[IPVO] [Multiple Exchanges] Neo & Bee - LMB Holdings

[sporket]

@pankkake:  He mentioned 30k.

[pedrog]

the problem is not whether you got the shares. but from where the shares got stolen from?

Gotcha. I did have him send me an email from the email address registered with the lmb account that was transferring me shares. It was a different email address than the one he was communicating to me with, but the email I transferred him shares via Havelock was also different from the other two. There were some consistencies with all three email addresses.

It should've been the other way around, you send him an email and he shows proof he can see its content...

Not having access to that email account could be the reason he was selling on LMB platform and not on Havelock...

Just speculating...

[thekekk]

32k says here but must be much more as at some time he says 1999 left then he says 4k
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=289730.msg5902847#msg5902847

[btcapples]

I use different emails for different services, don't want all my eggs in one basket. Id be more than happy to answer any questions you can simply ask me directly

THIRD PERSON:

BTCAPPLES saw signs of a sinking ship and decided to jump overboard, investigate him, please.

I never said I only had 2 or 4k shares that was the amount I was selling at the time.

[WhaleInc]

BTCAPPLES provided an incredible amount of 'proof' that his shares were being traded. None of which was requested in any meaningful way. Why is that?

[Herp]

BTCAPPLES provided an incredible amount of 'proof' that his shares were being traded. None of which was requested in any meaningful way. Why is that?

Very good question.

[ampere]

BTCAPPLES provided an incredible amount of 'proof' that his shares were being traded. None of which was requested in any meaningful way. Why is that?

To prove he's not a scammer so he could find more buyers would be my guess. Seems reasonable.

[btcapples]

the compliance officer of Neo and Bee Ltd has stated that due to an increase of abnormal activity on the LMB share platform, there may be a high possibility of questionable trading activity.

It's interesting that Neo mentioned suspicious activity on LMB platform. A recent highly suspicious selling thread comes to mind, with what I think were "faked" transfers between accounts owned by the same individual, in order to create a panic.

link to what I think was a fake sale, meant to manipulate share price lower: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=526430.0

This seller was supposedly selling shares way below market value on LMB platform.

p.s: notice name of the seller "btcapples". A notorious spammer troll connected to Mpex.

I am glad I am notorious after a little over a week on these forums, there are users here that can attest to about 10,000 of those shares, that have already posted on here, (lynn, greenbits, some other guy I forgot his name). Then there are others who wish to remain anonymous and I will respect that.

Herp, whenever it is convenient for you or you lose an argument, you resort to the same thing every single time, shill, or fake account, or price manipulation. I'm beginning to think that you are Danny himself with all of this "manipulation" going on.

[btcapples]

BTCAPPLES provided an incredible amount of 'proof' that his shares were being traded. None of which was requested in any meaningful way. Why is that?

I could provide no proof, you would ask me what is my skepticism of proving a few pictures to ease tension is.

I could provide a moderate amount of proof, you would continue to ask me why I refuse to include every feasible piece of evidence and that I have malicious intentions.

I could provide all the proof in the world, and you would tell me how suspicious it is that I provided it without it being asked.

I'll be sure to include as little information as possible from now on to not arise any suspicions, because if the logic

BTCAPPLES provided an incredible amount of 'proof' that his shares were being traded. None of which was requested in any meaningful way. Why is that?

is credible, then I serve no purpose in justifying my actions.

This is just something that I should do according to you, but I intend on answering everyone's questions with as much detail and "incredible amounts of 'proof'" as possible.

[Herp]

btcapples reportedly sells all his shares in that sale and still finds it very appealing to heavily trollspam this thread with a lot of negativity and posts crap like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=289730.msg5955837#msg5955837

His behavior stinks to high heaven of manipulation.  

[WhaleInc]

I'll tell you the actual reason. It's because BTCAPPLES, in his mind, needs to lend legitimacy to his operation; while others don't see it the same as him, because they're not aware that it's a scam. It's psych 101.

[ampere]

This might be a good time to plug Peershares 
http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=527.0

[sporket]

I dig the paranoids on this forum.  A special breed.  Everyone is plotting against them -- the gobment, the NSA, the trolls, competing exchanges...
except...
Except for the guy who asked them for money to start a bank.
A bitcoin bank.
In Cyprus.
The guy who has suddenly stopped them from trading their shares.
Without even bothering to stop by or even tweet for 10 days.
Nah, he's their banker buddy!


To Logic

[btcapples]

I'll tell you the actual reason. It's because BTCAPPLES, in his mind, needs to lend legitimacy to his operation; while others don't see it the same as him, because they're not aware that it's a scam. It's psych 101.

btcapples reportedly sells all his shares in that sale and still finds it very appealing to heavily trollspam this thread with a lot of negativity and posts crap like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=289730.msg5955837#msg5955837

His behavior stinks to high heaven of manipulation. 

Can't argue with this logic right here, you've beaten me at my own game.

[sporket]

@btcapples:  Brilliant men -- captains of industry, banking moguls, international financiers.  All taken in by ... apples.
How u do it, bro?

[lynn_402]

Do anybody have an idea on why suspicious trade behaviours on LMB could justify provoking a trade stop on Havelock?

[btcapples]

Call it a 6th sense, call it magic.. Call it everything but what it actually is

The ability to look at a situation such as this, and determine the best course of action to take, an absent CEO, the posts talking about how the CEO is fleeing the island, no news or attempts of contact of any sort, broken promises, transfers not going through, TAT usually clarifying any concerns within 24 hours, he logged in every day, looked at this thread and decided not to say anything? Why, you might ask? I didn't want to know the answer, but would say it was easy to deduce (too much Elementary/Sherlock) that it was not good, hence the sell order. I will be certain the next time I want to sell my shares in a company for top value to tell people my concerns with that company, I bet people will be tripping over each other to get them! It could've just as easily been Danny having really good news that had to wait, or him taking a week long break from the chaos that is Bitcoin, in which case I would've been the fool, but now I am the...  manipulative notorious troll that provides "incredible amount of 'proof'.


Ask me questions directly, I have no problem answering every question with detail and not sidestepping them at all.

[Herp]

@btcapples

Call it BS. Ok?

[jimmothy]

Do anybody have an idea on why suspicious trade behaviours on LMB could justify provoking a trade stop on Havelock?

No idea.

From what I've gathered it might be a glitch/hack on lmb holdings.

[btcapples]

@btcapples

Call it BS. Ok?

It's not my fault you bought shares before the halt happened, no one held a gun to your head and you have no one to blame but yourself. Call that BS.