welche bountys signaturen lohnen sich am meisten???

[Lakai01]

Hätte mich da auch gerne beworben, allein schon wegen dem guten Gehalt, glaub aber weniger das ich da Chancen habe da ich sowie schon bei icopress bin, macht ja wenig Sinn für ihn seine Leute rumzuschieben.
Aber in der Zukunft irgendwann probier ich es vielleicht mal.

Der Platz ist sehr heiß begehrt, ja. Da haben sich mittlerweile auch ein paar große Namen des Forums (bzw. mit sehr niedrigem BPIP-Rang) beworben. Ich weiß aber ehrlich gesagt nicht inwieweit icopress aus sowas überhaupt wert legt.
Es sind auch bereits 4 Seiten an Bewerbungen, er hat also da definitiv die Qual der Wahl.


Bzgl. der Unterstützung weiterer Coins bei eXch:
Du kannst hier https://exch.cx/support Kontakt mit dem Support aufnehmen und um die Unterstützung weiterer Coins bitten. Umso mehr Leute das machen umso eher werden die das auch implementieren!

[1714235816]

1714235816

[1714235816]

1714235816

[1714235816]

1714235816

[icopress]

Just an idea.

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?

But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

Just an idea.

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?

But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

Not really a fan, haha.
I would rather take my weekly payment and put it on a sports parley myself than trying to win a raffle. 
That way I can somewhat control my faith myself.

But the idea is fun and I guess a few people would like it, but really only a few in my opinion.

[willi9974]

Just an idea.

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?

But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

Hi icopress,

That wouldn't be for me.
I see the income from signature campaigns more as a basic income, and I am happy every week when I get paid. Also as a savings plan, to make my HODL stack each week a little bigger.

Best regards,
Willi

[Lakai01]

Just an idea.

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?

But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

Statistically speaking, each participant would win the same number of times if the campaign were to run long enough (i.e. several years, presumably in order to get as many 16-week cycles as possible). For the average earnings, it would therefore not matter whether you receive the entire amount once every 16 weeks or a partial amount once a week.

With highly fluctuating assets such as Bitcoin, however, I see this as problematic in that the payout of week 1 will be significantly higher or significantly lower than the payout of week 16. You only need to look at the Bitcoin price 16 weeks ago. So the participants receive a different amount of payment in Bitcoin, even if the USD value is the same (a fixed BTC amount of course shifts the problem to someone receiving more/less USD).

For you as a BM, there is also a very good chance that someone will leave the campaign after winning. Statistically, the chances of winning more than once every 16 weeks are quite low

Personally, I wouldn't be a fan of this at all, I like the weekly BTC receipt much better!

[MinoRaiola]

Titel: [OPEN] Crashino.com | Crash, Crypto Casino & Sports Betting | Signature Campaign

Bounty-Manager: Hhampuz
Forumrang: Hero/Legendary Members
Boards: Lokale Bereiche erlaubt
Anzahl der freien Spots: 10 Plätze frei
Anzahl der notwendigen Posts: 20 Beiträge, davon 10 in Gambling
Vergütung: 70$ in BTC pro Woche


Titel: [OPEN] MetaWin.com Signature Campaign | The First WEB3 Casino | Sr Member+

Bounty-Manager: Little Mouse
Forumrang: Sr. Member - Legendary
Boards: Lokale Bereiche erlaubt, max. 5 Postings/woche
Anzahl der freien Spots: 2x Hero, 1x Sr. Member
Anzahl der notwendigen Posts: 25 Beiträge, davon 10 in Gambling
Vergütung: Hero Member 75$ / Sr Member 65$ in BTC pro Woche

We have 2x Hero and 1x Sr Member open. Please apply.

[5tift]

Titel: JustCasino.io | Unique Crypto Casino | Signature Campaign Up to $80
Bounty-Manager: Little Mouse
Forumrang: Sr. Member - Legendary
Boards: 5 Postings lokal erlaubt
Anzahl der freien Spots: 1 Platz
Anzahl der notwendigen Posts: 25 Postings, davon 5 in Gambling
Vergütung: Sr Member 60$ in BTC pro Woche

We have 1x Legendary and 1x Hero Member slot open. Please apply now.

Friends, new avatars are available. Please update them within this week.

