How to choose the right ICO?

[volf22]

This subject rose already repeatedly and all have agreed on the answer that the choice is a komleksny concept and one shouldn't look on something, there are also companies which collect the huge sums out of the blue

[Where ico ?]

Hi there! hard to say exactly as that is a tricky issue.  To me, you need to go off of several points that are: a team, wp, real business experience, projected profitability backed up with the well-equipped base.

A group of professional advisors. In case the team have experience in similar projects, there's a good chance, the whole ico will be successful.
A  well-structed WP which speaks for itself. Anyone needs to understand what they are investing in,right?
I found the connection to real business to be important,too. Finally, it's a low soft or hard cap which is to me gives more chances for success

Someone mentioned VLB eariler here, which is a great example of a trust-worthy ICO. At first I leant towards a strong team of advisors
 (IBM, QIWI, cool right?), but then I learned from their whitepaper that the soft cap is $4M n hard cap $12 and decided to invest. The reviews're very promising!

[Monkey_]

Crypto market is emerging and by making the right choice, we can make real good $$$'s. What are the key for a ICO to be successful?

Add additional options if I miss in the voting options

With cohesiveness and team support, the possibilities of ICO can be a success, but we must know the team first with experienced ones.

[clavirda]

This subject rose already repeatedly and all have agreed on the answer that the choice is a komleksny concept and one shouldn't look on something, there are also companies which collect the huge sums out of the blue

As for me, I always conduct a comprehensive analysis. Here are some of the parameters that I pay special attention to:
1. Number of people in the team
2. Who are the advisors
3. How many tokens are created
4. Technical documentation
5. When the site and social networks were created
6. Activity in social networks

There are more parameters, but they are the most basic.

[1NV3ST0NM3]

I think after the question regarding the existence of Nakamoto this is the second toughest question we have here. Finding a right ICO is a myth I think. There is nothing like a right ICO perhaps you can find the one that suits you the most. The parameters which I look for is a good reputation and a small cap target which is achievable practically. I found it with VLB ICO. They have stood against odds and enjoy a great reputation. Apart from Reputation look for teams credibility too and their past experiences.

[Nikitavoz]

In this crypto ICO boom time, it can be hard to choose the right coin or token to buy and invest, for me main things are project idea, social activities, team and road map...

[mirror001]

Compatible group behind the venture, Good whitepaper with detail guide, Advisory board with some expereienced individuals, Backed by some enrolled organization and which are good to go for quite a long time. Very low softcap and hardcap with the goal that financial specialists need to purchase tokens in the wake of posting instead of amid ICO.
You need to peruse painstakingly the ICO's whitepapers and their guides, and furthermore you have to check the group behind the venture and ensure on the off chance that they are genuine individuals with great learning and experience about such undertakings or not, on the grounds that there are such huge numbers of phony groups behind trick ICOs.

[caoowd8]

It's like investing. Everyone has different investment reasons. Even few masters can make every investment.

[bitcoinveda]

ICO can be successful if the funds collected can achieve the specified targets and the participation of the team that supports ICO

For that what are the measures we have to take in order to participate in the ICO, collecting fund it is not enough because whether they are prompt in developing the roadmap or not we have to check before investing? Now there are many ICO making the good amount of investment but when it comes to real-time development they are failing to make because there is no technical person for developing those.

[Kilomans]

Maybe by trying to investigate the team. How much experience they have, where, in what, why they are trying to build ICO and go on the Market, are they going to achieve something or just trying to close your eyes. Can you find these people on Internet, Facebook, LinkedIn. That would tell you very enough.

[gustogusto]

If they are dealing with a problem instead of creating a problem I look. If the team behind the project have excellent experience I look closer. If the leader of the ICO has experience taking previous companies from beta stage successful I look I sit up and take notice. And with all of these if they have partnerships and solid advisors I'll begin to contemplate an investment

[Koomsd]

where the find good team any site ?

[Foxdub]

cryptocurrency news site Bitcoin.com has surveyed last year’s ICOs and found that of 902 tracked by TokenData, 142 failed before raising funding, and another 276 failed after fundraising.
That’s a 46% failure rate — but wait, there’s more. Bitcoin.com found another 113 projects that it calls “semi-failed,” because their teams have gone off the radar or their community has withered away. Add those, and the failure rate jumps to 59%.

[Sergo Grigo]

It is extremely difficult to choose a prospective ISO project. Because many projects are not implemented because of conflicts or differences of developers.

[RobertNykanen]

I'd never invested in the projects, where the tokens are the only means of reckoning with investors and direct connection with the idea of the project no. So for example a good ICO was Monero and Zec.

[Blockman21]

You should to see how that development idea. And equally important is the development team, advisory board, roadmap and whitepaper.

[Markperop]

If they are dealing with a problem instead of creating a problem I look. If the team behind the project have excellent experience I look closer. If the leader of the ICO has experience taking previous companies from beta stage successful I look I sit up and take notice. And with all of these if they have partnerships and solid advisors I'll begin to contemplate an investment

by the way, a very correct and qualitative view of the selection of the company's ico for consideration as a beginner. Apparently this is not the first time you are doing this business. But you still need to know the professional and authoritative people who are either developers or investors in this project in order to follow their example.

[deevan]

The options you mentioned all play their important role while choosing right ICO, However, among all I can say the team behind the Project must be very strong, they should have enough connections and partnerships to carry their project for future success. Also most importantly the product that they are launching in the market must be beneficial to every targeted audience. Marketing of a project is also a very important factor to consider as to enhance awareness of their project in the market.

Regarding Roadmap, it is just a descriptive plan they will follow but this factor also depends on a team, can the team implement the project according to the roadmap? so it is necessary to check team background experience.

[storfox]

There should be one great idea in ICO which is different from other ICOs, coins or tokens.It is critical to know the nature of the company and the teams behind ICOs. Most of the companies are newly incorporated, but many founders have been around in their respective industries. It is possible to review profiles and search for news and mentions in their prior projects and efforts and also Nitpicking the white paper could prove useful in revealing the details of how their solutions work and what need areas they will be addressing.

[DanWalker]

In this crypto ICO boom time, it can be hard to choose the right coin or token to buy and invest, for me main things are project idea, social activities, team and road map...

Sometimes choosing by such criteria will not save you from scammers. They have managed to make projects that are very similar to reliable ones. And now in order to find a good project you need to make much more effort such as checking addresses of registration, phones, domains and so on.