⚡ [ANN] ⚡ DeepOnion TOR ⚡ DeepVault ⚡ Cryptopia 🚀 Airdrop 24/40 🚀 WE DOMINATE!

[FreshB]

Bounty payments just completed, thank you for all articles videos and tutorials!!
keep up!

Great work dev. When can we expect the airdrop for deeppoints?

[Ratio2112]

Bounty payments just completed, thank you for all articles videos and tutorials!!
keep up!

Great work dev. When can we expect the airdrop for deeppoints?

Tomorrow bro 

[bykardinal]

Guys , try to guess who is it from the DeepOnion community members  
A little hint you can find here https://deeponion.org/community/threads/post-your-picture-thread-the-official-faces-of-deeponion-members.6350/




Use Di1zov5J1vqLoQ9VG4xLRKjU5Z7inPxn8A to verify.  

[crypto-rainbow]

Bounty payments just completed, thank you for all articles videos and tutorials!!
keep up!

Great work dev. When can we expect the airdrop for deeppoints?

Tomorrow UTC time around 13:30-15:30.

[crypto-rainbow]

Never got latest airdrop
It appears new rules are not working very good.
Wrote support ticket on deeponion.org.
Ive never looked up seriously this forum but now that i have to
1. Where is delete account function. One of main principles of data security is ability of the owner to destroy data completely.
2. It does not work with tuta.io mails. tutanota is awesome encrypted mail system.Its lame not to support it. So like im all anonymous and shit , nobody knows my secrets...except google (as usual) that reads all my mails and for all i know can reset my password whenever somebody hacks it.Next things i know facebook will congratulate me with any onion transcation on public feed. I think one of the requirements of onion community suppose to be strict rules on mail usage. Digital signature at least. NEVER USE MAINSTREAM MAIL SERVERS at best.
Really dissapointed.

Check Status https://deeponion.org/community/check_status.php
User ID   984328
Status   Skipped for the airdrop. We have not found enough posts in your DeepOnion official forum in the last week . You must have at least 3 valid posts (over 50 characters) in Deeponion official forum. Increase valid post counts to participate the upcoming airdrop.

[gawajn]

Somebondy knows when the deeppoints airdrop will occure tommorrow?
Do we need a minimum "points" amount to take part in the airdrop, or is everybody receving a proportional amount equal to their deeppoint amount?

[crypto-rainbow]

Don't let anyone claim your work.Protect your copyrights in seconds with DeepVault Technology

[cola-jere]

While I did receive less than 50% of what I was previously getting from the past airdrops, getting 357 onions is still good for me.

If I may suggest, adding another computation parameter to the airdrop: bitcointalk forum rank + number of onions held = weekly airdrop.
That way, higher ranked bitcointalk members will be enticed to still participate in DeepOnion signature campaign/airdrop and hold their onions. The rank in bitcointalk was one of the original parameters and was removed.

Re-adjusting / adapting is always good for the community benefit.

[juanichiloco]

Somebondy knows when the deeppoints airdrop will occure tommorrow?
Do we need a minimum "points" amount to take part in the airdrop, or is everybody receving a proportional amount equal to their deeppoint amount?

The mods will count this Sunday around 13:30 UTC the total DeepPoints and distribute them proportionally to all members, there is no minimum points required to be included.

See official post here: https://deeponion.org/community/threads/deeppoints-distribution-coming-soon.6242/

[Cobaro]

Somebondy knows when the deeppoints airdrop will occure tommorrow?
Do we need a minimum "points" amount to take part in the airdrop, or is everybody receving a proportional amount equal to their deeppoint amount?

Ho no minimum requirements. Even if you not in airdrop you can get onions for deeppoints. If I'm not wrong it's 2PM? Correct me if I'm wrong.

[cola-jere]

MORE IS BETTER!!  

That being said, I had some spare time and I have build in addition to the community pool a community block explorer for all Onion Adapts!!
Please check it out and let me know your comments:

http://onionexplorer.youngwebsolutions.com:3001/

It has the same function as the official block explorer, but in addition it also displays the market information!
If you are a top 100 holder, I can add your name if you want to show off to your friends, just send me a PM, note that i need a signed message in order to proof you are the holder of that address..

This explorer is nice. I like the color theme and the market information. Good job!!!  

[spov]

Some people do not like the new rules as they got less than before. But if you take this as an investment, 7% profit for every week, that is a high RoR.

