|
Bloody Mary
|
 |
November 17, 2017, 04:32:40 AM |
|
I think industry overall really crazy and unpredictable now... but it is a very interesting and important topic.. and I want to learn more about it.. I was thinking how.. so from my experience, I feel that conferences could be a good way to learn... I found this one https://blockshowasia.com/ and I'm thinking to go, but tickets are not so cheap, but I suppose it could worth it... what do you think guys? have you heard about it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a
SourceForge forum.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leah38
|
|
November 17, 2017, 02:33:49 PM |
|
I observed that most successful ICOs nowadays are those with small quantity of coins or tokens. The more the harder to buy the higher value it becomes after ICO. That's my speculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
maliboom
|
|
November 17, 2017, 10:26:36 PM |
|
hello, I think most of them are bankrupt.
Only those linked to blockchains were successful.
Those of the traditional economy that can be made with traditional societies do not need ico
|
|
|
|
|
airdrophunter
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
The Exchange for EOS Community
|
|
November 18, 2017, 03:52:45 AM |
|
I think knowing the team behind the ICO matters most. So i guess it's better to know each member of the team. If it has a picture, much better plus it would be great if their profile can be found in LinkedIn too. After that, their website and their whitepaper will be the things that i am going to consider before i spend my money investing on them or spending my time on the campaign.
|
|
|
|
|
bayu7adi
|
|
November 18, 2017, 07:20:45 AM |
|
just see the development progress of the project...
actually a failed project is better than scam project..
|
|
|
|
|
|
VarDiff
|
|
November 18, 2017, 11:22:34 AM |
|
Usually, in accelerators, investors choose startups by the team first. You can have no real clients, you can have poor MVP — it doesn't matter. The most important thing is a team. If your team already have finished products — that's a most important proof that you can work together effectively.
So my choice is a Team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toropen
|
|
November 18, 2017, 04:08:57 PM |
|
Now a lot of Scam and choose a really interesting ICO is very difficult. Usually you can buy cheaper after the IPO
|
|
|
|
|
Hannahanto
|
|
November 18, 2017, 06:14:42 PM |
|
Crypto market is emerging and by making the right choice, we can make real good $$$'s. What the key for a ICO to be successful?
Add additional options if I miss in the voting options
Add on: The project. This is the base. Based on its service one provides, the market is captured. It's the object everyone is looking at. Second as you have, the team. The team is the back bone of every ICO. Check out the team members profiles given in Whitepapers. All the best. |
|
|
|
|
|
maarx
|
|
November 18, 2017, 10:12:56 PM
Last edit: November 19, 2017, 04:27:41 AM by maarx |
|
It depends on the services they provide to the society. It should be driven by a healthy team with multiple experienced candidates.The more experienced they are, more growth would be there. Choose the best you can from coinmarketcap.com
|
|
|
|
|
chimcoin
|
|
November 19, 2017, 06:10:28 AM |
|
Today, ICOs has made many people lost their investment and many has also made fortune but this are some of the tips in choosing a good ICOs.
1.proof of concept
Always check to see if the company has already tested a preliminary product or concept. Without any proof of concept you will be unable to rationally make an investment. If the company simply has a whitepaper without any proof of concept you should consider this a red flag.
2.core team :Do they have any background in the industry they are trying to penetrate? Does anyone in the team have prior experience with cryptocurrency and blockchain?
3.market readiness: Is the market ready for the new technology? These and many more questions to consider while choosing a good ICOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sandy14350
|
|
November 19, 2017, 12:27:17 PM |
|
best coins are decided by the bussiness utility and teams that run those... in odd cases even though they have a great bussiness utility, the token getted mobbed by the failure team and the best example would be the authorship coin, great business model with the worst team ever
|
|
|
|
|
|
sazon84
|
|
November 19, 2017, 02:09:13 PM |
|
I choose ICO in the first place for the idea. If there are a lot like ICO? How are they different from others? And the second important point - the team.
|
|
|
|
|
ekkoadmiral
|
|
November 19, 2017, 03:31:00 PM |
|
-the first is the idea of the project
-is a real project, the ICO brings reality
-Compatible team
-roadmap, specific schedule of the project
|
|
|
|
|
|
reflector
|
|
November 19, 2017, 08:21:29 PM |
|
First you have to read their white paper and then you will comes to know the project and it is relevant to the bitcoin and blockchain technology. If it is completely work on future as confirming it you can understand the life span of this project and upcoming coin from them. Escrows will works big part in ICO by distributing the token to all the people. You can check him to know more about it.
|
|
|
|
|
Aristus
Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
|
|
November 20, 2017, 12:01:50 AM |
|
I think it's "team".
The strength of the project and its future rely on the capability of each team member.
|
|
|
|
|
DIW
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 131
DIWtoken.com
|
|
November 20, 2017, 09:21:04 AM |
|
1. Team composition - skill, knowhow, connections, funds
2. Partnerships
3. Adopters
4. Usefulness of the project
5. Number of potential audience
6. Level of necessity within the applicable market
7. Level of thought that went into develop the project
8. Level of professionalism and commitment shown thus far - website, marketing, whitepaper
9. Level of the people and websites talking about it
|
|
|
|
mittooss
Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
DEm1CKDTViM1y9YmEcBaktNLWVx8rwuQUm
|
|
November 20, 2017, 09:50:58 AM |
|
1. Team composition - skill, knowhow, connections, funds
2. Partnerships
3. Adopters
4. Usefulness of the project
5. Number of potential audience
6. Level of necessity within the applicable market
7. Level of thought that went into develop the project
8. Level of professionalism and commitment shown thus far - website, marketing, whitepaper
9. Level of the people and websites talking about it
Very true... Congrats and keep it up |
|
|
|
|
|
lenj
|
|
November 20, 2017, 11:30:29 AM |
|
actually choose the right ico is not only need aspect. it should goo from all aspect.
like developer team is good and experience people. the idea is never used by other project and also marketing people and advertising. all should be good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PalindromemordnilaP
|
|
November 20, 2017, 01:51:00 PM |
|
Exactly what i am voting for in the poll options; it's the team that comes first. The deeper you know their personal background means a lot because it is the team that drive this ICO anyway. Just look if they have their personal information in LinkedIn and do some research. If majority or all members of the team has previous project and it was a success, then that's a good indication to trust the ICO and at best, invest on it.
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
