Oh... You again
It's been a while! Just a quick question before I start: do you have any personal feud against us or against a member of our team? I mean, come on, creating a profile solely to intervene here and throw some FUD... Well, anyone enjoys spending his time as he wishes, after all
I am going to be called a troll again but, seriously, who believes for a second this sudden influx of comments is real?
Only one liners, asking questions with obvious answers, while others answer with one liners as well... smh
Either the SelfPay team is having a laugh and making these comments themselves, or they've hired someone to do that and create a fake hype around the project.
The truth is, their telegram channel has gained about a few dozen users, and their social media posts have a handful of likes/retweets...
We can't control who comes and go, it's a public forum. We are indeed increasing our reach and this must be a consequence of it.
Also, I am just baffled that they have not changed their prices. I already believed 300 tokens for 1ETH was high when the ETH was worth around US$ 200, now that the value has tripled, their token is still worth the same? That means the token value is around US$ 2? When very successful tokens like Ripple started at US$ 0.0X? That must be a joke, right?
You do know that what matters is not the price per token but the total market cap, right? A bit like the price of a company share, where the total number of shares multiplied by its unit price defines the company's market cap, and then, supply and demand playing its magic, the price goes up or down, regardless of the supply (as long as it's fixed to avoid dilution). And for a project like SelfPay with all its regional implications, a total market cap of a bit more than 33,300 ETH is definitely reasonable. But, I shouldn't be telling you this, you should be well documented on that topic before saying nonsense, right?
This is my personal opinion but I'd stay away from that project, not convincing at all, and I am not sure the team knows what they are doing.
Oh, based on the nonsense you said before? Right.
I am curious too, what if the ICO sales fails to reach the minimum cap? Will they reimburse people from the preICO sales too? Because if not, I will say it again, it looks to me they're just trying to do an ICO knowing it'll fail, keep the previous found, and go "oh well, it did not work, bye bye"
We're not keeping any funds for ourselves, we're utilizing it as any regular company would do, to run its operations. But... Do you know how it works? I'm a little bit in doubt, based on your previous (scary) assumptions.
