JCS-CCT
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
|
 |
June 02, 2018, 05:57:58 PM |
|
Edit: I think AngeGallego's fix only fixes the difficulty issue and not the ring issue.
I think it fixed none of both. And from my understanding the ring issue wasn't a ring issue, means after flushing the mem pool problem still excists, but i'am not a coder, just some basic understanding, but that's what i get out. I think the problem is way deeper and more complex having mind some monero features have been removed and others added and i bet there somewhere lies the problem with some kind of incompatiblity.... Just only a guess of course. Could be. I hope they give us an update soon. |
|
|
|
|
JCS-CCT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
|
|
June 02, 2018, 07:09:38 PM |
|
Edit: I think AngeGallego's fix only fixes the difficulty issue and not the ring issue.
I think it fixed none of both. And from my understanding the ring issue wasn't a ring issue, means after flushing the mem pool problem still excists, but i'am not a coder, just some basic understanding, but that's what i get out. You are not a coder but I am. And yes, this patch fix the difficulty problem - it simple makes next blocks 375 a fixed difficulty blocks where difficulty is hardcoded in patch. And no, it not fix the Transactions Bug. Are you helping with the transaction bug? I think they need help. |
|
|
|
|
boxalex
Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 13
|
|
June 02, 2018, 07:18:44 PM |
|
Edit: I think AngeGallego's fix only fixes the difficulty issue and not the ring issue.
I think it fixed none of both. And from my understanding the ring issue wasn't a ring issue, means after flushing the mem pool problem still excists, but i'am not a coder, just some basic understanding, but that's what i get out. You are not a coder but I am. And yes, this patch fix the difficulty problem - it simple makes next blocks 375 a fixed difficulty blocks where difficulty is hardcoded in patch. And no, it not fix the Transactions Bug. how can it do this when the block is rejected? Doesn't the block need to be accepted to fix the difficulty problem first? As said, that's my non coder thought: As long as none of the new blocks gets accepted so doesn't any change within it, not? |
|
|
|
|
JCS-CCT
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 1
|
|
June 02, 2018, 08:08:50 PM |
|
Are you helping with the transaction bug? I think they need help.
As I see they don't want any help. Their reaction is only one - "Mine, you fools, mine! It's not profitable, you will lost you money on electricity, but you must mine!" If you know a fix, you can submit a pull request. This is more than just about the devs, there are many users like myself that have transactions on the blockchain and own ETN coins. |
|
|
|
|
boxalex
Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 13
|
|
June 02, 2018, 08:16:33 PM |
|
how can it do this when the block is rejected? Doesn't the block need to be accepted to fix the difficulty problem first?
As said, that's my non coder thought: As long as none of the new blocks gets accepted so doesn't any change within it, not?
Nope. Difficulty is calculated by the miner before calclutating block hash as the part of the block template. (function Blockchain::create_block_template() in blockchain.cpp) If patch decide that difficulty for the next block must be lower miner will spend less time building next block. Thx, got it more or less, not complety, lol, but i got an idea at least. How about a temporary roll-back? Wouldn't that be temporary the better decision after 4 days without working network? |
|
|
|
|
dogtana
Member
Offline
Activity: 845
Merit: 56
|
|
June 03, 2018, 08:14:33 AM Merited by contraband (1) |
|
How about some FAITH in the team!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
LaScuderia
|
|
June 03, 2018, 08:18:53 AM |
|
If you know a fix, you can submit a pull request. This is more than just about the devs, there are many users like myself that have transactions on the blockchain and own ETN coins.
One more time. Developers are NOT interested in patches. They think all is OK - just read their twitter. The problem is not even in the patches themselves or in anything else you need to look wider. Any correction requires an audit and may lead to even greater problems. So if there is not a big hole or some big problem in the code, then they will not fix it. |
|
|
|
|
|
contraband (OP)
|
|
June 03, 2018, 08:19:38 AM |
|
MISLEADING UNTRUE INFORMATION POSTED AS FACT WILL ALWAYS BE DELETED
DO NOT POST INFO SUCH AS THIS HERE
IF YOU FEEL COMPELLED TO POST INFO WHICH WAS DELETED, MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD, AND IF YOU MESSAGE ME THE LINK TO YOUR THREAD WITH THIS GIBBERISH, I WILL EVEN POST THE LINK HERE, AS I AM NOT TRYING TO HIDE ANYTHING.
THE POSTS DELETED MISLEAD THOSE IN THE COMMUNITY WITHOUT THE TECH KNOWLEDGE TO KNOW FACT FROM FICTION.
