Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot!

[Symphonized]

Win 3 consecutive bets (in a row) on 3x multiplier and on the Roll Under option in descending order to win a share in $800 this week in our Stephen Hawking-inspired forum challenge



Play now: https://forum.primedice.com/topic/39684-%F0%9F%8F%86-800-the-greatest-minds-stephen-hawking%F0%9F%8C%8C/



Current RACE ends in 11 Hours

[Symphonized]

It's time for round 10 of the VIP Bingo and we're excited!! ✖✖



Play for $6000 this week: https://forum.primedice.com/topic/39683-%F0%9F%A5%87-2000-vip%C2%A0bingo-round-x-%E2%80%8B%F0%9F%92%B0%E2%80%8B/



Current RACE ends in 9 Hours

[Betwrong]

If you play x100 without changing the stake per 100 reels, your balance could be negative meanwhile I always change the bet amount in every 100 rolls
this way I can cover the losses on the initial 100 rolls and I also started with a low amount. BTW I agree that nothing is certain in gambling, people are just trying to get more opportunities  

if you feel that way and you do benefiting from that strategy then it's good for you, we do believe from what we feel that we have some edge, not sure since there's no mathematical explanation on it, it's just luck that matters.
~

Indeed, saying that changing seeds doesn't improve one's chances of winning we probably must add that it doesn't decrease them either. So, if someone feels good from changing seeds, then why not? After all, this practice can lead to better understanding of the mechanics of provably fair dice game. And getting some new knowledge is always a good thing.

[seleme]

If you play x100 without changing the stake per 100 reels, your balance could be negative meanwhile I always change the bet amount in every 100 rolls
this way I can cover the losses on the initial 100 rolls and I also started with a low amount. BTW I agree that nothing is certain in gambling, people are just trying to get more opportunities  

if you feel that way and you do benefiting from that strategy then it's good for you, we do believe from what we feel that we have some edge, not sure since there's no mathematical explanation on it, it's just luck that matters.
~

Indeed, saying that changing seeds doesn't improve one's chances of winning we probably must add that it doesn't decrease them either. So, if someone feels good from changing seeds, then why not? After all, this practice can lead to better understanding of the mechanics of provably fair dice game. And getting some new knowledge is always a good thing.

Afaik, the result is generated by player seed + server seed + nonce... It doesn't matter how many times I changed seed but the same red streak never getting close to an end. It is kinda psychological rather than fairness, IMHO.

For a small example, the crash has a higher house edge on some platforms(around 3%) while the same game has a low house edge on Stake(exactly 1%). All results were pre-generated and the testers have verified the RTP after testing 1 billion crash bets with super algorithms. It is kinda impossible to blame seed if all outcomes were generated based on RTP... Just my 2 cents..

[Symphonized]

Current RACE ends in 10 Hours

[Symphonized]

Current RACE ends in 10 Hours

[TheUltraElite]

Afaik, the result is generated by player seed + server seed + nonce... It doesn't matter how many times I changed seed but the same red streak never getting close to an end. It is kinda psychological rather than fairness, IMHO.

The importance of having a server seed that can be changed is to reveal the older server seed in order to use that to verify the bets placed before that instant.

That is the reason people are given the option to "rerandomize" the seeds. When you are betting the server seed is unknown - for obvious reasons otherwise you will be cheating the system. When you are done betting you can verify your bets to be fair by revealing the older server seed which was active all along.

It seems to me that many new players may not actually be knowing how to verify bets which is why they ask this question or have this idea that changing seeds means changing your chance of winning - its not so.

[Fredomago]

-Snip-

-Snip-
~

Indeed, saying that changing seeds doesn't improve one's chances of winning we probably must add that it doesn't decrease them either. So, if someone feels good from changing seeds, then why not? After all, this practice can lead to better understanding of the mechanics of provably fair dice game. And getting some new knowledge is always a good thing.

Yeah right, I don't argue with your statement, it's not adding or decreasing anything. If the player/gambler feels like he needed to change
the seed, it's he's right to do so, If he believes that the chance may change or if luck permits him after changing the seeds then so be it
Gamblers always looking for new knowledge, they are aiming to win and establishing system that they can use each time they gamble.

[Symphonized]

Current TOP 10 Racers:





Current RACE ends in 9 Hours

[seleme]

Afaik, the result is generated by player seed + server seed + nonce... It doesn't matter how many times I changed seed but the same red streak never getting close to an end. It is kinda psychological rather than fairness, IMHO.

The importance of having a server seed that can be changed is to reveal the older server seed in order to use that to verify the bets placed before that instant.

That is the reason people are given the option to "rerandomize" the seeds. When you are betting the server seed is unknown - for obvious reasons otherwise you will be cheating the system. When you are done betting you can verify your bets to be fair by revealing the older server seed which was active all along.

It seems to me that many new players may not actually be knowing how to verify bets which is why they ask this question or have this idea that changing seeds means changing your chance of winning - its not so.

I agree and have nothing to add to your statement. That is nice to see someone has shared the same opinion with me, thanks for the heads up
Btw, it is always better to ask here rather than keep searching on the other gambling forums. I was looking for an answer to why the Stake and Primedice team don't allow to merge both accounts and found a decent answer by a Stake team member. If I had such a chance to merge accounts on both platforms, surely my current Stake account now is diamond VIP rank.