     

[Turbartuluk]

Just an idea.

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?

But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

To my mind this kind of payment conditions would set the wrong incentives. If it is just a kind of raffle i guess you will attract those people who only fullfill the minimum requirements of participation while those who are far above will look for other campains.

To make it fair i guess you will need increased minimum requierements or some kind of winning chances related to effort by participants (quantity + quality). I am not a friend of the former while the latter seems to go against simplicity.

[sam00]

Just an idea.

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?

But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

I wouldn't join such a campaign aswell

If my boss asked me to raffle my monthly paycheck with my colleagues I also wouldn't do that.. As AHOYBRAUSE said, I'd much rather hit the casino every week than just raffling of my winnings

[Cricktor]

Just an idea.

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?

But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

I wouldn't want to participate in such a campaign, too. This is too much gamble for my taste and statistics could make you have to wait for a really long period until you win such a raffle (potential for quite some frustration; something I'd rather not associate with a campaign).
Then there's indeed what Turbartuluk mentions how to account for the posting quality and quantity of each campaign participant. I see no easy and fair solution to treat everybody based on their contribution during the campaign.

I'm not very good at statistics but if you actually do such a campaign, what do you think of the following additional rules?

• a raffle winner takes it all but then has to leave the campaign forever
• the freed spot by the last raffle winner is of course replenished by only one new participant
• total number of participants of the campaign is constant with a fair and not too high upper limit

Just some ideas I had while thinking over such a campaign proposal... (I still wouldn't want to participate even with my suggestions)

[Turbartuluk]

I'm not very good at statistics but if you actually do such a campaign, what do you think of the following additional rules?

• a raffle winner takes it all but then has to leave the campaign forever
• the freed spot by the last raffle winner is of course replenished by only one new participant
• total number of participants of the campaign is constant with a fair and not too high upper limit

Very interesting set of rules. I guess this could give it a taste of: you have to have been part of it.
On the other hand you could calculate how long you will be approximately part of it and i guess most users are not looking for short term campaigns.
Maybe the winner could than also win a spot in one of other campaigns. Or even make the raffle the only way to join another special campaign to increase exclusivity.

[Lafu]

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?
But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

I guess there will be not many would be join that campaign , maybe when there is a guhe amount that they can get.
But this would be also nothing for me to join.

But i have an other idea , for maybe doing something like that just once in a year as special event on that campaign.
Maybe at the Christmas time or at some special time that would be choosen from the campaign manager.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

What do you think if a campaign appears in which 16 people (or 100) will participate?
But only 1 user will receive the payment weekly. That is, by means of raffle, a winner will be determined who will receive the entire amount of the campaign’s weekly budget.

I guess there will be not many would be join that campaign , maybe when there is a guhe amount that they can get.
But this would be also nothing for me to join.

But i have an other idea , for maybe doing something like that just once in a year as special event on that campaign.
Maybe at the Christmas time or at some special time that would be choosen from the campaign manager.

I think the only people that would participate are ones that can't get anything else, like people with a lot of negative trust, or people that simply just don't care about the money since they already have enough.

Anyway, I doubt there would be many applications for a campaign with these payment options. 

[MinoRaiola]

Es gibt dort schon sehr viele Bewerbungen, aktuell aber noch im Status OPEN.

Titel: [OPEN] SWGT Signature Campaign 🔥 Binance #SWGT & CERTIK Audited

Bounty-Manager: AB de Royse777
Forumrang: Sr. Member - Legendary
Boards: Lokale Bereiche erlaubt
Anzahl der freien Spots: 2 Plätze frei
Anzahl der notwendigen Posts: 20 Beiträge
Vergütung: 40$ in BTC pro Woche

+

Titel: [OPEN] Dice9.Win - Provably Fair Games | Signature Campaign | Sr+

Bounty-Manager: Little Mouse
Forumrang: Sr. Member - Legendary
Boards: Lokale Bereiche erlaubt, 3 Postings pro Woche maximal
Anzahl der freien Spots: 10 Plätze frei
Anzahl der notwendigen Posts: 20 Beiträge, davon 10 in Gambling
Vergütung: 70$ in BTC pro Woche

[Koal-84]

Es gibt dort schon sehr viele Bewerbungen, aktuell aber noch im Status OPEN.
~

Die neuen (oder auch teilweise alten) Kampagnen finde ich gar nicht mehr so attraktiv, meistens min. 20 Beiträge und dann auch noch mit teilweise 10 gambling Beiträgen...

