CoinMarketCap.com - Market Cap Rankings of All Cryptocurrencies!

[Sukrim]

I thought about this as well, but in the end it's an even more manual and only partly applicable measure compared to the "available supply".

[robao]

Please up information to pesetacoin.

Url  http://pesetacoin.info

Block Explorer http://www.pesetachain.info

Bitcointalk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=403378.new#new

And add exchange https://betasharex.com/trade/PTC/BTC

Thank you

[Armis]

Important EMC2 Milestone Reached

EMC2 has reached a milestone -- halving of block rewards, now at 128 / block.

[Gliss]

A helpful sortable column would be "Date Established". I am always curious at the amount of time a coin has been alive. It'd probably be too much work to track down all the dates but it would help me sort the oldest, mature coins from the brand new coins just getting started.

Like a "founded" column or 1st block date. Just someway to STR coins by maturity.

+1

for the 'circa' column, simply 4 characters,  month and year -- 1114 would be November 2014

Yep that would work!

Yep, I have all that in DOACC (see sig) and in RDF to boot.

I ensured that each DOACC entry has an “incept date” of YYYY-MM. Yes, it was a lot of work but I saw it as essential to DOACC. And, once completed, it's then well worth maintaining, at least from a disciplinary perspective if not a financial one.

It allows me to publish the altcoin launch graphs/graphics on Minkiz front page (http://minkiz.co/). Another, less compelling, example of where I use it is in Minki’s version of the bitcointalk Sleepers list. The details are a bit rough'n'ready atm, still in “ninja launch” mode.

If Gliss is interested, we could use DOACC to backfill a “founded” column for all the altcoins currently listed at coinmarketcap (AIUI, assets have their own release date calendar courtesy of the asset issue mechanism), merely by posing an appropriate SPARQL query of the the DOACC RDF graph, along the lines:

Code:

PREFIX skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#>
PREFIX doacc: <http://purl.org/net/bel-epa/doacc#>

SELECT ?node ?label ?symbol ?incept WHERE 
{
?node skos:prefLabel ?label .
?node doacc:symbol ?symbol .
?node doacc:incept ?incept.
}
LIMIT 25

(If you want to see it working, just copynpasta the above into the form field on http://minkiz.co/sparql)

The only hiccough is a few differences in trading symbols, apparently inherited from the regrettable practice of major exchanges deciding to ignore the actual symbol specified in the bitcoinunits.cpp code.

For example, see Silkcoin, referenced as “SILK” on the exchanges --- and consequently in the coinmarketcap stats (http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/silkcoin/) --- which, if everybody had their druthers, is actually “SC” in the wallet code (https://github.com/shnurf/silkcoin/blob/master/src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp#L38).

For DOACC, I chose to go by the verifiable fact of what's actually specified in the C++ code.

For my occasional use of cross-referencing DOACC data with coinmarketcap data, I use a map (Python dictionary) of coinmarketcap symbols -> DOACC symbols. We'd turn the dictionary mapping into a separate graph of RDF statements and either use it to augment a copy of the main DOACC graph or act as a source for a federated query - both of which are fairly trivial to do.

btw, I'd say that your instincts are correct; given the calendarial flexibility of “ninja” launches, YYYY-MM is about as precise as you can sensibly get / need to be.

Cheers

Graham

This is great, I'll take a deeper look soon.

Gliss, can you please consider changing the front page to show "all" instead of just "currencies"?

The distinction is totally arbitrary. "Has its own blockchain" is clearly not the distinguishing factor if you are putting both nubits and nushares, meanwhile bitUSD doesn't get to be on the front page even though it's completely analagous to nubits.

Stuff like MaidSafeCoin is important - just because it's on MSC doesn't mean it shouldn't be first-class.

All the shitty user-issued assets won't show up near the top anyway. If something is worth $XXm, it should be visible.

Agreed.  The only reason I separated them out in the first place is because I considered the assets section experimental and didn't want to risk destroying the main page.  But the assets page has been pretty stable so I will make the switch soon.

I have a proposal for a new feature.

show market cap as market cap calculated by total final supply

so for instance BTC market cap would be caluclated using 21000000 times the current BTC price

This could be a third option on top of "Total supply" and "Available supply"

Although some coins might not have been minted yet, the price ought to reflect the value of the known upcoming inflation in the money supply.

For coins where the end supply is unlimited this value could just be zero.

The "total final supply" value could be interesting for people looking at coins as store of value rather than an item used for exchanging value.

