Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 09:16:49 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: BitcoinOrama Report on the KnCminer/OrSoC Open-day Mon 10/06/13 (Stockholm)  (Read 55671 times)
Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:19:53 PM
 #101


good read.

and your idea about AYBABTO is totally la
me. Wink

Wha?!...and after I complimented you on your choice of signature the other day...! Roll Eyes

 Grin Grin
That was totally 'cause *I* have good taste Grin


In this instance we have an agreement:

http://www.planettribes.com/allyourbase/index.shtml

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
J35st3r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:21:24 PM
 #102

Granted... at least voltage tests and i/o tests seem simple enough...  but on the other hand, if they're capable of excluding defective engines through an automated process onboard - then there's really little reason to pre-test anything.

Well, there is the matter of an expensive test socket/interface to be designed and procured. And did you note they have not even selected their foundry yet. In another post I noted the over-optimism of ASIC customers (ie KNCMiner in this context, as the customer of the foundry), that was 20 years ago. Seems nothing has changed. There will be tears.

PS I edited for clarity, hence the difference from firefop's quote below.

1Jest66T6Jw1gSVpvYpYLXR6qgnch6QYU1 NumberOfTheBeast ... go on, give it a try Grin
firefop
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:25:24 PM
 #103

Granted... at least voltage tests and i/o tests seem simple enough...  but on the other hand, if they're capable of excluding defective engines through an automated process onboard - then there's really little reason to pre-test anything.

Well, there is the mater of an expensive test socket/interface to be designed and procured. And did you note they have not even selected their foundry yet. In another post I noted the over-optimism of ASIC customers (ie KNCMiner in this context vs foundries), that was 20 years ago. Seems nothing has changed. There will be tears.

I'm inclined to agree... but you know every once in awhile someone wins 64btc playing satoshidice. So I guess we'll just wait and see.

Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:27:50 PM
 #104

Granted... at least voltage tests and i/o tests seem simple enough...  but on the other hand, if they're capable of excluding defective engines through an automated process onboard - then there's really little reason to pre-test anything.

Well, there is the mater of an expensive test socket/interface to be designed and procured. And did you note they have not even selected their foundry yet. In another post I noted the over-optimism of ASIC customers (ie KNCMiner in this context vs foundries), that was 20 years ago. Seems nothing has changed. There will be tears.

I believe they have. I think this is mentioned later in the audio.

There are two competing foundries, we were told who they were, both have the final design, both are bidding for the gig. Sam mentioned something of huge interest here in front of us. So i'm not the only one who heard this, but I'm not sure I can repeat it; so I won't, but it involves meeting the September deadline.

The decision was to made on Tuesday/Wednesday to place the order with the chosen foundry I believe was mentioned. I attended Monday.

I'm also only through the first page of questions.

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
KS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:33:08 PM
 #105

so, did you pay for a jupiter/saturn in the end? you don't seem to want to answer the question publicly.

I'll keep on riding you for that, not that I particularly enjoy it, if you keep on painting KNC in an especially good way yet don't invest yourself.
Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:34:04 PM
 #106

so, did you pay for a jupiter/saturn in the end? you don't seem to want to answer the question publicly.

I'll keep on riding you for that, not that I particularly enjoy it, if you keep on painting KNC in an especially good way yet don't invest yourself.

Yes, I answered that in the first post on this thread!

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
suryc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 298
Merit: 250


Play2Live pre-sale starts on January 25th


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:35:33 PM
 #107

Is anyone clear on what the physical size of these going to be?
There site says a Jupiter is "160 x 160 x 200", but doesn't specify units. If that is cm, which I would assume it is, that is really massive.

.
PLAY
            ▄██████████████▄
          ▄██▀▀██████████████▄
        ▄██▀    ▀██████████████▄
      ▄██▀        ▀██████████████▄
    ▄██▀   ██████▄  ▀██████████████▄
  ▄██▀          ██    ▀██████████████▄
 ███       ▄█████▀      ███████████████
  ▀██▄    ▐██         ▄██████████████▀
    ▀██▄  ▐██████▌  ▄██████████████▀
      ▀██▄        ▄██████████████▀
        ▀██▄    ▄██████████████▀
          ▀██▄▄██████████████▀
            ▀██████████████▀
.
LIVE
.
██████
███▀▀▀
███







███
███▄▄▄
██████
██████
▀▀▀███
███







███
▄▄▄███
██████
J35st3r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:37:32 PM
 #108

There are two competing foundries, we were told who they were, both have the final design, both are bidding for the gig. Sam mentioned something of huge interest here in front of us. So i'm not the only one who heard this, but I'm not sure I can repeat it; so I won't, but it involves meeting the September deadline.

Yes, but the point I am making is that this s very late in the game to be selecting your foundry. OK, there has been a lot of progress since I left the industry 20 years back, but this is a very tight schecdule. Perhaps I should quote again the article linked by KS in the other thread  http://www.edn.com/design/systems-design/4319891/The-economics-of-structured-and-standard-cell-ASIC-designs (2006 vintage but still relevant).

I wish some of the current ASIC design gurus would comment on this (several very informed guys post on these threads).

