Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2024, 04:58:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Why no one has the balls to make a new SHA256 ?  (Read 1822 times)
rammy2k2 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:12:58 PM
 #1

Why no one has the balls to make a new SHA256 ?
AlphaC
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0



View Profile WWW
June 13, 2013, 08:14:32 PM
 #2

http://dailyinspires.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/in-city-atomic-bomb-military-wallpapers-1024x768.jpg
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011

Reverse engineer from time to time


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:14:49 PM
 #3

I have to agree with OP. I saw so many scrypt/scrypt-jane coins that it's worse than SHA256 coins.

BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
Hazard
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
June 13, 2013, 08:14:54 PM
 #4

Because itll just get asic bombed. How the fuck is that lacking balls? Thats called foresight.

Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011

Reverse engineer from time to time


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:16:03 PM
 #5

Because itll just get asic bombed. How the fuck is that lacking balls? Thats called foresight.
I have one reason that won't happen.

BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
Mr.V
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:19:11 PM
 #6

^ 500million coins to the 1st person with ASICS to jump on the new sha256 coin

BTC:1NwEE7C2hVLSNGwSrFvsYgTrKddCvfhRwY
rammy2k2 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:19:38 PM
 #7

I have to agree with OP. I saw so many scrypt/scrypt-jane coins that it's worse than SHA256 coins.

+1 .. i see all these .. fakecoin ... dreamcoin ...memecoin ...
Hazard
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
June 13, 2013, 08:20:30 PM
 #8

I have to agree with OP. I saw so many scrypt/scrypt-jane coins that it's worse than SHA256 coins.

+1 .. i see all these .. fakecoin ... dreamcoin ...memecoin ...
and what does that have to do with the algorithm chosen?

absolutely nothing.

Walt Sobchak
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 110


God rest Donnie's soul.


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:40:30 PM
 #9

Why no one has the balls to make a new SHA256 ?

You are waiting to bring the pain to it, that's why  Roll Eyes

Smokey, this is not 'nam, this is bowling. There are rules. Do as the dude would wish, and mine some Lebowskis! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260311.0
jackjack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1280


May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:49:38 PM
 #10

ASICs can't do much things if merge-mined...

Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2
Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
vinne81
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:51:43 PM
 #11

ASICs can't do much things if merge-mined...

No fun then either  Grin
jbmiller10
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 134
Merit: 100



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 08:59:19 PM
 #12

Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.

I go by threestar most places.
Join us in the Digitalcoin Chatroom!
BrewCrewFan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 501



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 09:08:49 PM
 #13

Because itll just get asic bombed. How the fuck is that lacking balls? Thats called foresight.

This. At least with scrypt some of us got a chance to mine

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!.
SqMe5ceYfdcGsRyVpgvpYb6bRLS9j8omvB

XChat : Addy : XYuZESQpeMtZ2wit8nVVnXKGytfiaTBCo6 PubKey : eteshLzeq8Bh54BRjGSunMTc6Ytxtk7HYaSmDYMQn61z
rammy2k2 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 09:56:30 PM
 #14

Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.

u really think thats true ? if it was BFL .. AVALON .. and many other upcoming companies, u think they would invest so much money if sha256 wasnt good no more ?
Hazard
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
June 13, 2013, 09:58:31 PM
 #15

Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.

u really think thats true ? if it was BFL .. AVALON .. and many other upcoming companies, u think they would invest so much money if sha256 wasnt good no more ?
Bitcoin can't just pack up its shit and move over to a new encryption algorithm. That's just not possible. BFL/Avalon make sha256 ASICs solely because bitcoin is based on sha256.. and bitcoin happens to be where the money is.

I'm sure that went over your head though, you appear to be mentally challenged.

rammy2k2 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1003



View Profile
June 13, 2013, 10:07:05 PM
 #16

Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.

u really think thats true ? if it was BFL .. AVALON .. and many other upcoming companies, u think they would invest so much money if sha256 wasnt good no more ?
Bitcoin can't just pack up its shit and move over to a new encryption algorithm. That's just not possible. BFL/Avalon make sha256 ASICs solely because bitcoin is based on sha256.. and bitcoin happens to be where the money is.

I'm sure that went over your head though, you appear to be mentally challenged.

ROFL .. u sure proved your IQ ... welcome to my ignore list
Hazard
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
June 13, 2013, 10:10:59 PM
 #17

Scrypt is technologically superior to SHA-256 as far as cryptos go. There's no reason to use SHA-256 anymore.

u really think thats true ? if it was BFL .. AVALON .. and many other upcoming companies, u think they would invest so much money if sha256 wasnt good no more ?
Bitcoin can't just pack up its shit and move over to a new encryption algorithm. That's just not possible. BFL/Avalon make sha256 ASICs solely because bitcoin is based on sha256.. and bitcoin happens to be where the money is.

I'm sure that went over your head though, you appear to be mentally challenged.

ROFL .. u sure proved your IQ ... welcome to my ignore list
"Im wrong so Im gonna plug my ears and pretend I cant hear you"

Joe_Bauers
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 802
Merit: 1003


GCVMMWH


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 10:19:54 PM
 #18

Why no one has the balls to make a new SHA256 ?

I'm wondering why no one has the balls to make a new SHA4096!
coinerd
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 10:30:20 PM
 #19

it's because hazard can't compile it yet
bitdwarf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


The cryptocoin watcher


View Profile
June 13, 2013, 10:43:53 PM
 #20

If you really have balls, make a MD4 coin. Grin

𝖄𝖆𝖈: YF3feU4PNLHrjwa1zV63BcCdWVk5z6DAh5 · 𝕭𝖙𝖈: 12F78M4oaNmyGE5C25ZixarG2Nk6UBEqme
Ɏ: "the altcoin for the everyman, where the sweat on one's brow can be used to cool one's overheating CPU" -- theprofileth
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!