If you need the PoC coins to show up too, you might add a fourth value "total final supply in year 2200" or some such, to try to add in all the extra coins coming in as interest

Coin owners would of course have to supply the final supply and built in inflation on top of that, if any. With some coins, it is probably not possible to put a specific value, but so be it.

Interesting idea.

[daimyo]

Hi

I submitted a request form for UFO to be added on coinmarketcap. Are there any other requirements?

[Armis]

Hi

I submitted a request form for UFO to be added on coinmarketcap. Are there any other requirements?

provide an API, if you don't have that your block explorer

[daimyo]

Hi

I submitted a request form for UFO to be added on coinmarketcap. Are there any other requirements?

provide an API, if you don't have that your block explorer

Name: UFO Coin
Symbol: UFO

Block Explorer: http://explorer.ufocoin.co:2750/
website: ufocoin.co
exchange: https://betasharex.com/trade/UFO/BTC

LOGO

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=658117.0

Thanks a lot!

[busterroni]

Hi, thanks for creating CMC, I use it multiple times per day and it's very helpful It's alright if I take screenshots of your graphs and add them to news articles right? I write for CryptoCoinsNews.com and Bitcoinist.net and add your graphs so readers can gain insight into the prices of cryptocurrencies. I always give the source of the graph and a link to it. Thanks

[alani123]

Today's volume for DOGE seems like a joke. 14,046,500$ from ANXPRO seems highly unlikely, is this an error?

[vlight]

Today's volume for DOGE seems like a joke. 14,046,500$ from ANXPRO seems highly unlikely, is this an error?

Same for Stellar.

[Gliss]

Today's volume for DOGE seems like a joke. 14,046,500$ from ANXPRO seems highly unlikely, is this an error?

Same for Stellar.

Yeah it's fixed now, conversion error.

[CoinHoarder]

Hi Gliss.

Great work with coin market cap, I am sure you get a ton of web traffic. I have a couple suggestions for you.

After clicking on a certain currency the graph of the market cap and price is very nice and easy to read. Once you get down to the graph on the volume though, it leaves a little to be desired. If there was large fluctuations in volume for the time period you have selected, the volume chart can sometimes be pretty useless as it's hard to tell what the volume is. This is due to the lines being so small in some cases, the range on the left not being detailed enough, and because when you hover over the lines no number value pops up (like on the market cap/price graph). I think it would go a long ways towards the usefulness of the volume graph to at the very least make it to where the numbers will pop up when the volume lines are hovered over. Perhaps you can think of some other way of making it easier.. there are not a lot of places that track historical volume or at least historical volume aggregated from multiple exchanges so I think this would be a nice feature of the website.

I also request that Nubits and bitUSD be treated similarly. Nubits is currently listed as a currency and bitUSD is listed as an asset, yet they both share their blockchain with their main tokens.. NuShares and BitsharesX respectively. Nubits and bitUSD are both cryptos whose values are pegged to the US dollar, and share block chains with other tokens. It is contradictory to have both Nubits and Nushares as separate listings under Currencies when bitUSD, bitBTC, etc, are listed under Assets but BitsharesX is listed under Currencies. I think some sort of policy should be set for tokens that share block chains as to which should be listed as Currencies and which should be listed as Assets. That way everything is fair & organized.

Thanks for the great website!

[daimyo]

Hi Gliss,

I am sorry, I have new info for UFO Coin.

The bitcointalk thread now is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=844754.0

and the coinmarketcap shows no exchange info which is https://betasharex.com/trade/UFO/BTC

I submitted those via the google form but not sure if it works

I would like to ask you to update those if possible

Thank you very much!

[GreekBitcoin]

Hi. You are using a block explorer for Gapcoin that apparently doesnt show coin supply.

I would suggest you use this block explorer http://coinia.net/gapcoin/blockexplorer.php  where you can see coin supply here http://coinia.net/gapcoin/getbalance.php?api=total

[arteleis]

Hey Gliss,

Please Remove Bittrex from Silkcoin listings on coinmarketcap as we have requested to be delisted from their exchange.

The current link to Bittrex is now dead on CMC.

Thanks!

[Gliss]

Hi. You are using a block explorer for Gapcoin that apparently doesnt show coin supply.

I would suggest you use this block explorer http://coinia.net/gapcoin/blockexplorer.php  where you can see coin supply here http://coinia.net/gapcoin/getbalance.php?api=total

Hi Gliss,

I am sorry, I have new info for UFO Coin.

