laik2
|
|
September 08, 2017, 12:48:12 PM |
|
Enhancements request: 1. Ability to change API port. 2. Ability to use failover stratum. 3. Ability to see incorrect gpu solutions like accepted/rejected/incorrect. 4. DevFee switch notice and ETC devfee mining without DAG switch. Feature request: Watchdog on GPU failure Thats it for now.
|
|
|
|
kcopcu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
September 08, 2017, 12:58:09 PM |
|
Enhancements request: 1. Ability to change API port. 2. Ability to use failover stratum. 3. Ability to see incorrect gpu solutions like accepted/rejected/incorrect. 4. DevFee switch notice and ETC devfee mining without DAG switch. Feature request: Watchdog on GPU failure Thats it for now.
I tried yesterday on my laptop . They've already changing port API and failover stratum usage . HTTP Port change : eminer.exe -http :80 Stratum failover : eminer -S eu1.ethermine.org:4444,us1.ethermine.org:4444
|
|
|
|
christianCoder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2017, 01:08:09 PM Last edit: September 09, 2017, 01:20:43 PM by christianCoder |
|
How can we verify this is only taking out a 1% dev fee? And what is the frequency of the 1% cut vs Claymore?
Even with the slightly higher hashrates, in comparison to Claymore, looks like Eminer profitability is much lower per my Ethermine.org Payout/Rounds dashboard. Also looks like Ether balance accumulates slower on this vs Claymore.
Has anyone else here noticed this? Taking "1%" every 10 minutes is very different from taking 1% every hour.
Please verify and respond.
|
|
|
|
smparo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2017, 03:17:40 PM |
|
How can we verify this is only taking out a 1% dev fee? And what is the frequency of the 1% cut vs Claymore?
Even with the slightly higher hashrates, in comparison to Claymore, looks like Eminer profitability is much lower per my Ethermine.org Payout/Rounds dashboard. Also looks like Ether balance accumulates slower on this vs Claymore.
Has anyone else here noticed this? Taking "1%" every 10 minutes is very different from taking 1% every hour.
Please verify and respond.
I'm just talking about windows eminer I notice that some times eminer write devfee on the log but I did not understand how often this is done (I seem to remember after a few hours that I had started it). You can search on your eminer console with CTRL+F. Also for the profitability there is a problem: every day there are increase of difficulty! https://www.coinwarz.com/difficulty-charts/ethereum-difficulty-chartFor me anyway the share is much more constant and with Claymore my average hashrate over the last 24 hours on ethermine was 57.4 and now with eminer is 59.2MH/s (2 x RX580)... your average is less than before?
|
|
|
|
christianCoder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2017, 09:57:39 PM Last edit: September 14, 2017, 01:19:53 AM by christianCoder |
|
I'm just talking about windows eminer I notice that some times eminer write devfee on the log but I did not understand how often this is done (I seem to remember after a few hours that I had started it). You can search on your eminer console with CTRL+F. Also for the profitability there is a problem: every day there are increase of difficulty! https://www.coinwarz.com/difficulty-charts/ethereum-difficulty-chartFor me anyway the share is much more constant and with Claymore my average hashrate over the last 24 hours on ethermine was 57.4 and now with eminer is 59.2MH/s (2 x RX580)... your average is less than before? Thanks for the reply and for checking. Getting 5 to 6 MH/s more than Claymore can also do core underclocks and memory overclocks more agressively on Eminer. However, not as stable as Claymore on Linux. Longest run w/o crashing was maybe 7 to 10 hours. Redacting the stability issue. Looks like it'll be running for 24hrs non-stop in a few hours -- all with aggressive core underclocks and undervolts. However, IMO, The Eminer dev fee is still a black box.Also want to encourage the E-miner guy (an AMD Employee perhaps) to keep innovating. I know a lot of work went into this and you have my support. But transparency is crucial.
|
|
|
|
aar
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 16
|
|
September 09, 2017, 10:03:48 PM |
|
interesting, certainly would be nice to have more competition in the mining software space.
|
|
|
|
kuduirt
Member
Offline
Activity: 304
Merit: 10
|
|
September 10, 2017, 05:47:22 PM |
|
shit miner ) same like clamor )nothng interisting imho
|
today you can oversleep mega Pump on bitcoin for 250 000$ per coin lol
|
|
|
oli123
|
|
September 11, 2017, 04:55:39 PM |
|
I found a link to eminer at http://cryptomining-blog.com/. So I decided to try it out. First I tried the command: eminer -B 0. I tested and the result was 27 Mh/s. So I tried eminer to Pegascoin mining. eminer -S eu.coin-miners.info:2222 -U wallet -P miner name 4xRX 480 8gb 1077/2200 core/mem no moded bios. Nice graphic design and useful information during mining. I like Eminer and I will use it for ethash mining. Here's the screen:
|
|
|
|
terrxysq
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
September 13, 2017, 03:55:50 PM |
|
any updates to this?