PLEASE NOTE, IF YOUR POST WAS DELETED IT IS POSSIBLE THAT YOU DID NOTHING BUT MAKE A COMMENT AND QUOTE THE OFFENDING POSTS
----JUST BECAUSE YOU POST A RADOM QUOTE FROM REDDIT, OR SOME OTHER WEBSITE, THAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO USE AS A "SOURCE" TO BASE MISLEADNG CONVERSATION
THIS BEHAVIOR WILL NOT BE TOLERATED ON THIS THREAD. THIS IS YOUR FIRST WARNING.
THOSE WHO CONTINUE WILL BE BANNED FROM THIS THREAD AND IF YOU FAIL TO LEAVE THE THREAD, YOUR ACCOUNT WILL BE BANNED FROM BITCOINTALK AS OTHERS HAVE BEEN IN THE PAST
THANK YOU
*** SPECIAL THANKS TO ALL THE MINERS THAT ARE CONTINUING TO MINE AND HELP BRING DOWN THE DIFFICULTY
|
|
|
|
|
|
contraband (OP)
|
|
June 03, 2018, 08:29:00 AM |
|
how can it do this when the block is rejected? Doesn't the block need to be accepted to fix the difficulty problem first?
As said, that's my non coder thought: As long as none of the new blocks gets accepted so doesn't any change within it, not?
Nope. Difficulty is calculated by the miner before calclutating block hash as the part of the block template. (function Blockchain::create_block_template() in blockchain.cpp) If patch decide that difficulty for the next block must be lower miner will spend less time building next block. Thx, got it more or less, not complety, lol, but i got an idea at least. How about a temporary roll-back? Wouldn't that be temporary the better decision after 4 days without working network? No, I dont think a rollback would be of interest |
|
|
|
|
Millennium_blue
Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 10
|
|
June 03, 2018, 08:31:30 AM |
|
Electroneum is not going well now, but I believe it will be rising soon.Because they are focused on the project.
|
|
|
|
|
KimberlyGB
Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 10
|
|
June 03, 2018, 09:15:15 AM |
|
Even the work of the team did not greatly affect the price of the coin, but I think if there will be a continuation of the work then there will be a good price.
|
|
|
|
|
new24core
Member
Offline
Activity: 413
Merit: 17
|
|
June 03, 2018, 09:48:21 AM |
|
So all the bonus blocks have been mined now and I am really hoping that I will see a payment. I have been mining on nanapool so can someone from ETN please comment ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
erwan
|
|
June 03, 2018, 10:19:53 AM |
|
ETN has a solid foundation but you should also note that other coins witdiversify, maybe try the other etnh better foundation has gone this path and caused investors millions and billions of hard earn cash. This is why diversification helps in spreading the risk.
|
|
|
|
|
boxalex
Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 13
|
|
June 03, 2018, 10:39:29 AM |
|
@ Contraband: I got 2 messages deleted: - 1 containing the miningpool hub statement that is still on their pool about the state of electroneum ....  - 1 containing some messages from the electroneum reddit channel that are still visible there but got deleted here? Seriously?? Not 1 piece of information was shared from the team so far in this thread, instead of the warning message that you bann users from here and bitcointalk (which leaves a bad taste anyway) you should have made a post on what's going on. I mean you should know, the less information you provide, the more speculation is going on.... Just my 2 cents. |
|
|
|
|
liksagen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2018, 11:26:42 AM |
|
There is a hysterical admin that, instead of eliminating the problem, it turns out to be able to delete messages and angrily write in black big letters.
In the message that is removed, you can find the contacts of people who successfully made the fork of ETN with V7
To you here a sound thought is said, take a pullback until the coin is killed finally
P.s:do not be a coin killer
|
|
|
|
|
Coinbaker_criptobakery
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 12
|
|
June 03, 2018, 11:45:48 AM |
|
Supporting ETN with my humble 12KHs. I really love this coin!
Guys, put all your miners to ETN!
|
|
|
|
|
realcryptomines
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2018, 12:22:46 PM |
|
Supporting ETN with my humble 12KHs. I really love this coin!
Guys, put all your miners to ETN!
Nah, bonus is over |
|
|
|
|
ffarinas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2018, 12:25:21 PM |
|
Where can i see real stats of the blockchain? to track the difficulty and network hash, because all i can fin is outdated info
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ziploc
|
|
June 03, 2018, 02:51:27 PM |
|
Stop focusing on the price....aim at the adoption and developpement...therefore mining right now to stabilize the network and put ETN back on the rails.
When adoption will be achieved the price will follow as a ''side effect''
We wanted anti-asic algo, we have it; now we have to deal with hash power decrease, mine and wait till all will adjust by itself.
Then again stop focusing on the wrong things, and the great will come by itself !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
BroganBloodstone
|
|
June 03, 2018, 02:54:07 PM |
|
As much as I love this project, I feel like Richard needs to employ more developers. Things like this keep happening and it seems the current dev team do not know what’s what. They should not be putting themselves in a position like this... Very frustrating to see. Hopefully we can get some smooth sailing after this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