Auch hat gerade Hhampuz einen Platz bei Trustdice frei, aber da sind auch wieder minimum 20 Beiträge mit 10 davon im gambling Bereich und es zählen nur 10 lokal.

Round 92 Payments have been sent out!

Thank you all for another fantastic week, keep it up!

We have 1x Full Member position open, apply now!

Anyone who applied prior to this message have been put on my ignore list.

[MinoRaiola]

Die neuen (oder auch teilweise alten) Kampagnen finde ich gar nicht mehr so attraktiv, meistens min. 20 Beiträge und dann auch noch mit teilweise 10 gambling Beiträgen...

Was würdest du attraktiv finden? Die Bezahlung ist ja relativ, also je nachdem ob man ausgewählt wird, oder selbst seine Bewerbung hinterlässt. Liegt es an der Vorgabe der 20/25 Postings und 10 in Gambling? Bei Online-Casinos hat sich das wohl so eingespielt, dass ohne Gambling "nichts" geht. Würdest du die Vorgabe auf ein Maximum von XX Postings pro Woche fixieren + X$ pro Posting und jeder macht so viel wie er will? Damit hat man aber keine Sicherheit auf ein Minimum an Postings pro Woche.

Eine Idee könnte auch eine Glückspiel Version sein. 10 Teilnehmer und jede Woche werden 5 Teilnehmer mit einem Bonus durch ein Lottospiel belohnt.

[cygan]

in der FJ kampagne, wo MinoRaiola und bct_ail teilgenommen und mit dieser unterwegs waren, ist leider nach 107! wochen schluss
dies hat Hhampuz hier angekündigt
somit haben wir mit euch beiden wieder zwei aktive user aus unserem bereich, die sich nach der suche nach einer neuen kampagne begeben werden/können

[Koal-84]

Was würdest du attraktiv finden?

Derzeit könnte ich mir keine andere Kampagne als Roobet vorstellen, die 15 Beiträge pro Woche sind machbar und wenn man einmal 2 Wochen keine Zeit hat geht die Welt nicht unter 😉. Sonst könnte ich mir derzeit nur eine Kampagne von icopress noch vorstellen, ohne Mindestanzahl an Beiträgen.

Aber Geschmäcker und Posting verhalten ist halt unterschiedlich.

[MinoRaiola]

in der FJ kampagne, wo MinoRaiola und bct_ail teilgenommen und mit dieser unterwegs waren, ist leider nach 107! wochen schluss
dies hat Hhampuz hier angekündigt
somit haben wir mit euch beiden wieder zwei aktive user aus unserem bereich, die sich nach der suche nach einer neuen kampagne begeben werden/können

Wie die Zeit rennt, das sieht man jetzt... +2 Jahre sind vergangen. Das Team rund um diese Kampagne und auch bei FortuneJack sind ganz entspannte Leute, mit ihnen kann man schnell in Kontakt kommen und etwas bewegen.
Ab dem 18.03. wird eine "Neue" Signatur Kampagne gestartet (probeweise erstmal 4 Wochen), also keine Exchange oder Casino. Mal sehen wie es ankommt und wie erfolgreich es wird. Wenn der Thread eröffnet wird, dann kann ich ihn hier auch posten.

[cygan]

neue BTC-signatur kampagne von yahoo62278, die diesmal direkt in BTC auszahlt:

Titel: 8ombard Signature & avatar campaign

Bounty-Manager: yahoo62278
Forumrang: full, senior, hero & legendary
Boards: lokal bereiche sind nicht erlaubt
Anzahl der freien Spots: 6-8
Anzahl der notwendigen Posts: 25 beiträge wöchentlich, davon 4 im gambling bereich
Zeitraum: unbekannt
Vergütung: full: 0.00058BTC/wöchentlich - senior: 0.0008BTC/wöchentlich - hero/legendary: 0.001BTC/wöchentlich

besonderheiten: ein account auf der plattform 8ombard ist nötig, sowie man muss mindestens 1 merit in der woche bekommen haben, um für die wöchentliche bezahlung berechtigt zu sein