Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 07:24:22 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [UPDATE: 2015-05-10] Bitcoin Core soft-fork "No Forced TX Fee" v0.10.1 available  (Read 54701 times)
HiveLibrary
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37


View Profile
March 14, 2013, 02:06:48 AM
 #141

the solution then should be options for both minimum and maximum and broadcast intent to transmit (of course this could blow up and cause people to refuse to mine certain amounts or certain addresses)
1481311462
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481311462

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481311462
Reply with quote  #2

1481311462
Report to moderator
1481311462
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481311462

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481311462
Reply with quote  #2

1481311462
Report to moderator
1481311462
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481311462

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481311462
Reply with quote  #2

1481311462
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
BitHits
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile WWW
March 15, 2013, 05:58:32 AM
 #142

Anyone got binaries of this? I was spread them around like hot cakes! This could easily overtake official client that still adheres to broken tx fee system

Free BTC http://beta.BitHits.info BTC 1DNNERMT5MMusfYnCBfcKCBjBKZWBC5Lg2 DGC DH2Pm4VXxsTeqUYZkEySU1c8p5TLvuLe8u LTC LP2QiL1pnsaKVX5Qa811pFJuFL8FxkxWRz
FreeMoney
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


Strength in numbers


View Profile WWW
March 15, 2013, 06:05:13 AM
 #143

I'm confused by this thread. I thought the fee was always voluntary anyway... ?

Nope, it is not voluntary if the mainline client's algorithm decides so.
I've no issue with enforced fees, but using the standard windows client, doing some testing with bitcoin, have paid more than 5 times the transaction value in fees - somewhat disproportionate - makes it just like a bank Wink

You've tested a bank's open source software and chosen to attach a fee that ended up going to a peer? Interesting for sure ;-)

Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
BitHits
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile WWW
March 15, 2013, 06:14:58 AM
 #144

I'm not saying we should have NO TX FEE at all. But at the very fucking a least a tx fee proportionate to the input value of the transaction!

Free BTC http://beta.BitHits.info BTC 1DNNERMT5MMusfYnCBfcKCBjBKZWBC5Lg2 DGC DH2Pm4VXxsTeqUYZkEySU1c8p5TLvuLe8u LTC LP2QiL1pnsaKVX5Qa811pFJuFL8FxkxWRz
BitHits
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile WWW
March 18, 2013, 12:02:26 AM
 #145

Code:
Administrator@PC /c/bitcoin-nftf-master/src
$ make -f makefile.mingw
g++ -c -mthreads -O2 -w -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DWIN32 -D_WINDOWS -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/c/bitcoin-nftf-master/src/leveldb/include -I/c/bitcoin-nftf-master/src/leveldb/helpers -I"/c/bitcoin-nftf-master/src" -I"/usr/local/include" -o obj/alert.o alert.cpp
alert.cpp:5:29: fatal error: boost/foreach.hpp: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Error 1

after copying C:\boost_1_43_0-mgw\boost to C:\bitcoin-nftf-master\src

Code:
Administrator@PC /c/bitcoin-nftf-master/src
$ make -f makefile.mingw
g++ -c -mthreads -O2 -w -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DWIN32 -D_WINDOWS -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/c/bitcoin-nftf-master/src/leveldb/include -I/c/bitcoin-nftf-master/src/leveldb/helpers -I"/c/bitcoin-nftf-master/src" -I"/usr/local/include" -o obj/alert.o alert.cpp
In file included from serialize.h:22:0,
                 from netbase.h:10,
                 from util.h:27,
                 from alert.h:13,
                 from alert.cpp:8:
allocators.h:12:53: fatal error: openssl/crypto.h: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Error 1

Free BTC http://beta.BitHits.info BTC 1DNNERMT5MMusfYnCBfcKCBjBKZWBC5Lg2 DGC DH2Pm4VXxsTeqUYZkEySU1c8p5TLvuLe8u LTC LP2QiL1pnsaKVX5Qa811pFJuFL8FxkxWRz
pera
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


­バカ


View Profile WWW
March 18, 2013, 03:48:53 AM
 #146

you should properly install boost and openssl on your mingw/msys environment.. maybe you want to try this:
http://nuwen.net/mingw.html

and then read this:
https://qt-project.org/wiki/Compiling-OpenSSL-with-MinGW

キタ━━━━(゚∀゚)━━━━ッ!!
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
March 18, 2013, 04:52:55 AM
 #147

I'm not saying we should have NO TX FEE at all. But at the very fucking a least a tx fee proportionate to the input value of the transaction!

The cost in storage, bandwith, and CPU is relative to the number of inputs and outputs not the value of the tx.  A fee based as a % of value would provide no DOS protection. 
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
March 18, 2013, 08:10:28 AM
 #148

I'm not saying we should have NO TX FEE at all. But at the very fucking a least a tx fee proportionate to the input value of the transaction!

The cost in storage, bandwith, and CPU is relative to the number of inputs and outputs not the value of the tx.  A fee based as a % of value would provide no DOS protection. 

Ok, but couldn't we get my topic any more derailed ?

BitHits
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile WWW
March 19, 2013, 04:53:49 AM
 #149

dammit! Now 0.8.1 comes out and its a hard fork from 0.7.2 and lower! So this wont even work anymore.

