[ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013

[ZeRo103]

http://digi.cryptcoins.net Scam or bad configured ... i only gives me 700 KH/s when i actually have 2700 kH/s this is over 1 hour now

[1713584030]

1713584030

[1713584030]

1713584030

[nearmiss]

http://digi.cryptcoins.net Scam or bad configured ... i only gives me 700 KH/s when i actually have 2700 kH/s this is over 1 hour now

come try out http://dgc.scryptmining.com   But on another note, I wouldn't worry too much about the displayed hash rate at a pool. Its only an estimate in the best of cases, and with new/quick coins sometimes the operators need to tweak some of the calc's to get it right (I am still doing that on mine as well), but either way it does *not* generally affect your payout rate (or shouldn't anyways)

[fenican]

http://digi.cryptcoins.net Scam or bad configured ... i only gives me 700 KH/s when i actually have 2700 kH/s this is over 1 hour now

My p2pool is at 41 mh/s now and we're solving blocks very quickly.  Feel free to come join the fun!

http://54.227.253.120:9500/static/

[ZeRo103]

I'm there .... well my pay seem to be according to 700 kH/s ... anyway ... for now i need to see  

[baritus]

Some of the reasons those coins didn't succeed:

1. Some pre-mine or "test" mining.
2. Some difficulty 0 and had a lot of hardware ready with their insiders
3. Some difficulty 0 and get over-mined since the very beginning before nodes are well distributed
4. Some only got mined at the beginning when it was easy and then they stopped

Why is digitalcoin different?

1. No pre-mine or any semblance of it.
2. Number 1 again.
3. digitalcoin had very low rewards at the beginning so coins didn't begin to be distributed in quantity until many people could participate
4. It is more profitable to stay with digitalcoin due to the nature of the reward system

DigitalCoin won't succeed for a different reason.  The chosen block time is actually too short.  I write about why that's a bad thing here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211535.0

I read that. Good thoughts. One of the developers who took part in this project did take care of that for us. Check the pool rates for the orphan rates and efficiency.

What exactly did the developer do to prevent these issues?  Note that the issues I present only become apparent once the distributed network becomes large enough.  Low orphan rates now doesn't necessarily prove anything, it likely just means that the network hasn't grown large enough for these problems to become apparent yet.

We are still in beta and working on documentation. You can check the source and see the changes yourself.

The only relevant thing that I see in the source diffs is that MAX_OUTBOUND_CONNECTIONS was increased from 8 to 16.  Is that the change made to avoid these issues?  If so, can you articulate why you believe that is sufficient?

That is one change I am aware of.

With fast blocks, one of the main issues is latency and propagation of the transactions through the network. More connected nodes means more ways for the transactions to be routed in case of a dead or unresponsive node in the network. It also means clients are able to connect to more nodes and lower the probability of a latency and therefore a fork in the network. It is under the basic principal that a faster network functions more optimally without bottlenecks. The faster a consensus can be reached and transmitted, the better.

Everything is going according to plan up to this point.

[Mazakguy]

Anywhere else but mege to get the windows-qt. for some reason the mega link dont work for me

[baritus]

digitalcoin.co -> Source -> Windows Binary Repo

[Walt Sobchak]

network hash is becoming unbalanced, need to get some people in to other pools. scryptmining.com  has too much power

[Walt Sobchak]

scratch that, the whole network is close to 400MH/s

[fenican]

I have surplus capacity over at my p2pool http://54.227.253.120:9500/static/

We're running about 45 mh/s.  Happy to take new miners to help balance out network load.  Should be able to handle 100 mh/s + with no problem

[BitJohn]

Mining here right now http://dgc.turbocoin.us liking it so far hashrates display off which is annoying but its a new pool and looks pretty .

[schnebi]

Free capacity also at P2Pool:

crypto-coins.de:8907

30 Mh/s at the moment... Server can take a lot more load....

[shivansps]

wonder how http://dgc.scryptmining.com/ can estimate 130 coins/day on stats, but im only making 0.3/hour -.- with 400khash/s

[BitJohn]

do your own estimates many flashpools like these were rushed to production so lots of bad math conversions it always gets sorted

[Walt Sobchak]

looks like scryptmining might be getting ddos'ed or something....

[baritus]

Why do you say that? There is actually just too much demand for the coin and no one is willing to sell it seems.

[iGotSpots]

So many rejected on all of those pools    First time I've ever actually thought it was a problem, I understand rejecteds happen, but I'm like...way higher than it should be

[baritus]

So many rejected on all of those pools    First time I've ever actually thought it was a problem, I understand rejecteds happen, but I'm like...way higher than it should be

That shouldn't be, what are your settings?

[Walt Sobchak]

who me? The scryptmining site is down and pool is  not responding

[iGotSpots]

That last pool on the list, fenican's or whatever seems to be working well for me now, though