kamiyama
|
|
February 07, 2018, 10:09:09 PM |
|
Transactions Blocks 06:48:14=local time 21:48:14=UTC?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Coinage.org (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2018, 10:35:50 PM |
|
Transactions Blocks 06:48:14=local time 21:48:14=UTC? Yes, its to help protect against timejacking. To avoid timejacking each node uses their local utc timestamp as the network time.
|
|
|
|
kamiyama
|
|
February 08, 2018, 12:41:58 AM |
|
What's the difference between these two?
|
|
|
|
bingbong1589
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 11
|
|
February 08, 2018, 01:46:49 AM |
|
Some feedback I'd like to give as I open it for the first time!
Firstly, of course it's in Alpha and not a big priority, but you guys should shift the left ribbon to the top or bottom for easier readability.
|
|
|
|
bingbong1589
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 11
|
|
February 08, 2018, 01:49:31 AM |
|
Wow it's actually pretty awesome to see how easy and intuitive the miner is good job on that!
However, I think their might be a glitch, because my speed is 0.0 h/s ?
|
|
|
|
Coinage.org (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2018, 03:36:10 AM |
|
I'll check into the miner showing 0 tomorrow. The plan for the UI will be to make it all editable by the user via css so while we wont be changing it now we likely will later through settings.
|
|
|
|
bingbong1589
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 11
|
|
February 08, 2018, 03:39:46 AM |
|
What's the difference between these two? Was also wondering about this, because I noticed I have the same thing occur
|
|
|
|
Coinage.org (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2018, 06:00:37 AM |
|
To show speed it needs to count every hash it tries, we didn't bother reimplementing the speed counter as we're not aiming at the miner efficiency yet. It's also only mining with one thread, even if you set it higher. Those are changes for beta or even production.
The duplicate is just a bug. We'll take care of it.
|
|
|
|
bingbong1589
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 11
|
|
February 08, 2018, 07:32:46 PM |
|
Other than that the wallet looks great and intuitive!
|
|
|
|
Coinage.org (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2018, 09:27:50 PM |
|
Excellent, anyone got any bugs, there is no way we got all the potential bugs. Please test poke and prod !
|
|
|
|
MiojoCoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
February 09, 2018, 04:02:43 AM |
|
What transaction speed do you intend to achieve? 600s block interval means transactions will generally take minutes to complete, right?
|
|
|
|
Vint.Cerf
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 09, 2018, 04:05:06 AM |
|
What transaction speed do you intend to achieve? 600s block interval means transactions will generally take minutes to complete, right?
Coinage, actually looks promising, hoping Dev pulls this off.
|
|
|
|
Coinage.org (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2018, 07:11:22 AM |
|
What transaction speed do you intend to achieve? 600s block interval means transactions will generally take minutes to complete, right?
10 minutes to get a confirmation. There are also several... considerations we added to account for if users want to add secondary layers of security. The intent is to allow users to be able to have instant transactions on their platform without worrying about double spends. But that will have to wait on testing to ensure it works as intended.
|
|
|
|
bingbong1589
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 11
|
|
February 09, 2018, 07:25:59 AM |
|
When will we be able to start mining?
|
|
|
|
Coinage.org (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2018, 12:57:52 PM |
|
It works, just needs optimization. Wallet just doesn't display speed. Currently it has a placeholder of sha2 in it, but the design allows us to update it on the fly. So no issues there, we will insert any algorithm we prefer, or several or rotation when we get done. We also need to complete a couple of pieces that will be needed for public use like further progression of data so this is just for testing purposes people. So who wants some free coins for a test transaction!?
|
|
|
|
cryptoRX
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 12
|
|
February 09, 2018, 01:12:46 PM Last edit: February 09, 2018, 01:28:05 PM by cryptoRX |
|
It works, just needs optimization. Wallet just doesn't display speed. Currently it has a placeholder of sha2 in it, but the design allows us to update it on the fly. So no issues there, we will insert any algorithm we prefer, or several or rotation when we get done. We also need to complete a couple of pieces that will be needed for public use like further progression of data so this is just for testing purposes people. So who wants some free coins for a test transaction!? I do! On a side note, the block rewards seem to be working as intended but are we mining our own chain on our wallets?
|
|
|
|
Coinage.org (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2018, 01:26:15 PM |
|
Give me an address, lets test this out.
|
|
|
|
cryptoRX
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 12
|
|
February 09, 2018, 01:28:37 PM |
|
Give me an address, lets test this out.
CKFxkJATJ99eD8ttS7LxrHJAZpkLp7NAED Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Coinage.org (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2018, 01:54:17 PM |
|
Found a bug
|
|
|
|
cryptoRX
Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 12
|
|
February 09, 2018, 02:05:25 PM |
|
Not sure if I found one too or whether it is by design.
The miner creates a new wallet and sends all your mined coins there instead of to the main address.
Seems to be a fixed address though and not just randomly creating new mining addresses with each start up so I guess that isn't a big issue.
|
|
|
|
|