|
haxllega
|
 |
September 30, 2017, 06:03:01 PM |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. If it's true we will see gigantic increase of value on first day of exchange. The market is big enough to accommodate more projects. I wouldn't worry too much about this. The problem is everyone just dump the coins which they get for free from bounties and stuff. Otherwise most of the ventures have good potential to thrive in the harsh market. As the Napolean will hold a strong bond on exchanges will see how it will go. Yes bounties always hit the price in the beginning. I hope they give bounties one month or later when napoleonx hit the exchanges. With that bounties, the effect can minimize. Many projects usually later distribute the earnings of bounty program participants. And this is normal. I think that even if distributed at once, the coins will not be sold in large quantities You are exaggerating my friend. Bounties are only 1-2% of entire distribution, usually they mean that price of tokens temporarily drops by 10 - 20% and then it completly recovers A problem is that in some ICOs it doesn't make sense to buy tokens during the ICO because price is higher than on first days at exchanges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
matjas
|
|
September 30, 2017, 06:17:20 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. For the far future where this will probably happen i would agree with you. But right now there are still so many individuals who are doing day trading that we dont have to fear about that. |
|
|
|
|
Korsakopf
|
|
September 30, 2017, 06:26:43 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. I think it will be a while before 'everybody' uses bots. And there will be differences in the bots of course. So i think this will not be a problem anytime soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sozialtourist
|
|
September 30, 2017, 06:29:11 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. I think it will be a while before 'everybody' uses bots. And there will be differences in the bots of course. So i think this will not be a problem anytime soon. There will be different bots of course, some might perform better than others so it's the task of the NapoleonX team to constantly improve their bots so that they won't get outperformed by others. |
|
|
|
|
|
Voltaje
|
|
September 30, 2017, 06:32:41 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. I think it will be a while before 'everybody' uses bots. And there will be differences in the bots of course. So i think this will not be a problem anytime soon. There will be different bots of course, some might perform better than others so it's the task of the NapoleonX team to constantly improve their bots so that they won't get outperformed by others. The DAFs are a set of various bots and strategies, that uses historical data to make decisions, they are NOT simple, so NapoleonX will definitely be better than others, that is the good part of this project, you don't get a simple bot for trading, you get an entire platform dedicated for trading  . |
|
|
|
|
|
Elkmar
|
|
September 30, 2017, 07:04:14 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. I think it will be a while before 'everybody' uses bots. And there will be differences in the bots of course. So i think this will not be a problem anytime soon. There will be different bots of course, some might perform better than others so it's the task of the NapoleonX team to constantly improve their bots so that they won't get outperformed by others. The DAFs are a set of various bots and strategies, that uses historical data to make decisions, they are NOT simple, so NapoleonX will definitely be better than others, that is the good part of this project, you don't get a simple bot for trading, you get an entire platform dedicated for trading . Do some trading bots use neural network technologies to learn from the market ? |
|
|
|
|
|
sockpuppet1911
|
|
September 30, 2017, 07:06:35 PM |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. Wow, i would appreciate a link to this rumor. NaPoleonX should be marketed to the people that missed out Cindicator, if they still have money left to invest  . |
|
|
|
|
|
Elkmar
|
|
September 30, 2017, 07:13:04 PM
Last edit: September 30, 2017, 07:28:05 PM by Elkmar |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. Wow, i would appreciate a link to this rumor. NaPoleonX should be marketed to the people that missed out Cindicator, if they still have money left to invest . Good information to know, seems like there is room for competitor in this particular field. |
|
|
|
|
|
FIEX
|
|
September 30, 2017, 07:15:20 PM |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. Wow, i would appreciate a link to this rumor. NaPoleonX should be marketed to the people that missed out Cindicator, if they still have money left to invest . The reason why Cindicator was sold out this fast is because people are looking for sure platforms. NapoleonX can also provide this to a lot of members. I'm sure investors will be looking at this!! This ICO will be great and will sale out fast! Keep it up team |
|
|
|
|
|
Elkmar
|
|
September 30, 2017, 07:28:57 PM |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. Wow, i would appreciate a link to this rumor. NaPoleonX should be marketed to the people that missed out Cindicator, if they still have money left to invest . The reason why Cindicator was sold out this fast is because people are looking for sure platforms. NapoleonX can also provide this to a lot of members. I'm sure investors will be looking at this!! This ICO will be great and will sale out fast! Keep it up team If you're right, it's sure that NapoleonX can provide what is needed. I heard about this project even before this ANN in France and the team seems very solid. |
|
|
|
|
|
Rigorous
|
|
September 30, 2017, 07:29:10 PM |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. Wow, i would appreciate a link to this rumor. NaPoleonX should be marketed to the people that missed out Cindicator, if they still have money left to invest . Alright. The team also noted that the total amount proposed by all 33,449 applicants from 160 countries of the world exceeded $500 million.Here is the link: http://cryptoconsulting.info/2017/news/cindicator-project-successfully-complete-an-unusual-token-sale-collects-15-million/ |
|
|
|
|
|
toolucky98
|
|
September 30, 2017, 07:40:03 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. I think it will be a while before 'everybody' uses bots. And there will be differences in the bots of course. So i think this will not be a problem anytime soon. There will be different bots of course, some might perform better than others so it's the task of the NapoleonX team to constantly improve their bots so that they won't get outperformed by others. The DAFs are a set of various bots and strategies, that uses historical data to make decisions, they are NOT simple, so NapoleonX will definitely be better than others, that is the good part of this project, you don't get a simple bot for trading, you get an entire platform dedicated for trading . Yes, we ourselves should choose a good and suitable strategy. The market will not stay the same all the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
