CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies!

[bounty manager]

Hello,

can someone help me contact cmc team? we have already filled the request form weeks ago but no response from the team.



Ticker: GFL

Website : https://goldenfleece.co/en/

Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2148853.0

Etherscan link: https://etherscan.io/token/0x26607f9bf9d62a37b0c78e1d3719fcd1fa32bef9

Github:  https://github.com/goldenfleececoin

Twitter: https://twitter.com/GoldenFleece_co

Exchange: https://yobit.net/en/trade/GFL/BTC

Whitepaper link:  https://goldenfleece.co/en/-/~/m/u/ck/files/Golden_Paper_v_3_2(1).pdf

We have crossed $100k USD daily volume

Presently trade able on Yobit , Etherdelta and IDEX.

[feinter]

What conditions must be met for the ERC20 token to be listed on Coinmarketcap - is there anything besides filling out the form?
How long can it take to place a coin on Coinmarketcap?

[mrankin]

It's a real pain that you guys changed your daily traded volume from $10K to $50K right as we hit the $10K daily trade volume.

[magrospic]

It's a real pain that you guys changed your daily traded volume from $10K to $50K right as we hit the $10K daily trade volume.

It's 100k now

[jackjackfly]

It's a real pain that you guys changed your daily traded volume from $10K to $50K right as we hit the $10K daily trade volume.

It's 100k now

it is really unbeliesvable, i think now only really really huge projects can be listed on coinmarketcap. But what others shall do, what about less tradable but still perspective coins and tokens

[tendy263]

I think any project that has a daily trading volume of 50k and above does not really warrant the attention of most serious investors which is the reason why coinmarketcap did revise that 10k threshold upwards, could be good for the market !!!

[feinter]

I think any project that has a daily trading volume of 50k and above does not really warrant the attention of most serious investors which is the reason why coinmarketcap did revise that 10k threshold upwards, could be good for the market !!!

Surely you are right, but think how many valuable coins will not be able to get to the Coinmarketcap .. Will be listed only those that will invest large amounts of money in marketing, or those who invest in bots trading with each other to raise daily volume.

[miningguru]

I think any project that has a daily trading volume of 50k and above does not really warrant the attention of most serious investors which is the reason why coinmarketcap did revise that 10k threshold upwards, could be good for the market !!!

Surely you are right, but think how many valuable coins will not be able to get to the Coinmarketcap .. Will be listed only those that will invest large amounts of money in marketing, or those who invest in bots trading with each other to raise daily volume.

For that reason CMC initiated minimum target for volumes because without generating those it is not possible to list them in CMC that's how they designed the code in the back ground.

[mrankin]

I think any project that has a daily trading volume of 50k and above does not really warrant the attention of most serious investors which is the reason why coinmarketcap did revise that 10k threshold upwards, could be good for the market !!!

Surely you are right, but think how many valuable coins will not be able to get to the Coinmarketcap .. Will be listed only those that will invest large amounts of money in marketing, or those who invest in bots trading with each other to raise daily volume.

For that reason CMC initiated minimum target for volumes because without generating those it is not possible to list them in CMC that's how they designed the code in the back ground.

What? CMC just uses API's to pull data. The traded volume is totally irrelevant. If they've moved the requirement to $100K daily traded volume then they have started their own demise IMO. Bring on their competition!

[magrospic]

CommerceBlock's volume is consistently over $100k but no luck so far 

$160k at the moment

https://coincodex.com/crypto/commerce-block/

[brian_nguyen]

Please update the below information for WeAreSatoshi

Website: www.wearesatoshi.net
Announcement: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=724727.0
Explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/wsx/
Telegram: https://t.me/joinchat/GVKqMxIaLU3Az90nzvmvtw

API is updated on CryptoID, please also update circulation

Thank you so much,
Brian Nguyen

[Ompyon]

I think any project that has a daily trading volume of 50k and above does not really warrant the attention of most serious investors which is the reason why coinmarketcap did revise that 10k threshold upwards, could be good for the market !!!

