[PrimeDice] (Staff Only) Earn Bitcoins Simply By Posting

[saif92]

Hi is the campaign still opened for new members? I am full member and also think i will become sr member next week. If everything is OK.
BR

Yes this campaign is still open and you can join any time no restrictions for any one here

[Stunna]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

[specgamer]

Hi is the campaign still opened for new members? I am full member and also think i will become sr member next week. If everything is OK.
BR

Well, Stunna requires CONSTRUCTIVE posts, so I'm not sure you fit in.. No offence.
Some of your posts seem to be posted for the sole reason of your signature campaign's payments.

[byt411]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

[deisik]

Hi is the campaign still opened for new members? I am full member and also think i will become sr member next week. If everything is OK.
BR

Well, Stunna requires CONSTRUCTIVE posts, so I'm not sure you fit in.. No offence.
Some of your posts seem to be posted for the sole reason of your signature campaign's payments.

specgamer, it is not up to you to decide if someone fits in... And stop making assumptions and drawing conclusions about constructiveness of someone else's posts (or lack thereof), it looks really mean (and again, you are not entitled for this)!

[DiamondCardz]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.

[byt411]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.

This prevents newbies from joining in the campaign and making 50 posts to earn trust.

[MICRO]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.

This prevents newbies from joining in the campaign and making 50 posts to earn trust.

I think nobody should get trust for this. Trust should be for trading, we dont risk anything with this, and Stunna also doesnt risk anything so, how are we becoming "trusted" just by posting for sig campaign?

[byt411]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.

This prevents newbies from joining in the campaign and making 50 posts to earn trust.

I think nobody should get trust for this. Trust should be for trading, we dont risk anything with this, and Stunna also doesnt risk anything so, how are we becoming "trusted" just by posting for sig campaign?

Of course there is trust involved. Stunna trusts us to not cheat posts. We trust Stunna to pay us for our hard work.

[forever21]

hi can i be adopted here? will be joining next week if there is still a problem with my current signature i hope stunna will accept me

[faiza1990]

hi can i be adopted here? will be joining next week if there is still a problem with my current signature i hope stunna will accept me

Currently this campaign is open for all without any problem you can join any time and add this signature

[Amph]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.

This prevents newbies from joining in the campaign and making 50 posts to earn trust.

I think nobody should get trust for this. Trust should be for trading, we dont risk anything with this, and Stunna also doesnt risk anything so, how are we becoming "trusted" just by posting for sig campaign?

the same problem occur when two people give trust to each other for every trade, they should just give 1 trust to each other, it seems like a trust abuse to me

there are several users doing so

[forever21]

hi can i be adopted here? will be joining next week if there is still a problem with my current signature i hope stunna will accept me

Currently this campaign is open for all without any problem you can join any time and add this signature

thank you but i still i'd like to give my current signature a chance to pay me for my work and withdraw from the campaign not for a BTC issue but for their attitude of not being a professional

[Cryptopher]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

Perhaps trust could come to those who have long periods of service to PrimeDice? After all, that would not just demonstrate loyalty, but rather it would demonstrate that they are contributors to the Bitcointalk community with no flagged post abuse.

It's not a biggie, but it was nice having some trust acknowledgement

[hilariousandco]

I think nobody should get trust for this. Trust should be for trading, we dont risk anything with this, and Stunna also doesnt risk anything so, how are we becoming "trusted" just by posting for sig campaign? 

the same problem occur when two people give trust to each other for every trade, they should just give 1 trust to each other, it seems like a trust abuse to me

there are several users doing so

The feedback system is far from perfect and as I mentioned before can be easily gamed and feedback essentially bought. If you're smart you can get yourself as much feedback as you want for little to no cost.

[MICRO]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.

This prevents newbies from joining in the campaign and making 50 posts to earn trust.

I think nobody should get trust for this. Trust should be for trading, we dont risk anything with this, and Stunna also doesnt risk anything so, how are we becoming "trusted" just by posting for sig campaign?

Of course there is trust involved. Stunna trusts us to not cheat posts. We trust Stunna to pay us for our hard work.

No he is not trusting us not to cheat posts, he checks us to se we are not cheating posts LOL .
On the other side , yeah its fine for us to give him 1+ feedback but only once.

[Amph]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.

This prevents newbies from joining in the campaign and making 50 posts to earn trust.

I think nobody should get trust for this. Trust should be for trading, we dont risk anything with this, and Stunna also doesnt risk anything so, how are we becoming "trusted" just by posting for sig campaign?

Of course there is trust involved. Stunna trusts us to not cheat posts. We trust Stunna to pay us for our hard work.

No he is not trusting us not to cheat posts, he checks us to se we are not cheating posts LOL .
On the other side , yeah its fine for us to give him 1+ feedback but only once.

i gave to stunna 3 positive feedback i should remove two of them now?

[MICRO]

IMHO I don't think dishing out feedback to those who participate is a good idea at all, especially with someone on DefaultTrust like Stunna. It's only going to make us see a rise in scammers with inflated trust scores. I did receive feedback from Stunna for participating but personally I'd rather all the participants (including me) have the feedback taken away from them than me just keep quiet and keep my extra positive trust rating.

Just quoting this to bring it back into Stunna's eye. In my opinion this is an issue that does need to be addressed, rather than ignored - the longer it is left for the higher the chance of it being abused.

Removed all of these trusts, thanks for bringing up this valid point. I don't feel that it would have caused any significant damage, but there isn't a sufficient burden of trust placed on participants of the campaign so it wasn't right for me to boost everyone's reputation. I understand everyone wants to accumulate trust regardless of whether their intentions are to scam or not, so I'm quite sorry about this.

You should limit the trust for high posters (> 400) and Sr. and Hero Members.

And what's the point in that? You're saying that to try and get yourself more trust. Giving it to just Sr. and Hero Members is pointless, and giving it to high posters would still result in inflated trust scores regardless.

This prevents newbies from joining in the campaign and making 50 posts to earn trust.

I think nobody should get trust for this. Trust should be for trading, we dont risk anything with this, and Stunna also doesnt risk anything so, how are we becoming "trusted" just by posting for sig campaign?

Of course there is trust involved. Stunna trusts us to not cheat posts. We trust Stunna to pay us for our hard work.

No he is not trusting us not to cheat posts, he checks us to se we are not cheating posts LOL .
On the other side , yeah its fine for us to give him 1+ feedback but only once.

i gave to stunna 3 positive feedback i should remove two of them now?

Idk man, i just said my opinion, u dont need to listen to me . And we all know we can trust stunna whatever his + rating is .

[hilariousandco]

It's up to you how many feedbacks you leave. I personally leave one after each payment and will continue to do so. We're the ones taking the risk and he's the person who has promised to deliver month after month so feedbacks can reflect that, though I'm sure leaving just one feedback saying you have received multiple payments is also fine. It's not really like Stunna needs the feedback from us untrustworthy trustplebs anyway , but I'm sure he appreciates it.

[MICRO]

One question.
I made rly nice excel book where u put ur starting posts, how much u get per post , and ur monthly goal (if u have one) and it shows u how much u earned how much u need for goal , final post count that u send to stunna and many many other things, with echange and so on... U will see.

Question is , in what forum section should i put the thread about it ? So u guys can check it out ?