JKC, the newest Litecoin-based alt coin has arrived!

[niteryder]

niteryder, thanks for the new pool. Can you also provide a status page.

Stats are on the main page.  First block in the pool was solved and paid out.  Looks to be working.

If this pools is verified to be working properly (need a few more users), I will use the awarded bounty to pre-fund the pool so we can have payouts after 10 confirms instead of 120.

[portice]

I'll toss a little bit your way niteryder

[marcetin]

I am in

[niteryder]

Thanks guys.  Blocks are coming in.  Please keep any eye on if the payouts are matching estimates.

[WOPR]

Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
 

[dreamwatcher]

Thanks guys.  Blocks are coming in.  Please keep any eye on if the payouts are matching estimates.

I sending my hash power your way.

3 rigs (though rig 1 is down at the moment, it should be up to nite)   

When everything is up and running, it should be a little over 3 M/H.

[niteryder]

Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
 

LOl, all 5 of us mining are 10% of that.  

[marcetin]

Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
 

LOl, all 5 of us mining are 10% of that.  

[WOPR]

P2Pool IP has changed to 37.11.63.133 (for people who can't connect directly to http://jkc.sytes.net:19327).

[dreamwatcher]

Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
 

LOl, all 5 of us mining are 10% of that.  

Just a couple of suggestions to help your pool be the best it can. 

First one is easy: In the account workers subscreen the rate column is still marked with the default mmcFE M/H label, when I believe you are showing K/H.

Second one is related to the first: The mmcFE accounting of the workers hash rate seems too low by about 450% (4.5x). For example: my worker number 2 is in reality working at about ~ 900 K/H but mmcFE is reporting around ~200 K/H. I understand that any pool software cannot be completely accurate with hash estimates, but 450% could be improved.

If you need any help, I have worked quite a bit with pool software (though the back-end is my forte , I have experimented with mmcFE). I assume you are using a stratum bridge to a pushpool, perhaps the issue lies there. Then again,I believe mmcFE estimates its hash rates strictly from the database.

[niteryder]

Network hashrate 71 MH/s
"blocks" : 18537,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.96001316,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 72753553,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
 

LOl, all 5 of us mining are 10% of that.  

Just a couple of suggestions to help your pool be the best it can. 

First one is easy: In the account workers subscreen the rate column is still marked with the default mmcFE M/H label, when I believe you are showing K/H.

Second one is related to the first: The mmcFE accounting of the workers hash rate seems too low by about 450% (4.5x). For example: my worker number 2 is in reality working at about ~ 900 K/H but mmcFE is reporting around ~200 K/H. I understand that any pool software cannot be completely accurate with hash estimates, but 450% could be improved.

If you need any help, I have worked quite a bit with pool software (though the back-end is my forte , I have experimented with mmcFE). I assume you are using a stratum bridge to a pushpool, perhaps the issue lies there. Then again,I believe mmcFE estimates its hash rates strictly from the database.

I am always open to help.  For the label, it looks all correct.  What am I missing?   Also, what should your total has rate be?  I see 258, 264 and 64 K/h.  I have 3 miners attached and it seems spot on.

[dreamwatcher]

The label is here, on the accountworkers screen.

Code:

Worker Accounts

    CAUTION! Deletion of a worker could cause all associated shares for that worker to be lost. Do not delete Workers unless you are certain all of their shares have been counted or that you have never used that worker account. 

Worker Name	Password	Active                  Mhash/s	 	 

Grep finds the Mhash in two places:

Code:

accountworkers.php:<tr><td>Worker Name</td><td>Password</td><td>Active</td><td>Mhash/s</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td></tr>

statsAuth.php:echo "<tr><td class=\"leftheader\">Pool Hash Rate</td><td>". number_format($show_hashrate, 3) . " Mhash/s</td></tr>";

I noticed the top hashers in the pool list seemed right, however my stats are way low.


For example cgminer reports on my 1st two rigs:

Miner 1

Code:

(5s):863.1K (avg):854.4Kh/s | Q:102  A:272  R:2  HW:0  E:267%  U:3.2/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  DW: 202  NB: 35  LW: 548  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
 Block: 97ccb1234f51543d...  Diff:128K  Started: [20:18:27]  Best share: 71.4K

Miner 2

Code:

(5s):897.0K (avg):895.2Kh/s | Q:106  A:244  R:0  HW:0  E:230%  U:2.7/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  DW: 210  NB: 35  LW: 568  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
 Block: 97ccb1234f51543d...  Diff:128K  Started: [20:18:33]  Best share: 47.7K

If anybody else hashrate seemes to be under reported, post a response. It may be a combination of miner software/pool software/mmcFE.

