I might be interested into this ICO, but after reading the whitepaper I still have few questions.
Whitepaper states:
1) "Continuous Contributors shall from time to time confirm the execution of their roles on the
Platform to keep their status and depository wallets active. "
Given that both CC roles&figures and required engagement/KPIs haven't been detailed yet, there's a clear issue evaluating this project's demands.
What is the general demographic that the Blackmoon project is geared towards?
Our aim is to give all interested parties an appropriate role to participate. We'd like both average and professional token holders to find a role that matches their abilities. I understand that it's a quite high level description but that's what we really want to achieve.
Demographics shall be wide and not limited by any specific parameters.
1) Fulltime Crypto investors and crypto believers, therefore the requested engagement/KPIs are generally high.
2) Mixed demographic, therefore requiring different rates of engagement/KPIs, but also allowing for quite low demands.
2) is what we are looking for.
Furthermore, are Continuos Contributors KPI evaluated on single funds' specific regulation, or as a whole for the entire BlackMoon platform?
Continuous contributors concept was introduced to help us to develop the entire platform. So it will be associated with the platform itself or all/every fund on the platform. We'll also ask for help regarding specific funds which will be starting at particular moments.
Personally, I believe that the Crypto market could thrive from opening itself onto larger demographics, simplifying its mechanics and allowing for a wider engagement from students and other classes of normal citizens.
Depending on the general required engagement/KPI to "confirm one's execution of a role", this project could either allow for a larger crowd or a selected niche.
We need as large active community as we can make.
This point is quite important, considering that whitepaper states:
"Continuous Contributors who do not execute their roles may have their status
recalled, depository wallet closed, and their deposited BMCs will be transferred to the holder’s
personal wallet without accruing any proceeds."
Illness, holidays, workplace demands can take anyone away from their CC role in this project.
Without enforcing the normal employment legislation, contributors could be identified as volunteers and be susceptible of losing their accrued proceeding.
For us it's important that CCs will be active. But when we wrote about inactivity we kept in mind something like a moths of absence of target actions.
I clearly understand that this project focuses a lot onto users' engagement, creating a community led to work together for a mutually shared gain; and it's totally fine that specific roles with higher KPI may get larger proceedings; yet I believe that enforcing high KPI roles, will destically limit this project's demographics.
What we want - an active happy community working together within transparent environment
What we don't want - unnecessary barriers for people to participate.
If CC roles could allow for normal bounty roles as detailed in the bounty section, this project could attract a larger demographic.
When I explain that concept in "I'm five" paradigm I tell people that they can consider it as a perpetual bounty. So yes.
So, overall, is there an official consensus if the Continuous Contributors' roles are geared towards extremely high engagement, or they allow for a mixed demographic with various and limited time to invest?
I hope I answered on that above.
Would be happy if you join us at
https://account.blackmooncrypto.com
