[ANN] INTENSE COIN - Blockchain backed decentralized VPN - Hybrid PoW

[sundownz]

The daemon seems to sync 100 blocks every time you start it and then stop.
At this rate I'm going to close and reopen it 500 times until I finally get the damn thing synced...  

I apologize for all the issues users are facing with sync, we will release a new version 2.0.2 in the next few days to solve these issues.

Thank you for your patience and support

https://github.com/valiant1x/intensecoinwallet/releases/

Looks like 2.0.1 GUI is available now -- great =)

[1715551607]

1715551607

[1715551607]

1715551607

[1715551607]

1715551607

[leonsnow]

Using the parameters suggested on the intensecoin page above does revive the syncing somehow but the daemon stops after a few minutes so it still needs re-starting regularly. Hope the next version will be more stable!

EDIT: actually it stops loading blocks after 90 seconds. Only a restart will get it to sync again.

EDIT2: here's an extract of the daemon with set_log 1:

2018-05-02 09:34:08.174 [P2P3]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:848        [54.37.87.203:48772 OUT] COMMAND_TIMED_SYNC Failed
2018-05-02 09:34:12.230 [P2P7]  INFO    global  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305     [112.94.4.145:59291 INC] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 171869 -> 179096 [Your node is 7227 blocks (10 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-05-02 09:34:13.185 [P2P3]  WARN    net     contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_async.h:475     [121.32.247.45:17116 INC] Signature mismatch, connection will be closed
2018-05-02 09:34:14.231 [P2P7]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:1564       [0.0.0.0:0 OUT] back ping connect failed to 112.94.4.145:48772
2018-05-02 09:34:15.658 [P2P3]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1063    [54.37.87.203:48772 OUT] transaction verification failed on NOTIFY_RESPONSE_GET_OBJECTS, tx_id = 7befd8327288da882e197fc9acaffa240ab744c5137050f5fa6036a874ef7c23, dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:34:15.757 [P2P0]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1025    [159.89.249.113:48772 OUT] Got block with unknown parent which was not requested - querying block hashes
2018-05-02 09:34:17.021 [P2P0]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1063    [159.89.249.113:48772 OUT] transaction verification failed on NOTIFY_RESPONSE_GET_OBJECTS, tx_id = 7befd8327288da882e197fc9acaffa240ab744c5137050f5fa6036a874ef7c23, dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:34:26.229 [P2P3]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:1564       [0.0.0.0:0 OUT] back ping connect failed to 5.80.151.52:48772
2018-05-02 09:34:26.282 [P2P3]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:1564       [0.0.0.0:0 OUT] back ping connect failed to 178.95.180.150:48772
2018-05-02 09:34:27.265 [P2P7]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1063    [178.95.180.150:49240 INC] transaction verification failed on NOTIFY_RESPONSE_GET_OBJECTS, tx_id = 7befd8327288da882e197fc9acaffa240ab744c5137050f5fa6036a874ef7c23, dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:34:35.947 [P2P4]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:933     returned not all requested objects (context.m_requested_objects.size()=20), dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:34:36.003 [P2P3]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1063    [140.82.9.90:48772 OUT] transaction verification failed on NOTIFY_RESPONSE_GET_OBJECTS, tx_id = 7befd8327288da882e197fc9acaffa240ab744c5137050f5fa6036a874ef7c23, dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:34:39.015 [P2P7]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:1564       [0.0.0.0:0 OUT] back ping connect failed to 216.56.240.80:48772
2018-05-02 09:34:39.323 [P2P3]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:1564       [0.0.0.0:0 OUT] back ping connect failed to 36.79.28.18:48772
2018-05-02 09:34:39.700 [P2P3]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1025    [86.122.3.67:63732 INC] Got block with unknown parent which was not requested - querying block hashes
2018-05-02 09:34:44.196 [P2P9]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1063    [140.82.9.90:48772 OUT] transaction verification failed on NOTIFY_RESPONSE_GET_OBJECTS, tx_id = 7befd8327288da882e197fc9acaffa240ab744c5137050f5fa6036a874ef7c23, dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:34:50.440 [P2P7]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:1564       [0.0.0.0:0 OUT] back ping connect failed to 117.102.89.98:48772
2018-05-02 09:34:50.891 [P2P7]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:933     returned not all requested objects (context.m_requested_objects.size()=20), dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:34:51.040 [P2P4]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:933     returned not all requested objects (context.m_requested_objects.size()=20), dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:34:59.913 [P2P3]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:933     returned not all requested objects (context.m_requested_objects.size()=20), dropping connection
2018-05-02 09:35:03.841 [P2P9]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1025    [86.122.3.67:63732 INC] Got block with unknown parent which was not requested - querying block hashes
2018-05-02 09:35:09.585 [P2P3]  ERROR   net     contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_async.h:289     [54.37.87.203:48772 OUT] [levin_protocol] -->> start_outer_call failed
2018-05-02 09:35:09.586 [P2P3]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:848        [54.37.87.203:48772 OUT] COMMAND_TIMED_SYNC Failed
2018-05-02 09:35:09.586 [P2P3]  ERROR   net     contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_async.h:289     [62.48.164.60:48772 OUT] [levin_protocol] -->> start_outer_call failed
2018-05-02 09:35:09.587 [P2P3]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:848        [62.48.164.60:48772 OUT] COMMAND_TIMED_SYNC Failed
2018-05-02 09:35:09.588 [P2P3]  ERROR   net     contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_async.h:289     [140.82.9.90:48772 OUT] [levin_protocol] -->> start_outer_call failed
2018-05-02 09:35:09.588 [P2P3]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:848        [140.82.9.90:48772 OUT] COMMAND_TIMED_SYNC Failed
2018-05-02 09:35:09.590 [P2P3]  ERROR   net     contrib/epee/include/net/levin_protocol_handler_async.h:289     [159.89.249.113:48772 OUT] [levin_protocol] -->> start_outer_call failed
2018-05-02 09:35:09.591 [P2P3]  WARN    net.p2p src/p2p/net_node.inl:848        [159.89.249.113:48772 OUT] COMMAND_TIMED_SYNC Failed
2018-05-02 09:35:17.118 [P2P4]  INFO    global  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305     [140.82.9.90:48772 OUT] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 171869 -> 174841 [Your node is 2972 blocks (4 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-05-02 09:35:17.198 [P2P4]  ERROR   net.cn  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1025    [86.122.3.67:63732 INC] Got block with unknown parent which was not requested - querying block hashes

