Do girls use Bitcoin ?

[r0ach]

For god's sake, I hope you most be joking. Otherwise you are a very, very sick person and need to see a doctor.

Is your post a joke?  Talking about the sad state of American women somehow qualifies someone as being "mentally ill"?  You're from the Netherlands, have you ever even been here?

There are plenty of highly intelligent women that say the exact same thing I did, such as the one below.  Is she mentally ill too?

Feminism and the Disposable Male - Karen Straughan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA

Let's face it, most of the feminist movement is just the agenda of man-hating lesbians, while masquerading as unbiased victims.

Most sane people see America as a country in decline, socially and economically.  Most large cities here are now wastelands.  The management of these cities also happens to be run by far leftists, which feminists and other nut jobs are a part of.

It sounds like a defamatory comment to say that "leftism" is a mental illness based entirely upon feelings of inferiority, but it's actually true.  People such as Ted Kaczynski have written about it in the past in undeniable, sound logic.  Scroll down to #10 in the list where it starts:

http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt


The classical scale of of ideology also has authoritarianism, and all other forms of centrally controlled, information gate keeper systems, where you have rats constantly saying "oh no, you can't say that, that's racist, that's sexist, that's whatever", located entirely on the far left.  Anarchy happens to be on the far right of the scale.  This website, and Bitcoin in general, happen to be referred to as "crypto anarchism", "anarcho capitalism", etc.  Your ideology of attempting to force people to fall in line by saying something isn't politically correct has zero effect here.

[Damnsammit]

Do shemale use bitcoin may be you should put

I'm a shemale and I use Bitcoin.

[Lucky Cris]

Of course we do. We mine too.    

[420]

Women of bitcoin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFHbXSnNkXU

[_Miracle]

Most women aren't smart enough or tech savvy enough to be into bitcoin, but there are certainly a lot of them who are both and I'm sure many on this site.

I know the post is old and I hope it's just a special sense of humor.


Ask the "girl" who runs IFLS (I F------ Love Science)

[RitzGrandCasino]

yes they certainly do.

[r0ach]

Most women aren't smart enough or tech savvy enough to be into bitcoin, but there are certainly a lot of them who are both and I'm sure many on this site.

I know the post is old and I hope it's just a special sense of humor.


Ask the "girl" who runs IFLS (I F------ Love Science)

His post is actually accurate, just not politically correct.  Society isn't afraid to call a stupid man an idiot.  Society gives a pass to women living a bimbo lifestyle and confronts anyone who criticizes them as being "sexist".  The same phenomenon is seen in virtually every aspect of comparing men to women in the post-feminist, western world.

The majority of women see a male having any kind of affiliation with pornography or sexual content as some kind of vile creep.  They, themselves, sit around reading Fabio and and Fifty Shades of Grey books all day and consider it "healthy", "normal", and "uplifting".

The double standards are too numerous to list.  Just watched the movie "Diehard 1".  The woman in the movie is applauded for punching an ex-husband in the face on an airplane.  I don't think a male committing assault vs the opposite sex would be met with similar applause.

Western civilization is currently garbage in general, and the women that inhabit it are monsters.  It's no wonder the percentage of American men wanting to get married has plummeted to nothing, or the rise of the strange, white guy obsessed with Asian girls (no, I'm not that guy).

[_Miracle]

Most women aren't smart enough or tech savvy enough to be into bitcoin, but there are certainly a lot of them who are both and I'm sure many on this site.

I know the post is old and I hope it's just a special sense of humor.


Ask the "girl" who runs IFLS (I F------ Love Science)

His post is actually accurate, just not politically correct.  Society isn't afraid to call a stupid man an idiot.  Society gives a pass to women living a bimbo lifestyle and confronts anyone who criticizes them as being "sexist".  The same phenomenon is seen in virtually every aspect of comparing men to women in the post-feminist, western world.

The majority of women see a male having any kind of affiliation with pornography or sexual content as some kind of vile creep.  They, themselves, sit around reading Fabio and and Fifty Shades of Grey books all day and consider it "healthy", "normal", and "uplifting".