ParRus
|
|
September 30, 2017, 07:55:24 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. I think it will be a while before 'everybody' uses bots. And there will be differences in the bots of course. So i think this will not be a problem anytime soon. There will be different bots of course, some might perform better than others so it's the task of the NapoleonX team to constantly improve their bots so that they won't get outperformed by others. The DAFs are a set of various bots and strategies, that uses historical data to make decisions, they are NOT simple, so NapoleonX will definitely be better than others, that is the good part of this project, you don't get a simple bot for trading, you get an entire platform dedicated for trading . Yes, we ourselves should choose a good and suitable strategy. The market will not stay the same all the time. bot is probably tuned to the optimal algorithm. puts for example 2 orders at once - if sees a big difference between the price of buying and selling I think, it will be very useful |
|
|
|
|
|
magisterr
|
|
September 30, 2017, 08:11:32 PM |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. Wow, i would appreciate a link to this rumor. NaPoleonX should be marketed to the people that missed out Cindicator, if they still have money left to invest . Alright. The team also noted that the total amount proposed by all 33,449 applicants from 160 countries of the world exceeded $500 million.Here is the link: http://cryptoconsulting.info/2017/news/cindicator-project-successfully-complete-an-unusual-token-sale-collects-15-million/Omg.. Does napolenX team can give info, how may investors interesing in their green list as well?  |
|
|
|
|
Affchain
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 0
|
|
September 30, 2017, 08:30:38 PM |
|
I still stand behind the notion that an algorithm will not be able to outperform a human. Even with basic knowledge of how trading
works. I'm not saying they are not useful or able to generate profits. An algorithms usefulness reaches as far as the owner of the
trading accounts being AFK and/or his need for sleep. A human can't make trades 24 hours a day 7 days a week. An algorithm doesn't need a break.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Korsakopf
|
|
September 30, 2017, 08:37:33 PM |
|
I still stand behind the notion that an algorithm will not be able to outperform a human. Even with basic knowledge of how trading
works. I'm not saying they are not useful or able to generate profits. An algorithms usefulness reaches as far as the owner of the
trading accounts being AFK and/or his need for sleep. A human can't make trades 24 hours a day 7 days a week. An algorithm doesn't need a break.
I kinda get your feeling, but not a lot of humans are succesful traders. Sure with crypto everybody can be a winner when BTC goes up so much, but with other commodities, it isn't so easy. I like trading bots, although i like a human to give the final yes/no when a trade is suggested. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cauchy
|
|
September 30, 2017, 08:43:33 PM |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. Wow, i would appreciate a link to this rumor. NaPoleonX should be marketed to the people that missed out Cindicator, if they still have money left to invest . Alright. The team also noted that the total amount proposed by all 33,449 applicants from 160 countries of the world exceeded $500 million.Here is the link: http://cryptoconsulting.info/2017/news/cindicator-project-successfully-complete-an-unusual-token-sale-collects-15-million/ |
|
|
|
|
|
Cauchy
|
|
September 30, 2017, 08:45:53 PM |
|
I think the project Cindicator will not prevent the development of the project NaPoleonX. I would say that these are different projects that will not compete with each other.
Even so, there are in the same category of asset management with trading strategies, backtesting and trading signals on both crypto and traditional assets. But if it is really true that Cindicator could have raised $485 million more after hitting their hard cap, that money is now free to flow into NaPoleonX. Wow, i would appreciate a link to this rumor. NaPoleonX should be marketed to the people that missed out Cindicator, if they still have money left to invest . Alright. The team also noted that the total amount proposed by all 33,449 applicants from 160 countries of the world exceeded $500 million.Here is the link: http://cryptoconsulting.info/2017/news/cindicator-project-successfully-complete-an-unusual-token-sale-collects-15-million/I still find it difficult to believe... but on another hand I got somewhere around 140k tokens from their cindicator challenge and if the demand was that high I would be surprised if it doesnt surge once the tokens is released so I will followup for sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cauchy
|
|
September 30, 2017, 08:47:15 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. I think it will be a while before 'everybody' uses bots. And there will be differences in the bots of course. So i think this will not be a problem anytime soon. There will be different bots of course, some might perform better than others so it's the task of the NapoleonX team to constantly improve their bots so that they won't get outperformed by others. The DAFs are a set of various bots and strategies, that uses historical data to make decisions, they are NOT simple, so NapoleonX will definitely be better than others, that is the good part of this project, you don't get a simple bot for trading, you get an entire platform dedicated for trading . Do some trading bots use neural network technologies to learn from the market ? They said AI/DL is in their roadmap but not initially. They will deploy already developet quant strategies initialy if I have understod the approach correctly. |
|
|
|
|
|
greatteager
|
|
September 30, 2017, 09:19:32 PM |
|
A good way to invest in cryptocurrency without the stress and knwoledge of the many settings importants to considers as return on an investment, risk , volatility of the market, distribution and diversification are managed by bot , now anybody can win money with this solution.
Just a thought, if everybody is using bots, doesn't that ultimately reduce the possible margin of profits available in individual trades. I think it will be a while before 'everybody' uses bots. And there will be differences in the bots of course. So i think this will not be a problem anytime soon. There will be different bots of course, some might perform better than others so it's the task of the NapoleonX team to constantly improve their bots so that they won't get outperformed by others. The DAFs are a set of various bots and strategies, that uses historical data to make decisions, they are NOT simple, so NapoleonX will definitely be better than others, that is the good part of this project, you don't get a simple bot for trading, you get an entire platform dedicated for trading . Do some trading bots use neural network technologies to learn from the market ? Where do you get this information?, give the link, the technology of the neural network is another level of development. |
|
|
|
|
|
