[PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting

[mistress_magpie]

I am thinking a thread with tagline ideas would be fun.

Mine so far:

Your Bitcoins Want To Play
The Dice Don't Lie

[hilariousandco]

I am thinking a thread with tagline ideas would be fun.

Mine so far:

Your Bitcoins Want To Play
The Dice Don't Lie

Maybe that could be a future PD giveaway/comp  .

[Holdaaja]

Damn, I'm gonna try make 4000 posts next month.

[guybrushthreepwood]

It will include everyone, if you have under 50 activity please remove the signature after January 17th. You will still be eligible for the Jan 17th payout though.

Oh, thanks for the clarification. Guess I'll have to wait a few days before I sign up again.

So do we essentially get a activity point per day as long as we make one post?

I think the 50 activity requirement is wrong on its own grounds. As most users write more posts than they spend days here since they registered (it is important for the activity level calculation), exactly this level is very rarely met here. The limit should rather be 49, I guess...

What's wrong about it? I'm still confused about how the activity points tally up. Why should the limit be 49?

Because your next activity level will be 49 and then 56 (if I'm not mistaken), so you aren't eligible until you hit 56 (that is, a week later after you hit 49), which is not very fair in my opinion. The same is true for the majority of posters (I've been through these numbers too)...

Oh. I'm still not entirely 100 on how the activity works. Why can the numbers be only 40 and 56 etc?

[deisik]

I think the 50 activity requirement is wrong on its own grounds. As most users write more posts than they spend days here since they registered (it is important for the activity level calculation), exactly this level is very rarely met here. The limit should rather be 49, I guess...

What's wrong about it? I'm still confused about how the activity points tally up. Why should the limit be 49?

Because your next activity level will be 49 and then 56 (if I'm not mistaken), so you aren't eligible until you hit 56 (that is, a week later after you hit 49), which is not very fair in my opinion. The same is true for the majority of posters (I've been through these numbers too)...

Oh. I'm still not entirely 100 on how the activity works. Why can the numbers be only 40 and 56 etc?

Activity depends on the minimum of two values, the first being the number of posts, the second the number of days since you registered here (rounded by the number of whole weeks). Obviously, as the number of posts in this case far exceeds the number of days, the activity will depend entirely on the latter. So we got 42 (6 full weeks registered), 49 (7 full weeks registered), and so on...

[guybrushthreepwood]

I think the 50 activity requirement is wrong on its own grounds. As most users write more posts than they spend days here since they registered (it is important for the activity level calculation), exactly this level is very rarely met here. The limit should rather be 49, I guess...

What's wrong about it? I'm still confused about how the activity points tally up. Why should the limit be 49?

Because your next activity level will be 49 and then 56 (if I'm not mistaken), so you aren't eligible until you hit 56 (that is, a week later after you hit 49), which is not very fair in my opinion. The same is true for the majority of posters (I've been through these numbers too)...

Oh. I'm still not entirely 100 on how the activity works. Why can the numbers be only 40 and 56 etc?

Activity depends on the minimum of two values, the first being the number of posts, the second the number of days since you registered here (rounded by the number of whole weeks). Obviously, as the number of posts in this case far exceeds the number of days, the activity will depend entirely on the latter. So we got 42 (6 full weeks registered), 49 (7 full weeks registered), and so on...

I still don't get it  . I'm not that great at maths lol.

[deisik]

You are not comprehending what I'm saying and missing the point entirely. I can post about events or situations that have happened to me in real life in an Off-topic forum thread, but that doesn't mean you are suddenly involved in the running of it or how I choose to live it, does it? I don't believe I asked for suggestions anywhere on how I can be better spending my time, nor do I need or want suggestions on that from you, especially when you come across condescending. And I'm completely calm. I'm just telling you where you're wrong on this and how trying to suggest how my own life could be better spent when you know little about it, and why it shouldn't be any of you concern to you at all. If I make a thread titled "How Can I Spend My Time Better?" or "Am I Wasting My Time Here?" then you are free to chime in with your observations and suggestions, but not here as this is not the place for that and is now taking this thread off topic.

Being in denial won't help you much. It is obvious at least to me that you're not satisfied with your life. But if you pretend otherwise, well, let it be so and let's finish at that

[mistress_magpie]

So there are two values - one, your number of posts, and two - your length of days or weeks being here.  For active forum posters, activity count increments by that smaller number - days and weeks.

[Holdaaja]

I think the 50 activity requirement is wrong on its own grounds. As most users write more posts than they spend days here since they registered (it is important for the activity level calculation), exactly this level is very rarely met here. The limit should rather be 49, I guess...