it worked quite well for my amd cards but when it comes to nvidia cards it gets some invalid command error after a few min of mining. also the speed is slightly less than claymore. 30.3 vs 31
not that really to compare the shares between eminer vs claymores but the effective hash rate from the pool seems to show higher rates for eminer. so a thumbs up for this.
|
|
|
|
E-Miner (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
September 14, 2017, 11:58:01 PM |
|
any updates to this?
it worked quite well for my amd cards but when it comes to nvidia cards it gets some invalid command error after a few min of mining. also the speed is slightly less than claymore. 30.3 vs 31
not that really to compare the shares between eminer vs claymores but the effective hash rate from the pool seems to show higher rates for eminer. so a thumbs up for this.
I will announce new release in a few days. Thanks for your report.
|
|
|
|
papasmurf1337
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 0
|
|
September 15, 2017, 01:06:07 AM |
|
Can you tell us what update will contain?
I am interested in this miner but do it little better for NVIDIA cards, specially for dual mining
|
|
|
|
terrxysq
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
September 15, 2017, 01:25:20 AM |
|
i think the AMD card code is pretty good after running for a few days. The displayed hashrate is slightly lower than claymore. But the average 24hr rate reported by the pools seems to be slightly more. When using claymore most of the time the average rate is only around 92-95% of the reported rate. When using eminer the average rate are mostly around 95-98% of the reported rate, and occasionally go over the reported rate for a while.
I think the N card code might need some improvement. At least it is not working properly for me.
|
|
|
|
E-Miner (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
September 15, 2017, 04:55:52 PM |
|
Can you tell us what update will contain?
I am interested in this miner but do it little better for NVIDIA cards, specially for dual mining
Here the some subjects; - Cloud monitor feature; miner can view and monitor all rigs on a website with statistics and alarms feature and this will be free service forever, if miner pay devfee. - Reported bugs fixed - Linux hashrate improved - DAG intensity feature added - Devfee coins selectable now. - Intensity improved.
|
|
|
|
terrxysq
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2017, 04:29:43 AM |
|
when you releasing an update?
will it be more stable for nvidia devices?
|
|
|
|
E-Miner (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2017, 11:52:10 AM |
|
when you releasing an update?
will it be more stable for nvidia devices?
Currently, I'm working on nvidia devices for the stabilization.
|
|
|
|
terrxysq
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2017, 02:04:35 PM |
|
cool. let me know if you need any testers.
|
|
|
|
bulgar73
Member
Offline
Activity: 128
Merit: 10
|
|
September 16, 2017, 09:37:56 PM |
|
I try your miner, great work !
Hashrate very close to Claymore.
Mining DBIX, can not connect to server clona.ru:5081, I set ............ -S stratum+tcp://clona.ru:5081 and received error
stratum=stratum+tcp://clona.ru:5081 CRIT [09-16|23:09:29] Stratum server critical error error="map[message:Method not found code:-3]"
without prefix "stratum+tcp://" in -S miner connect to pool but with "etherproxy://....." and do not show woker name on this pool, only show "0"
thnx
---- BTC
|
|
|
|
E-Miner (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2017, 12:44:58 AM |
|
I try your miner, great work !
Hashrate very close to Claymore.
Mining DBIX, can not connect to server clona.ru:5081, I set ............ -S stratum+tcp://clona.ru:5081 and received error
stratum=stratum+tcp://clona.ru:5081 CRIT [09-16|23:09:29] Stratum server critical error error="map[message:Method not found code:-3]"
without prefix "stratum+tcp://" in -S miner connect to pool but with "etherproxy://....." and do not show woker name on this pool, only show "0"
thnx
---- BTC
I checked, like the pool doesn't support worker name with stratum protocol.
|
|
|
|
ranastic
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2017, 03:56:07 AM |
|
Any help to using Eminer on ethos?
|
|
|
|
bulgar73
Member
Offline
Activity: 128
Merit: 10
|
|
September 17, 2017, 05:13:07 AM |
|
I try your miner, great work !
Hashrate very close to Claymore.
Mining DBIX, can not connect to server clona.ru:5081, I set ............ -S stratum+tcp://clona.ru:5081 and received error
stratum=stratum+tcp://clona.ru:5081 CRIT [09-16|23:09:29] Stratum server critical error error="map[message:Method not found code:-3]"
without prefix "stratum+tcp://" in -S miner connect to pool but with "etherproxy://....." and do not show woker name on this pool, only show "0"
thnx
---- BTC
I checked, like the pool doesn't support worker name with stratum protocol. Claymore work ...... ---- BTC
|
|
|
|
|