A different network connection may be helpfull. Express VPN helps me on similar issue.

[sundownz]

The daemon seems to sync 100 blocks every time you start it and then stop.
At this rate I'm going to close and reopen it 500 times until I finally get the damn thing synced...  

I apologize for all the issues users are facing with sync, we will release a new version 2.0.2 in the next few days to solve these issues.

Thank you for your patience and support

https://github.com/valiant1x/intensecoinwallet/releases/

Looks like 2.0.1 GUI is available now -- great =)

Well. So far having issues synching. It goes for a while, stops... then I closed wallet & daemon and synch has started all over from scratch.

[sundownz]

Hi! Why do I sometimes have full synchronization, then 174372 -> 179096 

you have to avoid your daemon communicate with v3 of nodes. use dedicated v4 nodes like this:

intensecoind --add-exclusive-node 140.82.9.90:48772 --add-exclusive-node 62.48.164.60:48772 --add-exclusive-node 69.162.83.202:48772 --add-exclusive-node 5.249.27.162:48772 --add-exclusive-node 54.37.87.203:48772

and if possible, use the most recent version of daemon, i had a strange blockchain overload errors until I compiled a newest one from git repository a hour ago

I tried this... so far it doesn't seem to be working... but I will let it run for a while and check back in.

[sundownz]

Also... my wallet showed my balance (up to the date it was able to synch) for a while but when I re-started it... it no longer does.

[ThePigwee]

To those having issues with syncing, it is a known issue that we are facing. Some nodes still running V3 are causing the daemon to not sync properly. Make sure you have the exclusive nodes in our update when opening your wallet. We are working on a new wallet that has these properties already integrated.

[ThePigwee]

Hello everybody!
Today the synchronization of the wallet (GUI 2.0.1) has finally ended, but there is nothing to rejoice! On an old wallet (GUI 1.4.1) I have a balance: 45775.00, and in a new wallet (GUI 2.0.1): 58.00. What happened to my other coins (45517.00)? I lost my coins? How to solve the problem, the developers, please help. I thank everyone for their help!
Below there is a link where I made a screenshot of the wallets.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_oJ7MMv8y4Ag6bemJXzVrK0RbskpfMoG

Sorry to hear that you are having an issue. I would recommend rescanning your balance in the new wallet. It can be found in “settings”. If this does not work, make sure that you have imported the correct wallet. If you are in need of some extensive troubleshooting, please reach out to us on Discord or Telegram.

[MaxMidnite]

To those having issues with syncing, it is a known issue that we are facing. Some nodes still running V3 are causing the daemon to not sync properly. Make sure you have the exclusive nodes in our update when opening your wallet. We are working on a new wallet that has these properties already integrated.

Hello, thank you for confirming, I tried number of ways, even the blog post way you mentioned:

2018-05-02 16:39:23.685 [P2P7]  INFO    global  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305     [140.82.9.90:48772 OUT] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 173376 -> 175052 [Your node is 1676 blocks (2 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2018-05-02 16:40:05.661 [P2P9]  INFO    global  src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:305     [62.48.164.60:48772 OUT] Sync data returned a new top block candidate: 173376 -> 175053 [Your node is 1677 blocks (2 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started


It does not seem to work for myself as each time the amount of blogs behind increases, its suppose to decrease?