What's wrong about it? I'm still confused about how the activity points tally up. Why should the limit be 49?

Because your next activity level will be 49 and then 56 (if I'm not mistaken), so you aren't eligible until you hit 56 (that is, a week later after you hit 49), which is not very fair in my opinion. The same is true for the majority of posters (I've been through these numbers too)...

Oh. I'm still not entirely 100 on how the activity works. Why can the numbers be only 40 and 56 etc?

Activity depends on the minimum of two values, the first being the number of posts, the second the number of days since you registered here (rounded by the number of whole weeks). Obviously, as the number of posts in this case far exceeds the number of days, the activity will depend entirely on the latter. So we got 42 (6 full weeks registered), 49 (7 full weeks registered), and so on...

I still don't get it  . I'm not that great at maths lol.

7 days after registration and minimum 7 posts an you have 7 activity,
14 days after registration and minimum 14 posts and you have 14 activity,
21 days after registration and minimum 21 posts amd you have 21 activity and so on.

[deisik]

I think the 50 activity requirement is wrong on its own grounds. As most users write more posts than they spend days here since they registered (it is important for the activity level calculation), exactly this level is very rarely met here. The limit should rather be 49, I guess...

What's wrong about it? I'm still confused about how the activity points tally up. Why should the limit be 49?

Because your next activity level will be 49 and then 56 (if I'm not mistaken), so you aren't eligible until you hit 56 (that is, a week later after you hit 49), which is not very fair in my opinion. The same is true for the majority of posters (I've been through these numbers too)...

Oh. I'm still not entirely 100 on how the activity works. Why can the numbers be only 40 and 56 etc?

Activity depends on the minimum of two values, the first being the number of posts, the second the number of days since you registered here (rounded by the number of whole weeks). Obviously, as the number of posts in this case far exceeds the number of days, the activity will depend entirely on the latter. So we got 42 (6 full weeks registered), 49 (7 full weeks registered), and so on...

I still don't get it  . I'm not that great at maths lol.

Ok, let's start again. In the case of most users here (including you and me), activity depends entirely on the days passed since registration. But in this case it can increase only in wide steps, since it is calculated in number of full weeks multiplied by 7 (that is, 42 of activity is equal to 6 full weeks spent here multiplied by the number of days in the week, as I understand it)

[GigaCoin]

****
nvm post ruined due to edit

[deisik]

I'm curious, is it possible to spare/share a high activity account here with someone else (whose account is too low in activity to be eligible) to write posts in four hands (under one account) and then share the profits (provided the parties trust each other)?

4000 posts would fit all, lol...

[Holdaaja]

I'm curious, is it possible to spare a high activity account here with someone else (whose account is too low in activity to be eligible) to write posts in four hands and then share the profits?

Why would someone do that? If other guy write less posts than you and you get 50% money then you lose money.

[hilariousandco]

You are not comprehending what I'm saying and missing the point entirely. I can post about events or situations that have happened to me in real life in an Off-topic forum thread, but that doesn't mean you are suddenly involved in the running of it or how I choose to live it, does it? I don't believe I asked for suggestions anywhere on how I can be better spending my time, nor do I need or want suggestions on that from you, especially when you come across condescending. And I'm completely calm. I'm just telling you where you're wrong on this and how trying to suggest how my own life could be better spent when you know little about it, and why it shouldn't be any of you concern to you at all. If I make a thread titled "How Can I Spend My Time Better?" or "Am I Wasting My Time Here?" then you are free to chime in with your observations and suggestions, but not here as this is not the place for that and is now taking this thread off topic.

Being in denial won't help you much. It is obvious at least to me that you're not satisfied with your life. But if you pretend otherwise, well, let it be so and let's finish at that

What am I being in denial about here exactly? And I don't know if I'll ever be satisfied with my life, nor do I think I know anyone that is for that matter. Isn't a big part of life the pursuit of contentment and finding purpose? I reckon I'm working on that right now, are you? I'm glad if you've already fulfilled yours, but tell me, don't you have better things to be doing than judging people you know almost zero about and posting on the internet right now? I find it kinda ironic and very hypocritical of you especially when we both seem to be in round about the same situation at the moment and know roughly the same amount of information about each other. Why don't you start a thread and tell the forum about all your awesome real life activities and how you've changed the world, because I'm sure you're such a success story and are 100% fulfilled. What is obvious to me is you seem to like to judge people you know nothing about over the internet, and have a problem with how many posts I make and what impact this may or may not have on my real world life. I'd say I'm actually quite productive at the moment and have a few things in the pipeline I'm working on, and maybe they will pay off eventually or maybe they wont. Who knows? But at least I'll have that minimum 0.4BTC at the end of the month to know I haven't completed wasted my time regardless of how satisfied or unsatisfied I currently am with my life.