Surely you are right, but think how many valuable coins will not be able to get to the Coinmarketcap .. Will be listed only those that will invest large amounts of money in marketing, or those who invest in bots trading with each other to raise daily volume.

For that reason CMC initiated minimum target for volumes because without generating those it is not possible to list them in CMC that's how they designed the code in the back ground.

What? CMC just uses API's to pull data. The traded volume is totally irrelevant. If they've moved the requirement to $100K daily traded volume then they have started their own demise IMO. Bring on their competition!

if that means that all existing coins must be listed on the CMC,
although the coin is a little trading volume

[feinter]

I think any project that has a daily trading volume of 50k and above does not really warrant the attention of most serious investors which is the reason why coinmarketcap did revise that 10k threshold upwards, could be good for the market !!!

Surely you are right, but think how many valuable coins will not be able to get to the Coinmarketcap .. Will be listed only those that will invest large amounts of money in marketing, or those who invest in bots trading with each other to raise daily volume.

For that reason CMC initiated minimum target for volumes because without generating those it is not possible to list them in CMC that's how they designed the code in the back ground.

What? CMC just uses API's to pull data. The traded volume is totally irrelevant. If they've moved the requirement to $100K daily traded volume then they have started their own demise IMO. Bring on their competition!

if that means that all existing coins must be listed on the CMC,
although the coin is a little trading volume

Placing all tokens would not be a good solution. There are many that are completely irrelevant (for example private tokens), however, such a high volume limit will block good and legit tokens, and those that unfairly use the bots to trade to increase volume, will be listed.

[AdrienBe]

I think it's becoming a joke the extent to which coinmarketcap.com's crazy "circulating supply" default reporting policy is now being gamed to death by opportunistic token creators.

This is decentralised crypto, not some regulated stock issuance governed by contractural processes. If the coins are generated on the blockchain they are all in circulation. The blockchain does not make any liquidity distinction between one wallet and another - they are homogeneous, not heterogeneous which is the whole point of a blockchain anyway.

Hey, the coins in my wallet are "not circulating" ! Do I get to exclude them from the reported supply to increase the per-coin price ? Why should some wallet holders be allowed to do this and not others ?

Worst of all, the wallet holders who are allowed to have their wallet contents excluded from the CMC default marketcap are usually the people who created the tokens in the first place.

Can you get any bigger a conflict of interest than that ?

This market's building the dotcom bubble from hell and the ludicrous CMC "circulating supply" policy is one of the main engines fuelling it.

...

I agree, the whole "circulating supply" topic is a mess. And most investors do not know about that until the day they want to run analysis on ICOs or any other analysis that needs historical data.

Token distribution is the base so I would expect a website or sort of organization dedicated to this task.

----

Here is the real question to which I think the answer is "No":

Is there any website dedicated to tracking history of circulating tokens of any coin?

Ideally, for each time a crypto has tokens added or removed to its circulating amount, we'd want to know:

• amount
• exact date
• sent to whom (even if burnt, we want the address)

A “proof” for each change (coins added/removed to circulation) should be provided from an official source: official website, blog, twitter, blockchain explorer, email from team, else. This is a very important point because we have seen in several instances that data shown on CoinMarketCap is incorrect.

----

Here is the simplified version of the above question to which I think the answer is again "No":

Is there any website dedicated to tracking amount of distributed tokens of any coin?

Ideally, for each coin:

• init circulation - along with proof
• current circulation - along with proof
• total supply - along with proof

“along with proof” means an official source: official website, blog, twitter, blockchain explorer, email from team, else. This is a very important point because we have seen in several instances that data shown on CoinMarketCap is incorrect.

----

Thanks in advance for helping the community sort that out. We desperately need higher quality in the crypto data we all access.

[Passive Coin]

Have requested second time to add Passive Coin to CoinMarketCap.
Not any answer. Seems this 100K volume is a crazy requirement and small niche (but good) projects have not any chances to get listed.
I really do not understand this CMC's policy.

