract, the plateform is not ready yet