HSRMINER Neoscrypt Fork by Justaminer - New Version!

[andrewpuzoff]

Try use -d option to specify only 1 GPU (GTX 970) to test and post result please.

it works fine with single gpu only

-d 0,2 -d 1,2 -d 0,1 don't work

[Just_a_miner]

Try use -d option to specify only 1 GPU (GTX 970) to test and post result please.

it works fine with single gpu only

-d 0,2 -d 1,2 -d 0,1 don't work

Thanks for feedback. So Gpu0 is gtx970 and Gpu2 is gtx970 ? And 1 gtx 970 works fine (i.e. -d 0 works and -d 2 works). Okay, I have to investigate the problem.

[stevascha]

[...]
I will play with benchmark to find the best hashrate/watt settings, and find the perfect intensity. Do you have a tip for the GTX1060 3GB, just "trial and error", or let the default miner settings and drink a beer?

Default intensity setting is fine tuned for 1060, but you can try to change it if you wish. My advice is to drink some beer and relax a little while miner works 

My advice depends on your current profit margin and % of electricity cost at the moment.

1. If your electrical bill is <20% of your gross income from mining, if it's winter time (cold), you just crank up PL and OC and intensity to the max and relax with some beer.

2. If your electrical is >20% but less than 33% of gross income, let go off the throttle a bit and get back into <25% zone on electrical. Add some harder liquor to the beer and relax.

3. If your electrical is >33% and BTCUSD is <$3,000 and you cant afford to buy beer any longer, then it's time to set PL to 50% or as low as you can go and switch to cheap vodka or some other substances so you still can relax

4. Finally, when you think it's over and mining is not profitable anymore... when you see Metroid show up with his suicidal ideas in this thread, you will remember the times when you had all your GPUs running at their max capacity and feel good about it

You can guess I'm running 1060's with -c 5 -i 16.5 and PL at 100% at the moment. Ambient temp is 3C and electrical is at ~18%. Don't even need my beer yet

hi dude, do you use this program? for now i still using klaust instead

[Just_a_miner]

You know the best thing about this thread is your AutoIt script, right?


I love the thing!

Thanks!

Enjoy! 

Got a question though... Your script does not attempt to reconnect to the main pool automatically so it will keep mining on the "failover" until it crashes.
Is there a way you could implement an automatic reconnection attempt to pool 1, say, every 15min? I'm useless at coding otherwise I'd gladly try to do it myself...

Take a look, I've implemented what you have been asking for - miners_autorun_fp.zip

Pool 0 is always main pool, all other pools are failover pools. You can change failover timelimit, default is 15 minutes.

[dragonmike]

You know the best thing about this thread is your AutoIt script, right?


I love the thing!

Thanks!

Enjoy! 

Got a question though... Your script does not attempt to reconnect to the main pool automatically so it will keep mining on the "failover" until it crashes.
Is there a way you could implement an automatic reconnection attempt to pool 1, say, every 15min? I'm useless at coding otherwise I'd gladly try to do it myself...

Take a look, I've implemented what you have been asking for - miners_autorun_fp.zip

Pool 0 is always main pool, all other pools are failover pools. You can change failover timelimit, default is 15 minutes.

Brilliant! Thanks!
I'll give it a whirl asap and let you and others know in here if it works as intended!

[jcabello7]

It works with 1080TI. It works with 980TI. But isn't working with 1080ti+980ti at same time! How can I solve it? Great work

[MagicSmoker]

Sweet mother of Crisco, NPlusMiner just added this as the new default Neoscrypt miner and it's going through the benchmarking now. If the console output is to believed it's doing over 4.5 MH/s on my 6x GTX 1060 rig, which is at least 300 kH/s better than Palgin's version claimed it could do. Even if I have to lop off 10%, same as Palgin, that's still a very respectable ~4.1 MH/s.

[cirlama]

It works with 1080TI. It works with 980TI. But isn't working with 1080ti+980ti at same time! How can I solve it? Great work

may be try to start 2 instances of the miner, 1 per GPU?

[skablast]

Someone have tried this with a gtx 1050 4 gb ?

May you share the hashrate ?

[holda29]

This repository is empty...

[bzhgbx]

Someone have tried this with a gtx 1050 4 gb ?

May you share the hashrate ?

with hp version

450 kH/s with gtx 1050 2Gb (non ti)
mem + 0 -
core +150
~55°
(4 gb should not get lot of more i think)

[Just_a_miner]

New version! Check 1st post of the topic.

Test support for Nvidia P104-100, please try and feedback.

