[ANN][PREICO] 🚀 🅱onum - Global backed loans and deposits on blockchain 🚀

[LightFork]

The only directions that will not be symmetric are the ETH <-> altcoins and bitcoin <-> altcoins. This we have seen many times, when problems arise people go into the most reliable assets.

Many more people in such a development of events can transfer their capital to a stable of coins like the USDT.

Stable coin is still not a fiat. I do not think that they are able to delay a large flow of people who want to protect themselves from losses in the crypto currency.

At the moment, this is so. But over time, the situation with the stable coin can clear up and it will be 100% reliable in any conditions as it was originally intended.

[Holopopstyir]

I thought about the distribution of tokens. Team gets 15%, and advisors 10%. Is not too much allocated to the advisers? What is their role in the project?

[Whitethoughts]

With a fall of 80 percent, a five-fold redundancy is required. I think redundancy can be reduced to threefold, since a drop of 80% is almost unrealistic.

To get $ 20 I will have to deposit 100;? Is this too much?

Watching what your goals are. If you want to save a deposit at any cost with a 100% guarantee, then this is quite a normal level of redundancy. All the same, you are returned all the security when you pay the loan.

[CanvinGale]

I thought about the distribution of tokens. Team gets 15%, and advisors 10%. Is not too much allocated to the advisers? What is their role in the project?

Normal proportion. Advisors carry out a general audit of the project and are responsible for its correct implementation with their reputation.

[KateMoss]

With a fall of 80 percent, a five-fold redundancy is required. I think redundancy can be reduced to threefold, since a drop of 80% is almost unrealistic.

To get $ 20 I will have to deposit 100;? Is this too much?

Watching what your goals are. If you want to save a deposit at any cost with a 100% guarantee, then this is quite a normal level of redundancy. All the same, you are returned all the security when you pay the loan.

And if there is a force majeure and the loan will not be paid?

[CryptoCashCow]

n1

[LuckyNicky]

I thought about the distribution of tokens. Team gets 15%, and advisors 10%. Is not too much allocated to the advisers? What is their role in the project?

First you need to know the information and then draw conclusions. If they are a full-fledged part of the team, then their share is completely relevant.

[AleXcreig]

Watching what your goals are. If you want to save a deposit at any cost with a 100% guarantee, then this is quite a normal level of redundancy. All the same, you are returned all the security when you pay the loan.

Not many can decide on this. Purely psychologically.

[Zeppelins]

I thought about the distribution of tokens. Team gets 15%, and advisors 10%. Is not too much allocated to the advisers? What is their role in the project?

Normal proportion. Advisors carry out a general audit of the project and are responsible for its correct implementation with their reputation.

Consultants risk their reputation with a bad ICO result. Reputation for them is an important indicator in this area, so this distribution is quite reasonable and fair.

[MikePerry]

Stable coin is still not a fiat. I do not think that they are able to delay a large flow of people who want to protect themselves from losses in the crypto currency.

At the moment, this is so. But over time, the situation with the stable coin can clear up and it will be 100% reliable in any conditions as it was originally intended.

I would like it to be so, but now it's not. You can not trust even the largest exchange - heard about the problems of Binance?

[LightFork]

I thought about the distribution of tokens. Team gets 15%, and advisors 10%. Is not too much allocated to the advisers? What is their role in the project?

Standard shares, nothing unusual. I think the developers will later describe in more detail the mechanism of interaction with the advisers.

[Whitethoughts]

Watching what your goals are. If you want to save a deposit at any cost with a 100% guarantee, then this is quite a normal level of redundancy. All the same, you are returned all the security when you pay the loan.

Not many can decide on this. Purely psychologically.

I understand what you're talking about. But the security of the funds is guaranteed by the platform. I think this is as reliable as shifting assets from one your pocket to another.

[Holopopstyir]

I thought about the distribution of tokens. Team gets 15%, and advisors 10%. Is not too much allocated to the advisers? What is their role in the project?

Standard shares, nothing unusual. I think the developers will later describe in more detail the mechanism of interaction with the advisers.

Well, if their share is justified by something concrete then I have no questions. It just seemed to me that usually the advisers are given less.

[Pay4youractivity]

Stable coin is still not a fiat. I do not think that they are able to delay a large flow of people who want to protect themselves from losses in the crypto currency.

At the moment, this is so. But over time, the situation with the stable coin can clear up and it will be 100% reliable in any conditions as it was originally intended.

I doubt it. Fiat and crypto currency are antagonists. There can not be any simplification of the situation. Always when dealing in the direction Fiat - Crypt there will be some specific problems.

[KateMoss]

Consultants risk their reputation with a bad ICO result. Reputation for them is an important indicator in this area, so this distribution is quite reasonable and fair.

Their risk is very high. If they fail several times in unsuccessful projects, then no one else will cooperate with them.

[AleXcreig]

Watching what your goals are. If you want to save a deposit at any cost with a 100% guarantee, then this is quite a normal level of redundancy. All the same, you are returned all the security when you pay the loan.

Not many can decide on this. Purely psychologically.

I understand what you're talking about. But the security of the funds is guaranteed by the platform. I think this is as reliable as shifting assets from one your pocket to another.

If you are sure that it will be possible to give the loan on time, then yes it is absolutely safe.

[Zeppelins]

Consultants risk their reputation with a bad ICO result. Reputation for them is an important indicator in this area, so this distribution is quite reasonable and fair.

Their risk is very high. If they fail several times in unsuccessful projects, then no one else will cooperate with them.

Of course. Moreover, as a rule, consultants have their own base of investors, which they have cooperated with for a long time.

[LuckyNicky]

With a fall of 80 percent, a five-fold redundancy is required. I think redundancy can be reduced to threefold, since a drop of 80% is almost unrealistic.

To get $ 20 I will have to deposit 100;? Is this too much?

Watching what your goals are. If you want to save a deposit at any cost with a 100% guarantee, then this is quite a normal level of redundancy. All the same, you are returned all the security when you pay the loan.

Reasonable. The main thing is that there are no problems with paying the loan. Then everything turns out well.

[CanvinGale]

Of course. Moreover, as a rule, consultants have their own base of investors, which they have cooperated with for a long time.

I wonder how they attract the attention of top-level advisers. My friends conduct ICO, they can not contact any of the advisers.

[MikePerry]

Of course. Moreover, as a rule, consultants have their own base of investors, which they have cooperated with for a long time.

I wonder how they attract the attention of top-level advisers. My friends conduct ICO, they can not contact any of the advisers.

Top-advisers are constantly busy and they do not have time to process requests.