Can you make a 0.8.x No Forced TX Fork ? Running a BitCoin Faucet/PTC site I desperately need this.

Free BTC http://beta.BitHits.info BTC 1DNNERMT5MMusfYnCBfcKCBjBKZWBC5Lg2 DGC DH2Pm4VXxsTeqUYZkEySU1c8p5TLvuLe8u LTC LP2QiL1pnsaKVX5Qa811pFJuFL8FxkxWRz
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
March 19, 2013, 08:41:10 AM
 #150

dammit! Now 0.8.1 comes out and its a hard fork from 0.7.2 and lower! So this wont even work anymore.

Can you make a 0.8.x No Forced TX Fork ? Running a BitCoin Faucet/PTC site I desperately need this.

I will make a fork, however be wary that now that we may be reaching block limit soon, so the transactions you make may never confirm.

This fork is kind of dangerous until the block size issue is not solved.

BitHits
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile WWW
March 20, 2013, 06:06:53 AM
 #151

block limit for 0.7.2 or ?

Free BTC http://beta.BitHits.info BTC 1DNNERMT5MMusfYnCBfcKCBjBKZWBC5Lg2 DGC DH2Pm4VXxsTeqUYZkEySU1c8p5TLvuLe8u LTC LP2QiL1pnsaKVX5Qa811pFJuFL8FxkxWRz
Atruk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700



View Profile
March 20, 2013, 06:47:33 AM
 #152

block limit for 0.7.2 or ?

Block limit for prior to 0.8/0.8.1... The issue with 0.7.2 is a bit more archane.

ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
March 20, 2013, 08:33:07 AM
 #153

block limit for 0.7.2 or ?

I was talking about the fixed 1MB block size.

Once we start getting close to it, low priority transactions (low amounts, multiple small outputs etc) without any fee may never confirm.

BitHits
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile WWW
March 21, 2013, 04:53:29 AM
 #154

I dont mind paying a fee. I just dont want to be paying 300% of the input of my transaction Tongue A fee absolutely proportionate to the input of my transaction is what I'm aiming for. Running a BTC Faucet like site I tend to have large transactions to many addresses for very small amounts. I've been experimenting trying to get the lowest fees. But I still cant seem to beat just sending them in bulk to about 2000 addresses at a time. Thou sending to 232-314 Addresses seems to be a bit of a sweet spot in terms of transaction size.

Free BTC http://beta.BitHits.info BTC 1DNNERMT5MMusfYnCBfcKCBjBKZWBC5Lg2 DGC DH2Pm4VXxsTeqUYZkEySU1c8p5TLvuLe8u LTC LP2QiL1pnsaKVX5Qa811pFJuFL8FxkxWRz
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
March 24, 2013, 04:22:02 PM
 #155

2013-03-24 Update:

NFTF - version 0.8.0, 0.8.1 released.

Fresh tags - nftf-v0.8.0, nftf-v0.8.1 are avaiable for download.
https://github.com/ShadowOfHarbringer/bitcoin-nftf/tags

MASTER branch was also updated to latest Bitcoin version:
https://github.com/ShadowOfHarbringer/bitcoin-nftf



2013-03-24 WARNING !!
PLEASE NOTE THAT UNTIL MAX BLOCK SIZE PROBLEM HAS BEEN SOLVED BY DEVELOPERS, SOME FREE (WITHOUT FEE) TRANSACTIONS CREATED BY THIS FORK MAY CONFIRM VERY SLOWLY OR NEVER.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION.




BitHits
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196



View Profile WWW
May 14, 2013, 08:05:01 AM
 #156

Binaries anyone!?

Free BTC http://beta.BitHits.info BTC 1DNNERMT5MMusfYnCBfcKCBjBKZWBC5Lg2 DGC DH2Pm4VXxsTeqUYZkEySU1c8p5TLvuLe8u LTC LP2QiL1pnsaKVX5Qa811pFJuFL8FxkxWRz
Atruk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700



View Profile
May 16, 2013, 07:04:45 AM
 #157

Binaries anyone!?

Building a binary from source isn't some magic limited to developers.

richik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15


View Profile
May 16, 2013, 09:48:24 AM
 #158

Would be much easier to everyone, if anybody will provide compiled binaries for Windows...  Grin
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470


Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952


View Profile
May 16, 2013, 09:51:14 AM
 #159

Would be much easier to everyone, if anybody will provide compiled binaries for Windows...  Grin

Well that surely won't be me. I don't use "legacy technologies from twentieth century" as somebody stated on this forums.

LvM
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
May 22, 2013, 06:48:08 PM
 #160

Each lawyer will tell you:
All these ARBITRARY and UNFORESEEABLE enforced transaction fees are ILLEGAL.

It cannot be down to miners whim, what at all and even HOW MUCH they want to claim.
A claim of fees must at least clearly be declared before a transaction is definitely mandated by users.

Otherwise there is no agreement.
No agreement, no fee.
And no other chicanry like delays or denial of service (seems also applied - illegally).

BTC violates GAAP, result a MESS  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211835.0
Anforderungen an eine PROFESSIONELLE BTC-Anwendung https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=189669
BANKGEHEIMNIS mit BTC gleich NULL!? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=188383 Antwort: Ja, wenn man nicht höllisch aufpaßt.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!