The double standards are too numerous to list.  Just watched the movie "Diehard 1".  The woman in the movie is applauded for punching an ex-husband in the face on an airplane.  I don't think a male committing assault vs the opposite sex would be met with similar applause.

Western civilization is currently garbage in general, and the women that inhabit it are monsters.  It's no wonder the percentage of American men wanting to get married has plummeted to nothing, or the rise of the strange, white guy obsessed with Asian girls (no, I'm not that guy).

Oiy Vey. What to say about all those over generalizations?
That’s almost like saying “all science minded geeks are socially inept”...which is wrong. Bitcoin/crypto is coming into a phase when average Joes and Josettes are going to be participating.
I'm average minded with a wide array of interests; including how people live and think all over the world. I don't HAVE to " be like" anything and neither does anyone else. I'm less of a geek, more of a goof and refuse to choose between Star Wars or Star Trek AND I don't judge my "kid" (23) for reading Manga over Stan Lee or Asimov.
As a teen I wanted to make my cars faster, stereos louder (and sound quality higher). When I finally got on board with computers it didn't take long to get motivated enough to build my own out of the same "more ‘better’ attitude". I like to ride (my own) motorcycle and dress up in varying degrees of girlie to lady, pretty painted nails and all.
No one here has to treat me any differently but if I'm at a meet-up and some ill-mannered fool puts their hand on my thigh (The blog post that inspired cryptobitchicks) and doesn’t take my one time "polite" removal of it as the cue not to do that...
That person could very well end up on the ground with their arm in a twist and I won't be embarrassed by my "un-lady like" behavior. On a good day I may even take the time to ask if there's some problem, such as Tourettes before twisting it hard enough to be remembered for awhile.

Most of the time in daily life people are generally respectful of each other. I hold the door open for people and and appreciate it when it's done for me.
Adopt or stay single.

[bryant.coleman]

Women tend to be more financially conservative and generally they don't trust new technology and methods.

[sanjoea]

compare to male they must be very less, below 20%

[r0ach]

Women tend to be more financially conservative

Since when?  I'm starting to get disappointed with the 4-5 star posters here.

Women aren't more fiscally conservative whatsoever, they're just more risk adverse and reactive in nature, while males are more proactive and risk prone in nature.  Biology and hormone differences create measurably different behavior on the bell curve (also a good book) level.  Nowhere in Darwin's Origin of species does it say anything about the word "equality".

This is why all the great leaders, inventors, serial killers, etc are men.  All areas where taking big risks is important and one of the defining factors.  Women are not biologically wired to do that, because if they did, their offspring would have croaked shortly after they did during the stone age, and they would not be here to complain about this thread now.

Next you will see fifty attempted rebuttal posts trying to claim they know some lesbian with a mohawk that loves to bet her life savings at a dog track every day so I have to be wrong.  Sorry, but no, learn what a bell curve is.  Individual data points are meaningless, and the idea of free will is only somewhat valid.

[bryant.coleman]

compare to male they must be very less, below 20%

No... way less than that... Read somewhere that it was around 2% (the original thread, "Demographic profile of Bitcoiners" must be still active here).

[elavenil]

yes they do , but their % is very less compared to males.

[_Miracle]

Women tend to be more financially conservative

Since when?  I'm starting to get disappointed with the 4-5 star posters here.

Women aren't more fiscally conservative whatsoever, they're just more risk adverse and reactive in nature, while males are more proactive and risk prone in nature.  Biology and hormone differences create measurably different behavior on the bell curve (also a good book) level.  Nowhere in Darwin's Origin of species does it say anything about the word "equality".

This is why all the great leaders, inventors, serial killers, etc are men.  All areas where taking big risks is important and one of the defining factors.  Women are not biologically wired to do that, because if they did, their offspring would have croaked shortly after they did during the stone age, and they would not be here to complain about this thread now.

Next you will see fifty attempted rebuttal posts trying to claim they know some lesbian with a mohawk that loves to bet her life savings at a dog track every day so I have to be wrong.  Sorry, but no, learn what a bell curve is.  Individual data points are meaningless, and the idea of free will is only somewhat valid.

