Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 12:10:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 [756] 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1079977 times)
abuelau
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 500


www.coinschedule.com


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:02:19 PM
 #15101

anyone remember what happen to BTCGarden with the person who complained to Chinese police...

If someone done similar (contact Chinese police and complained about ponzi scheme) they would be forced to shut down and return investors money.

I'll be in China in 3 weeks, we may have to group up to make it more credible when complaining.

PS. I personally don't want to go this path but if they turn out to be fraudulent then justice needs to be served... "The Law Way"

I think that they still have one final chance to prove themselves. Let's wait for their next communication before we decide what to do next.

Know what's happening in cryptoworld: www.coinschedule.com
1714219838
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714219838

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714219838
Reply with quote  #2

1714219838
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714219838
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714219838

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714219838
Reply with quote  #2

1714219838
Report to moderator
1714219838
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714219838

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714219838
Reply with quote  #2

1714219838
Report to moderator
1714219838
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714219838

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714219838
Reply with quote  #2

1714219838
Report to moderator
GreekGeek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 577
Merit: 500


Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:04:08 PM
 #15102

this is bad (if true)

Its not as bad as it could have been. If Fabrizzio is not bullshitting (or misled even more than he claims to have been), then at least there has been a production run of something at some point. I dont see that leading to a profitable venture though, and so far, my conjecture I posted earlier still fits the known facts fairly well.

My opinion is
Fabrizzio is bullshitting us
I have a hunch  after I saw his face http://www.linkedin.com/in/fabriziotatti
looks a bit wizzley

Maybe this whole thing was based on 2-3 Avalons just to keep the moral up , so they can get rid of the shares above IPO,
and than buying them back below IPO, no harm right?  

retirement fund : 1NBM5DM317RfWsHXKUfPUDtba2scavpPoB
Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:04:23 PM
 #15103

this is bad (if true)

Its not as bad as it could have been. If Fabrizzio is not bullshitting (or misled even more than he claims to have been), then at least there has been a production run of something at some point. I dont see that leading to a profitable venture though, and so far, my conjecture I posted earlier still fits the known facts fairly well.

It's probably a complete scam.
Zubilica
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 837
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:04:58 PM
 #15104

I just feel sorry for the sucker that post a sell order 99845    0.01, for myself I'm just mad.
GreekGeek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 577
Merit: 500


Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:05:32 PM
 #15105

this is bad (if true)

Its not as bad as it could have been. If Fabrizzio is not bullshitting (or misled even more than he claims to have been), then at least there has been a production run of something at some point. I dont see that leading to a profitable venture though, and so far, my conjecture I posted earlier still fits the known facts fairly well.

It's probably a complete scam.


thank you
exactly my point ^^

retirement fund : 1NBM5DM317RfWsHXKUfPUDtba2scavpPoB
Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:05:41 PM
 #15106

What I would like to understand is the relationship between all these different people. How did TheSwede get into this? Who did he talk to? How much does he really know?

How can Fabrizio sign a document without really knowing what he was doing? He surely trusts the people he signed documents for. Who are they?

And what about Howard Wang? Can someone in the USA or California try and contact him??

Perhaps they made him sign or tricked him into signing. He is in China.
Howard Wang is probably calling the shots.
physalis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:06:39 PM
 #15107

I have a hunch  after I saw his face http://www.linkedin.com/in/fabriziotatti
looks a bit wizzley

 Cheesy

Here's another portrait:

abuelau
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 750
Merit: 500


www.coinschedule.com


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:06:57 PM
 #15108

What I would like to understand is the relationship between all these different people. How did TheSwede get into this? Who did he talk to? How much does he really know?

IMO, Theswede knows everything and is the "mastermind" behind labcoin. He put himself forward as a "spokesperson" to be able to dodge behind that title when the shit hits the fan, but his statements make it almost impossible to believe he is just doing PR without direct involvement. And seriously, who would hire theswede to be a spokesperson of anything?

"Sam" may or may not exist. He might be a fabrication of theswede, or he might be one of the techies in HK. Hard to know for sure, but theswede knows who he is, theswede is within reach of US law, and in violation of US laws, so Id focus on that first. Has to be the easiest way to get to the bottom of this, assuming you can uncover his identity.

Quote
How can Fabrizio sign a document without really knowing what he was doing? He surely trusts the people he signed documents for. Who are they?

