hsrminer - Nvidia mining software for various algos by palgin&alexkap

[sir_blacks]

@Mr.Spider703 dear one even Excavator dev admit speed is not top one & they need to tune better & main problem of excavator is stability ... but what ever use what ever you like & believe is best for you ... there are discussion there github dev place already about this with feedback & all what a well informed person need

[1715170662]

1715170662

[Mr.Spider703]

@Mr.Spider703 dear one even Excavator dev admit speed is not top one & they need to tune better & main problem of excavator is stability ... but what ever use what ever you like & believe is best for you ... there are discussion there github dev place already about this with feedback & all what a well informed person need

Oh thanks. but I'm not that much about it, I have a program with a self-switching and at what distances the excavator wins. about the fact that the maid pointed to problems with stability honestly did not know, then I try to use this fork. sorry if someone offended

[crocozino]

neoscrypt, KlausT faster than this shit 

disagree here, based on my observation KlausT is slower, for about 5%
for example Klaust for my GTX 1080ti on PL80 and +50 core/150 mem pushes 1.68-1.71kh/s
while with the same settings, HSR miner produce 1.8-1.82 kh/s

[nitrobg]

neoscrypt, KlausT faster than this shit 

disagree here, based on my observation KlausT is slower, for about 5%
for example Klaust for my GTX 1080ti on PL80 and +50 core/150 mem pushes 1.68-1.71kh/s
while with the same settings, HSR miner produce 1.8-1.82 kh/s

Reported hashrate means nothing. Run both miners in parallel using the same cards and different wallets and then compare the results.

[Just_a_miner]

exavator Version 1.4.3 alpha NVIDIA this version faster than yours, and this is the truth

If you would take a look at my screenshots you would notice that Excavator build I've used for benchmark is 4511 - it's exactly Excavator 1.4.3 Alpha from 02.02.2018. Anyway if Excavator is faster for your rig - it's okay but your message is pointless as a) you haven't provided any screenshots with comparison and just repeat words "faster" and "truth", b) everyone can just try every miner themselves and choose what is best for them.

[Mr.Spider703]

I take my words back, for a long distance your fork is faster
My friend tested here on 1080ti and fork faster than excavator

[MagicSmoker]

Reported hashrate means nothing. Run both miners in parallel using the same cards and different wallets and then compare the results.

That's precisely what I did a few pages back and reported in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2565979.msg29675722#msg29675722

I've been advised that I should have used pool-reported average hashrate for 24 hours instead of payout, and I finally understand why, but in the above test I did run both miners concurrently on the same pool but pointed to different wallet addresses so only a difference in average luck per share would cause a difference in payout, besides average hashrate, of course.

[XCroSs]

is it possible to config hsrminer to run on GTX 1030 ?

i've tried and get ton of rejected shared and then disconnected 

[entinio]

Still no Linux version ? 

[MagicSmoker]

Still no Linux version ? 

OP/Dev is AWOL - last post to this thread was Dec 30th.

[entinio]

Still no Linux version ? 

OP/Dev is AWOL - last post to this thread was Dec 30th.

May be coding the Linux one ? Ahah :-D

[stanle_98]

Does anyone try using GTX 1050 ti 4 Gb OC for neoscrypt ?

[rnikdo@seznam.cz]

Hi,
i try to solomining and sometimes it writes: we found close match! and the error is followed

[giveen1]

Does anyone try using GTX 1050 ti 4 Gb OC for neoscrypt ?

Yes, it does 475-500 KH/s

[beursstarter]

Does anyone try using GTX 1050 ti 4 Gb OC for neoscrypt ?

Depending on the model and OC settings, I get between 530 and 580. My Gigabyte 1050Ti OC does 530.

[stevascha]

Reported hashrate means nothing. Run both miners in parallel using the same cards and different wallets and then compare the results.