Not sure "monsters" were included in the Bell Curve unless we stick in Mary Shelly. You are full of too many absolutes to have a reasonable exchange with. Margret Thatcher , woman scientists in space.
From this conversation it appears that bitcoin women are too smart be on forums. You seem to have had some unfortunate experience and now your life is spent confirming that bias.

Good luck with that.

[faiza1990]

compare to male they must be very less, below 20%

No... way less than that... Read somewhere that it was around 2% (the original thread, "Demographic profile of Bitcoiners" must be still active here).

yes agree its really very less between 2 to 5% and still nothing happening about this mean no way to encourage them for coming in this field

[the_poet]

Not sure if it's a repost.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdzOT-lsGO4

[pera]

I bookmarked this thread so I could use it next time someone says that there are no sexism in the bitcoin community

[roslinpl]

Are girls / women interested in Bitcoin ?
Your opinion ?

1st Virgin Galactic customer was
a GIRL from some hot island, dont remember now.

she earn bitcoins few years ago

[r0ach]

Not sure "monsters" were included in the Bell Curve unless we stick in Mary Shelly. You are full of too many absolutes to have a reasonable exchange with. Margret Thatcher , woman scientists in space.
From this conversation it appears that bitcoin women are too smart be on forums. You seem to have had some unfortunate experience and now your life is spent confirming that bias.

Good luck with that.

Nope, you just pull the predictable, far left attack of "you must be sexist, racist, or wrong" card when someone says something obviously true, but not politically correct.  Far left ideologues always refuse to talk about any kind of statistic related to bell curves and only focus on individual behavior, which as mentioned earlier, is a completely meaningless data point.  You attempted to use one person, Margret Thatcher as the basis for the argument, so obviously do not grasp that idea very well.

Even if you don't consider yourself a "far left ideologue", you will take the position of one just for arguments sake, because you believe the conclusion of the argument makes you look like less of a person, when it's just simple biology.

The fields of big data analysis would not exist if humans weren't easily predictable.  You know everything I said is true, or more truth than fiction at the very least, but you're going to argue against it no matter what, because you're offended that everyone walking the earth isn't identical in nature and capability, even when evolution and specialization predict the exact opposite occurring.

Just like how there are large differences in one kind of ant or another, there are large differences in each sex, race, and whatever other biological attribute you can come up with.  Denying that evolution, specialization, or natural selection factors exist just makes you look like a fool.

The far leftist paradox:  always pushing against religion using evolution as an argument, then calling anyone that acknowledges the existence of evolution as sexist and racist.

[_Miracle]

Not sure "monsters" were included in the Bell Curve unless we stick in Mary Shelly. You are full of too many absolutes to have a reasonable exchange with. Margret Thatcher , woman scientists in space.
From this conversation it appears that bitcoin women are too smart be on forums. You seem to have had some unfortunate experience and now your life is spent confirming that bias.

Good luck with that.

Nope, you just pull the predictable, far left attack of "you must be sexist, racist, or wrong" card when someone says something obviously true, but not politically correct.  Far left ideologues always refuse to talk about any kind of statistic related to bell curves and only focus on individual behavior, which as mentioned earlier, is a completely meaningless data point.  You attempted to use one person, Margret Thatcher as the basis for the argument, so obviously do not grasp that idea very well.

Even if you don't consider yourself a "far left ideologue", you will take the position of one just for arguments sake, because you believe the conclusion of the argument makes you look like less of a person, when it's just simple biology.

The fields of big data analysis would not exist if humans weren't easily predictable.  You know everything I said is true, or more truth than fiction at the very least, but you're going to argue against it no matter what, because you're offended that everyone walking the earth isn't identical in nature and capability, even when evolution and specialization predict the exact opposite occurring.

Just like how there are large differences in one kind of ant or another, there are large differences in each sex, race, and whatever other biological attribute you can come up with.  Denying that evolution, specialization, or natural selection factors exist just makes you look like a fool.

The far leftist paradox:  always pushing against religion using evolution as an argument, then calling anyone that acknowledges the existence of evolution as sexist and racist.

"You are full of too many absolutes to have a reasonable exchange with"