[ANN][pre-ico]WeAre - Revolution in Helping Investors and Founders with ICO

[retrend]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

But it also has a different meaning, users will find out about the new project and may want to invest in it.
It's very cool from a marketing standpoint!

It's very cool, it turns out the bounty campaign ceases to have any meaning at all

Yes exactly

[1714657757]

1714657757

[1714657757]

1714657757

[1714657757]

1714657757

[1714657757]

1714657757

[1714657757]

1714657757

[1714657757]

1714657757

[Xelpherpolis]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

In any case, they will not risk anything

In what sense? What do you mean?

I mean that token holders do not risk the tokens that they already have. Since new tokens will be issued for each project.

This is great, great approach!
What if all the released tokens are not sold?

[Leather]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

In any case, they will not risk anything

In what sense? What do you mean?

I mean that token holders do not risk the tokens that they already have. Since new tokens will be issued for each project.

This is great, great approach!
What if all the released tokens are not sold?

All these tokens will simply be destroyed, that's all.

[vit0z]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

[Leather]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

Which team do you mean?

[vit0z]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

Which team do you mean?

Well, I'm talking about the team of this new startup project.
After all, there is an emission of tokens. which already have their price and are traded on stock exchanges. They can just steal these tokens and not make any product, do they?

[Leather]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

Which team do you mean?

Well, I'm talking about the team of this new startup project.
After all, there is an emission of tokens. which already have their price and are traded on stock exchanges. They can just steal these tokens and not make any product, do they?

Dude, it does not work that way.
firstly they will not have access to tokens, it will all happen through a smart contract.
In most cases, the issue of a token based on the WeAre token will most likely occur, in order to avoid problems with the price.

[vit0z]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

Which team do you mean?

Well, I'm talking about the team of this new startup project.
After all, there is an emission of tokens. which already have their price and are traded on stock exchanges. They can just steal these tokens and not make any product, do they?

Dude, it does not work that way.
firstly they will not have access to tokens, it will all happen through a smart contract.
In most cases, the issue of a token based on the WeAre token will most likely occur, in order to avoid problems with the price.

what are the problems with the price you're talking about? 

[Leather]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

Which team do you mean?

Well, I'm talking about the team of this new startup project.
After all, there is an emission of tokens. which already have their price and are traded on stock exchanges. They can just steal these tokens and not make any product, do they?

Dude, it does not work that way.
firstly they will not have access to tokens, it will all happen through a smart contract.
In most cases, the issue of a token based on the WeAre token will most likely occur, in order to avoid problems with the price.

what are the problems with the price you're talking about? 

Well, think about it. Token WeAre is already traded on the exchange, its value is volatile, how can you issue this token and collect on this investment basis?
On the startup project, you need to collect a certain amount of investment, if it is evaluated in WeAre tokens, then this amount will be quite volatile.

[carnitastaco]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

Which team do you mean?

Well, I'm talking about the team of this new startup project.
After all, there is an emission of tokens. which already have their price and are traded on stock exchanges. They can just steal these tokens and not make any product, do they?

Dude, it does not work that way.
firstly they will not have access to tokens, it will all happen through a smart contract.
In most cases, the issue of a token based on the WeAre token will most likely occur, in order to avoid problems with the price.

what are the problems with the price you're talking about? 

Well, think about it. Token WeAre is already traded on the exchange, its value is volatile, how can you issue this token and collect on this investment basis?
On the startup project, you need to collect a certain amount of investment, if it is evaluated in WeAre tokens, then this amount will be quite volatile.

I do not think so. If the project is going to collect 1,000,000 WeAre tokens
That its purpose will be this amount. Initially, the entire settlement system within the framework of this project is designed for a token. And its market value is different.

[vit0z]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

Which team do you mean?

Well, I'm talking about the team of this new startup project.
After all, there is an emission of tokens. which already have their price and are traded on stock exchanges. They can just steal these tokens and not make any product, do they?

Dude, it does not work that way.
firstly they will not have access to tokens, it will all happen through a smart contract.
In most cases, the issue of a token based on the WeAre token will most likely occur, in order to avoid problems with the price.

what are the problems with the price you're talking about? 

Well, think about it. Token WeAre is already traded on the exchange, its value is volatile, how can you issue this token and collect on this investment basis?
On the startup project, you need to collect a certain amount of investment, if it is evaluated in WeAre tokens, then this amount will be quite volatile.

I do not think so. If the project is going to collect 1,000,000 WeAre tokens
That its purpose will be this amount. Initially, the entire settlement system within the framework of this project is designed for a token. And its market value is different.

I agree, this option seems to me more logical 

[Leather]

Will the project team have access to tokens that are released anew for a particular new project?

Which team do you mean?

Well, I'm talking about the team of this new startup project.
After all, there is an emission of tokens. which already have their price and are traded on stock exchanges. They can just steal these tokens and not make any product, do they?

Dude, it does not work that way.
firstly they will not have access to tokens, it will all happen through a smart contract.
In most cases, the issue of a token based on the WeAre token will most likely occur, in order to avoid problems with the price.

what are the problems with the price you're talking about? 

Well, think about it. Token WeAre is already traded on the exchange, its value is volatile, how can you issue this token and collect on this investment basis?
On the startup project, you need to collect a certain amount of investment, if it is evaluated in WeAre tokens, then this amount will be quite volatile.

I do not think so. If the project is going to collect 1,000,000 WeAre tokens
That its purpose will be this amount. Initially, the entire settlement system within the framework of this project is designed for a token. And its market value is different.

I agree, this option seems to me more logical 

Well, maybe it is, while it is difficult to say something.
We will wait for the release of this project

[Groc]

So what about the release?
When is the project planned?

[carnitastaco]

So what about the release?
When is the project planned?

Completely finished system will be rotational in 2018-2019, there is no exact date yet.
Many factors are not yet taken into account, which is influenced by it.

[Groc]

So what about the release?
When is the project planned?

Completely finished system will be rotational in 2018-2019, there is no exact date yet.
Many factors are not yet taken into account, which is influenced by it.

Ok, I get it, thanks for the info 

[Gash]

I do not quite understand why you need to offer token holders to vote for projects.

Why?
They have a full relation to this platform. In fact, they are shareholders, they should have the right to vote, do not they?

Well, to some extent yes, but still.
I believe that such decisions should be made by specialists who understand this. This is more logical than just trusting random people who bought tokens of the company.

But it also has a different meaning, users will find out about the new project and may want to invest in it.
It's very cool from a marketing standpoint!

It's very cool, it turns out the bounty campaign ceases to have any meaning at all

Yes exactly

I think that u are a tokenized silvan. Ive told u twenty times u are incapable of buying shit and have no provision, no planing and u are a poor chihuahua dog. Nothing can change the fact that u gambled money, put everything on red and ultimately lost all. U and Money are perpendicular to each other.

[retricallos]

So what about the release?
When is the project planned?

I am sure it will not be "at one day" - first alpha-version, then beta, this is entire ecosystem, it will be developing all the time)

[moepaing]

So what about the release?
When is the project planned?

I am sure it will not be "at one day" - first alpha-version, then beta, this is entire ecosystem, it will be developing all the time)

What do mean "ecosystem"? I think all functions will be ready firstly, and the quantity of projects do not influence on system "readyness".

[2520]

I want to note that this draft white paper is very high quality and in addition in several languages, finally there is a project which does not require the assistance of an interpreter in order to understand its essence and meaning

[duke944]

I want to note that this draft white paper is very high quality and in addition in several languages, finally there is a project which does not require the assistance of an interpreter in order to understand its essence and meaning

absolutely with you it agree I think it is cool and comfortable