Also there are 2 tests versions for GTX 970+, please try with GTX 970 + some other GPU, or 2x970 to see if some of the test versions work, and feedback the results - it will help me add full support for GTX 970.

[Just_a_miner]

It works with 1080TI. It works with 980TI. But isn't working with 1080ti+980ti at same time! How can I solve it? Great work

There is some bug that prevent work of 2+ 9xx gpus. Try 2 test versions and feedback results please.

[Bluecheese]

It works with 1080TI. It works with 980TI. But isn't working with 1080ti+980ti at same time! How can I solve it? Great work

There is some bug that prevent work of 2+ 9xx gpus. Try 2 test versions and feedback results please.

I just posted the same thing on the older thread.  You can benchmark 1 by itself just fine, huh

[Just_a_miner]

It works with 1080TI. It works with 980TI. But isn't working with 1080ti+980ti at same time! How can I solve it? Great work

There is some bug that prevent work of 2+ 9xx gpus. Try 2 test versions and feedback results please.

I just posted the same thing on the older thread.  You can benchmark 1 by itself just fine, huh

Try Test ver 1, Test ver 2.

[Just_a_miner]

asus mining p104-4g it's not working
 INFO : [02:20:03] : GPU #3: Asus P104-100, flags: 0, 0, 0

can you make it work?

Try new version and post result please.

[Bluecheese]

It works with 1080TI. It works with 980TI. But isn't working with 1080ti+980ti at same time! How can I solve it? Great work

There is some bug that prevent work of 2+ 9xx gpus. Try 2 test versions and feedback results please.

I just posted the same thing on the older thread.  You can benchmark 1 by itself just fine, huh

Try Test ver 1, Test ver 2.

Test 1 file results:

INFO : [09:36:57] : Starting benchmark mode with neoscrypt
 INFO : [09:36:59] : Checking for NVML...
 INFO : [09:36:59] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [09:36:59] : 2 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [09:37:00] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:37:00] : GPU #6: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:37:09] : GPU #6 Found nonce 804cc3e4
 INFO : [09:37:17] : GPU #6 Found nonce 804cc3e4
 INFO : [09:37:17] : GPU #3 Found nonce 009cb91b
 INFO : [09:37:33] : GPU #3 Found nonce 009cb91b
 INFO : [09:37:34] : GPU#3 - neoscrypt hashrate = 659.13kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:34] : GPU#6 - neoscrypt hashrate = 667.17kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Result for GPU#3 - GeForce GTX 980: 659.13 kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Result for GPU#6 - GeForce GTX 980: 667.17 kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Total: 1326.30 kH/s

I'd give pictures but I don't know how to upload them

[Bluecheese]

And from Test 2 - no-go:

 INFO : [09:50:26] : Starting benchmark mode with neoscrypt
 INFO : [09:50:27] : Checking for NVML...
 INFO : [09:50:27] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [09:50:27] : 2 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [09:50:27] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 1, 0
 INFO : [09:50:27] : GPU #6: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 1, 0
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1070' at line 1460 : unspecified launch failure.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_hash_1070' at line 1460 : unspecified launch failure.

I don't know why it's looking at my 1070, it mining just fine.  Of course I used the -d option to single out the cards

So it looks like test 1 file is the one to go with

[Just_a_miner]

Test 1 file results:

INFO : [09:36:57] : Starting benchmark mode with neoscrypt
 INFO : [09:36:59] : Checking for NVML...
 INFO : [09:36:59] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [09:36:59] : 2 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [09:37:00] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:37:00] : GPU #6: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:37:09] : GPU #6 Found nonce 804cc3e4
 INFO : [09:37:17] : GPU #6 Found nonce 804cc3e4
 INFO : [09:37:17] : GPU #3 Found nonce 009cb91b
 INFO : [09:37:33] : GPU #3 Found nonce 009cb91b
 INFO : [09:37:34] : GPU#3 - neoscrypt hashrate = 659.13kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:34] : GPU#6 - neoscrypt hashrate = 667.17kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Result for GPU#3 - GeForce GTX 980: 659.13 kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Result for GPU#6 - GeForce GTX 980: 667.17 kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Total: 1326.30 kH/s

I'd give pictures but I don't know how to upload them

Okay, thanks. No need for pictures. Hashrates are low in test version, as main goal is to find way to make it work, performance will come later. How much memory does your GTX 980 have?

Also please try Test1 version with ALL of your cards, you may hide results, just tell me if it works with all gpus together.