[deisik]

I'm curious, is it possible to spare a high activity account here with someone else (whose account is too low in activity to be eligible) to write posts in four hands and then share the profits?

Why would someone do that? If other guy write less posts than you and you get 50% money then you lose money.

Who said about 50%? Obviously, the user who shared his high activity account should get more despite the number of posts even in the case they made equal number of posts (I would call it a premium for sharing)...

Actually, it is a matter of negotiating. I'm more concerned about technical feasibility of this (out of sheer curiosity), i.e. writing from two different ip addresses (possibly located in different quarters of the world) almost simultaneously under the same user account

[phazon307]

I comment at least some everyday and I have not even made a dent in post counts. LOL!

[deisik]

You are not comprehending what I'm saying and missing the point entirely. I can post about events or situations that have happened to me in real life in an Off-topic forum thread, but that doesn't mean you are suddenly involved in the running of it or how I choose to live it, does it? I don't believe I asked for suggestions anywhere on how I can be better spending my time, nor do I need or want suggestions on that from you, especially when you come across condescending. And I'm completely calm. I'm just telling you where you're wrong on this and how trying to suggest how my own life could be better spent when you know little about it, and why it shouldn't be any of you concern to you at all. If I make a thread titled "How Can I Spend My Time Better?" or "Am I Wasting My Time Here?" then you are free to chime in with your observations and suggestions, but not here as this is not the place for that and is now taking this thread off topic.

Being in denial won't help you much. It is obvious at least to me that you're not satisfied with your life. But if you pretend otherwise, well, let it be so and let's finish at that

What am I being in denial about here exactly? And I don't know if I'll ever be satisfied with my life, nor do I think I know anyone that is for that matter. Isn't a big part of life the pursuit of contentment and finding purpose? I reckon I'm working on that right now, are you? I'm glad if you've already fulfilled yours, but tell me, don't you have better things to be doing than judging people you know almost zero about and posting on the internet right now? I find it kinda ironic and very hypocritical of you especially when we both seem to be in round about the same situation at the moment and know roughly the same amount of information about each other. Why don't you start a thread and tell the forum about all your awesome real life activities and how you've changed the world, because I'm sure you're such a success story and are 100% fulfilled. What is obvious to me is you seem to like to judge people you know nothing about over the internet, and have a problem with how many posts I make and what impact this may or may not have on my real world life. I'd say I'm actually quite productive at the moment and have a few things in the pipeline I'm working on, and maybe they will pay off eventually or maybe they wont. Who knows? But at least I'll have that minimum 0.4BTC at the end of the month to know I haven't completed wasted my time regardless of how satisfied or unsatisfied I currently am with my life.

If you told me (even if I hadn't written anything of the kind myself) that I had no life (or something of the sort), I wouldn't care a damn thing about it (if only curious what made you think so). But you wrote that yourself about your life (i.e. lack thereof), and when asked about it, you at first started with saying that it was no concern of mine, then switched to just blah-blah-blah...

Why do you care?

[guybrushthreepwood]

7 days after registration and minimum 7 posts an you have 7 activity,
14 days after registration and minimum 14 posts and you have 14 activity,
21 days after registration and minimum 21 posts amd you have 21 activity and so on.

Ah, thanks.

I comment at least some everyday and I have not even made a dent in post counts. LOL!

Not everyone needs to go for the max money I guess, but the option is always there. It's still getting paid for something you would do anyway so a little amount of BTC for posting is still better than nothing. I can't understand why more people don't sign up for these deals (unless you have moral objections like against gambling etc). I would try go for it if I had more time but I don't. If I did I would be posting all day lol.

[MoneyGod]

I just read this this campaign is going to pay 0.8 for 4000 posts but who is going to do this few months back few peoples do 1000 and was jumping for achievement but this is too much lets see who is first to achieving this figure 

[guybrushthreepwood]

I just read this this campaign is going to pay 0.8 for 4000 posts but who is going to do this few months back few peoples do 1000 and was jumping for achievement but this is too much lets see who is first to achieving this figure 

It will be interesting to see if anyone does, but I doubt anyone will achieve 4000 posts. I hope people don't spam crap to try get it though.