That's precisely what I did a few pages back and reported in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2565979.msg29675722#msg29675722

I've been advised that I should have used pool-reported average hashrate for 24 hours instead of payout, and I finally understand why, but in the above test I did run both miners concurrently on the same pool but pointed to different wallet addresses so only a difference in average luck per share would cause a difference in payout, besides average hashrate, of course.

so do you use hsrminer or klaust?
from i know, 80 80ti were good using hsr but if you have 70ti 60 so on, use klaust instead

[Mike-Crypto]

Hello,

Great work on the miner so far, thank you.

I'd like to use this miner long term as it seems fast but according to the -h options display there is no way to set a target temperature.  Is this possible just now?  If not is fan control something you will be adding to hsrminer in the near future?

I tried the miner on my GTX 1060 3GB and the temp quickly hit 75c so I had to shut it down.  That's my gaming card in a closed case, I can't risk frying that card so need to keep the temps a bit lower than that.

Cheers, Mike...

[MagicSmoker]

Reported hashrate means nothing. Run both miners in parallel using the same cards and different wallets and then compare the results.

That's precisely what I did a few pages back and reported in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2565979.msg29675722#msg29675722

I've been advised that I should have used pool-reported average hashrate for 24 hours instead of payout, and I finally understand why, but in the above test I did run both miners concurrently on the same pool but pointed to different wallet addresses so only a difference in average luck per share would cause a difference in payout, besides average hashrate, of course.

so do you use hsrminer or klaust?
from i know, 80 80ti were good using hsr but if you have 70ti 60 so on, use klaust instead

It depends. On my 6x GTX 1060 rig and my Founder's Edition 1080 test rig I use hsrminer because it is faster and stable, but on my other 1080 (Asus ROG Strix) I use ccminer because of the mysterious drop in hashrate that inevitably occurs after 1-3 hours of operation (a drop reflected on the pool, as well).

[Elder III]

Hello,

Great work on the miner so far, thank you.

I'd like to use this miner long term as it seems fast but according to the -h options display there is no way to set a target temperature.  Is this possible just now?  If not is fan control something you will be adding to hsrminer in the near future?

I tried the miner on my GTX 1060 3GB and the temp quickly hit 75c so I had to shut it down.  That's my gaming card in a closed case, I can't risk frying that card so need to keep the temps a bit lower than that.

Cheers, Mike...

You can use Afterburner to set a target temperature if you wish.... but 75c is not even remotely in danger of "frying" your GPU. Heck, even Nvidia by default has them target ~83c when under 100% load and they are designed to hit 100C or so before shutting down due to temperature. Obviously they will degrade faster if you run them that hot 24/7, but 75c is not an issue.

If you set that fan speed to manually run at 60% that may be all you need to keep your GPU below 75c if that's the only GPU in your case and you have good aiflow (good quality intake and exhaust case fans).

[Mike-Crypto]

Hello,

Great work on the miner so far, thank you.

I'd like to use this miner long term as it seems fast but according to the -h options display there is no way to set a target temperature.  Is this possible just now?  If not is fan control something you will be adding to hsrminer in the near future?

I tried the miner on my GTX 1060 3GB and the temp quickly hit 75c so I had to shut it down.  That's my gaming card in a closed case, I can't risk frying that card so need to keep the temps a bit lower than that.

Cheers, Mike...

You can use Afterburner to set a target temperature if you wish.... but 75c is not even remotely in danger of "frying" your GPU. Heck, even Nvidia by default has them target ~83c when under 100% load and they are designed to hit 100C or so before shutting down due to temperature. Obviously they will degrade faster if you run them that hot 24/7, but 75c is not an issue.

If you set that fan speed to manually run at 60% that may be all you need to keep your GPU below 75c if that's the only GPU in your case and you have good aiflow (good quality intake and exhaust case fans).

Thanks for that Elder III.  I was a bit worried because I had a couple of black screens whilst mining, Windows re-drew all the open windows and this is my main desktop machine, I work on it and game on it.  The card was a Christmas present and I can't afford to replace it so I'm really paranoid about over stressing it.  I've got a full aluminium case and 120mm Scythe fans so cooling is good.  May be I'll start mining on it again after what you say, I could certainly do with the extra sol/s.

Cheers, Mike...