Asked him that too, and wonder myself. Its possible Fabrizio doesnt want to give up the identities of the people just yet, before having consulted with them, before having felt enough heat on himself. Assuming one of them is a friend, that actually makes sense. What doesnt make sense is that he would know none of them.

Quote
And what about Howard Wang? Can someone in the USA or California try and contact him??

Why dont you? I went after fabrizzio, Ill let someone else do the talking to Wang.

TheSwede and Labcoin are not the same person... their writing style is different, their posting time is different.. I don't think so.

As for the rest... who knows. Your theory is as good as any at this point.

I might be able to contact Howard if someone can find a way (email, phone, etc). I couldn't find anything about him apart from the linkedin profile.

Know what's happening in cryptoworld: www.coinschedule.com
GreekGeek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 577
Merit: 500


Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:09:24 PM
 #15109

What I would like to understand is the relationship between all these different people. How did TheSwede get into this? Who did he talk to? How much does he really know?

IMO, Theswede knows everything and is the "mastermind" behind labcoin. He put himself forward as a "spokesperson" to be able to dodge behind that title when the shit hits the fan, but his statements make it almost impossible to believe he is just doing PR without direct involvement. And seriously, who would hire theswede to be a spokesperson of anything?

"Sam" may or may not exist. He might be a fabrication of theswede, or he might be one of the techies in HK. Hard to know for sure, but theswede knows who he is, theswede is within reach of US law, and in violation of US laws, so Id focus on that first. Has to be the easiest way to get to the bottom of this, assuming you can uncover his identity.

Quote
How can Fabrizio sign a document without really knowing what he was doing? He surely trusts the people he signed documents for. Who are they?

Asked him that too, and wonder myself. Its possible Fabrizio doesnt want to give up the identities of the people just yet, before having consulted with them, before having felt enough heat on himself. Assuming one of them is a friend, that actually makes sense. What doesnt make sense is that he would know none of them.

Quote
And what about Howard Wang? Can someone in the USA or California try and contact him??

Why dont you? I went after fabrizzio, Ill let someone else do the talking to Wang.

TheSwede and Labcoin are not the same person... their writing style is different, their posting time is different.. I don't think so.

As for the rest... who knows. Your theory is as good as any at this point.

I might be able to contact Howard if someone can find a way (email, phone, etc). I couldn't find anything about him apart from the linkedin profile.

So how do we know again that Howard is real?

retirement fund : 1NBM5DM317RfWsHXKUfPUDtba2scavpPoB
Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:09:28 PM
 #15110

anyone remember what happen to BTCGarden with the person who complained to Chinese police...

If someone done similar (contact Chinese police and complained about ponzi scheme) they would be forced to shut down and return investors money.

I'll be in China in 3 weeks, we may have to group up to make it more credible when complaining.

PS. I personally don't want to go this path but if they turn out to be fraudulent then justice needs to be served... "The Law Way"

How would they return investors money without cooperation from Burnside or the blockchain? That is if they even have the money.
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:10:32 PM
 #15111

My opinion is
Fabrizzio is bullshitting us
I have a hunch  after I saw his face http://www.linkedin.com/in/fabriziotatti
looks a bit wizzley

Maybe this whole thing was based on 2-3 Avalons just to keep the moral up , so they can get rid of the shares above IPO,
and than buying them back below IPO, no harm right?  

Fabrizzio  doesnt seem to know a thing about bitcoin, just started working in what appears a fairly decent job at OPPO, and is the only one who's identity is absolutely clear. We may have to go through him to find the others, but I very much doubt he is the guy behind this.
dwdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


- - -Caveat Aleo- - -


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:11:49 PM
 #15112

anyone remember what happen to BTCGarden with the person who complained to Chinese police...

If someone done similar (contact Chinese police and complained about ponzi scheme) they would be forced to shut down and return investors money.

I'll be in China in 3 weeks, we may have to group up to make it more credible when complaining.

PS. I personally don't want to go this path but if they turn out to be fraudulent then justice needs to be served... "The Law Way"

How would they return investors money without cooperation from Burnside or the blockchain? That is if they even have the money.

What money? The money is in the share price.  Unless the owners sold some shares there is no money to recoup.
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:12:52 PM
 #15113

So how do we know again that Howard is real?

