Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 03:36:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [~32 TH] HHTT - Selected Diff/Stratum/PPLNS/Paid Stales/High Availability/Tor  (Read 29733 times)
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 16, 2013, 05:05:17 PM
 #21

Lot of things today!

a new happy soul with 1 TH/s deployed has joined our ranks!

Every hash counts, so 1 TH counts a lot Smiley

spiccioli
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 20, 2013, 11:46:58 AM
 #22

So fireduck has an asic... 1FdkASiCe5Tkueouk2mZHfnDPGwtYFYFRW   

and he just found a block!

Which gives three in the last half day Wink

spiccioli
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 22, 2013, 12:45:17 PM
 #23

6 TH/s right now  Cool

spiccioli
fireduck
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 24, 2013, 10:07:13 PM
 #24

fireduck was here Smiley

I mean, a second address appeared tonight (UTC+2) under pool funds... so someone had to add it and it wasn't me Smiley

spiccioli

Yeah, I would out of town and a power outage at home took some things down.  I wasn't home to bring the encypted filesystems back up so needed to pay people from a separate pool of bitcoin for a little while.

I've seen moved a few of those backend tasks to AWS so that shouldn't be a problem again.


Bitrated user: fireduck.
fireduck
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 24, 2013, 10:10:57 PM
 #25

Given that fireduck, owner of HHTT pool, is away since a few weeks now and the original thread title shows a wrong speed I've decided to wait until the original thread went pushed down to page 2 before opening this new topic to cover the HHTT pool and to be able to update pool's speed.

spiccioli


Much thanks for making a thread and updating it.  I haven't been on bitcointalk much, the interface makes me a little crazy.

If someone needs to reach me, the easiest way is to email me directly (fireduck@gmail.com), post a question to reddit.com/r/hhtt.

I can also be reached on Bitmessage: BM-2D91jXnixXu5rFZGFVHSUEfEVNTnNi6NnE

This week I just added another server, NRT (Tokyo) and improved some alarming to know about potential problems.


Bitrated user: fireduck.
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 25, 2013, 03:21:25 PM
 #26

Given that fireduck, owner of HHTT pool, is away since a few weeks now and the original thread title shows a wrong speed I've decided to wait until the original thread went pushed down to page 2 before opening this new topic to cover the HHTT pool and to be able to update pool's speed.

spiccioli


Much thanks for making a thread and updating it.  I haven't been on bitcointalk much, the interface makes me a little crazy.

If someone needs to reach me, the easiest way is to email me directly (fireduck@gmail.com), post a question to reddit.com/r/hhtt.

I can also be reached on Bitmessage: BM-2D91jXnixXu5rFZGFVHSUEfEVNTnNi6NnE

This week I just added another server, NRT (Tokyo) and improved some alarming to know about potential problems.



Great news fireduck and thanks for keeping the pool going!

spiccioli
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 06:35:44 AM
 #27

It is becoming ugly... we need moar hashing power, there really is no other solution for this "problem".

spiccioli
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 04:30:09 PM
 #28

I'd like to quote gigavps of the semi-private pool because I couldn't have said it better:


Runs of bad luck are never fun, but please remember that this stuff turns in a blink of an eye. If you leave a pool after having bad luck, you ultimately doom yourself to less revenue.


Smiley

spiccioli
Polyatomic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 257
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 07:44:36 PM
 #29

This block had 200 BTC in transactions fees. http://blockchain.info/tx/4ed20e0768124bc67dc684d57941be1482ccdaa45dadb64be12afba8c8554537
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 09:01:29 PM
 #30


It came from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.msg3025285#msg3025285

holy sh...

spiccioli
techwtf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 09:39:47 PM
 #31

3 issues:

1 "ERROR Failed to contact the origin." for user-details page. user-details-json seems work better.

2 fix the calculation of "Profit and loss measured in blocks", since the current bad luck ... Sad

3 any chance for NMC merged mining (add another address in username?)
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 09:42:05 PM
 #32

3 issues:

1 "ERROR Failed to contact the origin." for user-details page. user-details-json seems work better.

2 fix the calculation of "Profit and loss measured in blocks", since the current bad luck ... Sad

3 any chance for NMC merged mining (add another address in username?)

see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=269042.msg3005269#msg3005269

spiccioli
techwtf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 28, 2013, 10:23:10 PM
 #33

3 issues:

1 "ERROR Failed to contact the origin." for user-details page. user-details-json seems work better.

2 fix the calculation of "Profit and loss measured in blocks", since the current bad luck ... Sad

3 any chance for NMC merged mining (add another address in username?)

see here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=269042.msg3005269#msg3005269

spiccioli

mid to low priority, so I prefer not to nudge him directly Smiley since nothing is interrupted.
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 29, 2013, 03:21:17 PM
 #34

Right now we're around 1% of the full bitcoin network, so we should expect around 1.4 blocks a day, which we're doing...

It's just difficulty going up so fast that we don't have time to get accustomed to the lower income and we start thinking we're unlucky... which is not true.

We need to find more miners for the pool...

spiccioli
JorgePasada
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 30, 2013, 09:17:30 AM
 #35

Hey Guys, introduced myself at the orig thread over here.

Good to meet y'all. Ideas for growing the pool and reducing our variance?
spiccioli (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1378
Merit: 1003

nec sine labore


View Profile
August 30, 2013, 10:48:31 AM
 #36

Hey Guys, introduced myself at the orig thread over here.

Good to meet y'all. Ideas for growing the pool and reducing our variance?

Hi Jorge,

to grow the pool we need more miners which would also reduce our variance, while to reduce your variance you can spread your hashing power to two or three pools, see the link I've posted a couple of messages back, but doing so you would increase our variance since the pool would have less miners...

Truth is a lot of miners should leave the bigger pools and point their gear here or on p2pool or on the other small pools.

spiccioli

ps. how went the date?  Roll Eyes
fireduck
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 31, 2013, 04:14:08 PM
 #37

It would make my life easier if people mining at something close to a TH/s would pick a difficulty of at least around 2048.

In general, being around a share every 5 seconds or higher would be good.  This will greatly reduce the database load.  I am trying to get away with using an AWS RDS small.


Bitrated user: fireduck.
JorgePasada
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 08:01:31 PM
 #38

It would make my life easier if people mining at something close to a TH/s would pick a difficulty of at least around 2048.

In general, being around a share every 5 seconds or higher would be good.  This will greatly reduce the database load.  I am trying to get away with using an AWS RDS small.



I just finished rewiring a bunch of stuff, flashing firmware and setting everything to 2048 later today.

Anyone know who 1E8xjHavR1NwVv6tWTC6pX7Z93MWmMmPTx is?

JorgePasada
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 01, 2013, 08:17:57 PM
Last edit: September 01, 2013, 09:29:09 PM by JorgePasada
 #39

Well, I wonder if this will actually work...

https://blockchain.info/tx/942f79f17ffc1987895adc99463b099f8bc88547b6aaefb4647df81f71c37e44

I haven't been on bitcointalk much, the interface makes me a little crazy.

It's insanely hard to extract the useful information from this seething mass of blabber.

ps. how went the date?  Roll Eyes

It went well :-)

fireduck
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 251



View Profile
September 02, 2013, 04:20:06 PM
 #40


Looks like it worked just fine one way or another.

Bitrated user: fireduck.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!