The problem is when people see that others are getting more for free, they start complaining. Just looking it as a 7% return for your investment is great! But there is always more.

[gerad09]

Thank you for my first Airdrop coins! Even if it was only 7 Onions
Is there a list on how many Airdrop coins everyone received like before?

[kamalsharma100]

Some people do not like the new rules as they got less than before. But if you take this as an investment, 7% profit for every week, that is a high RoR.

Most of these people who are not liking the rules are either multiple bitcointalk forum account holders or were not true DeepOnion supporters.  They were just doing 10 posts here in bitcointalk forum and were not doing anything for the project.  They were not even registered at official forum.  Most of them were involved in just too many compaigns too.  I think New Rules are actually very good.  Real supporters will now actually be getting more Onions from Deeppoints system than before with old airdrop system

[Cobaro]

Thank you for my first Airdrop coins! Even if it was only 7 Onions
Is there a list on how many Airdrop coins everyone received like before?

There is list somewhere in deeponion.org but to be honest mate if you received 7 coins, you don't need to see it

[w0lf0.]

I really like new rules, i reiceved less Onions than before but i'am happy anyway, if it can help the system i haven't problems.

[gigabyted]

the airdrop amount HAS to be tied to one wallet to stop the account farmers. the airdropped amount is fixed in the coins structure. so, how do we come up with a fair distribution? just throw out coins to whoever is in line?

I might have a proposition.

I think the new weight system is a good idea, but just not set on the right people.

lets say they everything in the airdrop has a factor or 1x (for EVERYONE).  Then we do a table like this for all the coins that were not received in a airdrop:

• 0-10k (1.2x)
• 10k-20k (2x)
• 20k-30k (3x)
• 30k-50k (4x)
• 50k+ (5x)

That way every one that buys ALOT would receives more airdrop (increasing their weight).  

MODs are the one that have the biggest airdrop (because of their support) so even with a factor of 1x (every airdrop balance) they would still do quite a lot, like 3-5k per week even if they dont buy any.

Of course those numbers could be different and i would even say they should be voted by the community.  The main purpose of this is to provide a buying support, every coins that were bought will provide a support and it will also make the price go higher since people will have to buy more in order to get more.  That way even if everyone receives less coins, those buyers will make the price rise and everyone will be happy.

If you check carefully every large balance have ground by 300% in the last 3 months but their total value is worth less than 3 months ago, this is because theres no buyers.  Check all the 400 airdrop members and only a dozen have more than the airdrop amount!

At the end if all the coins get distributed and we dont have more buyers, we will all have alot of coins with no value.  I rather have less coins with buyers backing the price under me!

Community could even provide different scenarios and they could be voted.  Right now people complains because of the rules because they decided by the team, but if they rules were picked by the community wouldn't it be better?  (By the way bitcore team  did that to pick their distribution model for their airdrop)

What do you think?  I rather have 10k coins at 5$ than 30k at 1$

What do you think about this guys?

[Cobaro]

the airdrop amount HAS to be tied to one wallet to stop the account farmers. the airdropped amount is fixed in the coins structure. so, how do we come up with a fair distribution? just throw out coins to whoever is in line?

I might have a proposition.

I think the new weight system is a good idea, but just not set on the right people.

lets say they everything in the airdrop has a factor or 1x (for EVERYONE).  Then we do a table like this for all the coins that were not received in a airdrop:

• 0-10k (1.2x)
• 10k-20k (2x)
• 20k-30k (3x)
• 30k-50k (4x)
• 50k+ (5x)

That way every one that buys ALOT would receives more airdrop (increasing their weight).  

MODs are the one that have the biggest airdrop (because of their support) so even with a factor of 1x (every airdrop balance) they would still do quite a lot, like 3-5k per week even if they dont buy any.

Of course those numbers could be different and i would even say they should be voted by the community.  The main purpose of this is to provide a buying support, every coins that were bought will provide a support and it will also make the price go higher since people will have to buy more in order to get more.  That way even if everyone receives less coins, those buyers will make the price rise and everyone will be happy.

If you check carefully every large balance have ground by 300% in the last 3 months but their total value is worth less than 3 months ago, this is because theres no buyers.  Check all the 400 airdrop members and only a dozen have more than the airdrop amount!

