Attractor
Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
|
|
April 05, 2018, 03:29:17 PM |
|
The price is still quite low. It's too undervalued
my botnet brought me 730k Ird, I'll wait when there will be an appropriate volume and will sell, what kind of undervaluation you say, if the coin is not popularized and where not used, I agree that Steve created a quality product, I like a wallet and a stable network , but without the same professional promotion manager, the coin is doomed to failure Having botnet is cool
|
|
|
|
stevebrush
Member
Offline
Activity: 361
Merit: 11
Iridium (IRD) dev
|
|
April 06, 2018, 08:18:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Acime
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
April 07, 2018, 10:25:53 AM |
|
Allright TK is back. Welcome back.
Whitepaper and Website by ET Sunday/Monday. Sorry for the delay.
Whats the news on this ?
|
|
|
|
Attractor
Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
|
|
April 07, 2018, 08:51:47 PM |
|
Great! Next step is to be listed on Coinmarketcap
|
|
|
|
stevebrush
Member
Offline
Activity: 361
Merit: 11
Iridium (IRD) dev
|
|
April 08, 2018, 08:23:56 PM |
|
Allright TK is back. Welcome back. Whitepaper and Website by ET Sunday/Monday. Sorry for the delay.
Whats the news on this ? Coming... all things in order, and sometimes, priorities...
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
April 09, 2018, 06:39:59 PM |
|
Anyone voting for CryptoNight heavy is aware that Claymore isn't going to support it in his miner? No CN-heavy, no old GPUs, sorry, I just don't have time for it.
As far as I understand he has removed the dev fee from his CryptoNight miner so he probably won't improve and support it anymore at all. Too bad, no other comes close to his level.
|
|
|
|
Fast_cris
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 185
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2018, 09:54:46 PM |
|
still alive this coin?
|
|
|
|
Attractor
Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
|
|
April 10, 2018, 05:36:07 PM |
|
still alive this coin?
Alive this coin is, my young padawan
|
|
|
|
nhiatay
|
|
April 11, 2018, 03:44:45 PM |
|
Great! Next step is to be listed on Coinmarketcap Based on the volume transaction daily, it is difficult to be listed on coinmarketcap. Need more time
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
April 11, 2018, 09:53:52 PM |
|
I think we just got an attack by ASICs. Watch blocks 106472 to 106478. Seven blocks found within 45 seconds. None of them found by one of the big pools. I haven't checked the smaller pools yet but without hashrate it is unlikely they found them.
EDIT: Another attack from block 106482 to 106488 (notice the pattern). Again seven blocks found, this time within three minutes (under 50% higher difficulty). I checked the pools irdpool.fr, irdpool.ca and cryptoknight.cc/iridium. The other pools listed on explorer.ird.cash/#network can't have found the blocks because their last blocks are too long ago. So this is an unknown pool or a private pool with tons of hashpower.
|
|
|
|
|
shufle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 12, 2018, 08:04:23 AM |
|
Maybe search engine show it first only for russian-speaking users? In first topic there are link to this thread
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
April 12, 2018, 07:42:46 PM |
|
Another hashrate (ASIC?) attack happened just now. Blocks 106910 to 106917, so 8 blocks total, found within 90 seconds. Not found by any of the known pools. Finding those blocks should have taken 1400 seconds. So the attack was done with 15x the global hashpower of the network, or with approximately 6 MH/s. Again, like the ones I saw by pure coincidence yesterday (there may be many more therefore), this one lasted only very short for 8 blocks (7 yesterday). Who would do that and why? I don't think someone would rent so much hashpower and then mine only for 1-2 minutes. So it this someone with a few dozen ASICs playing around?
|
|
|
|
stevebrush
Member
Offline
Activity: 361
Merit: 11
Iridium (IRD) dev
|
|
April 13, 2018, 07:29:11 AM |
|
Another hashrate (ASIC?) attack happened just now. Blocks 106910 to 106917, so 8 blocks total, found within 90 seconds. Not found by any of the known pools. Finding those blocks should have taken 1400 seconds. So the attack was done with 15x the global hashpower of the network, or with approximately 6 MH/s. Again, like the ones I saw by pure coincidence yesterday (there may be many more therefore), this one lasted only very short for 8 blocks (7 yesterday). Who would do that and why? I don't think someone would rent so much hashpower and then mine only for 1-2 minutes. So it this someone with a few dozen ASICs playing around?