THe linkedin profile is of a real person. That he is involved in labcoin is not proven, though likely (putting the linkedin profile of someone unrelated in the IPO prospectus would be utterly stupid). If you want to know more, just pick up the phone, call ITU and ask for a researcher called Zhenhua Howard Wang, and find out. Or try to connect through linkedin
Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:13:58 PM
 #15114

anyone remember what happen to BTCGarden with the person who complained to Chinese police...

If someone done similar (contact Chinese police and complained about ponzi scheme) they would be forced to shut down and return investors money.

I'll be in China in 3 weeks, we may have to group up to make it more credible when complaining.

PS. I personally don't want to go this path but if they turn out to be fraudulent then justice needs to be served... "The Law Way"

How would they return investors money without cooperation from Burnside or the blockchain? That is if they even have the money.

What money? The money is in the share price.  

 The money is lost even if it is a ponzi scheme. Their silence speaks volumes. If it were anyone else running a legit operation they would be freaking out about these share prices. They'll let the price drop to 0 and not care when a corporation is supposed to legally profit for shareholders? It doesn't make sense.
alexius89
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 709
Merit: 500


Gridcoin Foundation


View Profile WWW
September 27, 2013, 01:15:30 PM
 #15115

My opinion is
Fabrizzio is bullshitting us
I have a hunch  after I saw his face http://www.linkedin.com/in/fabriziotatti
looks a bit wizzley

Maybe this whole thing was based on 2-3 Avalons just to keep the moral up , so they can get rid of the shares above IPO,
and than buying them back below IPO, no harm right?  

Fabrizzio  doesnt seem to know a thing about bitcoin, just started working in what appears a fairly decent job at OPPO, and is the only one who's identity is absolutely clear. We may have to go through him to find the others, but I very much doubt he is the guy behind this.


User "Labcoin" has a Skype Name in his Profile named "delaria"

User  "Delaria" on bitcointalk  is a italian Guy who run 3 avalons some months ago under the Name "Labcoin"

Dont you guys think User "Labcoin"  is an italian aka Fabrizio?

Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:16:49 PM
 #15116

Perhaps Burnside knew it was a scam and had to shut down his site because of stuff like that. The last thing anyone wants is the SEC to get involved but that is something which could happen. The people associated with Labcoin who live in the USA should be worried.

My guess is they will try to act like they don't even know what Labcoin is and act like someone stole their identities.
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:17:45 PM
 #15117

User "Labcoin" has a Skype Name in his Profile named "delaria"

User  "Delaria" on bitcointalk  is a italian Guy who run 3 avalons some months ago under the Name "Labcoin"

Dont you guys think User "Labcoin"  is an italian aka Fabrizio?

Got a link for that second claim? If this is true, I revise my opinion.
Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:18:09 PM
 #15118

My opinion is
Fabrizzio is bullshitting us
I have a hunch  after I saw his face http://www.linkedin.com/in/fabriziotatti
looks a bit wizzley

Maybe this whole thing was based on 2-3 Avalons just to keep the moral up , so they can get rid of the shares above IPO,
and than buying them back below IPO, no harm right?  

Fabrizzio  doesnt seem to know a thing about bitcoin, just started working in what appears a fairly decent job at OPPO, and is the only one who's identity is absolutely clear. We may have to go through him to find the others, but I very much doubt he is the guy behind this.


User "Labcoin" has a Skype Name in his Profile named "delaria"

User  "Delaria" on bitcointalk  is a italian Guy who run 3 avalons some months ago under the Name "Labcoin"

Dont you guys think User "Labcoin"  is an italian aka Fabrizio?

No, they communicate different. Labcoin is Samuel Noi.
Luckybit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 510



View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:19:14 PM
 #15119

User "Labcoin" has a Skype Name in his Profile named "delaria"

User  "Delaria" on bitcointalk  is a italian Guy who run 3 avalons some months ago under the Name "Labcoin"

Dont you guys think User "Labcoin"  is an italian aka Fabrizio?

Got a link for that second claim? If this is true, I revise my opinion.

That would be evidence proving without a doubt that Fabrizio has direct involvement with Labcoin. He will have a difficult time denying it.
velacreations
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 27, 2013, 01:21:06 PM
 #15120

round and round Labcon goes....

it almost got down to fair value, but then back up again.  I guess people want a second chance to lose their money...

Pages: « 1 ... 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 [756] 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!