At the end if all the coins get distributed and we dont have more buyers, we will all have alot of coins with no value.  I rather have less coins with buyers backing the price under me!

Community could even provide different scenarios and they could be voted.  Right now people complains because of the rules because they decided by the team, but if they rules were picked by the community wouldn't it be better?  (By the way bitcore team  did that to pick their distribution model for their airdrop)

What do you think?  I rather have 10k coins at 5$ than 30k at 1$

What do you think about this guys?

Just quick after first airdrop those 2 categories:

• 20k-30k (3x)
• 30k-50k (4x)

Will be in the best possition

• 50k+ (5x)

In my opinion there can't be x2, in this logic I will buy 10k of coins and after first airdrop sell 10k and will have 10k for next airdrop.

[nonconformist]

MORE IS BETTER!!  

That being said, I had some spare time and I have build in addition to the community pool a community block explorer for all Onion Adapts!!
Please check it out and let me know your comments:

http://onionexplorer.youngwebsolutions.com:3001/

It has the same function as the official block explorer, but in addition it also displays the market information!
If you are a top 100 holder, I can add your name if you want to show off to your friends, just send me a PM, note that i need a signed message in order to proof you are the holder of that address..

youngwebs, I found your site very useful. Thank you very much for doing this. Now we can trace and monitor our wallets activities much much better. I really appreciate the effort and expertise you put on this project.

[Cryptoprivacy]

the airdrop amount HAS to be tied to one wallet to stop the account farmers. the airdropped amount is fixed in the coins structure. so, how do we come up with a fair distribution? just throw out coins to whoever is in line?

I might have a proposition.

I think the new weight system is a good idea, but just not set on the right people.

lets say they everything in the airdrop has a factor or 1x (for EVERYONE).  Then we do a table like this for all the coins that were not received in a airdrop:

• 0-10k (1.2x)
• 10k-20k (2x)
• 20k-30k (3x)
• 30k-50k (4x)
• 50k+ (5x)

That way every one that buys ALOT would receives more airdrop (increasing their weight).  

MODs are the one that have the biggest airdrop (because of their support) so even with a factor of 1x (every airdrop balance) they would still do quite a lot, like 3-5k per week even if they dont buy any.

Of course those numbers could be different and i would even say they should be voted by the community.  The main purpose of this is to provide a buying support, every coins that were bought will provide a support and it will also make the price go higher since people will have to buy more in order to get more.  That way even if everyone receives less coins, those buyers will make the price rise and everyone will be happy.

If you check carefully every large balance have ground by 300% in the last 3 months but their total value is worth less than 3 months ago, this is because theres no buyers.  Check all the 400 airdrop members and only a dozen have more than the airdrop amount!

At the end if all the coins get distributed and we dont have more buyers, we will all have alot of coins with no value.  I rather have less coins with buyers backing the price under me!

Community could even provide different scenarios and they could be voted.  Right now people complains because of the rules because they decided by the team, but if they rules were picked by the community wouldn't it be better?  (By the way bitcore team  did that to pick their distribution model for their airdrop)

What do you think?  I rather have 10k coins at 5$ than 30k at 1$

What do you think about this guys?

I think that there are some really interesting ideas in your post and I appreciate that you have this constructive approach. I personally do not complain about my airdrop amount, even though it is a bit lower than it would be according to the old rules.

But what I am really worried about is the impact of the new rules on our community. I saw a lot of flames and negativity connected to this topic. Whatever the airdrop rules are, they should rather put our community together and make it stronger, instead of splitting it (I know, there is nothing like ideal rules and it is not possible to make everyone satisfied, but I believe that there are things which could and should be improved).

I have no objections when the main contributors or investors get more than the other, the problem is that the gap between the "rich" and the "poor" is being increased too much by the new rules. And the situations when such gap is becoming too big often do not end well. Therefore I believe that the rules need some change, maybe just a simple adjustment of the "factors" would be sufficient.

We should show to the cryptoworld that we are able to effectively solve our disputes. This would make our project stronger and I believe that the new investors and supporters would appreciate it.

And to your last question:
"What do you think?  I rather have 10k coins at 5$ than 30k at 1$"

This is exactly the point, I am definitely for the first option Therefore I also believe that some adjustment of the rules would be a win-win situation for all as the smaller hodlers would get more Onions and the bigger hodlers would be more than enough compensated by the increase of price.