brunosa
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:14:04 PM |
|
What that supose to mean? The 1007 block
|
|
|
|
GeePeeU
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 545
Merit: 251
ASK
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:17:00 PM |
|
Block 1007 going on 15 minutes.
Yes i noticed that too, can someone explain what is going on? This is a block chain tech how can that stuck? That's over my head. Block 1007 going on 25 minutes. you yourself confirm for me I could be wrong I hope not right There is only 1 pool, (The Dev's) that is currently finding blocks. I am not aware of anyone solo mining this. So given that the difficulty is rapidly fluctuating, a lot of people are pointing hashpower at it, and it's new, It's probably just going down from high traffic. And if that pool goes down, blocks stop getting processed, because no other entity is hashing them. I'd like to think this is a legit project. The combination of crypto+vpn seems hand and hand. And both are becoming more prevalent every day.
|
|
|
|
GeePeeU
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 545
Merit: 251
ASK
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:26:34 PM |
|
@alexius89-2 Block 1007 almost at an hour
|
|
|
|
freedom_io
Member
Offline
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
quarkchain.io
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:29:13 PM |
|
The project looks interesting. I hope these are all temporary problems in the early stages of live coin. Patience to the devs and good luck to all participants. I'll keep watching.
|
|
|
|
flyin_piggie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:29:35 PM |
|
Well, that was intense. Got late to the party and pool stuck at me having 96 pending coins, then re-launch and now diff seems bit too high for my poor single card. With block time 30 min (or is it stuck again?), at the moment i have no intention waiting 1800 minutes just to see if pending balance will go up, or we have another relaunch. For people asking about pending=0, in previous posts it was mentioned about 40-60 minutes, but pending is calculated after 60 blocks confirmation, if block time is 1 minute then it's 60 minutes, if block time is 30 minutes then it would be 30 min * 60 blocks for your pending balance to update. I may get back in few days when things are less 'intense'
|
|
|
|
Solidsnek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:34:04 PM |
|
Why are we still here? Just to suffer?
|
|
|
|
GeePeeU
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 545
Merit: 251
ASK
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:36:08 PM |
|
Why are we still here? Just to suffer? If you consider hashing into thin air while waiting for the pool to come back up suffering, then yes.
|
|
|
|
TheKryptonian
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:40:32 PM |
|
This is NOT an official statement as I'm just a guy trying to make a quick buck like y'all. I'm just sharing what little insight I have, but again, I'm not a dev so do your own research:
Earlier today on slack, one of the devs mentioned that the pool has a bug that causes it to get stuck on a block sometimes. All the hash going into trying to solve that block is being wasted. I think it's going to stay this way until one of the devs restarts the pool daemon or wallet or whatever. But the devs are offline on slack, so no telling when that will be.
This happened earlier too, at block 800-something. I'm just assuming it's the same thing now, but I don't see why it wouldn't be.
It was pretty much fine after the reset, but waiting for that is a bitch. The devs are trying to get other pool operators to put up pools. They claim that will make all this go away because this is supposedly a pool issue, not a blockchain issue. The truth of that remains to be seen, but I personally will be keeping an eye on this coin until a new pool is up, to see if it helps.
Until then though, I'm gonna pull my miners.
|
|
|
|
felipelago
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:47:15 PM |
|
wtf ? block chain go down again ? And now ? new wallet again ? lost coins again ?
|
|
|
|
TheKryptonian
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:48:45 PM |
|
wtf ? block chain go down again ? And now ? new wallet again ? lost coins again ? I believe the devs think it's a pool issue not a blockchain issue, but that's just what they said on slack. No idea how we'll figure it out one way or the other.
|
|
|
|
Ryuh
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:51:14 PM |
|
This is NOT an official statement as I'm just a guy trying to make a quick buck like y'all. I'm just sharing what little insight I have, but again, I'm not a dev so do your own research:
Earlier today on slack, one of the devs mentioned that the pool has a bug that causes it to get stuck on a block sometimes. All the hash going into trying to solve that block is being wasted. I think it's going to stay this way until one of the devs restarts the pool daemon or wallet or whatever. But the devs are offline on slack, so no telling when that will be.
This happened earlier too, at block 800-something. I'm just assuming it's the same thing now, but I don't see why it wouldn't be.
It was pretty much fine after the reset, but waiting for that is a bitch. The devs are trying to get other pool operators to put up pools. They claim that will make all this go away because this is supposedly a pool issue, not a blockchain issue. The truth of that remains to be seen, but I personally will be keeping an eye on this coin until a new pool is up, to see if it helps.
Until then though, I'm gonna pull my miners.
