ZeRo103
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Hack The Planet
|
|
May 21, 2013, 03:36:35 AM |
|
http://digi.cryptcoins.net Scam or bad configured ... i only gives me 700 KH/s when i actually have 2700 kH/s this is over 1 hour now
|
|
|
|
nearmiss
|
|
May 21, 2013, 03:38:32 AM |
|
http://digi.cryptcoins.net Scam or bad configured ... i only gives me 700 KH/s when i actually have 2700 kH/s this is over 1 hour now come try out http://dgc.scryptmining.com But on another note, I wouldn't worry too much about the displayed hash rate at a pool. Its only an estimate in the best of cases, and with new/quick coins sometimes the operators need to tweak some of the calc's to get it right (I am still doing that on mine as well), but either way it does *not* generally affect your payout rate (or shouldn't anyways)
|
Profit-Switching Pool w/ Vardiff -> http://hashco.ws Optionally keep the alts we mine or auto-trade for BTC. In addition can be paid out in any of: 365, AC, BC, BTC, C2, CINNI, COMM, FAC, HBN, MINT, PMC, QRK, RDD, WC, XBC
|
|
|
|
ZeRo103
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Hack The Planet
|
|
May 21, 2013, 03:44:36 AM |
|
I'm there .... well my pay seem to be according to 700 kH/s ... anyway ... for now i need to see
|
|
|
|
baritus (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
|
|
May 21, 2013, 03:52:38 AM |
|
Some of the reasons those coins didn't succeed:
1. Some pre-mine or "test" mining. 2. Some difficulty 0 and had a lot of hardware ready with their insiders 3. Some difficulty 0 and get over-mined since the very beginning before nodes are well distributed 4. Some only got mined at the beginning when it was easy and then they stopped
Why is digitalcoin different?
1. No pre-mine or any semblance of it. 2. Number 1 again. 3. digitalcoin had very low rewards at the beginning so coins didn't begin to be distributed in quantity until many people could participate 4. It is more profitable to stay with digitalcoin due to the nature of the reward system
DigitalCoin won't succeed for a different reason. The chosen block time is actually too short. I write about why that's a bad thing here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211535.0I read that. Good thoughts. One of the developers who took part in this project did take care of that for us. Check the pool rates for the orphan rates and efficiency. What exactly did the developer do to prevent these issues? Note that the issues I present only become apparent once the distributed network becomes large enough. Low orphan rates now doesn't necessarily prove anything, it likely just means that the network hasn't grown large enough for these problems to become apparent yet. We are still in beta and working on documentation. You can check the source and see the changes yourself. The only relevant thing that I see in the source diffs is that MAX_OUTBOUND_CONNECTIONS was increased from 8 to 16. Is that the change made to avoid these issues? If so, can you articulate why you believe that is sufficient? That is one change I am aware of. With fast blocks, one of the main issues is latency and propagation of the transactions through the network. More connected nodes means more ways for the transactions to be routed in case of a dead or unresponsive node in the network. It also means clients are able to connect to more nodes and lower the probability of a latency and therefore a fork in the network. It is under the basic principal that a faster network functions more optimally without bottlenecks. The faster a consensus can be reached and transmitted, the better. Everything is going according to plan up to this point.
|
Digitalcoin - Sha256, Scrypt, x11 Mining - Multi-algorithm & One Click Masternodes - Founded in 2013
|
|
|
Mazakguy
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:14:42 AM |
|
Anywhere else but mege to get the windows-qt. for some reason the mega link dont work for me
|
|
|
|
baritus (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:17:22 AM |
|
digitalcoin.co -> Source -> Windows Binary Repo
|
Digitalcoin - Sha256, Scrypt, x11 Mining - Multi-algorithm & One Click Masternodes - Founded in 2013
|
|
|
Walt Sobchak
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 110
God rest Donnie's soul.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:22:32 AM |
|
network hash is becoming unbalanced, need to get some people in to other pools. scryptmining.com has too much power
|
|
|
|
Walt Sobchak
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 110
God rest Donnie's soul.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:23:22 AM |
|
scratch that, the whole network is close to 400MH/s
|
|
|
|
fenican
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:27:58 AM |
|
I have surplus capacity over at my p2pool http://54.227.253.120:9500/static/We're running about 45 mh/s. Happy to take new miners to help balance out network load. Should be able to handle 100 mh/s + with no problem
|
|
|
|
BitJohn
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:29:40 AM |
|
Mining here right now http://dgc.turbocoin.us liking it so far hashrates display off which is annoying but its a new pool and looks pretty .
|
|
|
|
schnebi
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:30:29 AM |
|
Free capacity also at P2Pool:
crypto-coins.de:8907
30 Mh/s at the moment... Server can take a lot more load....
|
|
|
|
|
BitJohn
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:33:56 AM |
|
do your own estimates many flashpools like these were rushed to production so lots of bad math conversions it always gets sorted
|
|
|
|
Walt Sobchak
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 110
God rest Donnie's soul.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:40:00 AM |
|
looks like scryptmining might be getting ddos'ed or something....
|
|
|
|
baritus (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:43:39 AM |
|
Why do you say that? There is actually just too much demand for the coin and no one is willing to sell it seems.
|
Digitalcoin - Sha256, Scrypt, x11 Mining - Multi-algorithm & One Click Masternodes - Founded in 2013
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:49:32 AM |
|
So many rejected on all of those pools First time I've ever actually thought it was a problem, I understand rejecteds happen, but I'm like...way higher than it should be
|
|
|
|
baritus (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:50:17 AM |
|
So many rejected on all of those pools First time I've ever actually thought it was a problem, I understand rejecteds happen, but I'm like...way higher than it should be That shouldn't be, what are your settings?
|
Digitalcoin - Sha256, Scrypt, x11 Mining - Multi-algorithm & One Click Masternodes - Founded in 2013
|
|
|
Walt Sobchak
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 110
God rest Donnie's soul.
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:50:40 AM |
|
who me? The scryptmining site is down and pool is not responding
|
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
May 21, 2013, 04:51:52 AM |
|
That last pool on the list, fenican's or whatever seems to be working well for me now, though
|
|
|
|
|