xman89
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
 |
June 16, 2014, 02:20:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cornerstonecoin
|
|
June 17, 2014, 03:29:46 AM |
|
Hi. I am the developer of CornerstoneCoin (CCX). Could you please include the CCX/LTC volume that we are seeing at AllCrypt in the 24hr volume? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
razzag
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2014, 12:24:17 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
iso3789
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 1
|
|
June 17, 2014, 12:28:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gliss (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2014, 01:10:07 PM |
|
155 Billion coins? is any of that premine? |
|
|
|
|
DStrange
|
|
June 17, 2014, 01:13:21 PM |
|
155 Billion coins? is any of that premine? No. Coin was launched July 4, 2012. So just deep mined. |
|
|
|
|
TaunSew
|
|
June 17, 2014, 01:27:04 PM |
|
NxT just like ripple. Please recalculate the capitalization. It has less volume than XC, Monero, et al.
|
There ain't no Revolution like a NEMolution. The only solution is Bitcoin's dissolution! NEM!
|
|
|
|
worhiper_-_
|
|
June 17, 2014, 01:29:21 PM |
|
NxT just like ripple. Please recalculate the capitalization. It has less volume than XC, Monero, et al.
Mastercoin has a low volume too. Should we make it look like it is valued less because currently it's more of a protocol rather that a currency and people are holding on to it? I don't think so.  |
|
|
|
|
|
TaunSew
|
|
June 17, 2014, 01:30:28 PM |
|
NxT just like ripple. Please recalculate the capitalization. It has less volume than XC, Monero, et al.
Mastercoin has a low volume too. Should we make it look like it is valued less because currently it's more of a protocol rather that a currency and people are holding on to it? I don't think so. I said NxT |
There ain't no Revolution like a NEMolution. The only solution is Bitcoin's dissolution! NEM!
|
|
|
tuvokcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
June 17, 2014, 05:41:43 PM |
|
Gliss,
The SaveCoin coin supply is not being correctly represented on coinmarketcap.com.
The coin supply listed presently, only shows the mined coins. The double asterisk indicates that the coin has been Significantly Premined, however those premined coins are not included like they are for other coins.
SaveCoin did have a premine of 20 Million coins. Of those 20 Million, 19 million are held in reserve to make daily interest payments in what is called Proof of Funds (POF). The coin pays out a .137% daily interest on every coin in circulation (except the premine). The wallet does not need to be open like POS. These coins are not technically available coin supply until paid out as interest.
The remaining 1 million premine are held by the Dev for bounties, promotions, giveaways and are fully available.
1) To accurately represent the coin's supply for the short term at least the 1 million Dev premine should be included.
2) To be even more accurate, the paid interest to date should also be included. We would be satisfied with #1 to get started until a process for #2 can be created.
3) Eliminating the 19M held in reserve for POF, makes the effective premine 5%. In light of this, does a 5% premine still qualify as significantly premined or can this designation be removed?
Given that SaveCoin is the only POF coin, we understand the confusion. Let me know if you have any questions or if any other information is required to make this change.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omnivion
|
|
June 17, 2014, 09:12:03 PM |
|
The block explorer coinmarketcap links to for BlackCoin isn't working. Link to this one instead: http://blackcha.in/ |
Blockchain for Apps | Blockchain for Business | Blockchain for Future |
|
|
|
Eadeqa
|
|
June 18, 2014, 09:10:30 AM |
|
NxT just like ripple. Please recalculate the capitalization. It has less volume than XC, Monero, et al.
It has more volume right now than peercoin and better distribution than both peercoin and litecoin. 50% of peercoin are controlled by 60 addresses. Litecoin is just as bad. All 1 billion nxt were distributed to original stakeholders who contributed BTC, and nxt currently has better distribution than both peercoin and litecoin. It's nothing like ripple |
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:54:45 AM |
|
NxT just like ripple. Please recalculate the capitalization. It has less volume than XC, Monero, et al.