Thank you for clarification!
|
|
|
|
sundownz
|
|
August 16, 2017, 05:53:23 PM |
|
Dang... pool issues again just in time for me to finally get my 40-core Xeon server mining, haha.
|
|
|
|
l187l
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
August 16, 2017, 06:16:26 PM |
|
2017-Aug-16 13:13:14.787275 INFO [daemon] intensecoin v1.1.1.1() 2017-Aug-16 13:13:14.787775 INFO [daemon] Module folder: C:\Users\Ron\Desktop\intensecoin-miner-win64\intensecoind.exe 2017-Aug-16 13:13:14.789277 INFO [daemon] Initializing p2p server... 2017-Aug-16 13:13:14.789777 INFO [node_server] Binding on 0.0.0.0:48772 2017-Aug-16 13:13:14.790778 INFO [miner] Mining has been stopped, 0 finished 2017-Aug-16 13:13:14.792280 ERROR [daemon] Exception: TcpListener::TcpListener, bind failed, result=10048, Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted. Can someone explain this? Do I need to port forward something?
|
|
|
|
Volodath
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
August 16, 2017, 06:18:52 PM |
|
I'm curious what miner you're using for such a xeon server. I'm using ccminer and get ~500h/s with my dual 2670v3 xeon rig.
|
|
|
|
sundownz
|
|
August 16, 2017, 06:35:19 PM Last edit: August 16, 2017, 06:46:24 PM by sundownz |
|
I'm curious what miner you're using for such a xeon server. I'm using ccminer and get ~500h/s with my dual 2670v3 xeon rig.
I am running ETHOS on it & downloaded CPUminer for Linux -- my server does right at 1000 H/S so your rate sounds about right. I do think it has more in it but I am a bit new to Linux based systems in general so I'm still tinkering. I have 4x E7-4870 Xeon chips in mine -- it's an HP DL580 G7 server: http://www.ebay.com/itm/381789596787?ul_noapp=trueI got it mainly as a tool to learn Linux mining but dollar to performance is quite good on this algo... also plan to install 8x RX560 GPUs in it later on.
|
|
|
|
ArgMining
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
August 16, 2017, 07:27:05 PM |
|
Pending Balance: 0.68880176 INT Total Paid: 269.00000000 INT Last Share Submitted: 2 minutes ago Hash Rate: 1.05 KH/sec Total Hashes Submitted: 30333004 6 Hours mining With 3x Gtx 1060. 269 coins? OK
|
|
|
|
Chocolatte
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Citius, altius, fortius
|
|
August 16, 2017, 07:51:41 PM |
|
use yiimp please!
[2017-08-16 22:46:49] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:46:49] ...retry after 30 seconds [2017-08-16 22:47:21] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:47:21] ...retry after 30 seconds [2017-08-16 22:47:37] GPU #0: 2085 MHz 8.70 H/W 80W 48C FAN 49% [2017-08-16 22:47:53] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:47:53] ...retry after 30 seconds [2017-08-16 22:48:25] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:48:25] ...retry after 30 seconds [2017-08-16 22:48:46] GPU #1: 2093 MHz 9.19 H/W 57W 48C FAN 49% [2017-08-16 22:48:57] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:48:57] ...retry after 30 seconds [2017-08-16 22:49:30] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:49:30] ...retry after 30 seconds [2017-08-16 22:49:50] GPU #2: 2076 MHz 8.98 H/W 61W 48C FAN 48% [2017-08-16 22:50:02] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:50:02] ...retry after 30 seconds [2017-08-16 22:50:34] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:50:34] ...retry after 30 seconds [2017-08-16 22:50:54] GPU #0: 2085 MHz 8.68 H/W 80W 49C FAN 49% [2017-08-16 22:51:06] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to 45.32.171.89 port 5555: Connection refused [2017-08-16 22:51:06] ...retry after 30 seconds
|
|
|
|
Ryuh
|
|
August 16, 2017, 07:52:48 PM |
|
Pool is down for me too...
|
|
|
|
valiant1
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 219
Merit: 121
Lethean Developer
|
|
August 16, 2017, 08:08:22 PM |
|
Hey everyone, As you have all noted, the pool is NOT reliable. Please consider looking into other options for mining. I am working on it now, so the pool is down. It was a waste of hashing power to have it running while defunct, since no blocks were forming. I'll bring it back up after I have addressed the bug in question which is periodically stalling the pool. We really didn't want the 0 fee pool to be the focal point of our VPN coin... But it is how most people are mining and it seems to be of great interest to all, so this is taking priority. If you're not already in Slack, please join us using the link from page1 as things are much more up to date!
|
|
|
|
Chocolatte
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Citius, altius, fortius
|
|
August 16, 2017, 08:15:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|