[ANN] CoinonatX-PoW/PoS-Masternodes-75% APR (CXT Sister) -NEW THREAD

[cryptophil]

https://join.slack.com/t/coinonatxfrog/shared_invite/enQtMjYzNjcxOTIyOTgxLTE2MDg5N2I2YWI2NzM2ZGEzYzRkNzY4YWY5NjAxOTZiZWIxMTY1YjczZDBjOGZjN2QyMWExMzc1NjIzYjA4OTg

I dont dig slack i have too many staking coins and discord works better for me and is more "centralized". Cheers anyway and will check it out.

[Moshen]

Try
https://github.com/podfrogs/CoinonatX/releases

I took the code and added a few extra goodies to it, I'm currently half way to finish and expect to complete the enhancements in two days. My original thought was that it would be a great idea to integrate that one right into windows explorer shell and build a firefox plugin for it. Oh my.

[cryptophil]

Try
https://github.com/podfrogs/CoinonatX/releases

I took the code and added a few extra goodies to it, I'm currently half way to finish and expect to complete the enhancements in two days. My original thought was that it would be a great idea to integrate that one right into windows explorer shell and build a firefox plugin for it. Oh my.

Did you manage to reduce that unbearable lag?

[modzer0]

Try
https://github.com/podfrogs/CoinonatX/releases

I took the code and added a few extra goodies to it, I'm currently half way to finish and expect to complete the enhancements in two days. My original thought was that it would be a great idea to integrate that one right into windows explorer shell and build a firefox plugin for it. Oh my.

Did you manage to reduce that unbearable lag?

I have also taken a look at the code myself over the last few days. The lag is caused by the list of masternodes being updated on the UI thread, so the UI freezes until the update is complete. It's very poor design to have long-running operations like that on the UI thread for this exact reason. I removed the lag completely by removing the calculation of the masternode rank in the list. But then, of course, there's no rank listed.

My real problem with fixing this properly is that I've compared the CoinonatX code extensively to other code based on the same original code. Crave, for example. All the masternode update code is nearly identical, and the updates also happen on the UI thread in Crave. But for some reason I haven't been able to trace yet, the Crave code completes much faster so there's no noticeable lag in the UI (it's still poor design).

I may work on moving the masternode list update code off the UI thread if the devs don't show some sign of caring about the wallet soon. I have a little money invested in this coin, so I'm motivated to do what I can for the project before the price drops completely to zero.

[sprobe]

Why does Cryptopia need 2000 confirmations to make CoinonatX ready for Exchange?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f6i5qah7z6jy7m6/Selection_779.png?dl=0
It take more than two days

[Randomaze]

Why does Cryptopia need 2000 confirmations to make CoinonatX ready for Exchange?

It take more than two days

Yes it is. But I think there are more questions to the Cryptopia itself, because other tokens also have a large number of confirmations compared to other exchanges

[cryptophil]

Try
https://github.com/podfrogs/CoinonatX/releases

I took the code and added a few extra goodies to it, I'm currently half way to finish and expect to complete the enhancements in two days. My original thought was that it would be a great idea to integrate that one right into windows explorer shell and build a firefox plugin for it. Oh my.

Did you manage to reduce that unbearable lag?

I have also taken a look at the code myself over the last few days. The lag is caused by the list of masternodes being updated on the UI thread, so the UI freezes until the update is complete. It's very poor design to have long-running operations like that on the UI thread for this exact reason. I removed the lag completely by removing the calculation of the masternode rank in the list. But then, of course, there's no rank listed.

My real problem with fixing this properly is that I've compared the CoinonatX code extensively to other code based on the same original code. Crave, for example. All the masternode update code is nearly identical, and the updates also happen on the UI thread in Crave. But for some reason I haven't been able to trace yet, the Crave code completes much faster so there's no noticeable lag in the UI (it's still poor design).

I may work on moving the masternode list update code off the UI thread if the devs don't show some sign of caring about the wallet soon. I have a little money invested in this coin, so I'm motivated to do what I can for the project before the price drops completely to zero.

Great, good to see community movement. I manage to send coins(took ages because of the lag) to a new wallet on another machine and so usable now! Will see next few day and give feedback. Is anyone staking, are you???

[Slowpok3]

In a weeks time it has been 3months since are CXT swap to XCXT and non of us have had 60% refunds yet, I dont know what the hold up is? Its not exactly hard to send a transaction

Also 3months since the initial release of the XCXT wallet, NEVER had an update, This is the buggiest more irritating wallet i've ever used.

    We would repay back the 60% in less than 7 days to come.


               Thank you

In early August, the developer promised to fulfill the terms of the exchange and return to the purses of the CXT 20% + 20% + 20% each month. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2068761.msg20654143#msg20654143
Result: Deception. Time passed, Nothing returned

Then there was a new promise from dev: we will return all at once in three months
Result: Deception. Time passed, Nothing returned

Then a new promise: We would repay back the 60% in less than 7 days to come.
Result: Deception. Time passed, Nothing returned

The rate fell more than 20 times, the wallet does not work normally, crediting to the exchange - 2000 confirmations = two days, the constant deception from the developer is not a coin, but a dream of a masochist

[REL1C]

Try
https://github.com/podfrogs/CoinonatX/releases

fatal error: openssl/crypto.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
makefile.unix:217: recipe for target 'obj/alert.o' failed
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Error 1


Hello. Maybe you already have a compiled file for Ubuntu Linux. Share, please.

[AdamW_^_^]

nice wallet! why is upnp standard selected? is it turned off? i dont like upnp

[AngeIFriend]

Does everyody ave the sameh mined earnings?b

[Crypto67]

i've just get an email for the 60% refund !
but it's said that we have to give them our CXT address, not our XCXT address 
is that correct?

[MegaAzer]

Where can I find ur WP??

[Buchi-88]

Port forwarding (NAT) for the Masternode 44578 or 44678?

[ramonestii]

Slack link does not work. Is there a other social communication (except twitter).

[ohgr]

i've just get an email for the 60% refund !
but it's said that we have to give them our CXT address, not our XCXT address 
is that correct?

Yes, we were always meant to get a portion of our CXT back post-swap.

[BartoszN1990]

Can i please update Pool mining !! all ofline od dont pay .... DEV !

http://pool.razorgames.org/?address=CSU9bkWuot1cSkycci9za16JU97a7skjWZ

SCAM POOOL !!!

mining over 5 h and they dont pay nothing ... please be aware to scam this pool ... check other coin the same !!

[BartoszN1990]

Anybody can explain this ?>



all other wallet takes 0.1 % i have run 6 wallet and my procesor with windows is arround 10-15% when i start this CoinonatX all go up ;oi wtf where is problem ?

[kris BTC]

i've just get an email for the 60% refund !
but it's said that we have to give them our CXT address, not our XCXT address 
is that correct?

Yea they are refunding you your original CXT by 60%

[loughlin]

is this coin dead?
I got nothing from staking in last week, the price went to the canal, Devs are inactive here. I see he come to the forum but no words from him. Maybe He comes here just to laugh with idiots who's expect something from his coin. Dev do not be shy, tell us more about future of XCXT