From other side, traders and crypto enthusiasts exaggerate (to bump, to overemphasize) the role of CMC. When I present Passive Coin to cryptolovers, the first question they ask: Is this coin listed on CMC?
A lot of people treat CMC like some kind of "crypto bible".

Anyway, Passive Coin is listed now at World Coin Index. If CMC dislike to list us, we are going to list at alternative services, with pleasure.

[embermineclay]

Have requested second time to add Passive Coin to CoinMarketCap.
Not any answer. Seems this 100K volume is a crazy requirement and small niche (but good) projects have not any chances to get listed.
I really do not understand this CMC's policy.

From other side, traders and crypto enthusiasts exaggerate (to bump, to overemphasize) the role of CMC. When I present Passive Coin to cryptolovers, the first question they ask: Is this coin listed on CMC?
A lot of people treat CMC like some kind of "crypto bible".

Anyway, Passive Coin is listed now at World Coin Index. If CMC dislike to list us, we are going to list at alternative services, with pleasure.

Yes. Their arbitrary rules are ridiculous and change without, seemingly, any reason whatsoever. 3-4 months ago, minimum trading volume needed to be $10,000. Last month $50,000. Now $100,000?! WTF do they expect?
And I agree. People rely on CMC too much as the "bible" of how well a coin/token is doing. It's ridiculous.

There are other services that are doing better and are actually approachable and transparent, like LiveCoinWatch. The fact that you can't find a single REAL persona behind CMC is appalling. Gliss?! Who even is he? NO ONE KNOWS!

[magrospic]

CommerceBlock's volume is consistently over $100k but no luck so far 

$160k at the moment

https://coincodex.com/crypto/commerce-block/

CommerceBlock volume now $250k

CMC add would be simply awesome 

[magrospic]

CommerceBlock's volume is consistently over $100k but no luck so far 

$160k at the moment

https://coincodex.com/crypto/commerce-block/

CommerceBlock volume now $250k

CMC add would be simply awesome 

CBT $500k volume for the last 24 hours

[jackjackfly]

Have requested second time to add Passive Coin to CoinMarketCap.
Not any answer. Seems this 100K volume is a crazy requirement and small niche (but good) projects have not any chances to get listed.
I really do not understand this CMC's policy.

From other side, traders and crypto enthusiasts exaggerate (to bump, to overemphasize) the role of CMC. When I present Passive Coin to cryptolovers, the first question they ask: Is this coin listed on CMC?
A lot of people treat CMC like some kind of "crypto bible".

Anyway, Passive Coin is listed now at World Coin Index. If CMC dislike to list us, we are going to list at alternative services, with pleasure.

Have faced same situation for ZONTO project, they have little trading but definitely awesome project, and Coinmarketcap just ignore such tokens at all. Actually I think new startups cannot compete already with old one
where to get trading amount if listing price for each exchange is more than 2 BTC

[atlantik]

Have requested second time to add Passive Coin to CoinMarketCap.
Not any answer. Seems this 100K volume is a crazy requirement and small niche (but good) projects have not any chances to get listed.
I really do not understand this CMC's policy.

From other side, traders and crypto enthusiasts exaggerate (to bump, to overemphasize) the role of CMC. When I present Passive Coin to cryptolovers, the first question they ask: Is this coin listed on CMC?
A lot of people treat CMC like some kind of "crypto bible".

Anyway, Passive Coin is listed now at World Coin Index. If CMC dislike to list us, we are going to list at alternative services, with pleasure.

Have faced same situation for ZONTO project, they have little trading but definitely awesome project, and Coinmarketcap just ignore such tokens at all. Actually I think new startups cannot compete already with old one
where to get trading amount if listing price for each exchange is more than 2 BTC

When the coin reaches a certain level of turnover of funds, it will itself fall with a rating. The system is so built that the small ones do not get there.