[Symphonized]

Current RACE ends in 12 Hours

[Betwrong]

~

Yeah right, I don't argue with your statement, it's not adding or decreasing anything. If the player/gambler feels like he needed to change
the seed, it's he's right to do so, If he believes that the chance may change or if luck permits him after changing the seeds then so be it
Gamblers always looking for new knowledge, they are aiming to win and establishing system that they can use each time they gamble.

True. Take me, for example. Knowing well that it has nothing to do with reality, I feel like I should hit below 1.00 after hitting above 98.99, so I change sides right away, and sometimes it works for me,  but it's not like a knowledge that I can use to be winning more playing dice. Rather, it's adding more fun to the game, that's all.

[Fredomago]

~

Yeah right, I don't argue with your statement, it's not adding or decreasing anything. If the player/gambler feels like he needed to change
the seed, it's he's right to do so, If he believes that the chance may change or if luck permits him after changing the seeds then so be it
Gamblers always looking for new knowledge, they are aiming to win and establishing system that they can use each time they gamble.

True. Take me, for example. Knowing well that it has nothing to do with reality, I feel like I should hit below 1.00 after hitting above 98.99, so I change sides right away, and sometimes it works for me,  but it's not like a knowledge that I can use to be winning more playing dice. Rather, it's adding more fun to the game, that's all.

Smiling while reading your post  , as it's happening to some gamblers, thinking that after hitting good odds then switch to the otherside,

I like the idea of adding it out with the enjoyment that you are gaining while playing, both sides are in win win places, you as gambler you fulfil your desire being entertained, while with the house side, they'll  able to keep the gamblers to continue playing.

[acquafredda]

Lurking a few highrollers on Primedice I was asking myself: why is a 0.001 BTC bet considered to be under the HR requirement?
I guess it is the sign of time passing: 5/6 years ago one would have considered a 100 or 1000 btc bet like high rolls.
Sometimes I tend to forget what bitcoin was able to achieve in such a short lifespan (and it is not over yet). 

[Symphonized]

🏆 [$800] The Greatest Minds: Mahatma Gandhi 🙏



Win 2 consecutive (in a row) bets on 6x, one on roll-over and one on roll-under; both bets should contain at least one "6" within the rolled number.
Example: 96.80 and 05.68;
0.03 USD minimum bet amount (in any currency).

Giveaway's Topic: https://forum.primedice.com/topic/39701-%F0%9F%8F%86-800-the-greatest-minds-mahatma-gandhi-%F0%9F%99%8F/



Current RACE ends in 10 Hours

[Carollzinha]

Lurking a few highrollers on Primedice I was asking myself: why is a 0.001 BTC bet considered to be under the HR requirement?
I guess it is the sign of time passing: 5/6 years ago one would have considered a 100 or 1000 btc bet like high rolls.
Sometimes I tend to forget what bitcoin was able to achieve in such a short lifespan (and it is not over yet). 

Would you consider anything less than $50 bet a HIGH roll?
And the last update in that value, if I am not wrong, was made @2018 and back then definitely 100 BTC were not worth just a few bucks lol

[acquafredda]

Lurking a few highrollers on Primedice I was asking myself: why is a 0.001 BTC bet considered to be under the HR requirement?
I guess it is the sign of time passing: 5/6 years ago one would have considered a 100 or 1000 btc bet like high rolls.
Sometimes I tend to forget what bitcoin was able to achieve in such a short lifespan (and it is not over yet). 

Would you consider anything less than $50 bet a HIGH roll?
And the last update in that value, if I am not wrong, was made @2018 and back then definitely 100 BTC were not worth just a few bucks lol

Anything below $1000 is not High rolling for me. High rolls need to be high by definition: I understand that we are speculating about personal evaluation, since for me $50 is not HR while for someone else it is. Personally speaking, I would not like to see my 0.001 bets on the high roll board, but I guess that is just me.

[nasipadang]

I am really amazed about the fact how many pages this topic already has on the forum. Is this not the gambling topic that is the oldest one by far?
At some moment, it would be like an anniversary to reach number of X pages 

[Haunebu]

I am really amazed about the fact how many pages this topic already has on the forum. Is this not the gambling topic that is the oldest one by far?
At some moment, it would be like an anniversary to reach number of X pages 

This isn't surprising since they launched way back during the early days of cryptocurrencies. This topic itself was created in 2013 which means that 8 years have passed since then and Primedice has established itself as a consistent performer.

This could be the oldest gambling site thread in this forum. Their forum remains popular too in the crypto gambling world.

[DarkDays]

Lurking a few highrollers on Primedice I was asking myself: why is a 0.001 BTC bet considered to be under the HR requirement?
I guess it is the sign of time passing: 5/6 years ago one would have considered a 100 or 1000 btc bet like high rolls.
Sometimes I tend to forget what bitcoin was able to achieve in such a short lifespan (and it is not over yet). 

Would you consider anything less than $50 bet a HIGH roll?
And the last update in that value, if I am not wrong, was made @2018 and back then definitely 100 BTC were not worth just a few bucks lol

Anything below $1000 is not High rolling for me. High rolls need to be high by definition: I understand that we are speculating about personal evaluation, since for me $50 is not HR while for someone else it is.

No, it is not just you. A high roll for me would be anything above 1K or even higher. Anything else below that is just not a high roll. I get that this depends from people to people but the pure definition is HIGH...

Personally speaking, I would not like to see my 0.001 bets on the high roll board, but I guess that is just me.

Haha, wouldn't that be something