The bitcointalk thread now is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=844754.0

and the coinmarketcap shows no exchange info which is https://betasharex.com/trade/UFO/BTC

I submitted those via the google form but not sure if it works

I would like to ask you to update those if possible

Thank you very much!

Hey Gliss,

Please Remove Bittrex from Silkcoin listings on coinmarketcap as we have requested to be delisted from their exchange.

The current link to Bittrex is now dead on CMC.

Thanks!

All updated, thanks.

Hi Gliss.

Great work with coin market cap, I am sure you get a ton of web traffic. I have a couple suggestions for you.

After clicking on a certain currency the graph of the market cap and price is very nice and easy to read. Once you get down to the graph on the volume though, it leaves a little to be desired. If there was large fluctuations in volume for the time period you have selected, the volume chart can sometimes be pretty useless as it's hard to tell what the volume is. This is due to the lines being so small in some cases, the range on the left not being detailed enough, and because when you hover over the lines no number value pops up (like on the market cap/price graph). I think it would go a long ways towards the usefulness of the volume graph to at the very least make it to where the numbers will pop up when the volume lines are hovered over. Perhaps you can think of some other way of making it easier.. there are not a lot of places that track historical volume or at least historical volume aggregated from multiple exchanges so I think this would be a nice feature of the website.

I also request that Nubits and bitUSD be treated similarly. Nubits is currently listed as a currency and bitUSD is listed as an asset, yet they both share their blockchain with their main tokens.. NuShares and BitsharesX respectively. Nubits and bitUSD are both cryptos whose values are pegged to the US dollar, and share block chains with other tokens. It is contradictory to have both Nubits and Nushares as separate listings under Currencies when bitUSD, bitBTC, etc, are listed under Assets but BitsharesX is listed under Currencies. I think some sort of policy should be set for tokens that share block chains as to which should be listed as Currencies and which should be listed as Assets. That way everything is fair & organized.

Thanks for the great website!

Thanks for the suggestions.  Definitely looking into upgrading the charts.  As for Nubits/BitUSD,  I thought Nubits was a separate blockchain.  Which other blockchain is it on?

[daimyo]

Cheers!

[FandangledGizmo]

Hi Gliss.

Great work with coin market cap, I am sure you get a ton of web traffic. I have a couple suggestions for you.

After clicking on a certain currency the graph of the market cap and price is very nice and easy to read. Once you get down to the graph on the volume though, it leaves a little to be desired. If there was large fluctuations in volume for the time period you have selected, the volume chart can sometimes be pretty useless as it's hard to tell what the volume is. This is due to the lines being so small in some cases, the range on the left not being detailed enough, and because when you hover over the lines no number value pops up (like on the market cap/price graph). I think it would go a long ways towards the usefulness of the volume graph to at the very least make it to where the numbers will pop up when the volume lines are hovered over. Perhaps you can think of some other way of making it easier.. there are not a lot of places that track historical volume or at least historical volume aggregated from multiple exchanges so I think this would be a nice feature of the website.

I also request that Nubits and bitUSD be treated similarly. Nubits is currently listed as a currency and bitUSD is listed as an asset, yet they both share their blockchain with their main tokens.. NuShares and BitsharesX respectively. Nubits and bitUSD are both cryptos whose values are pegged to the US dollar, and share block chains with other tokens. It is contradictory to have both Nubits and Nushares as separate listings under Currencies when bitUSD, bitBTC, etc, are listed under Assets but BitsharesX is listed under Currencies. I think some sort of policy should be set for tokens that share block chains as to which should be listed as Currencies and which should be listed as Assets. That way everything is fair & organized.

Thanks for the great website!

Thanks for the suggestions.  Definitely looking into upgrading the charts.  As for Nubits/BitUSD,  I thought Nubits was a separate blockchain.  Which other blockchain is it on?

NuBits is on the same blockchain as NuShares. (Both on main page)
BitUSD is on the BitSharesX blockchain. (But BitUSD is listed on the assets page.)

[daimyo]

Gliss,

just got a new markets today.

https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-UFO

Can you please add that to UFO too

Thank you

[true-asset]

Mandatory #Urocoin $URO wallet upgrade to v1.0.2.3 required before 08 NOV 2014. Please RT and spread
https://github.com/urocoin/uro/releases/tag/1.0.2.3 @BittrexExchange @cryptsy

https://twitter.com/UroFoundation/status/530185048486461442