[Bluecheese]

Test 1 file results:

INFO : [09:36:57] : Starting benchmark mode with neoscrypt
 INFO : [09:36:59] : Checking for NVML...
 INFO : [09:36:59] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [09:36:59] : 2 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [09:37:00] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:37:00] : GPU #6: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:37:09] : GPU #6 Found nonce 804cc3e4
 INFO : [09:37:17] : GPU #6 Found nonce 804cc3e4
 INFO : [09:37:17] : GPU #3 Found nonce 009cb91b
 INFO : [09:37:33] : GPU #3 Found nonce 009cb91b
 INFO : [09:37:34] : GPU#3 - neoscrypt hashrate = 659.13kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:34] : GPU#6 - neoscrypt hashrate = 667.17kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Result for GPU#3 - GeForce GTX 980: 659.13 kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Result for GPU#6 - GeForce GTX 980: 667.17 kH/s
 INFO : [09:37:35] : Total: 1326.30 kH/s

I'd give pictures but I don't know how to upload them

Okay, thanks. No need for pictures. Hashrates are low in test version, as main goal is to find way to make it work, performance will come later. How much memory does your GTX 980 have?

Also please try Test1 version with ALL of your cards, you may hide results, just tell me if it works with all gpus together.

Both 960 cards are at 4096MB.

 INFO : [09:55:55] : Starting benchmark mode with neoscrypt
 INFO : [09:55:57] : Checking for NVML...
 INFO : [09:55:57] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [09:55:57] : 9 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, flags: 0, 1, 0
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #3: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #6: GeForce GTX 980, flags: 0, 0, 1
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #7: GeForce GTX 1080, flags: 1, 0, 0
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, flags: 1, 0, 0
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, flags: 1, 0, 0
 INFO : [09:55:58] : GPU #8: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, flags: 1, 0, 0
 INFO : [09:56:00] : GPU #1 Found nonce 1c8403e4
 INFO : [09:56:00] : GPU #8 Found nonce e3b7bd40
 INFO : [09:56:00] : GPU #2 Found nonce 391d2883
 INFO : [09:56:01] : GPU #1 Found nonce 1c8403e4
 INFO : [09:56:01] : GPU #8 Found nonce e3b7bd40
 INFO : [09:56:03] : GPU #2 Found nonce 391d2883
 INFO : [09:56:04] : GPU #0 Found nonce 009cb91b
 INFO : [09:56:08] : GPU #4 Found nonce 72327a76
 INFO : [09:56:09] : GPU #5 Found nonce 8eb01cdb
 INFO : [09:56:09] : GPU #6 Found nonce ab0d71c8
 INFO : [09:56:09] : GPU #0 Found nonce 009cb91b
 INFO : [09:56:11] : GPU #7 Found nonce c7e855b1
 INFO : [09:56:16] : GPU #3 Found nonce 55f9ca9d
 INFO : [09:56:17] : GPU #4 Found nonce 72327a76
 INFO : [09:56:19] : GPU #5 Found nonce 8eb01cdb
 INFO : [09:56:19] : GPU #6 Found nonce ab0d71c8
 INFO : [09:56:23] : GPU #7 Found nonce c7e855b1
 INFO : [09:56:33] : GPU #3 Found nonce 55f9ca9d
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#7 - neoscrypt hashrate = 1137.18kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#5 - neoscrypt hashrate = 806.02kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#6 - neoscrypt hashrate = 674.93kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#1 - neoscrypt hashrate = 1113.82kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#4 - neoscrypt hashrate = 814.07kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#3 - neoscrypt hashrate = 663.98kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#0 - neoscrypt hashrate = 1908.66kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#2 - neoscrypt hashrate = 1902.45kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:34] : GPU#8 - neoscrypt hashrate = 1901.28kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#0 - ASUS GTX 1080 Ti: 1908.66 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#1 - GeForce GTX 1070: 1113.82 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#2 - ASUS GTX 1080 Ti: 1902.45 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#3 - GeForce GTX 980: 663.98 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#4 - ASUS GTX 1060 3GB: 814.07 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#5 - ASUS GTX 1060 3GB: 806.02 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#6 - GeForce GTX 980: 674.93 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#7 - MSI GTX 1080: 1137.18 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Result for GPU#8 - ASUS GTX 1080 Ti: 1901.28 kH/s
 INFO : [09:56:36] : Total: 10922.40 kH/s

Cool! That file played nice with all of them.  I need to toss a 1050Ti in there along with 960.  (May pop a breaker)  LOL

What's with the flags?