Although this is not a crtical issue, it may be that mmcFE is also under reporting total pool stats as well    

[niteryder]

The label is here, on the accountworkers screen.

Code:

Worker Accounts

    CAUTION! Deletion of a worker could cause all associated shares for that worker to be lost. Do not delete Workers unless you are certain all of their shares have been counted or that you have never used that worker account. 

Worker Name	Password	Active                  Mhash/s	 	 

Grep finds the Mhash in two places:

Code:

accountworkers.php:<tr><td>Worker Name</td><td>Password</td><td>Active</td><td>Mhash/s</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td></tr>

statsAuth.php:echo "<tr><td class=\"leftheader\">Pool Hash Rate</td><td>". number_format($show_hashrate, 3) . " Mhash/s</td></tr>";

I noticed the top hashers in the pool list seemed right, however my stats are way low.


For example cgminer reports on my 1st two rigs:

Miner 1

Code:

(5s):863.1K (avg):854.4Kh/s | Q:102  A:272  R:2  HW:0  E:267%  U:3.2/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  DW: 202  NB: 35  LW: 548  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
 Block: 97ccb1234f51543d...  Diff:128K  Started: [20:18:27]  Best share: 71.4K

Miner 2

Code:

(5s):897.0K (avg):895.2Kh/s | Q:106  A:244  R:0  HW:0  E:230%  U:2.7/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  DW: 210  NB: 35  LW: 568  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to jkc.allpoolz.com diff 64 with stratum as user
 Block: 97ccb1234f51543d...  Diff:128K  Started: [20:18:33]  Best share: 47.7K

If anybody else hashrate seemes to be under reported, post a response. It may be a combination of miner software/pool software/mmcFE.

Although this is not a crtical issue, it may be that mmcFE is also under reporting total pool stats as well    

Fixed the Mh to Kh header.  Also, do the shares match up?

[dreamwatcher]

Fixed the Mh to Kh header.  Also, do the shares match up?

It appears so, I did restart the miners a couple of times, it appears since the last restart about 905 accepted shares and the pool shows 1031 total accepted.

I can restart the miners, and do a recount. I will report back in about an hour or so.

[niteryder]

Does a high-rez pic with a transparent background exist of this coin?

[dreamwatcher]

Fixed the Mh to Kh header.  Also, do the shares match up?

It appears so, I did restart the miners a couple of times, it appears since the last restart about 905 accepted shares and the pool shows 1031 total accepted.

I can restart the miners, and do a recount. I will report back in about an hour or so.

From 9:00 to 9:46 the pool reports 355 shares (1423 @ 9:46) - (1068 @ 9:00) = 355

CGminer reports 173+129+50 = 352 shares

So the share counting is fine, and that is what is important.

I will check on my end, as I now believe I may be overwriting shares (aggressive Intensity..though I only run at 13 ( that is the threshold for memory overwrite according to CGminers developer).

Pools can be great diagnostic tools also.


TO the JKC community, niteryder's pool is perfectly fine, go ahead and join his pool with confidence.

[niteryder]

Fixed the Mh to Kh header.  Also, do the shares match up?

It appears so, I did restart the miners a couple of times, it appears since the last restart about 905 accepted shares and the pool shows 1031 total accepted.

I can restart the miners, and do a recount. I will report back in about an hour or so.

From 9:00 to 9:46 the pool reports 355 shares (1423 @ 9:46) - (1068 @ 9:00) = 355

CGminer reports 173+129+50 = 352 shares

So the share counting is fine, and that is what is important.

I will check on my end, as I now believe I may be overwriting shares (aggressive Intensity..though I only run at 13 ( that is the threshold for memory overwrite according to CGminers developer).

Pools can be great diagnostic tools also.


TO the JKC community, niteryder's pool is perfectly fine, go ahead and join his pool with confidence.

Thanks!  I do see a small bug.  If you set the payout threshold to over 100, it defaults back to 99.99 when you refresh the page.  I'll work on it.

[whj]

Plan on the Exchange？

[js2082]

Does a high-rez pic with a transparent background exist of this coin?

I don't really have hi-rez one, I have 256x256. If you need a higher resolution one, maybe I can make one for you. You can do circular crop (for example using office - powerpoint, word etc), so background shouldn't be matter.

[live627]

Does a high-rez pic with a transparent background exist of this coin?

I don't really have hi-rez one, I have 256x256. If you need a higher resolution one, maybe I can make one for you. You can do circular crop (for example using office - powerpoint, word etc), so background shouldn't be matter.

or magic wand in photoshop...