MonkeyMarcel
Member
 Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
 |
July 23, 2013, 01:53:35 PM |
|
I'm happy with ACTM, ACM, ATM or even ACMN.
Of those options I like ACTM, its the closest to ActM that we have been using anyway +1 for ACTM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
VinceSamios
|
|
July 23, 2013, 02:42:07 PM |
|
Sorry to spoil the party - in this thread, I'm still going to use AM :-P I have no interest in ASICMiner, old, slow, boring, high power consumption, ASIC technology (lol)
|
|
|
|
grimholt
Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 10
|
|
July 23, 2013, 02:45:27 PM |
|
Sorry to spoil the party - in this thread, I'm still going to use AM :-P I have no interest in ASICMiner, old, slow, boring, high power consumption, ASIC technology (lol)
The technology isn't really the point, we all know ACTM's technology is (will be) superior. The fact remains, however, that ASICMiner is already on the market, and you will only confuse people if you use their abbreviation when referring to ACTM. |
|
|
|
|
drdanishkhan
|
|
July 23, 2013, 02:56:35 PM |
|
how about a vote.. ACTM vs ACM vs ActM
|
BTC tip jar 1LrwjfQ41DA9u8PLcQBLp7CueoWotdKshq
|
|
|
|
VinceSamios
|
|
July 23, 2013, 02:59:54 PM |
|
Well in that case, technically speaking, if you want to be pedantic about it, you should be referring to ASICMiner as G.ASICMINER-PT
Technically speaking to use "AM" in reference to ActiveMiner is more correct than using it in reference to ASICMiner, since the latter already includes an acronym. So ASICMiner should become ASICM.
I'm 90% being argumentative for the sake of it, and 10% because my primary interest at the moment is in AM (the active one) hence I'd prefer to type fewer characters - we're all smart people, I'm sure we can guess when someone is using the acronym "AM" in the ActiveMiner thread they are referring to the thread topic.
|
|
|
|
statdude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 23, 2013, 03:25:40 PM |
|
I will pay
Premium of .0004 per
.003 strike put,
60 days expiration
My options model values these at .000179-.00029, so this is a nice premium, and 11.6% return in 60 days.
BTCT or BitFunder preferred.
20 BTC ready to go.
Bump |
|
|
|
|
kleeck
|
|
July 23, 2013, 05:11:14 PM |
|
Well in that case, technically speaking, if you want to be pedantic about it, you should be referring to ASICMiner as G.ASICMINER-PT
Technically speaking to use "AM" in reference to ActiveMiner is more correct than using it in reference to ASICMiner, since the latter already includes an acronym. So ASICMiner should become ASICM.
I'm 90% being argumentative for the sake of it, and 10% because my primary interest at the moment is in AM (the active one) hence I'd prefer to type fewer characters - we're all smart people, I'm sure we can guess when someone is using the acronym "AM" in the ActiveMiner thread they are referring to the thread topic.
Regardless of where your assets are and what is easier for you, personally, it would be appropriate for you to use the proper identifier with the corresponding stock. I'll drop this line of conversation at that, since we have more important things to discuss here LIKE ZOMGPROFITZ!!!!!11ELEVENTEEN! |
|
|
|
MonkeyMarcel
Member
Offline
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
|
|
July 24, 2013, 06:27:17 AM |
|
Sorry to spoil the party - in this thread, I'm still going to use AM :-P I have no interest in ASICMiner, old, slow, boring, high power consumption, ASIC technology (lol)
You can use whatever you like, people just wont know what you are talking about. |
|
|
|
|
sayaz
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
July 24, 2013, 10:44:22 AM |
|
Do you even regurgitate already over used memes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
drdanishkhan
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:02:26 PM |
|
Why the sudden selling???
|
BTC tip jar 1LrwjfQ41DA9u8PLcQBLp7CueoWotdKshq
|
|
|
|
kleeck
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:07:40 PM |
|
Why the sudden selling???
I was wondering the same. Possible confusion over the ActiveMining release? We're still sitting at .0036 and it seems to be bouncing around that number, so it isn't anything massive. I just see a lot of small sells consistently. On the speculation front: Has anyone ran any numbers with projected difficulty/hash rate to get a rough dividend projection for ActiveMining? I can run numbers, but their always seems to be some math-head out there that loves doing it and being way more thorough than myself.  What do you guys think we will see in 1mo, 3mo, 6mo? |
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:23:12 PM |
|
Why the sudden selling???
Which sudden selling? The range .003 - .004 is traded for some time now.  |
|
|
|
sayaz
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:25:01 PM |
|
It's a speculators dream
|
|
|
|
|
slightboyme
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:35:22 PM |
|
mind sharing what tool this is ? thanks |
|
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:39:57 PM |
|
mind sharing what tool this is ? thanks
Sure, it's NinjaTrader. NT allows historical data import via CSV files. File specifications can be found here.  |
|
|
|
|
matuszed
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:41:45 PM |
|
mind sharing what tool this is ? thanks
Sure, it's NinjaTrader. NT allows historical data import via CSV files. File specifications can be found here. +1 that software is legit. Are you a professional trader by any chance? Also plug for anyone interested in a Fast Hash Us group buy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=261708.0 |
"Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." -Keynes
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1024
|
|
July 24, 2013, 03:49:29 PM |
|
+1 that software is legit. Are you a professional trader by any chance? No, it's just a hobby and I fully support the Bitcoin movement. |
|
|
|
|
kleeck
|
|
July 24, 2013, 05:41:09 PM
Last edit: July 24, 2013, 06:25:51 PM by kleeck |
|
So, here's my back of the napkin dividend calculations:
Current Difficulty: 37,508,353
(Working off of 20% increases per diff. increase period)
2nd diff. increase in August difficulty projection: 45,010,023.64
ActM Expecting 6.6TH/s by mid Aug.
(6606028.8 MH/s)
73.8117 BTC/day
2214.351 (30 days profit)
2214.351/10m = .0002214351/share (Only relevant if .0025/share hasn't been dispersed via divs.)
2214.351/25m = .00008857404/share (more realistic)
3.5% weekly every 30 days
or
184% 48% APR
What say ye?
Edit: Oops. Miscalculated... I started doing one thing and switched mid calculation. It isn't 3.5% weekly, but monthly, which moves our APR.
|
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 24, 2013, 05:48:48 PM |
|
So, here's my back of the napkin dividend calculations:
Current Difficulty: 37,508,353
(Working off of 20% increases per diff. increase period)
2nd diff. increase in August difficulty projection: 45,010,023.64
ActM Expecting 6.6TH/s by mid Aug.
(6606028.8 MH/s)
73.8117 BTC/day
2214.351 (30 days profit)
2214.351/10m = .0002214351/share (Only relevant if .0025/share hasn't been dispersed via divs.)
2214.351/25m = .00008857404/share (more realistic)
3.5% weekly
or
184% APR
What say ye?
I don't know how we're going to predict the hardware sales portion, though the potential is pretty astounding. |
|
|
|
|
|