[SlowGrowth]

Dear Intense Family,

I know everyone is having some issues with sync, we are working on a new release to solve these and it will be pushed in the next days.

Meanwhile i am running this 15,000 ITNS giveaway on twitter, if anyone would like to enter just RT the following link:

https://twitter.com/c1sc0r1b31r0/status/991730714986074112

The winner will be selected random by the 20th of May at 9pm UTC.

Good luck and thank you for all the support

[xda-developer]

All speaking about coins and wallet synchronisation. But what with the core project? Does decentralized VPN available already? Could you share your experience how it works?

[SlowGrowth]

All speaking about coins and wallet synchronisation. But what with the core project? Does decentralized VPN available already? Could you share your experience how it works?

Check our 1st of May post in our website.

[mroctopus]

Hello everybody!
Today the synchronization of the wallet (GUI 2.0.1) has finally ended, but there is nothing to rejoice! On an old wallet (GUI 1.4.1) I have a balance: 45775.00, and in a new wallet (GUI 2.0.1): 58.00. What happened to my other coins (45517.00)? I lost my coins? How to solve the problem, the developers, please help. I thank everyone for their help!
Below there is a link where I made a screenshot of the wallets.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_oJ7MMv8y4Ag6bemJXzVrK0RbskpfMoG

maybe not fully sync. there are bugs. please wait for GUI 2.0.2.

[proride]

Have we any economy plan for vpn pricing?
So, If we ll have 1000 users of vpn for 2$ mounth - it is 2000$ only.
It will not realy affects on itns price.
Am I wrong? Have you some calc of future price?

[Edwinc08]

Intense is about to blow up riding this BULL RUN!!! hold on to your spaceship because we are about to pass the moon.

[Snider]

Intense is about to blow up riding this BULL RUN!!! hold on to your spaceship because we are about to pass the moon.

Been waiting a really long time for it go ITNS, GO!

[readonly]

Have we any economy plan for vpn pricing?
So, If we ll have 1000 users of vpn for 2$ mounth - it is 2000$ only.
It will not realy affects on itns price.
Am I wrong? Have you some calc of future price?

Yes, I'm also interested in this question. How will the price for VPN be formed?

[lwp1on1]

Hi to all,

in last 10 days, ITNS have gone through very difficult situations. You see a few versions, which have been made to resolve issues that happened. To be honest, anyone who is in ITNS coin (I mean have them) is a little bit concerned and that is normal, but, after this almost two weeks gone, I see that ITNS team have strong dedication to resolve issues. After all, community is also strong and very helpful to anyone that ask normally for help or support (Discord my choice).  This is not 'ode' to ITNS team, this is just truth from one user, who have many questions about 'what to do' to sync, see wallet balance, etc. Also, community on Discord is also ready to help, because they function as a chain, when someone resolve his problem, he continue to help others, so in that way I admit that ITNS is strong community and very dedicated to help each other !

Someone write that ITNS is 'scam', maybe it is true (from his point of view), but first at all, read Whitepaper, than get involved in community talk and follow the ITNS team work, support and releases...soon, You will achieve new infos and I am sure that You will agree that ITNS is faraway from 'scam'. ITNS have good story and as any other good story, he need time to reach his goals, strong team, community and support. It's easy to blame team, but, before blame someone, get involved inside community and just read msgs, soon after You will place Your question, then You can see that ITNS have strong support (ITNS team and members) who share knowledge and experience, to help anyone that have ITNS coins (doesn't matter is You have few of them or much more).

This message is not sponsored from ITNS team or anyone else, it's just my experience with ITNS and people in his background and around.

Calm down your heads, do not be nervous, be reasonable and ask if You need help, I am sure that someone from ITNS community will find a way to help You resolve problem.

Stay in good health and have a perfect day, everyday

Lwp

[Everglow]

Intense is about to blow up riding this BULL RUN!!! hold on to your spaceship because we are about to pass the moon.

Lol this spaceship is too heavey and it was sink for a long long time. When market go to an uptrend, my portfolio with a huge amount ITNS still unchange 

[johnwarren12]

Have we any economy plan for vpn pricing?
So, If we ll have 1000 users of vpn for 2$ mounth - it is 2000$ only.
It will not realy affects on itns price.
Am I wrong? Have you some calc of future price?

A couple of days ago, SlowGrowth did mention about just the top 3 free apps in Google Chrome to have 13 million total installs. There are like 4500 members in the discord group only. The team is talking millions of users, not thousands

[abudfv2008]

Have we any economy plan for vpn pricing?
So, If we ll have 1000 users of vpn for 2$ mounth - it is 2000$ only.
It will not realy affects on itns price.
Am I wrong? Have you some calc of future price?

Itns vpn has millions potential users in many countries where idiots in government try to block internet.
But the question is - will it work if government will be blocking it. The technology should be banproof utilising sophisticated methods of establishing the link.
For the moment even simple sync is not working correctly - hoping to be fixed.