It has more volume right now than peercoin and better distribution than both peercoin and litecoin. 50% of peercoin are controlled by 60 addresses. Litecoin is just as bad. All 1 billion nxt were distributed to original stakeholders who contributed BTC, and nxt currently has better distribution than both peercoin and litecoin. It's nothing like ripple Everything in your post is wrong. |
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion) |
|
|
|
From Above
|
|
June 18, 2014, 11:57:26 AM |
|
NxT just like ripple. Please recalculate the capitalization. It has less volume than XC, Monero, et al.
It has more volume right now than peercoin and better distribution than both peercoin and litecoin. 50% of peercoin are controlled by 60 addresses. Litecoin is just as bad. All 1 billion nxt were distributed to original stakeholders who contributed BTC, and nxt currently has better distribution than both peercoin and litecoin. It's nothing like ripple Everything in your post is wrong. U are wrong LaudaM nxt volume 24h $ 162,732 peercoin volume 24h $ 57,952 (roughly 1/3 of Nxt) for distribution check respective distribution tables Plz note that none of these small coins can rival Bitcoin volume by any means. ~CfA~ ps regarding user 'TaunSew': https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=654862.msg7378163#msg7378163 |
|
|
|
|
Gliss (OP)
|
|
June 18, 2014, 12:40:06 PM |
|
155 Billion coins? is any of that premine? No. Coin was launched July 4, 2012. So just deep mined. Ok, added. Gliss,
The SaveCoin coin supply is not being correctly represented on coinmarketcap.com.
The coin supply listed presently, only shows the mined coins. The double asterisk indicates that the coin has been Significantly Premined, however those premined coins are not included like they are for other coins.
SaveCoin did have a premine of 20 Million coins. Of those 20 Million, 19 million are held in reserve to make daily interest payments in what is called Proof of Funds (POF). The coin pays out a .137% daily interest on every coin in circulation (except the premine). The wallet does not need to be open like POS. These coins are not technically available coin supply until paid out as interest.
The remaining 1 million premine are held by the Dev for bounties, promotions, giveaways and are fully available.
1) To accurately represent the coin's supply for the short term at least the 1 million Dev premine should be included.
2) To be even more accurate, the paid interest to date should also be included. We would be satisfied with #1 to get started until a process for #2 can be created.
3) Eliminating the 19M held in reserve for POF, makes the effective premine 5%. In light of this, does a 5% premine still qualify as significantly premined or can this designation be removed?
Given that SaveCoin is the only POF coin, we understand the confusion. Let me know if you have any questions or if any other information is required to make this change.
Thanks.
That makes sense, I'll take a look tonight. |
|
|
|
|
rethink-your-strategy
|
|
June 18, 2014, 03:01:25 PM |
|
Bytecoin had an 82% premine before public release (under the guise of it supposedly being on the "darkweb" for 2 years, a claim nobody can validate). It definitely needs a ** on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rethink-your-strategy
|
|
June 18, 2014, 03:08:41 PM |
|
155 Billion coins? is any of that premine? No. Coin was launched July 4, 2012. So just deep mined. Nonsense - the blockchain was not observed by ANYBODY that is known here on Bitcointalk, on IRC, or even on a cryptography mailing list. Not a single known person has come forth and said "I've had a full node since the middle of 2012, I can vouch for the validity of the blockchain". Given that the whitepaper is dated September 2013, and the first github commit is November 2013, there's no evidence that it existed before November 2013. Its first proper public release was in March 2014, by which time 82% had been mined. Falsifying the blockchain is trivial, and this is doubly so as BCN was released with a purposely crippled miner that did insanely stupid stuff like recalculating static values in each iteration of a loop (doing this by accident is a practical impossibility given the generally ok-written code). It NEEDS to be listed as "significantly premined" until there is overwhelming evidence from people who are known in this forum or in cryptography circles that its claim of being 2 years old is true. Even IF it is true, the fact that it was unavailable to anyone for 2 years and then suddenly released publicly would likely still count as a premine. |
|
|
|
|
|
coinmaster222
|
|
June 18, 2014, 03:15:33 PM |
|
Bytecoin had an 82% premine before public release (under the guise of it supposedly being on the "darkweb" for 2 years, a claim nobody can validate). It definitely needs a ** on it.
Can you link to where the 82% premine comes from? I've never heard of it. |
|
|
|
|