1Jest66T6Jw1gSVpvYpYLXR6qgnch6QYU1 NumberOfTheBeast ... go on, give it a try Grin
Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:43:49 PM
 #109

There are two competing foundries, we were told who they were, both have the final design, both are bidding for the gig. Sam mentioned something of huge interest here in front of us. So i'm not the only one who heard this, but I'm not sure I can repeat it; so I won't, but it involves meeting the September deadline.

Yes, but the point I am making is that this s very late in the game to be selecting your foundry. OK, there has been a lot of progress since I left the industry 20 years back, but this is a very tight schecdule. Perhaps I should quote again the article linked by KS in the other thread  http://www.edn.com/design/systems-design/4319891/The-economics-of-structured-and-standard-cell-ASIC-designs (2006 vintage but still relevant).

I wish some of the current ASIC design gurus would comment on this (several very informed guys post on these threads).

But ORSoC have a strong relationship with both foundries, it's not like they are selecting people they haven't worked with. They are negotiating delivery for Sept.

They were to resell the FPGAs in Mars at an amazing price because of a direct relationship with ALTERA. The deal was though the chips could not be harvested and resold under the agreement. Customers could in theory if they could release the chips from the board, but that's why KnC couldn't offer a trade-in deal with the FPGAs for their scrypt miners to be made at a later date.

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
J35st3r
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:50:19 PM
 #110

But ORSoC have a strong relationship with both foundries, it's not like they are selecting people they haven't worked with. They are negotiating delivery for Sept.

Yeah, good point. My experience was with new entrants with wide-eyed expectations. I'm still rather worried about the lack of a test strategy. But in my day yields of 30-60% were common, if they can manage 95% today, them maybe the build it and pray approach will work (it certainly seems to be what BFL used). Read the artice I linked. It shows the sort of timescales the professionals work to.

1Jest66T6Jw1gSVpvYpYLXR6qgnch6QYU1 NumberOfTheBeast ... go on, give it a try Grin
KS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:51:18 PM
 #111

so, did you pay for a jupiter/saturn in the end? you don't seem to want to answer the question publicly.

I'll keep on riding you for that, not that I particularly enjoy it, if you keep on painting KNC in an especially good way yet don't invest yourself.

Yes, I answered that in the first post on this thread!

Yeah, but "paid for" is the keyword I'm looking for. You already had a Jupiter (or 2) and a Saturn on order before.
KS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:56:14 PM
 #112

but that's why KnC couldn't offer a trade-in deal with the FPGAs for their scrypt miners to be made at a later date.

So you're saying they scrapped the Mars because of a trade-in deal they couldn't do for a non-existing miner??

I'm pulling your leg, but there is still a lot of BS coming from your source. Either you're drunk in the coolaid or you're genuinely deaf to it.
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 11:56:57 PM
 #113


Marcus: The die size will be...very large.

That sounds like trouble waiting to happen.

Buy & Hold
DPoS
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 12:20:11 AM
 #114

how about:

I drink your bitshake

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKQ3LXHKB34


or combine them

All your bitshake are belong to I  (or  us)

~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~Play Boardgames for Bitcoins!!~~BTC~~GAMBIT~~BTC~~ Something I say help? Donate BTC! 1KN1K1xStzsgfYxdArSX4PEjFfcLEuYhid
rizzman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 12:48:45 AM
 #115

Would it be; "All your Bitcoin are belong to us", or "All your Bitcoins are belong to us"?

It would be the singular, right? As 'base' was never plural...

Haha! I would gladly pay an extra $25 bucks for that... would be awesome!
erschiessen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 12:59:03 AM
 #116

how about:

I drink your bitshake

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKQ3LXHKB34


or combine them

All your bitshake are belong to I  (or  us)
There's no cow on the ice

Your Message Here
12KHW3i2Hamk1irY8b181N4vMXUnVYL1ah
erschiessen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 01:01:40 AM
 #117

Good work thus far, bitcoinorama

OTHER ATTENDEES:

Please feel free to chime in, more voices are needed in the choir!

Your Message Here
12KHW3i2Hamk1irY8b181N4vMXUnVYL1ah
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
June 14, 2013, 01:02:01 AM
 #118


Marcus: The die size will be...very large.

That sounds like trouble waiting to happen.

Why is that?

Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193


View Profile
June 14, 2013, 01:27:18 AM
 #119


Marcus: The die size will be...very large.

That sounds like trouble waiting to happen.

Why is that?

So many things can go wrong. Timing signals/voltage drops across the whole die, low wafer yields, too much heat, etc.

Buy & Hold
Bitcoinorama (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 14, 2013, 01:38:42 AM
 #120

Is anyone clear on what the physical size of these going to be?
There site says a Jupiter is "160 x 160 x 200", but doesn't specify units. If that is cm, which I would assume it is, that is really massive.

To me Mars was about 16cm by 16cm, by 20cm, That pcb board they gave me fits a space the exact same dimensions as an iPad screen area.

I know this as I'm positioning it over one now.

Make my day! Say thanks if you found me helpful Smiley BTC Address --->
1487ThaKjezGA6SiE8fvGcxbgJJu6XWtZp
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!