It's on the way... these shorts attacks test the network reactivity too. also I will make graph data on the block explorer.
|
|
|
|
stevebrush
Member
Offline
Activity: 361
Merit: 11
Iridium (IRD) dev
|
|
April 13, 2018, 09:14:19 PM |
|
Some news : I tested successfully the cryptonight V7 and also the cryptonight-lite V7. I like the cryptonight lite V7 witch is fair for old cpu too. Cryptonight heavy is... heavy and not all implemented on miners softwares. My fear is common people could'nt mine. Also by following monero, we can be assured that nexts versions will be followed too. I think about portable wallets too.
Is anybody against the cryptonight-lite V7 ?
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
April 13, 2018, 09:17:09 PM |
|
Is irdpool.fr stuck? No block found since 2 hours despite estimated to find a block every 20 minutes.
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
|
April 13, 2018, 09:24:59 PM |
|
Some news : I tested successfully the cryptonight V7 and also the cryptonight-lite V7. I like the cryptonight lite V7 witch is fair for old cpu too. Cryptonight heavy is... heavy and not all implemented on miners softwares. My fear is common people could'nt mine. Also by following monero, we can be assured that nexts versions will be followed too. I think about portable wallets too.
Is anybody against the cryptonight-lite V7 ?
As far as I remember pretty much everybody here voted for CN heavy. I haven't voted yet but I don't like that CN heavy will not be available in Claymore's miner. Not sure if the people who voted were aware of this since Claymore mentioned this only one week ago.
|
|
|
|
MagicSmoker
|
|
April 13, 2018, 09:32:03 PM |
|
I like the cryptonight lite V7 witch is fair for old cpu too.
If this is the same algo that Turtlecoin [TRTL] switched to then, sure. Otherwise, following Monero is also a good strategy as I outlined before. The threat of ASICs is very real, though - I also mine mined Intensecoin but its network hashrate has jumped from 3-5MH/s to 25-35MH/s over the last 2 days. EDIT - @nanona - I didn't know about Claymore not including Heavy and that would definitely sway my vote even though I prefer xmr-stak.
|
|
|
|
stevebrush
Member
Offline
Activity: 361
Merit: 11
Iridium (IRD) dev
|
|
April 13, 2018, 09:45:41 PM |
|
Is irdpool.fr stuck? No block found since 2 hours despite estimated to find a block every 20 minutes.
I restarted it and put some power, looks ok now
|
|
|
|
stevebrush
Member
Offline
Activity: 361
Merit: 11
Iridium (IRD) dev
|
|
April 13, 2018, 09:49:04 PM |
|
Some news : I tested successfully the cryptonight V7 and also the cryptonight-lite V7. I like the cryptonight lite V7 witch is fair for old cpu too. Cryptonight heavy is... heavy and not all implemented on miners softwares. My fear is common people could'nt mine. Also by following monero, we can be assured that nexts versions will be followed too. I think about portable wallets too. Is anybody against the cryptonight-lite V7 ?
As far as I remember pretty much everybody here voted for CN heavy. I haven't voted yet but I don't like that CN heavy will not be available in Claymore's miner. Not sure if the people who voted were aware of this since Claymore mentioned this only one week ago. I know, but there is reflections behind and it's easier to implement/test. (actually, I already tested v7 and v7 lite and it's ok, Need to prepare pool libs). For the heavy version, it's harder to implement but will try this week-end.
|
|
|
|
|